00-001421
Department Of Children And Family Services vs.
Cool School, Inc., D/B/A Antoinette Garrity
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, January 23, 2001.
Recommended Order on Tuesday, January 23, 2001.
1STATE OF FLORIDA
4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
8DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND )
13FAMILY SERVICES, )
16)
17Petitioner, )
19)
20vs. ) Case No. 00-1421
25)
26COOL SCHOOL, INC., d/b/a )
31ANTOINETTE GARRITY, )
34)
35Respondent. )
37_________________________________)
38RECOMMENDED ORDER
40Following notice to all parties, Don W. Davis,
48Administrative Law Judge for the Division of Administrative
56Hearings, held a final hearing in the above-styled case on
66Thursday, January 11, 2001, in Jacksonville, Duval County,
74Florida.
75APPEARANCES
76For Petitioner: Robin Whipple-Hunter, Esquire
81Department of Children and
85Family Services
875920 Arlington Expressway
90Jacksonville, Florida 32231-0083
93For Respondent: No Appearance
97STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
101The issue to be resolved in this proceeding is whether
111Respondent, as a child day-care facility operator, committed
119the violations of Florida Statutes and Florida Administrative
127Code, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint, of failing
136to submit background screening documents within ten days of
145employment of seven staff employees.
150PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
152Respondent, a child day-care facility operator licensed
159by the Department of Children and Family Services
167(Department), was the subject of an Administrative Complaint
175filed by the Department on March 9, 2000. The Administrative
185Complaint alleged that Respondent's facility was in violation
193of certain provisions of Chapter 435, Florida Statutes, and
202Chapter 65-C, Florida Administrative Code, by failing to
210submit employee background screening information within ten
217days of employment.
220Respondent timely sought an administrative proceeding to
227contest the violations, pursuant to Section 120.57, Florida
235Statutes, and the dispute was transferred to the Division of
245Administrative Hearings.
247At the final hearing, the Department presented one
255witness and three exhibits. Respondent failed to appear at
264the final hearing and no evidence was presented on her behalf.
275Official recognition was taken of Sections 402.305(2),
282402.310, 435.04, and 435.05, Florida Statutes; Rule 22.006
290(5)(e), Florida Administrative Code; and Respondent's response
297to the undersigned's Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
304No transcript was provided. The Department's counsel
311submitted a Proposed Recommended Order which has been reviewed
320and utilized in preparation of this recommended order.
328Respondent did not submit a recommended order.
335FINDINGS OF FACT
3381. Cool School is a licensed day care facility licensed
348by the Department of Children and Family Services.
3562. On or about M arch 1, 2000, the Department received a
368complaint, inter alia , that required background screening
375documents had not been submitted on some employees.
3833. Pursuant to this complaint, Susan Kipen, Family
391Services Counselor, Day Care Licensure, of the Department,
399investigated the matter and further conducted a routine
407inspection of the facility. The investigation and inspection
415took place on March 1, 2000.
4214. During the March 1, 2000, investigation/inspection,
428Kipen discovered that the facility was out of compliance in
438the areas of Personnel and Record Keeping.
4455. After review of personnel files, Kipen discovered
453that background screening documents had not been submitted on
462seven staff persons within ten days of their employment with
472the facility, as required by the Department.
4796. Further, Kipen discovered that none of the files for
489the seven staff persons included form CF/FSP 5131, Background
498Screening and Personnel File Requirements; a form required by
507the Department to be used by day care operators and kept in
519employee files. The files were incomplete and in a state of
530disarray.
5317. In her response to the undersigned's Order of Pre-
541hearing Instructions, Respondent admitted that she had failed
549to send all background screening within the ten day period for
560three employees: Merry Howard, Christie Sosa, and Michelle
568Williams.
569CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
5728. The Division of Administrative Hearings has
579jurisdiction of the subject matter of and the parties to this
590proceeding. Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.
5959. The Department alleges that Respondent should be
603subjected to an administrative fine of $350 for violations of
613section 402.305, Florida Statutes, and Rule Chapter 65C-22,
621Florida Administrative Code.
62410. Section 402.305(2), Florida Statutes, stat es:
631PERSONNEL. minimum standard for child
636care personnel shall include minimum
641requirements as to:
644(a) Good moral character based upon
650screening. This screening shall be
655conducted as provided in Chapter 435,
661using level 2 standards for screening
667set forth in that chapter.
67211. With regard to Level 2 screening standards, Section
681435.04(1), Florida Statutes, states:
685All employees in positions designated
690by law as positions of trust or
697responsibility shall be required to
702undergo security background investigations
706as a condition of employment and continued
713employment. For purposes of this
718subsection, security background investi-
722gations shall include, but not be limited
729to, employment history checks,
733fingerprinting for all purposes and
738checks in this subsection, statewide
743criminal and juvenile records checks
748through the Florida Department of Law
754Enforcement, and federal criminal records
759checks through Federal Bureau of
764Investigation, and may include local
769criminal records checks through local
774law enforcement agencies
77712. Section 435.05, Florida Statutes states, in part:
785Except as otherwise provided by law, the
792following requirements shall apply to
797covered employees:
799(1)(a) Every person employed in a position
806for which employment screening is required
812must, within 5 working days after starting
819to work, submit to the employer a complete
827set of information necessary to conduct a
834screening under this section.
838(b) For level 1 screening, the employer
845must submit the information necessary for
851screening to the Florida Department of Law
858Enforcement within 5 working days after
864receiving it. The Florida Department of Law
871Enforcement will conduct a search of its
878records and will respond to the employer
885agency. The employer will inform the
891employee whether screening has revealed any
897disqualifying information.
899(c) For level 2 screening, the employer or
907licensing agency must submit the
912information necessary for screening to the
918Florida Department of Law Enforcement
923within 5 working days after receiving it.
930The Florida Department of Law Enforcement
936will conduct a search of its criminal and
944juvenile records and will request that the
951Federal Bureau of Investigation conduct a
957search of its records for each employee for
965whom the request is made. The Florida
972Department of Law Enforcement will respond
978to the employer or licensing agency, and
985the employer or licensing agency will
991inform the employee whether screening has
997revealed disqualifying information.
1000(d) The person whose background is being
1007checked must supply any missing criminal or
1014other necessary information to the employer
1020within 30 days after the employer makes a
1028request for the information or be subject
1035to automatic disqualification.
103813. Rule Section 65C-22.006(5), Florida Administrative
1044Code, states in part:
1048Personnel Records. Records shall be
1053maintained and kept current on all child
1060care personnel, as defined by s.
1066402.302(8), F.S.. . . These shall
1072include:
1073(a) Position and date of employment
1079(e) Level 2 screening information
1084documented on CF-FSP Form 5131, Apr. 97,
1091background Screening and Personnel File
1096Requirements.
109714. Section 402.310, Florida Statutes, states in part:
1105(1)(a) The department or local licensing
1111agency may deny, suspend or revoke a
1118license or impose an administrative fine
1124not to exceed $100 per violation, per day,
1132for the violation of any provision of ss.
1140402.301-402.319 or rules adopted
1144thereunder. However, where the violation
1149could or does cause death or serious harm,
1157the department or local licensing agency
1163may impose an administrative fine, not to
1170exceed $500 per violation per day.
1176(b) In determining the appropriate
1181disciplinary action to be taken for a
1188violation an provided in paragraph (a), the
1195following factors shall be considered:
12001. The severity of the violation,
1206including the probability of death or
1212serious harm to the health and safety of
1220any person will result or has resulted, the
1228severity of the actual or potential harm,
1235and the extent to which the provisions of
1243ss. 402.301-402.319 have been violated.
12482. Actions taken by the licensee to
1255correct the violation or to remedy
1261complaints.
12623. Any previous violations of the
1268licensee.
126915. Respondent admitted to not submitting background
1276screening on three of seven named staff persons. The purpose
1286of background screening employees is to eliminate from
1294employment in areas of trust those persons found guilty, or
1304who have pled guilty, or pled nolo contendere to any offense,
1315as delineated in Section 435.03(2), Florida Statutes.
132216. The failure to either submit or timely submit
1331background screening information, while not posing an
1338immediate threat to the health, safety, and well being of a
1349child in this case, posed potential harm. Respondent's
1357unlawful practice, if undisciplined, could result in eventual
1365harm to a child through Respondent's permitting of employment
1374of inappropriate persons in the facility.
138017. Further, the failure to document the submission of
1389background screening information necessarily hinders the
1395licensing agency from being able to determine the progress, if
1405any, a facility has made in screening its employees. Under
1415the circumstances, the administrative fine of $350 is
1423reasonable.
1424RECOMMENDATION
1425Having considered the foregoing Findings of Fact,
1432Conclusions of Law, the evidence of record, and the candor and
1443demeanor of the witness, it is recommended that a Final Order
1454be entered confirming the imposition of an administrative fine
1463against Respondent in the amount of $350.
1470DONE AND ENTERED this 23rd day of January, 2001, in
1480Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
1484___________________________________
1485DON W. DAVIS
1488Administrative Law Judge
1491Division of Administrative Hearings
1495The DeSoto Building
14981230 Apalachee Parkway
1501Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
1504(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675
1508Fax Filing (850) 921-6847
1512www.doah.state.fl.us
1513Filed with the Clerk of the
1519Division of Administrative Hearings
1523this 23rd day of January , 2001.
1529COPIES FURNISHED:
1531Robin Whipple-Hunter, Esquire
1534Department of Children and
1538Family Services
15405920 Arlington Expressway
1543Jacksonville, Florida 32231-0083
1546Antoinette Garrity
1548c/o Cool School, Inc.
155257 College Drive
1555Orange Park, Florida 32065
1559Virginia A. Daire, Agency Clerk
1564Department of Children and
1568Family Services
1570Building 2, Room 204B
15741317 Winewood Boulevard
1577Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700
1580Josie Tomayo, General Counsel
1584Department of Children and
1588Family Services
15901317 Winewood Boulevard
1593Building 2, Room 204
1597Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700
1600NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
1606All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within
161615 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any
1626exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the
1636agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.
- Date
- Proceedings
- PDF:
- Date: 01/23/2001
- Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
- PDF:
- Date: 01/23/2001
- Proceedings: Recommended Order issued (hearing held January 11, 2001) CASE CLOSED.
- PDF:
- Date: 01/16/2001
- Proceedings: Letter to Judge D. Davis from A. Garrity In re: hearing location (filed via facsimile).
- Date: 01/11/2001
- Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
- PDF:
- Date: 01/09/2001
- Proceedings: Unilateral Response to Order of Pre-Hearing Instructions and Pre-Hearing Stipulation (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
- PDF:
- Date: 12/28/2000
- Proceedings: Amended Notice of Hearing issued. (hearing set for January 11, 2001; 10:30 a.m.; Jacksonville, FL, amended as to room location).
- PDF:
- Date: 12/22/2000
- Proceedings: Third Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for January 11, 2001; 10:30 a.m.; Jacksonville, FL).
- PDF:
- Date: 12/18/2000
- Proceedings: Respondent Response to Pre-Hearing Instructions and Pre-Hearing Stipulation filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 12/15/2000
- Proceedings: Notice of Status and Motion to Re-Schedule Final Hearing (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
- PDF:
- Date: 11/15/2000
- Proceedings: Order Granting Continuance and Placing Case in Abeyance issued (parties to advise status by December 15, 2000).
- PDF:
- Date: 11/15/2000
- Proceedings: Response to Respondent`s Motion for Continuance (filed via facsimile).
- PDF:
- Date: 09/28/2000
- Proceedings: Second Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for November 20, 2000; 10:30 a.m.; Jacksonville, FL).
- PDF:
- Date: 09/25/2000
- Proceedings: Notice of Status and Motion to Reschedule Final Hearing (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
- PDF:
- Date: 07/25/2000
- Proceedings: Order Granting Continuance and Placing Case in Abeyance sent out. (parties to advise status by September 25, 2000)
- PDF:
- Date: 06/13/2000
- Proceedings: Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for July 27, 2000; 10:30 a.m.; Jacksonville, FL)
- Date: 04/07/2000
- Proceedings: Initial Order issued.