00-001931 Department Of Health, Board Of Nursing vs. Rachelle Chiaro Vaslowski, R.N. Status: Closed Recommended Order on Friday, April 6, 2001.

Summary: Agency proved the Respondent diverted drugs from patients and failed to conform to acceptable professional standards.

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH , )

BOARD OF NURSING , )

)

Petitioner , )

)

vs. ) Case No. 00-1931

)

RACHELLE CHIARO VASLOWSKI, R.N. , )

)

Respondent. )

___________________________________)

RECOMMENDED ORDER

A hearing was held pursuant to notice, on February 20,

2001, in Daytona Beach, Florida, by Stephen F. Dean, assigned

Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative

Hearings, in Tallahassee, Florida.

APPEARANCES

For Petitioner : Michael E. Duclos, Esquire

Agency for Health Care Administration

2727 Mahan Drive

Tallahassee, Florida 32308

For Respondent : No appearance

STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

The issue in this proceeding is whether Respondent

committed the offences set forth in the Administrative

Complaint and, if so, whether Respondent's nursing license

should be disciplined accordingly.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

On October 28, 1998, Petitioner issued an Administrative

Complaint which alleged that Respondent violated the

provisions of Section 464.018(1)(h), Florida Statutes, by

having engaged in unprofessional conduct on or about

January 6, 1998.

Respondent, through her attorney of record, filed an

Answer to the Administrative Complaint and an Election of

Rights form contesting the allegations and requesting a formal

hearing. Petitioner referred the matter to the Division of

Administrative Hearings on May 8, 2000. On May 11, 2000, the

Division of Administrative Hearings issued an Initial Order.

The parties filed a joint Response to Initial Order. In

accordance with the dates provided in the Response to Initial

Order, a Notice of Hearing was issued for February 20, 2001.

In compliance with the Order of Prehearing Instructions,

Petitioner filed a Unilateral Prehearing Stipulation.

Respondent's attorney filed a motion to withdraw because of a

lack of client cooperation, which the assigned Judge granted.

At the hearing, Petitioner presented the testimony of

Barbara Geyer, R.N., and Katherine Johnson, R.N. Petitioner's

Exhibits numbered 1 through 5 were admitted into evidence.

Respondent did not appear at the hearing, although she was

duly noticed.

Petitioner timely filed its Proposed Recommended Order on

March 16, 2001, which was read and considered.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. The Agency for health Care Administration is the

agency charged with the regulatory and prosecutorial duties

related to nursing practice in the State of Florida.

2. Respondent, Rachelle Chiaro Vaslowski, holds a

nursing license number RN 2913542.

3. Respondent's last known address is 240 Brookline

Avenue, Daytona Beach, Florida 32118.

4. Respondent was employed by the Coquina Center (the

Center) from February 12, 1997, until her termination on

January 7, 1998.

5. On January 6 and 7, 1998, Respondent was working a

day shift at the Center as a registered nurse, at 170 North

Center Street, Ormond Beach, Florida.

6. Respondent was under the supervision of Barbara

Geyer, R.N., Unit Manager for the sub-acute care section of

the nursing home. Respondent was assigned to care for

patients which included the administration of their scheduled

medications.

7. Ms. Geyer testified regarding Respondent's

performance of her duties. On Respondent's shift, patients,

whom Respondent was caring for, had not received the

medication that they were prescribed. Ms. Geyer also observed

twenty to thirty cc' s of clear fluid on Respondent's

medication cart when this was brought to her attention by

Respondent.

8. Respondent told Ms. Geyer, "I've just spilled a

bottle of Roxanol, should I take the plunger and suck it back

up again." Roxanol is a strong mixture of pain medication,

consisting of Morphine and Demerol, used to medicate the

terminally ill. Ms. Geyer advised Respondent that the

medication had to be appropriately discarded and the correct

documents completed regarding its wastage.

9. Ms. Geyer, who has been an R.N. for many years,

observed that Respondent had a very confused look on her face.

10. Ms. Geyer went to her Director of Nursing, Kathy

Johnson and advised her of the situation. Both women

interviewed Respondent regarding the spilling of the narcotic.

11. A hasty inventory also was conducted of Respondent's

medication cart. Respondent was the only person on duty with

a key to the cart. There were medications for which

Respondent had received which were unaccounted for. Two and a

half vials of Morphine and 14 Ambien were missing.

12. They also found two vials marked as containing

Roxanol. Since this was the medication that was supposed to

have been spilled, Ms. Geyer questioned Respondent about it.

Respondent replied, "What do you want, there is more than you

need?"

13. Ms. Geyer and Ms. Johnson both stuck their fingers

in the supposed vials containing Roxanol. Both women

testified that one had a bitter taste and the other had no

taste at all.

14. Ms. Geyer observed that, in addition to having a

dazed look in her eyes, Respondent gave totally inappropriate

responses to the questions she was asked when interviewed.

15. Ms. Johnson, the head nurse, testified that she

observed Respondent's nursing skills had declined. Respondent

forgot to chart medications she administered. This became a

pattern. Ms. Johnson identified Petitioner's Exhibit No. 5 as

the complaint she had filed with the State against Respondent

on February 20, 1998.

16. Ms. Johnson was qualified as a nursing expert based

on her education, training, and experience. She observed that

Respondent, when interviewed following the spilling incident,

was confused and dazed. Questions had to be repeated several

times to her. Respondent appeared not to understand the

questions.

17. Ms. Johnson described that when Respondent was

informed that they were going to do a narcotics count on

Respondent's medication cart, Respondent grabbed her

belongings and left the facility in haste. She did not clock

out. She did not tell anybody she was leaving. She left the

keys on the cart and she was out the door. Ms. Johnson opined

that this was very unprofessional behavior.

18. The Center's pharmacy policies and procedures were

identified by Ms. Geyer. Ms. Geyer explained the policies and

procedures regarding controlled substances. Respondent failed

to follow the policy and procedure for disposing of controlled

substances.

19. As supervising nurse, Ms. Geyer, filled out a

narcotics "wasting" report on Respondent spilling of Roxanol.

The medication error report was signed by Barbara Geyer.

20. Ms. Johnson also testified that it is a violation of

nursing procedures to not account for narcotics properly when

you administer or "waste" them. Further, she opined it was

unprofessional conduct to work under the influence of

narcotics, to take medications that are intended for patients,

and not properly chart medications.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

21. The Division of Administrative Hearings has

jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter in this case.

Sections 120.569 and 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.

22. Section 464.018(1)(h), Florida Statutes, makes it a

violation of the Nurse Practice Act for a licensee to engage

in:

Unprofessional conduct, which shall

include, but not be limited to, any

departure from, or the failure to conform

to, the minimal standards of acceptable and

prevailing nursing practice . . . "

23. Rule 64B9-8.005, Florida Administrative Code,

defines unprofessional conduct to include:

(1 ) Inaccurate recording, falsifying or

altering of patient records . . . ;

(2 ) Administering medications or

treatments in a negligent manner;

(3 ) Misappropriating supplies, equipment

or drugs; or

(4) Leaving a nursing assignment before

properly advising appropriate personnel

* * *

(13 ) Failure to conform to the minimal

standards of acceptable prevailing nursing

practice, regardless of whether or not

actual injury to a patient was sustained.

24. Petitioner has the burden of proving by clear and

convincing evidence that Respondent failed to practice nursing

in accordance with the Florida Statutes, and the Rules.

25. The evidence shows Respondent failed to conform to

minimal acceptable standards of nursing practice by diverting

drugs meant for patients by using the drugs on duty; by

failing to follow policies and procedures for disposing of

controlled substances; and by leaving her nursing assignment

before being properly relieved.

26. The observations of two experienced registered

nurses indicate that Respondent was under the influence of

drugs while she was on duty. The evidence indicates the drugs

she had taken were diverted from patients. Her actions are

below the minimum acceptable prevailing standards for nursing

practice according to the expert witness. Further, by

diverting the drugs to her own use, she was in possession of

controlled substances unlawfully. Respondent's conduct is a

violation of Section 464.018(1)(h), Florida Statutes.

27. Rule 64B9-8.006(3)(i), provides penalty guidelines

for unprofessional conduct in delivery of nursing services as

follows: $250-$1000 fine and up to suspension until

Respondent proves she practice safety followed by probation.

28. Rule 64B9-8.006(3)(j), provides penalty guidelines

for unlawful possession of controlled substances as follows:

$250-$1000 fine and up to 5 years suspension followed by

probation.

29. Rule 64B9-8.006(3)(k), provides penalty guidelines

for impairment as follows: $100-$1000 plus referral to IPN

and stayed suspension under IPN or probation with conditions.

30. What Respondent did was the result of her

impairment. The appropriate disposition of this case is to

prohibit Respondent from practicing until she has proven she

is no longer impaired and can practice safely and

professionally. Therefore, she should be suspended until she

completes satisfactorily the IPN program, demonstrates she has

the knowledge and ability to practice professionally, and,

thereafter, her practice should be followed for a sufficient

period to insure she continues to practice safely. A fine is

inappropriate in this case, but if one must be rendered, the

minimum of $100 should be levied.

RECOMMENDATION

Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions

of Law set forth herein, it is

RECOMMENDED:

That the Board of Nursing enter a final order suspending

the license of Respondent to practice until she has

satisfactorily completed the IPN program, and, thereafter,

place her on a five-year probation to follow her practice.

DONE AND ENTERED this 6th day of April, 2001, in

Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

STEPHEN F. DEAN

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings

The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488- 9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing [phone]

www.doah.state.fl.us

Filed with the Clerk of the

Division of Administrative Hearings

this 6th day of April, 2001.

COPIES FURNISHED:

Michael E. Duclos, Esquire

Agency for Health Care Administration

2727 Mahan Drive

Tallahassee, Florida 32308

Rachelle Chiaro Vaslowski

240 Brookline Avenue

Daytona Beach, Florida 32118

Ruth R. Stiehl, Executive Director

Board of Nursing

Department of Health

4080 Woodcock Drive, Suite 202

Jacksonville, Florida 32207-2714

Theodore M. Henderson, Agency Clerk

Department of Health

4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin A02

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1701

William W. Large, General Counsel

Department of Health

4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin A02

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1701

Dr. Robert G. Brooks, Secretary

Department of Health

4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin A00

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1701

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this recommended order. Any exceptions

to this recommended order should be filed with the agency that

will issue the final order in this case.