00-003259PL Department Of Health, Board Of Podiatric Medicine vs. George C. P. Mcnally
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, November 9, 2000.


View Dockets  
Summary: Podiatrist was found to have failed to keep proper records; he over prescribed legend drugs; failed to practice prudentially; and practiced beyond the scope of his license.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF )

14PODIATRIC MEDICINE, )

17)

18Petitioner, )

20)

21vs. ) Case No. 00-3259PL

26)

27GEORGE C. P. MCNALLY, )

32)

33Respondent. )

35_________________________________)

36RECOMMENDED ORDER

38Notice was provided, and a formal hearing was held on

48October 11, 2000, at the Destin Community Center, in Destin,

58Florida, and conducted by Harry L. Hooper, Administrative Law

67Judge with the Division of Administrative Hearings.

74APPEARANCES

75For Petitioner: Wings S. Benton, Esquire

81Agency for Health Care Administration

86Office of the General Counsel

91Practitioner Regulation-Legal

93Post Office Box 14229

97Tallahassee, Florida 32317-4229

100For Respondent: George C. P. McNally, D.P.M., pro se

109Post Office Box 5585

113Destin, Florida 32540

116STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

120Should Respondent's license to practice podiatric medicine

127be disciplined for failure to keep required written medical

136records, for prescribing or dispensing legend drugs other than in

146the course of his professional podiatric practice, for failing to

156practice as a reasonably prudent podiatric physician, and for

165practicing beyond the scope of his license?

172PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

174On June 13, 2000, Petitioner filed an Administrative

182Complaint against Respondent. On August 14, 2000, Respondent

190requested a formal hearing for the purpose of disputing the

200allegations of wrongdoing contained in the complaint. At the

209formal hearing, Petitioner offered Exhibits 1-26 which were

217admitted into evidence without objection. Petitioner presented

224the testimony of Sara Helen Lowe; Lloyd Eugene Richard; Patient

234B.R.; Patient B.R.'s wife; Barry C. Blass, D.P.M.; and the

244Respondent. Petitioner also presented the deposition testimony

251of Dr. Thomas L. Hicks, M.D. and Richard D. Roth, D.P.M. A

263Transcript was prepared and filed with the Division of

272Administrative Hearings on October 27, 2000. Both parties timely

281provided Proposed Recommended Orders which were considered in the

290preparation of the Recommended Order.

295FINDINGS OF FACT

2981. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating

307the practice of podiatric medicine pursuant to Section 20.43,

316Florida Statutes, and Chapters 456 and 461, Florida Statutes.

325Dr. McNally has been licensed without interruption to practice

334podiatry in the State of Florida since October 22, 1996. He has

346not been the subject of disciplinary action by the Board of

357Podiatry.

3582. Dr. McNally was licensed as a podiatrist in the State of

370Florida by the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) in

380October 1996. He was born on June 19, 1969.

3893. Ms. Sara Helen Lowe, a pharmacist, is an inspector for

400AHCA. She conducted a survey of pharmacies in the vicinity of

411Destin and Ft. Walton area and discovered that Respondent had

421written multiple prescriptions for legend drugs which were in the

431name of Patient B.R. She also determined from her survey that

442Respondent had prescribed the legend drug Phentermine for six of

452his patients.

4544. A legend drug is a drug for which a prescription is

466required and includes Schedule II controlled substances under

474Chapter 893, Florida Statutes. A Schedule II controlled

482substance is a pharmaceutical which has medical uses and also has

493a potential for being abused.

4985. Mrs. B.R. is the wife of Patient B.R. She was aware

510that her husband received numerous prescriptions from Dr. McNally

519for multiple drugs including oxycodone and methadone in 1998 and

5291999. Mrs. B.R. was aware that her husband had an open wound on

542his foot for several years. She was also aware that he suffered

554chronic and severe pain from this condition.

5616. Mrs. B.R. was concerned about the amount of drugs being

572consumed by Patient B.R. and discussed this matter with Dr.

582McNally. During this conversation, Dr. McNally told her that,

"591B.R. was in chronic pain, and that the amount of medication that

603B.R. took was basically B.R.'s problem."

6097. Mrs. B.R. was angry with regard to the amount and type

621of drugs which were prescribed by Dr. McNally. However, she

631thought that during this time his foot wound was improving.

6418. Mrs. B.R. was aware that Dr. McNally brought drugs to

652patient B.R.'s hospital room when patient B.R. was hospitalized

661in November of 1998.

6659. Mrs. B.R. was aware that her husband was hospitalized on

676an emergency basis for an overdose of Tegrital, a drug designed

687to combat seizures. This drug was not prescribed by Dr. McNally.

698It was prescribed by another doctor.

70410. The pain that patient B.R. suffered caused a hardship

714in Mrs. B.R.'s home but she preferred that he take the pain

726medication rather than see him suffer.

73211. Patient B.R. lives in Destin with his wife. He is

743receiving disability payments due to a hip replacement, a knee

753replacement, and an ulcer on his right foot.

76112. In an effort to relieve the pain in B.R.'s foot

772Respondent prescribed Oxycodone, Endodan, Endocet, Methadone,

778Roxicet, Roxiprin, Percocet, Oxycontin, Morphine Sulfate Er, MS

786Contin, Oramorph SR, and Roxicodone. All of these are forms of

797oxycodone, methadone, or morphine, alone, or in combinations with

806acetaminophen. Dr. McNally prescribed approximately 8,705 units

814of oxycodone, 250 units of methadone, and 510 units of morphine

825for patient B.R. during the eighteen-month period he treated him.

835These drugs were prescribed to him subsequent to his first visit

846to Dr. McNally in 1997. All of the foregoing drugs are Schedule

858II controlled substances pursuant to Chapter 893, Florida

866Statutes.

86713. Patient B.R. obtained prescriptions during office

874visits and by telephoning Dr. McNally. When B.R. called Dr.

884McNally the doctor would ask him what drugs he wished to have and

897B.R. would tell him. Dr. McNally would then provide the

907prescription to a pharmacy telephonically. On at least one

916occasion the prescription was left inside the screen door of

926Dr. McNally's dwelling for Patient B.R. to pick up.

93514. Office visits were on some occasions made at the

945offices of Dr. Haire from which Dr. McNally occasionally

954practiced. During office visits Dr. McNally would sometimes take

963B.R.'s temperature. He checked B.R.'s vital signs approximately

971every six months.

97415. Patient B.R. got prescriptions from Dr. McNally when

983Dr. McNally was on an extended trip to Europe in early 1998 or

9961999.

99716. While Patient B.R. was a patient in the local hospital,

1008Dr. McNally brought him drugs because the pain medication

1017provided by the hospital was inadequate. Dr. McNally brought the

1027drugs to his hospital room four or five times. He bought these

1039drugs with patient B.R.'s credit cards. Patient B.R. was in the

1050hospital November 9 through 17, 1998.

105617. Dr. McNally submitted insurance claims for patient B.R.

1065for a portion of the time he was treating patient B.R. but

1077eventually stopped.

107918. Patient B.R. stopped seeing Dr. McNally. Subsequently,

1087a therapist, Sherry Levitis, recommended that patient B.R. attend

1096a pain management center in New Orleans. As a result of his

1108attendence there he experienced a decrease in needle-like pains.

1117The pain management succeeded in getting B.R. to gradually reduce

1127the amount of pain-killing drugs that he was ingesting.

113619. Patient B.R. never received any drug rehabilitation.

1144The pain management clinic taught him that he could get by

1155without the aid of drugs.

116020. Patient B.R. went to different pharmacies to have his

1170prescriptions filled because he thought they would question the

1179amount if he received too many drugs from the same business. He

1191was advised by Dr. McNally to avoid making frequent visits to the

1203same pharmacy.

120521. Patient B.R. never shared the drugs he obtained with

1215others.

121622. The use of these drugs changed patient B.R.'s

1225personality and caused domestic difficulties. He became

1232dependent on the drugs. Buying the drugs was a financial strain.

124323. At the time of the hearing patient B.R. still was

1254suffering from the ulcer on his right foot. Though he has had

1266surgery on the ulcer three times, it has not healed.

127624. Patient B.R. believes his emergency trip to the

1285hospital was the result of his taking Tegrital which is an anti-

1297seizure medicine. He believes he should have coordinated the

1306taking of this medicine with Dr. McNally and that his failure to

1318do so was the cause of the medical event which resulted in

1330emergency hospitalization. The medical doctor who prescribed the

1338Tegrital never asked him if he was taking other medications.

134825. Numerous efforts were made by Dr. McNally to address

1358patient B.R.'s foot condition and the resultant pain, including

1367surgery, orthotics, and pain management efforts.

137326. The drugs prescribed by Dr. McNally enabled patient

1382B.R. to get off of his couch and live a more normal life.

1395Patient B.R. had better results in addressing his pain and

1405treating his ulcer with Dr. McNally than with any other doctor.

141627. At the insistence of Petitioner, Dr. McNally supplied

1425to Petitioner what he claimed to be patient records in the case

1437of B.R. Petitioner believed these records to be phony.

144628. Dr. McNally prescribed Phentermine to patients and

1454asserted that he believed it would enhance circulation in the

1464lower extremities.

146629. Dr. McNally has been out of the country often and has

1478prescribed drugs for patients in the United States while he was

1489physically located in Italy. Dr. McNally prescribed drugs for

1498patient B.R. while in Europe. He provided patient B.R. with

1508numerous prescriptions for limited amounts because he did not

1517want him to have too many drugs in his possession at once.

152930. Dr. McNally, at the time of the hearing, was not

1540accepting new patients but was continuing to treat some old ones.

1551He no longer carries malpractice insurance.

155731. Dr. McNally claimed that the medical records in the

1567case of patient B.R., records which he supplied to ACHA at ACHA's

1579request, were prepared by him either at the time of patient

1590B.R.'s visits, a few days after a visit, or several days after a

1603visit.

160432. Dr. McNally used the word "analgesic" when preparing

1613records on patient B.R. He did not enter the actual names of the

1626drugs. "Analgesic" could encompass all drugs which relieve pain.

163533. Dr. McNally turned to pharmaceuticals in B.R.'s case

1644because he had tried all available alternative treatments without

1653success.

165434. Dr. McNally prescribed drugs for the benefit of patient

1664B.R. in the belief that he was doing what was best for his

1677patient.

167835. Barry C. Blass, D.P.M., testified. He is an expert in

1689the field of podiatry.

169336. Dr. Blass reviewed the evidence with regard to Dr.

1703McNally and his treatment of patient B.R. and with regard to Dr.

1715McNally's prescriptions of Phentermine for six patients.

172237. The pain-relieving drugs prescribed by Dr. McNally for

1731B.R. were far in excess of an amount which would be appropriate.

1743The amounts of legend drugs prescribed were about double that

1753permitted by the instructions contained on the container.

176138. Dr. Blass reviewed 229 pages of office notes addressing

1771the treatment of patient B.R. which purported to encompass the

1781period January 2, 1998 through September 29, 1999. Almost all of

1792the notes were identical with the exception of the dates. For

1803the notes to be legitimate, patient B.R. would have had to visit

1815Dr. McNally every day during October 1998 and almost everyday on

1826several other months.

182939. It is a deficiency for a physician to fail to note on

1842office notes that a patient has been prescribed legend drugs.

1852The standard of care requires a physician to sign office notes.

1863Respondent did not sign his notes. Additionally, the office

1872notes were inconsistent with the hospital records of B.R., in

1882that they indicated treatment in Dr. McNally's office when in

1892fact B.R. was on those dates resident in a hospital.

190240. The office notes provided by the Respondent were

1911manufactured, are not authentic, were not prepared at or near a

1922time of an actual office visit, if there was an office visit, and

1935are not, therefore, actual medical records addressing the

1943treatment of patient B.R.

194741. It is inappropriate for a physician to bring drugs into

1958a hospital for the use of a hospitalized patient.

196742. Phentermine is a diet drug which has no podiatric uses

1978and therefore should not be prescribed by a podiatrist.

1987Phentermine is usually prescribed as a remedy for exogenous

1996obesity.

199743. Thomas L. Hicks, M.D., is an expert in the field of

2009medicine. His testimony was provided by deposition.

201644. Dr. Hicks reviewed the medical records supplied by

2025Dr. McNally, and provided expert opinions based on that review.

2035It is inappropriate for a podiatrist to prescribe Phentermine.

2044Respondent's prescriptions for Phentermine were unsafe and in

2052excess of the customary dosages recommended by the manufacturer.

2061By writing these prescriptions, Dr. McNally practiced outside of

2070the scope of his license.

207545. The amount of Schedule II drugs prescribed for patient

2085B.R. was inappropriate, dangerous, and not justified by the

2094medical records. Dr. McNally wrote the prescriptions for patient

2103B.R. at very frequent intervals which, while peculiar, did not

2113violate the Practice Act. Usually when writing prescriptions for

2122chronic pain a physician prescribes for a longer period of time.

213346. Richard D.Roth, D.P.M., testified. He is an expert in

2143the field of podiatric medicine.

214847. Dr. Roth reviewed the medical records supplied by Dr.

2158McNally. The prescribing of Phentermine by Dr. McNally was

2167outside of the scope of his license and was potentially

2177dangerous.

217848. Dr. McNally's treatment notes were inadequate in that,

2187for example, they do not describe the exact location, size, or

2198depth of an ulcer, among other things. Neither do they describe

2209the types of analgesics prescribed even though massive doses of

2219narcotic analgesics were prescribed. Dr. McNally's records in

2227the case of patient B.R. are grotesquely incomplete. Most of the

2238notes provided by Dr. McNally were canned notes generated by a

2249computer.

2250CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

225349. The Division of Administrative Hearings has

2260jurisdiction over the subject matter. Section 120.57(1), Florida

2268Statutes.

226950. Section 461.013(1)(l), Florida Statutes, provides the

2276following ground for disciplinary action:

2281Failing to keep written medical records

2287justifying the course of treatment of the

2294patient, including, but not limited to,

2300patient histories, examination results, and

2305test results.

230751. Section 461.013(1)(o), Florida Statutes, provides the

2314following ground for disciplinary action:

2319Prescribing, dispensing, administering,

2322mixing, or otherwise preparing a legend drug,

2329including all controlled substances, other

2334than in the course of the podiatric

2341physician's professional practice. For the

2346purposes of this paragraph, it shall be

2353legally presumed that prescribing,

2357dispensing, administering, mixing, or

2361otherwise preparing legend drugs, including

2366all controlled substances, inappropriately or

2371in excessive or inappropriate quantities is

2377not in the best interest of the patient and

2386is not in the course of the podiatric

2394physician's professional practice, without

2398regard to her or his intent.

240452. Section 461.013(1)(s), Florida Statutes, provides the

2411following ground for disciplinary action:

2416. . . [T]he failure to practice podiatric

2424medicine at a level of care, skill, and

2432treatment which is recognized by a reasonably

2439prudent podiatric physician as being

2444acceptable under similar conditions and

2449circumstances. The board shall give great

2455weight to the standards for malpractice in s.

2463766.102 in interpreting this section. As

2469used in this paragraph, "repeated

2474malpractice" includes, but is not limited to,

2481three or more claims for medical malpractice

2488within the previous 5-year period resulting

2494in indemnities being paid in excess of

2501$10,000 each to the claimant in a judgment or

2511settlement and which incidents involved

2516negligent conduct by the podiatric

2521physicians. As used in this paragraph, "gross

2528malpractice" or "the failure to practice

2534podiatric medicine with the level of care,

2541skill, and treatment which is recognized by a

2549reasonably prudent similar podiatric

2553physician as being acceptable under similar

2559conditions and circumstances" shall not be

2565construed so as to require more than one

2573instance, event, or act.

257753. Section 461.013(1)(u), Florida Statutes, provides the

2584following ground for disciplinary action:

2589Practicing or offering to practice beyond the

2596scope permitted by law or accepting and

2603performing professional responsibilities

2606which the licensee knows or has reason to

2614know that she or he is not competent to

2623perform.

262454. The material allegations set forth in the

2632Administrative Complaint must be proven by clear and convincing

2641evidence. Department of Banking and Finance v. Osborne Stern and

2651Company, Inc. , 670 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 1996) and Ferris v.

2662Turlington , 510 So. 2d 292(Fla. 1987). In this case the

2672allegations of the complaint have been proven by clear and

2682convincing evidence.

268455. Rules 64B18-14.002(2)(m), (p), (t), and (v), Florida

2692Administrative Code, set forth the range of penalties which may

2702be imposed upon Respondent for violations of Sections

2710461.013(1)(l), (o), (s), and (u), Florida Statutes. The

2718guidelines for the four alleged violations contain penalties

2726ranging from reprimand to revocation and provide for fines of

2736$250 to $1,000.

274056. Rule 64B18-14.003, Florida Administrative Code,

2746provides for the following aggravating circumstances which may

2754affect the quantity of the penalty and the factors which bear on

2766this case have been duly considered in formulating the

2775recommendation. The factors are:

2779(1) The severity of the offense;

2785(2) The danger to the public;

2791(3) The number of repetitions of the

2798offense;

2799(4) The length of time since the violation

2807when no further complaints have been made

2814against the licensee;

2817(5) The number of times the licensee has

2825been previously disciplined by the Board;

2831(6) The length of time the licensee has

2839practiced without having any disciplinary

2844action taken;

2846(7) The damage to a patient caused by the

2855violation;

2856(8) Any efforts of rehabilitation by the

2863licensee;

2864(9) The licensee's actual knowledge of the

2871violation;

2872(10) Attempts by the licensee to correct or

2880stop the violation, or the refusal of the

2888licensee to correct or stop the violation;

2895(11) Related violations by the licensee in

2902Florida or in another jurisdiction, including

2908findings of guilt or innocence, penalties

2914imposed and penalties served;

2918(12) The degree to which the licensee was

2926involved in the violation;

2930(13) The degree to which the licensee

2937benefited from the violation;

2941(14) The cost of the disciplinary action.

294857. In considering the penalty to be recommended several of

2958the factors listed in Rule 64B18-14.003, Florida Administrative

2966Code, should be considered. These include the fact that the

2976offenses are serious offenses, the potential danger to the public

2986from Respondent's actions was great, and the prohibited

2994activities occurred many times over a substantial period of time.

3004It is particularly disturbing that he presented manufactured

3012medical notes to ACHA. On the other hand, there was no evidence

3024that anyone was actually harmed. Dr. McNally is a relatively

3034young person who has been practicing podiatry for only four

3044years, he believed that what he was doing was in the best

3056interests of his patients, and he received no benefit from the

3067violation.

3068RECOMMENDATIONS

3069Based upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law, it

3080is

3081RECOMMENDED:

3082That the Board of Podiatric Medicine enter a final order

3092finding that the Respondent, George C. P. McNally, failed to keep

3103required medical records during the period January 2, 1998

3112through September 29, 1999, in violation of Section

3120461.013(1)(l), Florida Statutes; that the Respondent prescribed

3127legend drugs other than in the course of his professional

3137podiatric practice during the period January 1988 through August

31461999, in violation of Section 461.013(1)(o), Florida Statutes;

3154that Respondent failed to practice as a reasonably prudent

3163podiatric physician during the period January 2, 1998 through

3172September 29, 1999, in violation of Section 461.013(1)(s),

3180Florida Statutes; and that Respondent practiced beyond the scope

3189of his license during the period January 1988 through August

31991999, in violation of Section 461.013(1)(u), Florida Statutes.

3207It is recommended that Respondent's license to practice podiatric

3216medicine be suspended for a period of six months, that he pay a

3229$2,000 fine, and that he pay for the cost of the investigation

3242and prosecution. The cost of investigation and prosecution shall

3251be assessed at the time the matter is presented to the Board of

3264Podiatric medicine.

3266DONE AND ENTERED this 9th day of November, 2000, in

3276Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida

3280___________________________________

3281HARRY L. HOOPER

3284Administrative Law Judge

3287Division of Administrative Hearings

3291The DeSoto Building

32941230 Apalachee Parkway

3297Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

3300(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

3304Fax Filing (850) 921-6847

3308www.doah.state.fl.us

3309Filed with the Clerk of the

3315Division of Administrative Hearings

3319this 9th day of November, 2000.

3325COPIES FURNISHED:

3327Wings S. Benton, Esquire

3331Agency for Health Care Administration

3336Post Office Box 14229

3340Tallahassee, Florida 32317-4229

3343George C. P. McNally

3347Post Office Box 5585

3351Destin, Florida 32540

3354Joe Baker, Jr., Executive Director

3359Board of Podiatric Medicine

3363Department of Health

33664052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin C07

3372Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1701

3375William W. Large, General Counsel

3380Department of Health

33834052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin A02

3389Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1701

3392Theodore M. Henderson, Agency Clerk

3397Department of Health

34004052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin A02

3406Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1701

3409NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

3415All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

342515 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions

3436to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that

3447will issue the Final Order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
PDF:
Date: 07/06/2004
Proceedings: Final Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/05/2001
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 11/09/2000
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 11/09/2000
Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
PDF:
Date: 11/09/2000
Proceedings: Recommended Order issued (hearing held October 11, 2000) CASE CLOSED.
PDF:
Date: 10/30/2000
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Date: 10/27/2000
Proceedings: Transcript (Volume 1) filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/17/2000
Proceedings: Ltr. to Judge H. Hooper from G. McNally In re: summary of case with recommendations filed.
Date: 10/11/2000
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
PDF:
Date: 10/06/2000
Proceedings: Petitioner`s First Request for Admissions filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/06/2000
Proceedings: Petitioner`s First Interrogatories to Respondent filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/06/2000
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Notice of Filing Respondent`s Response to Petitioner`s First Reuest for Admissions filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/06/2000
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Notice of Filing Respondent`s Response to Petitioner`s First Interrogatories filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/04/2000
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Witness List (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 10/04/2000
Proceedings: Amended Notice of Taking Deposition of S. Wilson, T. Underwood, R. Roth (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 10/04/2000
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition (R. Roth) (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 10/03/2000
Proceedings: Order issued. (Respondent shall produce the documents identified in the motion, not already produced, pertaining to the patient B. R. at the location agreed to by the parties).
PDF:
Date: 09/29/2000
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition of S. Wilson (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 09/29/2000
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Motion to Shorten Time (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 09/28/2000
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition of T. Hicks (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 09/25/2000
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Depositions Duces Tecum (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 09/01/2000
Proceedings: Petitioner`s First Request for Production of Documents (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 09/01/2000
Proceedings: Certificate of Service of Petitioner`s First Interrogatories to Respondent (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 09/01/2000
Proceedings: Petitioner`s First Request for Admissions filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/31/2000
Proceedings: Notice of Substitution of counsel (W. Benton) filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/25/2000
Proceedings: Joint Response to Revised Initial Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/24/2000
Proceedings: Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
PDF:
Date: 08/24/2000
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for October 11, 2000; 9:30 a.m.; Destin, FL).
PDF:
Date: 08/18/2000
Proceedings: Memorandum to Judge Adams from G. McNally Re: Revised Initial Order filed.
Date: 08/10/2000
Proceedings: Initial Order issued.
PDF:
Date: 08/09/2000
Proceedings: Election of Rights filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/09/2000
Proceedings: Administrative Complaint filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/09/2000
Proceedings: Agency referral filed.

Case Information

Judge:
HARRY L. HOOPER
Date Filed:
08/09/2000
Date Assignment:
10/03/2000
Last Docket Entry:
07/06/2004
Location:
Destin, Florida
District:
Northern
Agency:
ADOPTED IN PART OR MODIFIED
Suffix:
PL
 

Related DOAH Cases(s) (1):

Related Florida Statute(s) (4):

Related Florida Rule(s) (2):