Published on: 23842229. The Florida Department of Corrections (FDC) has elected to conduct a public hearing to receive and consider comments and questions regarding .... Thursday, November 12, 2020, 9:00 a.m. and ending no later than .... A virtual public hearing will be held via GoToWebinar.
Published on: 23735044. The proposed rules clarify language, correct errors, revise disciplinary provisions, revise close management privileges and statuses, and establish inmate privileges related to the possession of tablets, the use of kiosks, ....
Published on: 23569077. Rulemaking is necessary to clarify rule language, to correct grammar and scrivener’s errors, to make the rules gender neutral, to add definitions, to change how administrative confinement credit is applied, to modify multiple disciplinary sentences to run concurrently unless justification is provided and warrants consecutive penalties, to add kiosk, tablet, and video visitation sanctions, to add provisions related to the review of disciplinary reports for inmates in inpatient mental health units by the Multidisciplinary Services Team, to reduce the use of disciplinary confinement as a sanction for misconduct that does not compromise staff safety or control, to reduce the maximum penalty for a number of non-violent infractions, to create a progressive penalty matrix for use in assessing penalties taking into account the time lapse between the last prior infraction and current infraction to assess the appropriate penalty, to require written justification for penalties imposed beyond the provided matrix, to add kiosk, tablet, and video visitation penalties, to add a definition of non-contact visiting, to allow CMII inmates to have one three-hour non-contact visit under certain circumstances, to allow CMIII inmates to have one four-hour non-contact visit under certain circumstances, to clarify the review process prior to placing inmates in close management (CM), to amend the non-contact visitation privileges of inmates in CMII, to amend the contact visitation privileges of inmates in CMIII, to clarify the telephone privileges of inmates in CM, to establish classification officer visitation requirements for inmates in close management, to establish inmate privileges related to the possession of tablets, the use of kiosks, the use of kiosk services, the use of tablet services, and the use of video visitation while in CM, to update Forms DC6-265 and DC6-233C for clarity and consistency, to establish inmate privileges related to the possession of tablets, the use of kiosks, the use of kiosk services, the use of tablet services, and the use of video visitation while in maximum management, to establish inmate privileges related to the possession of tablets, the use of kiosks, the use of kiosk services, the use of tablet services, and the use of video visitation while on death row.
Published on: 9798472. Inmate Visiting - Definitions, Inmate Visiting - General, Visiting Application Initiation Process, Visiting Record Management, Visiting Denial, Review of Request for Visiting Privileges, Permissible Items for Visitors, Revocation or Suspension of Visiting Privileges, Reinstatement of Revoked or Suspended Visiting Privileges, Visiting - Special Status Inmates, Non-Contact Visiting, Visiting - Forms
Published on: 9483513. The purpose and effect of the proposed rulemaking is to amend Rule 33-601.713, F.A.C., to clarify language and add a definition of “major rule violation” for the purpose of visiting privileges suspension; to amend Rule 33-601.714, F.A.C., to clarify the warden’s authority to deny or terminate a visit; to amend Rule 33-601.715, F.A.C., to correct language referring to the wrong form; to amend Rule 33-601.716, F.A.C., to clarify the circumstances under which an individual may be on the visiting list of more than one non-family inmate; to substantially reword Rule 33-601.717, F.A.C., to clarify the circumstances under which an individual may be denied visiting privileges; to repeal Rule 33-601.718, F.A.C., as the language is being moved to other rules within Chapter 33-601, F.A.C.; to amend Rule 33-601.725, F.A.C., to include a photo ID and a copy of a notarized authorization to supervise a minor as permissible items for visitors to possess; to amend Rule 33-601.731, F.A.C., to clarify the circumstances under which an individual’s visiting privileges may be suspended and to incorporate by reference the Visiting Privileges Suspension Matrix, which specifies the time period of suspensions in relation to their underlying infractions; to amend Rule 33-601.732, F.A.C., to clarify the procedure for reinstatement of suspended visiting privileges; to amend Rule 33-601.733, F.A.C., to include language being moved from Rule 33-601.734, F.A.C., concerning the visiting privileges of inmates in confinement and protective management statuses; to amend Rule 33-601.735, F.A.C., to clarify that noncontact visits for confinement and protective management status inmates must be pre-approved by the warden or designee; and to amend Rule 33-601.737, F.A.C., to clarify form language.
Published on: 9483319. Inmate Visiting - Definitions, Inmate Visiting - General, Visiting Application Initiation Process, Visiting Record Management, Visiting Denial, Review of Request for Visiting Privileges, Permissible Items for Visitors, Revocation or Suspension of Visiting Privileges, Reinstatement of Revoked or Suspended Visiting Privileges, Visiting - Special Status Inmates, Non-Contact Visiting, Visiting - Forms