08-002710
Department Of Business And Professional Regulation, Division Of Hotels And Restaurants vs.
Brisas Del Yunque
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, September 5, 2008.
Recommended Order on Friday, September 5, 2008.
1STATE OF FLORIDA
4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
8DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND )
13PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, )
16DIVISION OF HOTELS AND )
21RESTAURANTS, )
23)
24Petitioner, )
26)
27vs. ) Case No. 08-2710
32)
33BRISAS DEL YUNQUE, )
37)
38Respondent. )
40)
41RECOMMENDED ORDER
43On July 29, 2008, an administrative hearing in this case
53was held by video teleconference between Tallahassee and
61Orlando, Florida, before William F. Quattlebaum, Administrative
68Law Judge, Division of Administrative Hearings.
74APPEARANCES
75For Petitioner: Ethan Chase Bender,
80Qualified Representative
82Department of Business and
86Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street
92Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202
95For Respondent: Tomas Lopez, pro se
101Brisas del Yunque
10429 South Semoran Boulevard
108Orlando, Florida 32807
111STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES
115The issues in the case are whether the allegations of the
126Administrative Complaint are correct, and, if so, what penalty
135should be imposed.
138PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
140By Administrative Complaint dated February 8, 2008, the
148Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of
156Hotels and Restaurants (Petitioner), alleges that Brisas Del
164Yunque (Respondent), a restaurant owned by Tomas Lopez, was
173found to be in violation of food safety regulations related to
184training of food service employees and to cleaning of microwave
194ovens. 1
196Mr. Lopez disputed the allegations and requested a formal
205administrative hearing. The Petitioner forwarded the matter to
213the Division of Administrative Hearings, which scheduled and
221conducted the formal hearing.
225At the hearing, the Petitioner presented the testimony of
234one witnesses and had Exhibits 1 through 3 admitted into
244evidence. Mr. Lopez testified on behalf of the Respondent.
253The Transcript of the hearing was filed on August 14, 2008.
264The Petitioner filed a Proposed Recommended Order on August 20,
2742008.
275FINDINGS OF FACT
2781. The Petitioner is the state agency charged with
287regulation of hotels and restaurants pursuant to Chapter 509,
296Florida Statutes (2007).
2992. At all times material to this case, the Respondent was
310a restaurant holding Food Service license number 5803705 and
319operating at 29 South Semoran Boulevard, Orlando, Florida 32807.
3283. On October 23, 2007, Alphonso Rullan, a sanitation
337safety specialist employed by the Petitioner, performed a
345routine inspection of the Respondent at which time there were
355employees engaged in food preparation.
3604. At the time of the October 23 inspection, the
370Respondent was unable to provide any evidence that the employees
380had received training in food safety protection.
3875. Mr. Rullan also observed during the October 23
396inspection that the interior of the microwave oven was soiled
406with crusted food material indicating that the oven was not
416being routinely cleaned at least every 24 hours.
4246. Mr. Rullan noted the deficiencies in an inspection
433report, a copy of which was provided to the manager, who was
445identified as "Victor Montenegro."
4497. On January 11, 2008, Mr. Rullan returned to the
459Respondent to perform a call back inspection, during which the
469Respondent was still unable to provide evidence that employees
478had received training in food safety protection. Mr. Rullan
487again observed that the microwave oven was soiled with crusted
497food material indicating that the oven was not being cleaned at
508least every 24 hours. The deficiencies were cited in an
518inspection report which was provided to Mr. Lopez at the time of
530the inspection.
5328. On February 8, 2008, the Petitioner issued an
541Administrative Complaint against the Respondent for failure to
549correct the deficiencies cited herein.
554CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
5579. The Division of Administrative Hearings has
564jurisdiction over the parties to and the subject matter of this
575proceeding. § 120.57, Fla. Stat. (2008).
58110. The Petitioner is the state agency charged with the
591regulation of food service establishments in the State of
600Florida. See Ch. 509, Fla. Stat. (2007). The Petitioner has
610adopted by incorporation the various provisions of the Food Code
620referenced herein. Fla. Admin. Code R. 61C-4.010(1). The
628Petitioner has the burden of proving by clear and convincing
638evidence the allegations set forth in the Administrative
646Complaint against the Respondent. Department of Banking and
654Finance v. Osborne Stern and Company , 670 So. 2d 932 (Fla.
6651996); Ferris v. Turlington , 510 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 1987). In
676this case, the burden has been met.
68311. The Administrative Complaint charged the Respondent
690with a violation of Subsection 509.049(5), Florida Statutes
698(2007), which provides as follows:
703It shall be the duty of each public food
712service establishment to provide training in
718accordance with the described rule to all
725food service employees of the public food
732service establishment. The public food
737service establishment may designate any
742certified food service manager to perform
748this function. Food service employees must
754receive certification within 60 days after
760employment. Certification pursuant to this
765section shall remain valid for 3 years. All
773public food service establishments must
778provide the division with proof of employee
785training upon request, including, but not
791limited to, at the time of any division
799inspection of the establishment. Proof of
805training for each food service employee
811shall include the name of the trained
818employee, the date of birth of the trained
826employee, the date the training occurred,
832and the approved food safety training
838program used.
84012. The evidence establishes that at the time of both the
851initial and the call back inspections, the Respondent failed to
861provide evidence that food service employees had received the
870required food safety training.
87413. The Administrative Complaint also charged the
881Respondent with a violation of Food Code Rule 4-602.12(b), which
891provides as follows:
894The cavities and door seals of microwave
901ovens shall be cleaned at least every
90824 hours by using the manufacturer's
914recommended cleaning procedure.
91714. The evidence establishes that at the time of both the
928initial and the call back inspections, observation of the
937microwave oven indicated that the cavities and door seals were
947not being cleaned in compliance with the rule.
95515. Subsection 509.261(1), Florida Statutes (2007),
961provides that each violation is treated as a separate offense
971and that each offense is punishable by a fine not to exceed
983$1,000 per offense. In addition, offenses may be disciplined by
994required attendance at an educational program sponsored by the
1003Hospitality Education Program, or by suspension, revocation, or
1011refusal of a license.
101516. The Petitioner's Proposed Recommended Order recommends
1022imposition of a total fine of $1,000 in this case. There is no
1036evidence that the penalty sought by the Petitioner is
1045inappropriate according to the range set forth in the statute.
1055RECOMMENDATION
1056Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
1066Law, it is RECOMMENDED that the Department of Business and
1076Professional Regulation enter a final order imposing a fine of
1086$1,000 against the Respondent and requiring the Respondent to
1096complete an appropriate educational program related to the
1104violations identified herein.
1107DONE AND ENTERED this 5th day of September, 2008, in
1117Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
1121S
1122WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM
1125Administrative Law Judge
1128Division of Administrative Hearings
1132The DeSoto Building
11351230 Apalachee Parkway
1138Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
1141(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675
1145Fax Filing (850) 921-6847
1149www.doah.state.fl.us
1150Filed with the Clerk of the
1156Division of Administrative Hearings
1160this 5th day of September, 2008.
1166ENDNOTE
11671/ Additionally, the Administrative Complaint included an
1174allegation related to an "uncovered electrical box behind the
1183cook's line," but the Petitioner withdrew the allegation at the
1193commencement of the hearing and offered no evidence related
1202thereto.
1203COPIES FURNISHED :
1206Ethan Chase Bender
1209Department of Business and
1213Professional Regulation
12151940 North Monroe Street
1219Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202
1222Tomas Lopez
1224Brisas del Yunque
122729 South Semoran Boulevard
1231Orlando, Florida 32807
1234Ned Luczynski, General Counsel
1238Department of Business and
1242Professional Regulation
1244Northwood Centre
12461940 North Monroe Street
1250Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792
1253William L. Veach, Director
1257Division of Hotels and Restaurants
1262Department of Business and
1266Professional Regulation
1268Northwood Centre
12701940 North Monroe Street
1274Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792
1277NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
1283All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within
129315 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions
1304to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that
1315will issue the Final Order in this case.
- Date
- Proceedings
- PDF:
- Date: 09/05/2008
- Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
- Date: 08/14/2008
- Proceedings: Transcript filed.
- Date: 07/29/2008
- Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Case Information
- Judge:
- WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM
- Date Filed:
- 06/06/2008
- Date Assignment:
- 06/09/2008
- Last Docket Entry:
- 10/20/2008
- Location:
- Orlando, Florida
- District:
- Middle
- Agency:
- ADOPTED IN TOTO
Counsels
-
Ethan Chase Bender
Address of Record -
Tomas Lopez
Address of Record -
Charles F. Tunnicliff, Esquire
Address of Record