00-003580 Brookwood-Walton County Convalescent Center And Brookwood-Washington County Convalescent Center vs. Agency For Health Care Administration
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, September 21, 2001.


View Dockets  
Summary: Petitioner entitled to interim rate increase for significant increase of liability insurance premium since reimbursement standards under state`s reimbursement plan and federal regulations are standards with which Petitioner had to comply.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8BROOKWOOD-WALTON COUNTY )

11CONVALESCENT CENTER AND )

15BROOKWOOD-WASHINGTON COUNTY )

18CONVALESCENT CENTER, )

21)

22Petitioners, )

24)

25vs. ) Case No. 00-3580

30)

31AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE )

36ADMINISTRATION, )

38)

39Respondent. )

41)

42RECOMMENDED ORDER

44Pursuant to notice, a formal administrative hearing was

52held before the Administrative Law Judge, Diane Cleavinger, of

61the Division of Administrative Hearings on May 30, 2001, in

71Tallahassee, Florida.

73APPEARANCES

74For Petitioner : Theodore E. Mack, Esquire

81Powell & Mack

84803 North Calhoun Street

88Tallahassee, Florida 32303

91For Respondent : Steven A. Grigas, Esquire

98Agency for Health Care Administr ation

1042727 Mahan Drive

107Fort Knox Building 3, Suite 3431

113Tallahassee, Florida 32308-5403

116STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

120The issue in this proceeding is whether the Agency for

130Health Care Administration's denial of Petitioners', Brookwood-

137Walton County Convalescent Center and Brookwood-Washington

143County Convalescent Center (Brookwood), interim rate request for

151general and professional liability insurance was proper and in

160keeping with state and federal laws and the rules and

170regulations governing Florida's Medicaid program.

175PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

177By letter dated June 30, 2000, the Agency for Health Care

188Administration (Agency or AHCA) denied Petitioner's interim rate

196request for general and professional liability insurance.

203Petitioner was advised that the requested change in

211reimbursement did not satisfy the requirements of Section

219IV.J.2. of the Florida Title XIX Long-Term Care Reimbursement

228Plan since there was no requirement for a nursing home to

239possess liability insurance, and no laws, rules, or standards

248had changed warranting an interim rate increase. Brookwood

256challenged the determination and requested an administrative

263hearing.

264At final hearing, Brookwood called one witness and offered

273seven exhibits into evidence. AHCA called two witnesses and

282offered four exhibits into evidence.

287The parties filed their Proposed Recommended Orders on

295August 9, 2001.

298FINDINGS OF FACT

3011. Petitioners, Brookwood-Washington County Convalescent

306Center and Walton County Convalescent Center (Brookwood) are

314licensed nursing homes in the State of Florida.

3222. The Brookwood facilities have historically been high

330Medicaid providers. Both participate in the Florida Medicaid

338program. Washington County Convalescent Center is currently 90

346percent Medicaid and Walton County Convalescent Center is 85

355percent Medicaid. The statewide average for all nursing homes

364in Florida is 50-55 percent Medicaid. Such high Medicaid

373participation makes Brookwood extremely sensitive to changes in

381its allowable costs and its ability to recover those costs.

3913. Florida's Medicaid program is needs-based, providing

398nursing home care to persons eligible for such care who fall

409below a certain level of income and assets.

4174. Medicaid is a "prospective" reimbursement program in

425that reimbursement to a nursing home is based on the facility's

436cost history adjusted or inflated to approximate future costs.

445Adjustments are made and reimbursement rates are set based on a

456nursing home's cost report for allowable costs it has incurred

466in the past year.

4705. In determining allowable reimbursable costs, AHCA

477utilizes the Florida Title XIX Long-Term Care Reimbursement

485Plan, Version XIX, dated November 27, 1995 (Reimbursement Plan),

494the reimbursement principles of the Federal Medicare Program's

502Health Insurance Manual (also known as the Provider

510Reimbursement Manual, PRM, or HIM-15), and Generally Accepted

518Accounting Principles ( GAAP ) or accepted industry practice. In

528making determinations as to allowable reimbursable costs, one

536first looks to the Plan, then HIM-15 and finally, GAAP.

5466. With certain exceptions not relevant here, The Florida

555Medicaid program reimburses all allowable costs, as those costs

564are defined in the Reimbursement Plan and HIM-15. Premiums paid

574by a nursing home for liability insurance are an allowable cost

585under the Reimbursement Plan. Allowable costs are broken out in

595the categories of property, patient care, and operating

603expenses. As indicated, in determining the prospective rate,

611AHCA inflates the reported allowable costs in each category

620forward subject to various class ceiling limitations and target

629limitations.

6307. A class ceiling is an upper limit on the cost that will

643be reimbursed. A target limitation is a limit on the rate of

655increase of costs from year to year. In short, a nursing home

667provider may be under its class ceilings; however, any increase

677in its costs that exceeds a certain percentage amount will not

688be recognized for reimbursement purposes.

6938. After applying the inflation factor, the class ceilings

702and the target limitations to allowable costs, AHCA arrives at a

713per-patient, per-day rate that the nursing home will be paid

723during the next year.

7279. Because nursing home reimbursement is prospective and

735subject to target limits, a nursing facility might be unable to

746recover its allowable costs of providing services if it

755experiences unanticipated expenses that cause its allowable

762costs to unexpectedly rise. In such cases, the Plan has

772provisions that allow, under very limited circumstances, an

780interim rate adjustment for an unexpected increase in costs.

789Such interim rate increases are covered in Section IV.J. of the

800Plan.

80110. In 1999, Brookwood's liability insurance premium cost

809was $400,000 for its six Florida facilities and one North

820Carolina facility. In the year 2000, Brookwood's liability

828insurance premium cost increased to $4,000,000. Of that amount,

839the premium cost for Walton County Convalescent Center increased

848from $56,000 to $546,000 and the premium cost for Washington

860County Convalescent Center increased from $84,000 to $819,000.

870The premium increase occurred after Brookwood's rates had been

879set based on its 1999 insurance costs. Additionally, in

888September of 2000, Brookwood's liability insurer left the state.

897Brookwood has since been unable to obtain liability insurance

906for its Florida facilities.

91011. It was possible for Brookwood to self-insure, but it

920did not. Self-insurance is generally only feasible for

928facilities larger than Brookwood. However, the evidence did not

937demonstrate that Brookwood could not self-insure.

94312. On May 30, 2000, faced with this unforeseen increase

953in liability insurance premiums, Brookwood applied to AHCA for

962an interim rate effective retroactively to January 1, 2000.

971This was necessary because the large increase in costs would not

982be covered by the normal rate of inflation allowed by the

993department and the cost of the increase would not be recoverable

1004through the normal prospective reimbursement methodology due to

1012the lag time between the cost increase and the filing of the

1024cost report. In addition, without an interim rate Brookwood

1033would not receive an adjustment to its target rate, thereby,

1043limiting reimbursement for any increased costs it did report on

1053its cost reports.

105613. Brookwood only requested interim ra tes for these two

1066facilities because its other four facilities were at or above

1076the cost ceilings and could get no relief from an interim rate.

1088In other words, for those four facilities, Medicaid will not

1098participate in payment for the extra costs incurred by the

1108increased liability insurance premiums. Even for the two

1116facilities at issue here, if an interim rate is granted, AHCA

1127will not reimburse for any costs that exceed the cost ceilings.

113814. The increase of premiums and subsequent pull out by

1148several insurance companies were part of a reaction to increased

1158loss in the area of nursing home liability. The crisis was, in

1170part, due to an increase in civil litigation against nursing

1180homes being brought under Sections 400.022 and 400.023, Florida

1189Statutes. Indeed, Florida's rate of nursing home liability

1197litigation is significantly above the national average.

1204However, Florida's nursing home population is also significantly

1212larger than the national average. However, the crisis was also

1222due to many other factors which impact liability and rates in

1233Florida. While there may be some debate about the causes of the

1245increased litigation, there is no debate that the cost of

1255liability insurance increased significantly over a short period

1263of time with some insurance companies ceasing to write liability

1273insurance for nursing homes in Florida.

127915. The Agency denied Brookwood's request because no new

1288interpretation of law by the state or federal government

1297pertaining to liability insurance had occurred which caused

1305Brookwood's costs to increase.

130916. As indicated earlier, the Plan contains provisions

1317that allow a nursing home participating in the Medicaid program

1327to request an interim change in its reimbursement rate when it

1338incurs costs resulting from patient care or operating changes

1347made to comply with existing state regulations and such costs

1357are at least $5,000 or one percent of its per diem.

136917. The language of Section IV.J.2 of the Estate's Long-

1379Term Care Reimbursement Plan states that:

1385J. The following provisions apply to

1391interim changes in component reimbursement

1396rates, other than through the routine semi-

1403annual rate setting process.

1407* * *

14102. Interim rate changes reflecting

1415increased costs occurring as a result of

1422patient care or operating changes shall be

1429considered only if such changes were made to

1437comply with existing State or Federal rules,

1444laws, or standards, and if the change in

1452cost to the provider is at least $5000 and

1461would cause a change of 1 percent or more in

1471the provider's current total per diem rate.

147818. Other subsections of Section J of the Reimbursement

1487Plan deal with new requirements or new interpretation of old

1497requirements. Those subsections do not apply in this case. The

1507term standards as used in Section J refers to standards in the

1519Reimbursement Plan, Section IV titled "Standards," the standards

1527of care and operation detailed by the Medicaid program in its

1538provider handbooks and such standards as are detailed in the

1548Code of Federal Regulations, and HCFA/HHS guidelines, as well as

1558state statutes and rules. These standards are the usual or

1568customary method or practice used by the nursing home industry

1578to gain reimbursement from Medicaid. The term standards include

1587reimbursement standards, methods or principles for medicaid

1594providers.

159519. In essence, a nursing home would have to incur

1605additional or new costs to receive an interim rate adjustment.

1615Brookwood's increase in insurance premiums was such an increase

1624in costs, which would be allowable subject to ceiling and target

1635limitations.

163620. At the time of Brookwood's request, there was no

1646specific requirement in the state Reimbursement Plan, state or

1655federal law requiring that liability insurance be carried by a

1665nursing home. Additionally, there was no change to the

1674Reimbursement Plan, state, or federal law or regulation

1682requiring that liability insurance be carried by a nursing home.

169221. On the other hand, the reimbursement standards or

1701requirements set forth in HIM-15 make it clear that a prudent

1712Medicaid provider is expected to carry liability insurance or

1721self-insurance in order to be reimbursed for any uninsured

1730losses.

173122. Specifically, Section 2160.2 of the Provider

1738Reimbursement Manual states:

1741Liability damages paid by the provider,

1747either imposed by law or assumed by

1754contract, which should reasonably have been

1760covered by liability insurance, are not

1766allowable.

1767Section 2161 of HIM-15 states that the reasonable costs of such

1778insurance are allowable. Section 2162.1 of HIM-15 states that

1787losses in excess of the deductible or co-insurance are allowable

1797costs so long as the amount of insurance was consistent with

1808sound management practices. Section 2162.5 of HIM-15 recognizes

1816the allowability of deductibles, so long as they do not exceed

182710 percent of the entity's net worth or $100,000 per provider.

1839It also states that if you set a deductible higher than those

1851amounts (or assume all the risk), any losses exceeding the

186110 percent or $100,000 will not be allowable as recognized

1872costs.

187323. The general implication of these a nd other related

1883sections of HIM-15 is that a prudent provider is expected to

1894carry liability insurance or be self-insured. Thus, a provider

1903will be reimbursed for the reasonable costs of liability

1912insurance, any reasonable deductible, and any losses in excess

1921of reasonable insurance coverage. These limitations on loss

1929recovery or reimbursement are standards for purposes of

1937determining whether a interim rate increase is allowable. These

1946standards were in effect at the time Brookwood's premiums

1955increased. Thus, in order to comply with Medicaid's

1963reimbursement standards, Brookwood had to remain insured or

1971self-insured. The choice of which type of insurance to utilize

1981to meet the reimbursement standard is left to the provider.

1991Brookwood reasonably chose to insure through an insurance

1999company. Since Brookwood was required to make such a choice in

2010order to comply or conform to Medicaid's reimbursement

2018standards, Brookwood is entitled to an interim rate increase.

202724. However, the interim rate provisions of the Plan only

2037recognize such rates submitted within 60 days prior to the date

2048of the interim rate request. Based on this limitation,

2057Petitioners' rate increase is limited to the increase in premium

2067incurred 60 days prior to its interim rate request around

2077May 30, 2000.

2080CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

208325. The Division of Administrative Hearings has

2090jurisdiction over the parties to and subject matter of this

2100proceeding.

210126. Petitioner bears the burden of showing that it is

2111entitled to the interim rate requested. Florida Department of

2120Transportation v. J.W.C. Company , 396 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 1st DCA

21311981) ; Balino v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative

2139Services , 348 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

214827. The Reimbursement Plan has been adopted and

2156incorporated by reference in Rule 59G-6.040, Florida

2163Administrative Code.

216528. The applicable controlling rules, regulations, and

2172principles governing Medicaid reimbursement are set forth in the

2181Plan, HIM-15, and GAAP. In determining reimbursement issues,

2189one first looks to the Plan, then to HIM-15, and finally to

2201GAAP, in that order of priority.

220729. An interim rate is meant to allow a provider under

2218very limited circumstances to be reimbursed for unanticipated

2226allowable costs that are not covered in their cost report.

223630. Section IV.J.2. Of the Plan requires the changes

2245creating the increased costs to be necessary for compliance

2254with, "existing State or Federal rules, laws, or standards".

2264The requirements of HIM-15 are clearly "standards", as that term

2274is used in Section IV.J.2. of the Plan. In Alabama Hospital

2285Association v. Beasley , 702 F.2d 955 (11th Cir. 1983)

2294(Appendix), the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals discussed the

"2303standards" for reimbursement set forth in 42 C.F.R. HIM-15 is

2313a compilation and codification of 42 C.F.R., Medicare

2321reimbursement principles, which are utilized by Medicare. In

2329maintaining liability insurance for its facilities, Brookwood

2336was acting as a prudent provider in accordance with the

2346standards set forth in HIM-15. Those standards require that a

2356provider maintain liability or self-insurance or face the risk

2365of being unreimbursed for losses.

237031. Because the parties agreed that Brookwood's liability

2378insurance premiums were allowable costs and the increase in

2387those costs met the threshold criteria of Section IV.J.2. of the

2398Plan, the fact that Brookwood incurred increased costs to comply

2408with recognized Medicaid reimbursement standards makes

2414Brookwood's request for an interim rate based on those increased

2424costs allowable under the Plan.

2429RECOMMENDATION

2430Based upon the foregoing findings of fact and Conclusions

2439of Law, it is

2443RECOMMENDED that

2445A final order be entered granting Brookwood's interim rate

2454request limited to the 60 days prior to the initial rate

2465request.

2466DONE AND ENTERED this 31st day of September, 2001, in

2476Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

2480___________________________________

2481DIANE CLEAVINGER

2483Administrative Law Judge

2486Division of Administrative Hearings

2490The DeSoto Building

24931230 Apalachee Parkway

2496Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

2499(850) 488- 9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

2504Fax Filing (850) 921-6847

2508www.doah.state.fl.us

2509Filed with the Clerk of the

2515Division of Administrative Hearings

2519this 21st day of September, 2001.

2525COPIES FURNISHED :

2528Steven A. Grigas, Esquire

2532Agency for Health Care Administration

25372727 Mahan Drive

2540Fort Knox Building 3, Suite 3431

2546Tallahassee, Florida 32308-5403

2549Theodore E. Mack, Esquire

2553Powell & Mack

2556803 North Calhoun Street

2560Tallahassee, Florida 32303

2563Diane Grubbs, Agency Clerk

2567Agency for Health Care Administration

25722727 Mahan Drive

2575Fort Knox Building 3, Suite 3431

2581Tallahassee, Florida 32308-5403

2584Julie Gallagher, General Counsel

2588Agency for Health Care Administration

25932727 Mahan Drive

2596Fort Knox Building 3, Suite 3431

2602Tallahassee, Florida 32308-5403

2605NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

2611All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

262115 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions

2632to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that

2643will issue the final order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
PDF:
Date: 03/01/2002
Proceedings: Final Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/22/2002
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 09/21/2001
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 09/21/2001
Proceedings: Recommended Order issued (hearing held May 30, 2001) CASE CLOSED.
PDF:
Date: 09/21/2001
Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
PDF:
Date: 08/09/2001
Proceedings: Proposed Recommended Order of Brookwood-Walton County Convalescent Center and Brookwood-Washington Convalescent Center filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/09/2001
Proceedings: Agency for Health Care Administration`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 07/27/2001
Proceedings: Order Granting Extension of Time filed.
PDF:
Date: 07/25/2001
Proceedings: Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Recommended Orders (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 07/06/2001
Proceedings: Agreed Upon Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
Date: 06/15/2001
Proceedings: Transcript filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/15/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Filing Transcript filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/04/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Filing filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/01/2001
Proceedings: Respondent`s Supplementation of Hearing Exhibit "P2" and Response to Questions Raised filed.
Date: 05/30/2001
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
PDF:
Date: 03/07/2001
Proceedings: Amended Notice of Hearing issued. (hearing set for May 29 and 30, 2001; 9:00 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL, amended as to Dates Only).
PDF:
Date: 03/01/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for May 28 and 29, 2001; 9:00 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL).
PDF:
Date: 02/27/2001
Proceedings: Response to Order (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 11/16/2000
Proceedings: Order Granting Continuance and Placing Case in Abeyance issued (parties to advise status by February 16, 2001).
PDF:
Date: 11/16/2000
Proceedings: Motion for Continuance (filed by Petitioners via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 09/11/2000
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for November 20, 2000; 9:00 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL).
PDF:
Date: 09/06/2000
Proceedings: Joint Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
Date: 08/31/2000
Proceedings: Initial Order issued.
PDF:
Date: 08/30/2000
Proceedings: Interim Rate Request filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/30/2000
Proceedings: Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/30/2000
Proceedings: Notice filed.

Case Information

Judge:
DIANE CLEAVINGER
Date Filed:
08/30/2000
Date Assignment:
05/29/2001
Last Docket Entry:
03/01/2002
Location:
Tallahassee, Florida
District:
Northern
Agency:
ADOPTED IN PART OR MODIFIED
 

Related DOAH Cases(s) (1):

Related Florida Statute(s) (2):

Related Florida Rule(s) (1):