Published on: 23807891. The rule amendments align training hours with recent statutory changes and allow cosmetology specialist instructors to evaluate competence based on performance rather than on students having completed a minimum number of ....
Published on: 23736984. The rule amendments align training hours with recent statutory changes and allow cosmetology specialist instructors to evaluate competence based on performance rather than on students having completed a minimum number of ....
Published on: 14931130. Diana Richardson on July 10, 2014 [DS-2014-092].; Petitioner seeks the Board’s interpretation of 61G5-22.002 and 22.003 regarding whether an instructor’s signature certifying “successful completion of 260 hours of instruction designed to meet the learning objectives set forth in subsections 65G5-22.004(2), 61G5-22.005(2) and 61G5-22.006(2), F.A.C.” satisfies the evaluation requirement making Petitioner legally eligible to apply for registration; and of 22.015, F.A.C., regarding whether Petitioner is eligible to apply for registration if she did not have a graded performance/practical evaluation of the services but completed the services. Petitioner also requests clarification of whether a graded performance/practical examination is required for the variety of services required in 61B5-22.017(2). The Board will consider this petition at its meeting currently scheduled for September 4, 2014. Except for good cause shown, motions for leave to intervene must be filed within 21 days after publication of this notice.
Published on: 6538496. The Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Board of Cosmetology, hereby gives notice that a public workshop for the purposes of rule development on rules in Chapter 61G5-22, will be held at the time, date and place listed below:; Sunday, January 25, 2009, at 10:00 am; Florida Hotel and Conference Center, 1500 Sand Lake Road, Orlando, Florida 33756.