01-000416EPP Orlando Utilities Commission, Curtis H. Stanton Energy Center Combined Cycle Unit A Power Plant Siting Supplemental Application No. Pa 81-14sa2 vs. *
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Monday, July 23, 2001.


View Dockets  
Summary: Certification of supplemental Power Plant Site including construction of transmission line to reconnect to existing on-site substation; off-cite natural gas pipeline; and expansion of main site.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8IN RE: ORLANDO UTILITIES )

13COMMISSION, KISSIMMEE )

16UTILITY AUTHORITY, )

19FLORIDA MUNICIPAL POWER )

23AGENCY, and SOUTHERN )

27COMPANY-FLORIDA, L.L.C., )

30CURTIS H. STANTON ENERGY ) Case No. 01- 0416EPP

39CENTER COMBINED CYCLE )

43UNIT A POWER PLANT )

48SITING SUPPLEMENTAL )

51APPLICATION NO. )

54PA 81- 14SA2 )

58________________________________)

59RECOMMENDED ORDER

61Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings,

69by its duly-designated Administrative Law Judge, Charles A.

77Stampelos, held a final hearing in the above-styled case on

87June 26, 2001, in Orlando, Florida.

93APPEARANCES

94For the Orlando Utilities Commission, Kissimmee Utility

101Authority, and Florida Municipal Power Agency:

107Tasha O'Dell Buford, Esquire

111Young, van Assenderp,

114Varnadoe & Anderson, P.A.

118225 South Adams Street

122P ost Office Box 1833

127Tallahassee, Florida 32302-1833

130For Orlando Utilities Commission:

134Thomas B. Tart, Esquire

138Orlando Utilities Commission

141500 South Orange Avenue

145Orlando, Florida 32801

148For Southern-Florida, L.L.C .:

152Lawrence N. Curtin, Esquire

156Holland & Knight, LLP

160315 South Calhoun Street, Suite 600

166Tallahassee, FL 32302-0810

169For the Department of Environmental Protection:

175Scott A. Goorland, Esquire

179Department of Environmental Protection

183Office of General Counsel

1873900 Commonwealth Boulevard

190Mail Station 35

193Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000

196For the St. Johns River Water Management District:

204Kris H. Davis, Esquire

208Charles A. Lobdell, III, Esquire

213St. Johns River Management District

218Post Office Box 1429

222Palatka, Florida 32178-1429

225For Orange County:

228Anthony J. Cotter, Esquire

232Assistant County Attorney

235Orange County Attorney’s Office

239Post Office Box 1353

243Orlando, Florida 32801-1353

246STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

250The issue to be resolved in this proceeding is whether

260certification should be granted to the Orlando Utilities

268Commission ("OUC"), Kissimmee Utility Authority (" KUA "), Florida

279Municipal Power Agency (" FMPA "), and Southern Company – Florida,

290LLC ("Southern-Florida") for Curtis H. Stanton Unit A at the

302Stanton Energy Center in Orlando, Florida, in accordance with the

312pertinent provisions of Sections 403.501 through 403.518, Florida

320Statutes.

321PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

323This proceeding arose on the application by OUC, KUA, FMPA,

333and Southern-Florida ("the Applicants") for a supplemental power

343plant site certification for the proposed Stanton Unit A and

353associated facilities ("the Stanton Unit A project"). The

363Stanton Unit A Project and the application include construction

372of a proposed on-site 230 kilovolt ("kV") transmission line to

384connect to the existing on-site substation. Substation No. 17

393(the Stanton Energy Center main substation) will be expanded to

403the west to accommodate the new transmission line. The Stanton

413Unit A Project also includes construction of a proposed off-site

423natural gas pipeline in the existing Stanton Energy Center

432railroad corridor to connect to the existing Florida Gas

441Transmission (" FGT") pipeline located approximately two miles

450south of the Stanton Energy Center site boundary.

458The Florida Public Service Commission (" PSC") issued a

468determination of need for Stanton Unit A on May 14, 2001, in

480accordance with Section 403.519, Florida Statutes.

486The certification hearing was held as noticed on June 26,

4962001, in accordance with Section 403.508(3), Florida Statutes.

504All notices required by law were timely published in accordance

514with Section 405.501 et seq. , Florida Statutes. The final

523hearing was conducted for the purpose of receiving evidence

532concerning whether the proposed project complies with the

540criteria contained in Sections 403.502 and 403.517, Florida

548Statutes.

549The Applicants presented pre-filed written testimony of

556thirteen (13) witnesses and ten (10) exhibits numbered OUC-1

565through OUC-10, including the Stanton Energy Center Unit A

574Supplemental Site Certification Application (" SSCA"), identified

582as OUC-1. A Composite Joint Stipulation between the Parties

591stipulating to the pre-filed testimony and exhibits, stipulating

599to acceptance of the expert witnesses, stipulating that there

608were no facts at issue, and stipulating to the proposed

618Conditions of Certification was presented by the Applicants and

627was identified as OUC-9. The Joint Stipulation between the

636Parties was amended at the hearing, ore tenus , marked as OUC-10

647and identified as the Amended Joint Stipulation between the

656Parties. The parties have agreed to the modification of the

666Conditions of Certification as stated in the Amended Joint

675Stipulation between the Parties.

679The Applicants' witnesses were accepted as proffered, as

687were the Applicants' pre-filed testimony, exhibits, and Joint

695Stipulation between the Parties, all without objection. The

703Applicants' fact witnesses and the subjects of their testimony

712included : Frederick F. Haddad, Jr., Orlando Utilities

720Commission; Thomas O. Anderson, Southern Company; and J. Michael

729Soltys, SSCA preparation. The Applicants' expert witnesses and

737the subjects of their testimony included : Girma Mergia,

746Groundwater Analysis/Impacts; Andrew P. Dicke, Noise

752Analysis/Impacts; Tammy Wang, Socioeconomics Analysis/Impacts;

757Kyle Lucas, Air Quality Analysis/Impacts; Andrew Burr, Ecological

765Impacts; Kenneth R. Weiss, Water Use & Wastewater

773Treatment/Impacts; Gregory A. Holscher, Air Pollution

779Control/ SCR; Michael Serafin, Natural Gas Line Site Development;

788Morris Stover, Transmission Site Development; and Michelle R.

796French, Stormwater Analysis/Impacts.

799The Department of Environmental Protection presented the

806testimony of Hamilton S. Oven, Jr., Administrator of the Siting

816Coordination Office of the Department of Environmental Protection

824("DEP") and a licensed professional engineer. He was admitted as

836an expert in electrical power plant siting and the power plant

847siting process. DEP had two (2) exhibits admitted into evidence,

857DEP-1, which is Mr. Oven's résumé, and DEP-2, which is the

868May 25, 2001, Department's Staff Analysis Report.

875The St. Johns River Water Management District ("SJRWMD")

885presented the testimony of James Hollingshead, a hydrologist in

894charge of water use permitting in central Florida for the SJRWMD.

905He was admitted as an expert in the fields of hydrogeology and

917the SJRWMD's Regulatory Permitting Program for Consumptive Use.

925The SJRWMD had one exhibit admitted into evidence, SJRWMD-1,

934which was Mr. Hollingshead's résumé.

939Opportunity was afforded for members of the general public

948to appear; however, no members of the public appeared.

957Upon concluding the taking of evidence, OUC, KUA, FMPA and

967Southern-Florida elected to order a Transcript of the proceedings

976which was filed with the Division on July 9, 2001. A Jointly

988Filed Proposed Recommended Order was timely submitted and has

997been considered in the rendition of this Recommended Order.

1006FINDINGS OF FACT

10091. OUC is a 28 percent owner of Unit A of the Curtis H.

1023Stanton Energy Center. FMPA is a 3.5 percent owner of Unit A of

1036the Curtis H. Stanton Energy Center. KUA is a 3.5 percent owner

1048of Unit A of the Curtis H. Stanton Energy Center. Southern-

1059Florida is a 65 percent owner of Unit A of the Curtis H. Stanton

1073Energy Center.

10752. Stanton Unit 1 (net rating of 440 MW) and Unit 2 (net

1088rating of 446 MW), and associated facilities, are existing

1097certified coal-fired units at the site. Stanton Units 1 and 2

1108operate under Certification Order PA 81-14, originally issued on

1117December 15, 1982, and supplemented on December 17, 1991, for the

1128addition of Stanton Unit 2. The Certification Order has been

1138subsequently modified in April 1993, July 1995, December 1997,

1147and August 1998. These units went into commercial operation in

11571987 and 1996, respectively. The Stanton Energy Center site is

1167certified for ultimate certification of 2,000 MW of coal or

1178natural gas-fired capacity.

11813. The Stanton Energy Center site, which is located

1190approximately 10 miles southeast of Orlando, encompasses

1197approximately 3,280 acres in eastern Orange County. Of the 3,280

1209acres, 1,100 acres have been allocated for development of power

1220generation and support facilities. The proposed Stanton Unit A

1229will be constructed on approximately 60 acres of that 1,100

1240acres.

12414. DEP is an agency of the State of Florida designated as

1253the lead agency for the review and evaluation of site

1263certification applications, in accordance with the various

1270provisions of the Florida Electrical Power Plant Siting Act,

1279Sections 403.501-403.518, Florida Statutes, and related rules

1286cited and discussed elsewhere herein.

12915. Notice of the certification hearing was accorded to all

1301parties entitled thereto as well as to the general public.

13116. The existing Stanton Energy Center began commercial

1319operation in 1987. It currently consists of two coal-fired units

1329known as Units 1 and 2, two natural draft cooling towers, a

1341cooling water supply pond, a solid waste disposal area, an

1351electrical switchyard, transmission lines, a railroad spur,

1358access roads, and a reclaimed water pipeline.

13657. The on-site facilities of the Stanton Unit A project

1375will consist of a General Electric 7FA combined cycle unit

1385consisting of two combustion turbines, two heat recovery steam

1394generators (" HRSGs "), a steam turbine generator, cooling tower,

1404wastewater treatment facilities, fuel oil and water storage

1412tanks, and natural gas delivery and metering facilities.

1420Additionally, a new 230 kV transmission line will be constructed

1430to connect Stanton Unit A with OUC’s existing on-site Stanton

1440Energy Center Substation No. 17. The connecting line will be

1450totally within the certified site. Stanton Unit A will have a

1461total nameplate rating of 791 mega volt amperes (" MVA") and a

1474nominal rating of approximately 633 MW.

1480PSC Need Determination

14838. On May 14, 2001, the Public Service Commission issued

1493Order No. PSC-01-1103-FOF-EM determining the need for the

1501proposed combined cycle Stanton Unit A to be constructed at

1511Stanton Energy Center.

1514Scheduling

15159. Mobilization and physical construction of Stanton Unit A

1524are scheduled to begin the fourth quarter of 2001, with

1534commercial operation commencing October 2003.

1539Generating Units

154110. Stanton Unit A will be a General Electric 7FA combined

1552cycle unit consisting of two combustion turbines, two HRSGs, and

1562a steam turbine generator. The unit will burn natural gas as a

1574primary fuel and will be capable of burning low sulfur No. 2 oil

1587as backup fuel.

159011. With the addition of Stanton Unit A, the generating

1600capacity at the Stanton Energy Center will be a nominal 1,519 MW.

1613Transmission Facilities

161512. OUC’s existing transmission system consists of 26

1623substations interconnected through approximately 302 miles of 230

1631kV and 115 kV lines and cables. The addition of Stanton Unit A

1644will require the construction of a new, on-site, 230kV

1653transmission line to connect Stanton Unit A with the existing on-

1664site Stanton Energy Center Substation No. 17. The total length

1674of the transmission line will be approximately 3,000 feet. The

1685transmission line will be a single-circuit, heavy-duty, single-

1693pole transmission line. The transmission line structures will be

1702steel poles with drilled concrete pier foundations or self-

1711supporting concrete poles. Both structure types will be capable

1720of supporting a double-circuit configuration. In conjunction

1727with the proposed transmission line, the existing OUC Substation

1736No. 17 will be expanded to the west to accommodate the new 230 kV

1750transmission line. The proposed transmission line route will be

1759located entirely within the existing Stanton Energy Center

1767property. Construction of a portion of the line will require

1777clearing approximately 0.4 acres of cypress strand and

1785permanently filling 0.57 acres of herbaceous wetlands. Overall,

1793adverse environmental impacts from the construction of the new

1802transmission line are expected to be minimal. The proposed

1811transmission line has been routed to minimize impacts on wetlands

1821as much as possible. Orange County and OUC have determined that

1832mitigation for such impacts consists of the granting of a

1842conservation easement of in-kind wetlands to offset the wetland

1851impacts.

1852Natural Gas Pipeline Lateral

185613. A 4-1/2 mile long, 16-inch lateral to a FGT line in

1868Orange County will provide the natural gas to fuel Stanton Unit

1879A. The pipeline lateral will originate at the crossing of the

189026-inch FGT gas supply line and OUC's railroad corridor, which is

19012-1/2 miles south of the Stanton Energy Center, and will

1911terminate at Stanton Unit A. OUC owns a 300-foot wide corridor

1922that contains a railroad spur, unimproved maintenance road, and a

1932230 kV transmission line. The gas pipeline will be installed

1942within this existing corridor. All fuel handling and metering

1951facilities will meet the applicable requirements as specified in

1960Chapter 25-12, Florida Administrative Code, and will meet all

1969applicable requirements of the United States Department of

1977Transportation ("DOT") (49 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 192)

1988as amended by the Materials Transportation Bureau.

1995Wastewater Treatment

199714. Process wastewaters consist of oil/water separator

2004effluent, chemical wastes, steam cycle (boiler) blowdown, and

2012evaporative cooling tower blowdown. Oil/water separator effluent

2019will be routed to the existing Stanton Energy Center recycle

2029basin where it will be reused in Stanton Units 1 and 2 flue gas

2043desulfurization and ash systems. Cooling tower and evaporative

2051cooler blowdown will be treated in a new brine concentrator

2061system. The brine concentrator system recovers a large amount of

2071the water in the blowdown and recycles it to the cooling towers.

2083Boiler blowdown from the HRSGs will be routed to the Stanton Unit

2095A cooling tower for reuse.

210015. Sanitary wastewater produced during normal plant

2107operations will be collected and routed to a new septic system

2118and tile field. The 30 new employees expected to be associated

2129with Stanton Unit A will increase sanitary wastes by

2138approximately 900 gallons per day (" gpd").

2146Well Field

214816. Groundwater withdrawals are currently taken from the

2156two existing on-site, deep wells that serve the Stanton Energy

2166Center. The Stanton Energy Center site is currently authorized

2175to pump up to two million gallons per day (" mgd") for plant

2189service water, demineralization, drinking and sanitary water.

2196This allocation will also supply Stanton Unit A service water,

2206potable water, and demineralization demands.

221117. In lieu of using additional groundwater, the Applicants

2220have agreed to diligently and in good faith pursue an agreement

2231with Orange County to transfer up to 8.0 mgd of surface water

2243(including stormwater/surficial groundwater) from the adjacent

2249Orange County Landfill property for use at the Stanton Energy

2259Center facility.

2261Fuel Supply and Storage

226518. A new 1.68 million gallon, above-ground fuel oil

2274(No. 2) storage tank will be added at the Stanton Energy Center

2286for Stanton Unit A.

229019. The construction, materials, installation, and use of

2298the bulk storage tank will conform to American Petroleum Industry

2308("API") Standard 650, American Institute of Steel Construction

2318(" AISC"), American Society for Testing and Materials (" ASTM"),

2330National Electric Code ("NEC"), and Occupational Safety and

2340Health Administration (" OSHA") standards. The location of the

2350storage tank is indicated on the Site Arrangement, Figure 2.1-3

2360of the Supplemental Site Certification Application, Volume 2.

236820. Fuel will be delivered to the vertical oil storage

2378tanks by tanker truck and/or rail. The containment area for each

2389fuel oil tank is provided by an earthen berm. The berm is

2401designed to meet the DEP requirements to provide containment for

2411both 110 percent of the storage capacity of the largest tank

2422within the impoundment and a sufficient allowance for the design

2432(10 year, 24 hour) rainfall storm event (approximately 7 inches).

2442In addition, the containment area is constructed with a synthetic

2452liner. The liner is sufficiently impermeable to ensure that no

2462oil can escape by infiltrating through the liner and soil and

2473into surface or groundwaters, as required by DEP regulation.

248221. The fuel oil truck unloading station is located

2491northwest of the existing coal units, as indicated on the Site

2502Arrangement. The station spill containment consists of above-

2510ground and double-walled below grade piping running to the

2519storage tanks outside and inside the earthen berm area. The

2529station also includes a manually operated isolation valve and a

2539check valve immediately adjacent to the unloading station. This

2548allows immediate isolation of the piping system from a spill at

2559the delivery truck and prevents backflow spillage of oil from the

2570system.

257122. The existing Spill Prevention, Control and

2578Countermeasures Plan and Facility Response Plan will be modified

2587as required to include Stanton Unit A facilities.

2595Foundation Stability

259723. The strata beneath the Stanton Energy Center site to a

2608depth of about 200 feet are divided into five stratigraphic

2618layers: a surficial sand layer, an intermediate cohesive layer,

2627a lower sand layer, a lower cohesive layer, and limestone

2637bedrock. The surficial sand layer consists of 32 to 71 feet of

2649heterogeneous arrangement of loose to dense, gray to brown sand,

2659silty sand, and clayey sand, with an intermittent thin clay

2669layer. Underlying the surficial layer is 4 to 15 feet of soft to

2682stiff, gray to brown highly plastic clay, sandy clay, and silty

2693clay, with occasional shell fragments. The intermediate cohesive

2701layer varies in thickness from 78 to 81 feet.

271024. Foundations for Stanton Unit A are to be similar to the

2722foundation types utilized for Stanton Units 1 and 2. Heavily

2732loaded, settlement sensitive structures within the existing

2739Stanton Energy Center are supported on deep foundations

2747consisting of friction piling. More lightly loaded structures

2755are anticipated to be supported on shallow footings or mats. The

2766existing Stanton Units 1 and 2 foundations have been performing

2776very satisfactorily since installation.

2780Archeological and Historic Sites

278425. In March 1981, the Florida Department of State,

2793Division of Archives, History, and Records Management determined

2801that the existing site did not contain significant archaeological

2810or historical resources. Construction of Stanton Unit A is

2819unlikely to affect any properties listed, or eligible for

2828listing, in the National Register.

2833Land-Use Compatibility

283526. The new construction at Stanton Energy Center will not

2845generate sufficient noise to negatively affect any local

2853residents. Construction noise levels for foundation construction

2860and equipment erection are estimated to be approximately 55

2869decibels (" dBA") at the north property boundary and approximately

288045 dBA at the nearest residence. The site clearing stage noise

2891emissions are anticipated to be 5 dBA less than the equipment

2902erection noise emissions. Noise levels during operation will

2910decrease from that which is expected during site clearing and

2920construction.

292127. The construction noise associated with Stanton Unit A

2930is not anticipated to be significant. The undeveloped

2938surrounding area, as well as the vegetative buffer and physical

2948distance to the nearest residences, will all mitigate the

2957intermittent disturbance.

2959affic impacts of Stanton Unit A construction are

2967expected to have a slight impact on area roadways. However, this

2978temporary impact will not have any lasting, significant adverse

2987impact on the roadways and intersections in the vicinity of the

2998Stanton Energy Center. During operation of Stanton Unit A, no

3008significant impacts on area traffic are expected and no new off-

3019site roads or road improvements will be required.

3027Socioeconomic Impacts

302929. The construction of Stanton Unit A will have a positive

3040impact on the local economy, providing approximately 300 jobs at

3050the peak of construction during the 24-month construction period.

3059The vast majority of the construction work force is expected to

3070be filled by workers already residing in the study area, which

3081consists of Brevard, Osceola, Orange, Lake, and Seminole

3089Counties. The estimated construction payroll is $28 million (in

30982001 dollars).

310030. There will be no significant, long-term increase in

3109demand by the Stanton Energy Center for public services, either

3119directly or indirectly, through an increase in population

3127attributable to increased staffing. While the influx of the

3136construction work force may increase the demand for services from

3146local governments and nearby service providers, representatives

3153of these entities have indicated that they have more than enough

3164service capacity to accommodate the construction work force.

3172Air Quality

317431. The Stanton Unit A combustion turbine is subject to

3184pre-construction review requirements under the provisions of

3191Chapter 62-212.400, Florida Administrative Code.

319632. The Stanton Energy Center is located in Orange County,

3206an area designated as an attainment area for all criteria

3216pollutants in accordance with Rule 62-204.360, Florida

3223Administrative Code.

322533. The Stanton Unit A combustion turbine is subject to

3235review under Rule 62-212.400, Florida Administrative Code,

3242Prevention of Significant Deterioration (" PSD "), because the

3251potential emission increases for particulate matter/particulate

3257matter less than 10 microns ("PM/ PM 10 "), carbon monoxide ("CO"),

3272volatile organic compounds (" VOC "), sulfur dioxides (" SO 2 "), and

3285nitrogen oxides (" NO X ") exceed the significant emission rates

3296given in Chapter 62-212, Table 62-212.400-2, Florida

3303Administrative Code. The PSD review consists of a determination

3312of Best Available Control Technology (" BACT") for PM/ PM 10 , CO,

3325VOC, SO 2 and NO X , an air quality impact analysis, and an

3338assessment of the Stanton Unit A Project’s impact on general

3348commercial and residential growth, soils, vegetation, and

3355visibility.

335634. The Stanton Unit A combustion turbine will increase

3365emissions of six pollutants at levels in excess of PSD

3375significant amounts: PM 10 , CO, SO 2 , NO X , VOC, and sulfuric acid

3388mist ("SAM"). PM 10 , SO 2 , and NO X are criteria pollutants and have

3404defined national and state ambient air quality standards

3412(" AAQS"), PSD increments, and significant impact levels. CO and

3423VOC are criteria pollutants and have only AAQS and significant

3433impact levels defined.

343635. The only Class I area near the Stanton Energy Center is

3448the Chassahowitzka National Wildlife Refuge, located

3454approximately 140 km west-northwest of the site.

346136. An air quality analysis, undertaken in accordance with

3470computer modeling procedures approved in advance with the DEP,

3479demonstrated that the Stanton Unit A Project resulted in no

3489significant air quality impacts in the area surrounding the

3498proposed facility. Therefore, further air quality impact

3505studies, which would include AAQS and PSD increment impact

3514analyses for these pollutants, were not required.

352137. Under the Clean Air Act, the Stanton Unit A project

3532would be classified as a "process unit" of hazardous air

3542pollutants ("HAP"), thereby requiring an analysis to determine if

3553the Stanton Unit A Project would have a potential to emit 10 tpy

3566of any one HAP or 25 tpy of any combination of HAPs . Maximum

3580Achievable Control Technology (" MACT") applicability calculations

3588were performed and revealed that no individual HAP has a

3598potential to be emitted in excess of 10 tpy and no combination of

3611HAPs has a potential to be emitted in excess of 25 tpy from

3624operation of the Stanton Unit A Project. It was determined that

3635the need to apply MACT is therefore not required pursuant to

3646Section 112 of the Clean Air Act.

365338. The Stanton Unit A combustion turbine’s air emissions

3662are expected to cause only minimal or insignificant impacts on

3672vegetation, soil, or wildlife.

367639. A regional haze analysis was performed which showed

3685that operation of the Stanton Unit A combustion turbine will not

3696result in adverse impacts on visibility in the vicinity of the

3707Chassahowitzka National Wildlife Refuge.

371140. Short-term increases in the labor force during the

3720construction phase will not result in permanent or significant

3729commercial and residential growth in the vicinity of the Stanton

3739Unit A Project. Any resulting air emissions from residual growth

3749will not be significant because the increase in population due to

3760the operation of the Stanton Unit A Project will be very small.

3772BACT and Emission Rates

377641. A BACT analysis was required as part of the PSD review.

3788The BACT review for the Stanton Unit A combustion turbine was

3799conducted for PM/ PM 10 , CO, NO X , SO 2 , and VOC.

381142. DEP determined that BACT for the Stanton Unit A

3821combustion turbine particulate matter (PM/ PM 10 ) emissions was good

3832combustion controls during natural gas and fuel oil firing. The

3842BACT for the particulate emissions from the Stanton Unit A

3852cooling tower is determined to be the use of drift eliminators

3863with a control efficiency of 0.002 percent.

387043. DEP determined that BACT for the Stanton Unit A

3880combustion turbine for CO emissions was good combustion controls

3889to achieve an emission limit of 17 ppmvd at 15 percent O 2 on a 24-

3905hour average for normal operation on natural gas and 14 ppmvd at

391715 percent O 2 for normal operation on fuel oil. An oxidation

3929catalyst will be installed, if necessary, to meet these emission

3939limits.

394044. DEP determined that BACT for the Stanton Unit A

3950combustion turbine for NOx emissions consists of using dry low NO X

3962burners with selective catalytic reduction (" SCR") to achieve an

3973emission limit of 3.5 ppmvd at 15 percent O 2 when burning natural

3986gas. This limit shall apply whether or not the unit is operating

3998with its duct burner on and/or in power augmentation mode. The

4009emissions of NO X with the combustion turbine operating on fuel oil

4021shall not exceed 10.0 ppmvd at 15 percent O 2 .

403245. DEP determined that BACT for the Stanton Unit A

4042combustion turbine for VOC emissions is good combustion controls

4051to achieve an emission limit of 2.7 ppmvd at 15 percent O 2 with

4065the CT firing fuel oil. The emission limit is 3.6 ppmvd at 15

4078percent O 2 with the CT firing natural gas (without power

4089augmentation) and 6.3 ppmvd at 15 percent O 2 (with power

4100augmentation).

410146. DEP determined that BACT for the Stanton Unit A

4111combustion turbine for SO 2 consists of firing natural gas and up

4123to 1,000 hours per consecutive 12-month period of 0.05 percent

4134sulfur fuel oil.

413747. DEP determined preliminarily that the Stanton Unit A

4146Project will comply with all applicable state and federal air

4156pollution regulations provided that the BACT determination is

4164implemented.

4165Industrial Wastewater

416748. The Stanton Energy Center has five major sources of

4177wastewater. These are sanitary wastes, oil/water separator

4184effluent, cooling tower blowdown, chemical wastes and boiler

4192blowdown. Oil/water separator effluent will be routed to the

4201existing Stanton Energy Center recycle basin where it will be

4211reused in Stanton Units 1 and 2 flue gas desulfurization and ash

4223systems. Cooling tower and evaporative cooler blowdown will be

4232treated in a new brine concentrator system. Sanitary wastes will

4242be routed to a new septic tank/tile field system. Boiler

4252blowdown from the HRSGs will be routed to the Stanton Unit A

4264cooling tower for reuse. See also Findings of Fact 14 and 15.

427649. It is estimated that 0.4 mgd of cooling tower blowdown,

4287resulting from operation of Stanton Unit A, will be returned to

4298the cooling tower as makeup water. Remaining wastewater streams

4307will be reused or recycled at the Stanton site.

431650. The HRSGs and pre-boiler piping will be chemically

4325cleaned during commissioning. The steam generators will also be

4334periodically cleaned during the life of the unit. The acid and

4345alkaline cleaning wastes resulting from this process will be

4354immediately neutralized on-site. The treated cleaning wastes

4361will be disposed of off-site by a licensed contractor.

4370Waste Disposal

437251. Stanton Unit A will generate no solid waste from the

4383energy generation process. Stanton Unit A will generate solid

4392waste associated with the brine concentrator treatment of the

4401cooling tower blowdown. This waste is combined with the solid

4411discharge waste produced by the treatment of the blowdown from

4421Stanton Units 1 and 2. Therefore, the addition of Stanton Unit A

4433will require no new landfills or solid waste disposal areas.

444352. Waste oil will be generated by Stanton Unit A

4453operation. Three processes generate waste oil: combustion

4460turbine cleaning, false starts of the combustion turbines, and

4469oil/water separator operation. This waste oil is hauled off-site

4478as needed by a licensed contractor for ultimate disposal.

4487Surface Water Hydrology and Water Quality Impacts

449453. The Stanton Unit A project is designed to be a zero

4506discharge facility for industrial wastes. Stanton Unit A will

4515use a mechanical draft cooling tower; makeup water will come from

4526the existing Makeup Water Supply Storage Pond, which receives

4535treated effluent from the Orange County Easterly Water

4543Reclamation Facility. Stanton Unit A will require an additional

45522.91 million gallons of treated wastewater per day for water lost

4563due to evaporation and drift and for blowdown. Cooling tower

4573blowdown will be directed to and treated in a cooling tower

4584blowdown treatment system.

458754. There are no sizeable surface water bodies on the

4597Stanton Energy Center site. Small segments of the Cowpen Branch

4607and the Hart Branch extend into the site; however, these small

4618streams are within the buffer zone on the site that will not be

4631affected by construction activities. Runoff from the

4638construction area will be contained in a collection basin.

464755. Construction of Stanton Unit A will have no significant

4657impact on the Cowpen Branch, the Hart Branch, or on-site

4667wetlands. Site preparation for construction of the proposed Unit

4676A facilities will occur in an area that was used for construction

4688laydown for Stanton Unit 2 construction.

469456. The Stanton Unit A storm water drainage system was

4704designed to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local

4714regulations regarding discharge into surface waters. Runoff from

4722areas not disturbed by construction or operations will be

4731directed to natural drainage systems within the area. Runoff

4740from disturbed areas will be directed to a drainage system and

4751then routed to the stormwater pond north of the Stanton Unit A

4763location.

4764Groundwater Hydrology and Impacts from Water Withdrawal

477157. During construction, dewatering will be necessary for

4779construction of heavy equipment foundations, underground

4785utilities, circulating water lines, and miscellaneous pits and

4793sumps. Dewatering activity is expected to last no more than 120

4804days with total withdrawal of less than 1 mgd. Discharge from

4815dewatering activities will be sent to the Stanton Unit A storm

4826water pond. The dewatering effects will be temporary and limited

4836to the power block area. The groundwater system will return to

4847its original state after completion of the dewatering. The

4856proposed Stanton Unit A Project will not cause any saltwater

4866intrusion in the area.

487058. The Stanton Energy Center currently uses groundwater

4878withdrawn from two 850 gallon per minute (" gpm") Floridan Aquifer

4890wells. Stanton Units 1 and 2 are currently authorized to use

4901approximately 2 million gpd of groundwater.

490759. In lieu of using additional groundwater for Stanton

4916Unit A, the Applicants have agreed to diligently and in good

4927faith pursue an agreement with Orange County to transfer up to

49388.0 million gallons per day of surface water (including

4947stormwater /surficial groundwater) from the adjacent Orange County

4955Landfill property for use at the Stanton Energy Center facility.

4965Ecological Resources

496760. The Stanton Energy Center occupies 3,280 acres.

4976Stanton Units 1 and 2 currently occupy approximately 310 acres of

4987land and approximately 1,100 acres have been scheduled for power

4998development.

499961. The Stanton Unit A facilities will be constructed on

5009the same area used for construction equipment/materials laydown

5017during construction of Stanton Units 1 and 2; the area was, thus,

5029previously disturbed. This 60-acre area is generally maintained

5037grassland, but will be cleared and grubbed for construction of

5047Stanton Unit A.

505062. The proposed new transmission line will connect Stanton

5059Unit A with OUC’s existing Stanton Energy Center Substation

5068No. 17. The land between Stanton Unit A and Sub station No. 17 is

5082mostly undeveloped/native area dominated by pine flatwoods and

5090cypress wetland vegetative communities. In addition to the

5098undeveloped/native area, there is an access road that was once

5108used as an alternative route to the Stanton Energy Center. The

5119surface water bodies crossed by the transmission line corridor

5128are limited to an artificial surface water (borrow ditch) and

5138isolated cypress strand and herbaceous wetland. The anticipated

5146impacts on these water bodies were minimized to the extent

5156practicable by the siting of the corridor. Approximately 0.57

5165acres of jurisdictional wetlands will be impacted. An

5173Environmental Resource Permit application has been submitted to

5181the United States Army Corps of Engineers for construction of the

5192transmission line.

519463. The Stanton Energy Center, including the proposed

5202Stanton Unit A, will not discharge effluent from the site into

5213surface waters; no impacts to aquatic life from such discharge

5223are, therefore, expected.

522664. A review of potential impacts to threatened and

5235endangered species was conducted based on habitat types that

5244occur at the Stanton Energy Center. Lists of threatened and

5254endangered species obtained from the United States Fish and

5263Wildlife Service and from the Florida Fish and Wildlife

5272Conservation Commission (" FFWCC") were reviewed and field surveys

5282were conducted. No critical habitat for federally listed species

5291occurs on Stanton Energy Center property. Protected species that

5300are known to occur on Stanton Energy Center property include the

5311eastern indigo snake, the gopher tortoise, the Florida pine

5320snake, the Florida scrub jay, the Kirtland's warbler, the

5329American kestrel, the bald eagle, the fox squirrel, the black

5339bear, and the red- cockaded woodpecker. Monitoring of the red-

5349cockaded woodpecker is required by the Conditions of

5357Certification for Stanton Units 1 and 2 and will also be

5368performed for Stanton Unit A.

537365. Site preparation will not permanently impact wildlife

5381habitat. However, wildlife species may be temporarily displaced

5389from adjacent communities by the noise, fugitive dust, and

5398activity associated with construction.

5402Impacts from Flooding and Hurricanes

540766. The 100-year flood elevations on the Stanton Energy

5416Center property vary from approximately 60 feet mean sea level

5426(" MSL") at the northeast corner of the property to approximately

543890 feet MSL at the southwest corner. All Stanton Unit A

5449facilities will be located above the 100-year flood elevation.

5458Noise Impacts

546067. Noise emissions attributable to constructio n activities

5468are highly variable, depending upon the location and operating

5477load of the construction equipment. Noise emissions during site

5486clearing and preparation will be dominated by diesel engine

5495noise. Site clearing and facility start-up will generally result

5504in minimal noise emissions. The one significant noise emission

5513associated with facility start-up will be steam blowout of the

5523HRSG and steam lines. Construction activities will be scheduled

5532during daytime and evening periods (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) to

5543the fullest extent possible. Any nighttime construction will be

5552limited to low noise activities as much as possible.

556168. Noise emissions are regulated under Chapter 15, Article

5570V, of the Orange County Code. The predicted A-weighted noise

5580emissions will satisfy the code criteria at the nearest

5589residential locations.

5591Traffic

559269. All roadways serving the construction and operational

5600traffic of Stanton Energy Center have adequate capacity to handle

5610the increase in traffic generated by construction and operation

5619of Stanton Unit A. A new paved "loop" road will be constructed

5631around the Stanton Unit A generation building and connected to

5641the Stanton Energy Center road system. During Stanton Unit A

5651construction, there will be some traffic congestion. However,

5659this impact will be temporary and will not have a lasting,

5670significant adverse impact on the existing levels of service on

5680affected local roads or highways. To lessen the impact of the

5691construction traffic congestion, OUC will encourage

5697transportation demand management techniques to reduce the number

5705of temporary, construction-related vehicle trips on the road

5713networks.

571470. Since construction of Stanton Unit A is expected to

5724have no greater impacts than those resulting from construction of

5734Stanton Units 1 or 2, no additional improvements to roadways or

5745traffic control systems are deemed necessary.

5751Consistency with the Local Comprehensive Plans

5757and Land Development Codes

576171. The Stanton Energy Center was initially certified by

5770the Siting Board on December 15, 1982 for an ultimate site

5781capacity of 2,000 MW. Stanton Unit A is consistent with the

5793ultimate certification and the applicable zoning and land use

5802plans of Orange County. As a result, no land use hearing was

5814required for the Stanton Unit A Project because the previously

5824certified ultimate site capacity will not be exceeded and the

5834land required for the construction and operation of Stanton Unit

5844A is within the boundaries of the previously certified site.

5854Therefore, t he Stanton Energy Center is consistent and in

5864compliance with the applicable sections of the Orange County

5873Comprehensive Plan, the East Central Florida Regional Planning

5881Council Interim Strategic Regional Policy Plan, the State

5889Comprehensive Plan , and the applicable local land use and zoning

5899ordinances.

5900Solid Waste

590272. Solid waste collection and disposal services at the

5911Stanton Energy Center will be coordinated with the appropriate

5920contractors to assure that all applicable regulations are met.

5929Public Services

593173. Public services such as police, fire, and emergency

5940medical services are available and sufficient to meet the needs

5950of Stanton Energy Center.

5954Variances

595574. Orange County will require no variances for operation

5964of the Stanton Unit A and its associated facilities.

5973Agency Positions and Stipulations

597775. In testimony entered at the certification hearing, the

5986DEP, through its expert witness, Hamilton S. Oven, rendered an

5996opinion that the Stanton Unit A Project would comply with all

6007applicable DEP statutes, rules, policies and criteria including,

6015but not limited to, those concerning air quality, water quality,

6025stormwater, wetlands, solid waste, industrial wastewater and

6032domestic wastewater, if the facility is built and operated in

6042accordance with the Department's Conditions of Certification

6049contained in DEP-2. Furthermore, Mr. Oven rendered an opinion

6058that the Stanton Unit A Project can comply with the Conditions of

6070Certification in DEP-2 and recommended that the Stanton Unit A

6080Project be approved.

608376. In testimony entered at the certification hearing, the

6092SJRWMD, through its expert witness, James J. Hollingshead,

6100rendered an opinion that the Stanton Unit A Project meets all the

6112standards, rules, and policies of SJRWMD applicable to the

6121Stanton Unit A Project, including compliance with the SJRWMD's

6130reasonable, beneficial use criteria. Accordingly, SJRWMD's staff

6137and the governing board of the SJRWMD recommend certification and

6147approval of the Stanton Unit A Project.

615477. The DEP, DOT, Department of Community Affairs (" DCA"),

6165FFWCC, Orange County, and the SJRWMD have recommended

6173certification of the proposed Stanton Unit A Project, including

6182its associated facilities, subject to recommended Conditions of

6190Certification. Those recommended Conditions of Certification are

6197attached to the DEP Staff Analysis Report as Appendix 1.

620778. The East Central Florida Regional Planning Council

6215(" ECFRPC") determined that use of the site for this industrial

6227use is consistent with the ECFRPC's Strategic Regional Policy

6236Plan. No state, regional, or local agency recommended denial of

6246certification.

6247CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

625079. The Division of Administrative Hearings has

6257jurisdiction over the parties to, and the subject matter of, this

6268proceeding. The proceeding was conducted in accordance with

6276Chapter 403.501-518, Part II, Florida Statutes, the "Florida

6284Electrical Power Plant Siting Act," and Chapter 62-17, Florida

6293Administrative Code.

629580. In accordance with Chapters 120 and 403, Florida

6304Statutes, and Chapter 62-17, Florida Administrative Code, proper

6312notice was accorded to all persons, entities, and parties

6321entitled thereto; notice also was provided to the general public.

6331All necessary and required governmental agencies participated in

6339the certification process. Reports and studies were issued by

6348the DEP, DCA , DOT, SJRWMD, South Florida Water Management

6357District (" SFWMD "), ECFRPC , FFWCC , and Orange County, in

6367accordance with their various statutory charges.

637381. The PSC has certified the need for the electrical

6383generating capacity, nominally 633 MW, to be supplied by Stanton

6393Unit A as required by Sections 403.508 and 403.519, Florida

6403Statutes.

640482. Preponderant evidence produced by OUC, KUA , FMPA , and

6413Southern-Florida in their SSCA , in their pre-filed testimony, in

6422the Joint Stipulation Between the Parties, in the Amended Joint

6432Stipulation Between the Parties, and at the certification hearing

6441demonstrates that the Applicants have met their burden of proving

6451that the proposed Stanton Unit A and its associated facilities

6461should be granted certification as described more particularly

6469herein.

647083. Preponderant evidence produced in their SSCA , in their

6479pre-filed testimony, in the Joint Stipulation Between the

6487Parties, in the Amended Joint Stipulation Between the Parties,

6496and at the hearing demonstrates that the construction and

6505operational safeguards for Stanton Unit A are technically

6513sufficient for the welfare and protection of citizens and are

6523reasonable and available methods to achieve that protection.

6531Stanton Unit A and associated facilities, if constructed,

6539maintained, and operated in accordance with the conditions and

6548parameters recommended and found herein and in the attached

6557Conditions of Certification, will result in minimal environmental

6565impacts compared to the benefits of the new combined cycle unit.

6576Such measures will minimize adverse effects on human health, the

6586environment, the ecology of the land and its wildlife, and the

6597ecology of state waters and their aquatic wildlife through the

6607use of reasonable and available methods. Certification of the

6616construction and operation of Stanton Unit A is consistent with

6626the goal of abundant, low-cost energy and will effect a

6636reasonable balance between minimal environmental impacts and an

6644already determined need for Unit A at the Stanton Energy Center.

665584. The proposed Stanton Unit A and its associated

6664facilities, if constructed and operated in accordance with the

6673findings and conclusions herein and in the recommended Conditions

6682of Certification, will be consistent and in compliance with the

6692State Comprehensive Plan and the Orange County Comprehensive

6700Plan.

6701RECOMMENDATION

6702Having considered the foregoing, it is, therefore,

6709RECOMMENDED that the Orlando Utilities Commission, Kissimmee

6716Utility Authority, Florida Municipal Power Agency, and Southern-

6724Florida, LLC , be granted certification, pursuant to Chapter 403,

6733Part II, Florida Statutes, for the location, construction, and

6742operation of proposed Stanton Unit A and its associated

6751facilities, as described in the Supplemental Site Certification

6759Application and as modified by the preponderant evidence of

6768record supportive of the above findings of fact and conclusions

6778of law, and in accordance with the Conditions of Certification,

6788which are incorporated herein and made a part hereof by

6798reference.

6799DONE AND ENTERED this 23rd day of July, 2001, in

6809Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

6813___________________________________

6814CHARLES A. STAMPELOS

6817Administrative Law Judge

6820Division of Administrative Hearings

6824The DeSoto Building

68271230 Apalachee Parkway

6830Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

6833(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

6837Fax Filing (850) 921-6847

6841www.doah.state.fl.us

6842Filed with the Clerk of the

6848Division of Administrative Hearings

6852this 23rd day of July, 2001.

6858COPIES FURNISHED:

6860Tasha O'Dell Buford, Esquire

6864Young, van Assenderp,

6867Varnadoe & Anderson, P.A.

6871225 South Adams Street, Suite 200

6877Post Office Box 1833

6881Tallahassee, Florida 32302-1833

6884Preston T. Robertson, Esquire

6888Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission

6893620 South Meridian Street, Room 108

6899Bryant Building

6901Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1600

6904Cathy Beddell, Esquire

6907Public Service Commission

69102540 Shumard Oak Boulevard

6914Tallahassee, Florida 32399

6917Lawrence N. Curtin, Esquire

6921Holland & Knight, LLP

6925315 South Calhoun Street

6929Post Office Box 810

6933Tallahassee, Florida 32302-0810

6936Ruth A. Holmes, Esquire

6940South Florida Water Management District

69453301 Gun Club Road

6949West Palm Beach, Florida 33416

6954Scott A. Goorland, Esquire

6958Department of Environmental Protection

69623900 Commonwealth Boulevard

6965The Douglas Building, Mail Station 35

6971Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000

6974Charles Lee, Sr., Vice President

6979Florida Audubon Society

69821331 Palmetto Avenue, Suite 110

6987Winter Park, Florida 32789

6991Kris H. Davis, Esquire

6995Charles A. Lobdell, III, Esquire

7000St. Johns River Water Management District

7006Post Office Box 1429

7010Palatka, Florida 32178-1429

7013Andrew S. Grayson, Esquire

7017Department of Community Affairs

70212555 Shumard Oak Boulevard

7025Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100

7028Thomas B. Tart, Esquire

7032Orlando Utilities Commission

7035500 South Orange Avenue

7039Orlando, Florida 32801

7042Anthony J. Cotter, Esquire

7046Orange County Attorney's Office

7050201 South Rosalind Avenue, Third Floor

7056Post Office Box 1353

7060Orlando, Florida 32801

7063Sheauching Yu, Esquire

7066Department of Transportation

7069605 Suwannee Street

7072Hayden Burns Building, Mail Station 58

7078Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0458

7081Greg Golgowski, Acting Executive Director

7086East Central Florida Regional

7090Planning Council

7092631 North Wymore Road, Suite 100

7098Maitland, Florida 32751

7101Frederick M. Bryant, Esquire

7105Florida Municipal Power Agency

71092061-2 Delta Way

7112Tallahassee, Florida 32303

7115John J. Fumero, Esquire

7119South Florida Water Management District

71243301 Gun Club Road

7128West Palm Beach, Florida 33416

7133Katherine Manella, Esquire

7136St. Johns River Water Management District

7142Post Office Box 1429

7146Palatka, Florida 32178-1429

7149Hamilton S. Oven

7152Department of Environmental Protection

71562600 Blair Stone Road, Mail Station 48

7163Tallahassee, Florida 32399

7166Kathy C. Carter, Agency Clerk

7171Department of Environmental Protection

71753900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35

7181Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000

7184Teri L. Donaldson, General Counsel

7189Department of Environmental Protection

71933900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35

7199Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000

7202NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

7208All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15

7219days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to

7230this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will

7241issue the Final Order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
PDF:
Date: 09/26/2001
Proceedings: Final Order of Certification filed.
PDF:
Date: 09/18/2001
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 08/10/2001
Proceedings: Waiver of Time Frames for Filing Exceptions (filed by A. Grayson via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 08/09/2001
Proceedings: Waiver of Time Frames for Filing Exceptions filed by A. Cotter
PDF:
Date: 08/07/2001
Proceedings: Notice and Waiver of Time for Filing Exceptions filed by P. Robertson
PDF:
Date: 08/06/2001
Proceedings: Waiver of Time Frames for Filing Exceptions (filed by SFWMD via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 07/31/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Waiver of Time to File Written Exceptions (filed by FPSC via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 07/23/2001
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 07/23/2001
Proceedings: Recommended Order issued (hearing held June 26, 2001) CASE CLOSED.
PDF:
Date: 07/23/2001
Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
PDF:
Date: 07/17/2001
Proceedings: Applicants` Notice of Filing Proposed Recommended Order; Jointly Filed Proposed Recommended Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 07/11/2001
Proceedings: Letter to Judge Stampelos from A. Cotter (regarding status of joint amended stipulation between the parties; memorandum of agreement between Orange County and Orlando Utilities Comission-Curtis H. Stauton Energy Center Combined Cycle Unit A Power Plant Sitting Application) filed via facsimile.
PDF:
Date: 07/09/2001
Proceedings: Letter to Judge Stampelos from T. Buford (enclosing substitute page 3 of the Amended Joint Stipulation Between the Parties) filed.
PDF:
Date: 07/09/2001
Proceedings: Amended Joint Stipulation Between the Parties filed.
Date: 07/09/2001
Proceedings: Transcript filed.
PDF:
Date: 07/09/2001
Proceedings: Applicants` Notice of Filing Hearing Transcript filed.
Date: 06/26/2001
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
PDF:
Date: 06/21/2001
Proceedings: Exhibits (to Pre-filed Testimony) filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/20/2001
Proceedings: Letter to H. Oven from J. Soltys dated June 18, 2001(regarding Orlando Utilities Commission, Supplemental Site Certification Application, and Stanton Energy Center Combined Cycle Unit A) filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/20/2001
Proceedings: Letter to H. Oven from J. Soltys dated June 20, 2001(regarding Orlando Utilities Commission, Supplemental Site Certification Application, and Stanton Energy Center Combined Cycle Unit A) filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/20/2001
Proceedings: List of Exhibits filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/20/2001
Proceedings: Letter to A. Cotter from T. Tart (Memorandum of Agreement) filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/20/2001
Proceedings: Prefiled Direct Testimony of Andrew G. Burr filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/20/2001
Proceedings: Applicants` Notice of Submission of Written Testimony filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/20/2001
Proceedings: (Proposed) Joint Stipulation between the Parties filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/20/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Sufficiency of Power Plant Sitting Supplemental Application filed by Department of Environmental Protection.
Date: 05/25/2001
Proceedings: Electric Power Plant Site Certification Staff Analysis Report filed by Department of Environmental Protection.
PDF:
Date: 05/25/2001
Proceedings: Department of Environmental Protection`s Notice of Filing of Written Analysis filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/11/2001
Proceedings: Order issued (the Motion for Alteration of Time Limits is granted, the altered time limits recited in the Motion are approved)
PDF:
Date: 05/11/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for June 26, 2001; 9:30 a.m.; Orlando, FL).
PDF:
Date: 05/10/2001
Proceedings: Second Joint Stipulation and Motion for Alteration of Time Limits (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 05/07/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by P. Robertson.
PDF:
Date: 04/30/2001
Proceedings: Order issued (the Motion for Alteration of Time Limit is granted).
PDF:
Date: 04/26/2001
Proceedings: Joint Stipulation and Motion for Alteration of Time Limit filed.
PDF:
Date: 03/20/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Appearance (filed by R. Holmes via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 03/13/2001
Proceedings: Letter to Judge Stampelos from T. Buford regarding Certificate of Publication; Letter to Orlando Utilities Commission from M. Eri regarding confirmation filed.
PDF:
Date: 03/13/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Department of Environmental Protection`s Determination of Insufficiency filed.
PDF:
Date: 03/01/2001
Proceedings: Department of Transportation`s Notice of Intent to Be a Party filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/20/2001
Proceedings: Orange County Florida`s Notice of Intent to be a Party filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/15/2001
Proceedings: Order issued (the Department of Environmental Protection`s Preliminary Schedule of Significant Dates (Exhibit "A"), is hereby adopted).
PDF:
Date: 02/15/2001
Proceedings: Fish and Wildlife Conservation commission Notice of Intent to be a Party filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/13/2001
Proceedings: Department of Environmental Protection`s Preliminary Schedule of Significant Dates (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 02/12/2001
Proceedings: St. Johns River Water Management District`s Response to Initial Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/12/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Appearance (filed by K. Davis).
PDF:
Date: 02/12/2001
Proceedings: St. Johns River Water Management District`s Notice of Intent to be a Party filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/12/2001
Proceedings: Response to Initial Order filed by Orange County.
PDF:
Date: 02/09/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Appearance (A. Cotter) filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/09/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Filing Site Certification Application filed by S. Goorland.
PDF:
Date: 02/09/2001
Proceedings: Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/09/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Filing List of Affected Agencies filed by S. Goorland.
PDF:
Date: 02/05/2001
Proceedings: Order issued (the Motion to Change Case Style is Granted).
PDF:
Date: 02/05/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Completeness of Power Plant Siting Supplemental Application (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 02/02/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Appearance (filed by L. Curtin via facsimile).
Date: 02/02/2001
Proceedings: Department of Environmental Protection`s Motion to Change Case Style and Notice of Corrected Certificate of Service filed.
PDF:
Date: 01/30/2001
Proceedings: Initial Order issued.
PDF:
Date: 01/30/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Receipt of Power Plant Siting Application and Request for Assignment of Administrative Law Judge filed.

Case Information

Judge:
CHARLES A. STAMPELOS
Date Filed:
11/01/2000
Date Assignment:
01/30/2001
Last Docket Entry:
09/26/2001
Location:
Orlando, Florida
District:
Middle
Agency:
ADOPTED IN TOTO
Suffix:
EPP
 

Counsels

Related Florida Statute(s) (6):

Related Florida Rule(s) (2):