12-002859TTS
Broward County School Board vs.
Rhea Cohen
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Monday, July 15, 2013.
Recommended Order on Monday, July 15, 2013.
1STATE OF FLORIDA
4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
8BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,
12Petitioner,
13vs.
14Case No. 12-2859TTS
17RHEA COHEN,
19Respondent.
20PAM STEWART, AS COMMISSIONER OF
25EDUCATION,
26Petitioner,
27vs.
28RHEA PLAUT COHEN, Case No. 13-0704PL
34Respondent.
35/
36RECOMMENDED ORDER
38Pursuant to notice, a formal administrative hearing was
46conducted in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on May 9, 2013, before
56Administrative Law Judge Claude B. Arrington of the Division of
66Administrative Hearings (DOAH).
69APPEARANCES
70For Petitioners: Charles T. Whitelock, Esquire
76Charles T. Whitelock, P.A.
80Suite E
82300 Southeast 13th Street
86Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316
90For Respondent: Robert F. McKee, Esquire
96Kelly and McKee
99Post Office Box 75638
103Tampa, Florida 33675
106STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES
110As to DOAH Case No. 12-2859TTS, whether Rhea Cohen
119(Respondent), a classroom teacher, committed the acts alleged in
128the Amended Administrative Complaint filed by Robert Runcie, as
137Superintendent of the Broward County Schools (Superintendent)
144and, if so, the discipline that should be imposed against
154Respondents employment.
156As to DOAH Case No. 13-0704PL, whether Respondent committed
165the acts alleged in the Administrative Complaint filed by Pam
175Stewart, as Commissioner of Education (Commissioner) and, if so,
184the discipline that should be imposed against Respondents
192teachers certificate.
194PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
196This is a consolidated proceeding pertaining to factual
204allegations relating to Respondents treatment of students. The
212Superintendent seeks to terminate Respondents employment in
219Case No. 12-2859TTS, and the Commissioner seeks to discipline
228Respondents teachers certificate in Case No. 13-0704PL.
235As will be discussed in the Conclusions of Law section,
245there are two different standards of proof. The Superintendent
254must prove his case by a preponderance of the evidence. The
265Commissioner must prove her case by clear and convincing
274evidence.
275All findings of fact set forth herein have been established
285by clear and convincing evidence. No factual dispute has turned
295on differences between the two standards.
301Separate discussions as to the School Boards case and the
311Commissioners case are set forth in the Conclusions of Law
321section. Separate recommendations have also been made.
328At the times relevant to this proceeding, Respondent was
337employed by the Broward County School Board (School Board) as an
348Exceptional Student Education (ESE) teacher at Crystal Lake
356Middle School (Crystal Lake). At its regularly scheduled meeting
365on August 7, 2012, the School Board took action to suspend
376Respondents employment without pay and institute proceedings to
384terminate her employment. Respondent timely challenged the
391School Boards action. The matter was referred to DOAH, where it
402was assigned DOAH Case No. 12-2859TTS.
408On December 10, 2012, the Superintendent filed Petitioners
416Motion to Amend Administrative Complaint, which the undersigned
425granted on December 11. The Amended Administrative Complaint,
433dated December 7, alleged certain facts pertaining to
441Respondents treatment of students and, based on those facts,
450alleged in three separate counts that Respondent was guilty of
460(I) immorality, (II) misconduct in office, and (III) moral
469turpitude. The Superintendent relied on the following in
477bringing these charges: sections 1001.51, 1012.27(5), and
4841012.33, Florida Statutes, and Forida Administrative Code
491Rule 6B-4.009(2), (3) and (6). 1/
497By Administrative Complaint dated November 30, 2012, the
505Commissioner alleged certain facts pertaining to Respondents
512treatment of students and, based on those facts, alleged that
522Respondent was guilty of: (Count 1) gross immorality or an act
533involving moral turpitude in violation of section 1012.795(1)(d);
541(Count 2) personal conduct which seriously reduced her
549effectiveness as an employee of the school board in violation of
560section 1012.795(1)(g); (Count 3) violating the Principles of
568Professional Conduct for the Education Profession prescribed by
576State Board of Education rules in violation of
584section 1022.795(1)(j); (Count 4) failing to make reasonable
592effort to protect the student from conditions harmful to learning
602and/or to the students mental health and/physical health and/or
611safety in violation of rule 6A-10.081(3)(a) 2/ ; (Count 5)
620intentionally exposing a student to unnecessary embarrassment or
628harassing or discriminating against a student on the basis of
638race, color, religion, sexual orientation, or social and family
647background in violation of rule 6A-10.081(3)(g).
653Respondent timely challenged the allegations of the
660Commissioners Administrative Complaint. The matter was referred
667to DOAH, where it was assigned DOAH Case No. 13-0704PL.
677On March 13, 2013, the parties filed their Joint Motion to
688Consolidate, which the undersigned granted by order entered on
697March 13.
699At the final hearing, Petitioners presented the testimony of
708Kimberly Sorren (a former ESE teaching intern 3/ at Crystal Lake),
719Donna Taylor Rollins (ESE paraprofessional), Lisa Phillips (ESE
727paraprofessional), Ray Montalbano (ESE teacher), Darlene Hudson
734(guidance director), and Sabine Phillips (principal). With the
742exception of Ms. Sorren, all of Petitioners witnesses were
751employed at Crystal Lake at the times relevant to these
761proceedings and at the time of the formal hearing. Petitioners
771entered into evidence 12 pre-marked exhibits pursuant to
779stipulation.
780Respondent testified on her own behalf, but offered no other
790testimony and no exhibits.
794A Transcript of the proceedings, consisting of one volume,
803was filed on May 23, 2013. The deadline for the filing of
815Proposed Recommended Orders was extended on an unopposed motion
824filed by Respondent. Thereafter, the parties timely filed
832Proposed Recommended Orders, which have been duly considered by
841the undersigned in the preparation of this Recommended Order.
850Unless otherwise noted, all statutory references are to
858Florida Statutes (2012), and all references to rules are to the
869version thereof in effect as of the entry of this Recommended
880Order.
881FINDINGS OF FACT
8841. At all times material hereto, the School Board has been
895the constitutional entity authorized to operate, control, and
903supervise the public schools in Broward County, Florida; and
912Robert Runcie was Superintendent of Schools.
9182. At all times material hereto, the Commissioner has been
928the head of the state agency responsible for certifying and
938regulating public school teachers in the State of Florida; and
948Pam Stewart was the Commissioner.
9533. Respondent has been employed by the School Board since
9632002 and holds a Professional Services Contract, issued in
972accordance with section 1012.33(3)(a). During the time relevant
980to this proceeding, Respondent was an ESE classroom teacher at
990Crystal Lake.
9924. During the 2007-2008 school year, Respondent was
1000employed as an ESE classroom teacher at Atlantic West Elementary
1010School teaching students on the autism spectrum. During that
1019school year, the Education Practices Commission (EPC) reprimanded
1027Respondent for sleeping in class while students were present and
1037for using restraints inappropriately to control or manage
1045autistic and exceptional student education students. The EPC
1053imposed an administrative fine against her in the amount of
1063$500.00. Thereafter, Respondent transferred to Crystal Lake.
10705. Respondent taught ESE students at Crystal Lake for the
10802010-2011 and 2011-2012 school years. The events at issue in
1090this proceeding occurred during either the 2010-2011 school year
1099or the 2011-2012 school year. Exact dates were available for
1109some of the events, but unavailable for other events.
11186. Respondents classroom at Crystal Lake for those two
1127school years was divided into two halves, separated by tables and
1138rolling chalkboards that did not form a solid wall.
11477. For the 2010-2011 school year, Respondent taught her
1156class of ESE students on one side of the divided classroom and a
1169Ms. Knighton taught on the other side.
11768. For the 2011-2012 school year Respondent shared the
1185classroom with Mr. Montalbano. On one side of the classroom was
1196Respondents class, consisting of 11 ESE students. On the other
1206side of the room was Mr. Montalbanos class, consisting of seven
1217ESE students. Mr. Montalbanos class was smaller because his
1226class functioned at a lower level than Respondents class.
12359. On October 4, 2011, student J., a non-verbal,
1244wheel chair-bound boy, and student D., a boy with Downs
1254syndrome, were sitting next to each other in Respondents
1263classroom. Student D. did something to irritate student J.
1272Student J. balled up his fist as if to strike student D.
1284Respondent, in front of the entire class, Lisa Phillips (an ESE
1295paraprofessional), and Ms. Sorren, made the following statement:
1303So is the cripple [student J.] going to beat up the retard
1315[student D.]. /4 Other students in the classroom laughed at
1325student J. and student D.
133010. Student J.s wheelchair is motorized. After making the
1339statement quoted above, Respondent attempted to move student J.
1348into a corner. When student J. moved the wheelchair away from
1359the corner, Respondent unplugged the wheelchairs battery and
1367made the statement: Now who has the power. I am in control,
1379not you. The other students laughed at student J. Respondent
1389then moved student J. to the corner. /5
139711. On October 11, 2011, Respondent sent student J. to
1407bother.
140812. One day at dismissal, student J. asked Respondent three
1418or four times to be taken to the bathroom. Respondent did not
1430respond to student J. The bus arrived, but the driver refused to
1442accept student J. because of his request to go to the toilet.
1454Mr. Montalbano, who overheard student J.s requests to
1462Respondent, took over the responsibility for student J.
147013. Respondent became frustrated while helping student J.
1478with the computer after student J. got the wires to the
1489headphones tangled. Respondent ripped the headphones out of the
1498back of the computer leaving the male connection in the female
1509end of the computer.
151314. In a private discussion with Mr. Montalbano, Respondent
1522referred to student D. as being a moron.
153015. Respondent sent her 11 students to Mr. Montalbanos
1539side of the classroom, which housed ten computers. There was a
1550disturbance because one student did not have a computer.
1559Respondent came to Mr. Montalbanos side of the classroom and
1569told student D. to give up his computer. Student D.s first
1580language is Bulgarian. When student D. muttered in protest,
1589Respondent yelled at him to express himself in English. When
1599student D. left the computer, his place was quickly taken by
1610another student. Student D. began to cry. Respondent walked
1619back to her side of the classroom, leaving student D. crying in
1631Mr. Montalbanos side of the classroom.
163716. On October 11, 2011, student Mi., an 11 year-old female
1648on the autism spectrum, was playing with a puzzle during free
1659time when she spotted an open computer. Student Mi. left the
1670puzzle pieces out to go to the computer. Respondent noted the
1681puzzle on the table and yelled out, Who left this puzzle out?
1694Student Mi. hid under a table in reaction to Respondents
1704statement. Respondent came to the table, roughly grabbed student
1713Mi., and pulled her out from under the table. Respondent led
1724student Mi. to the table with the puzzle and yelled in front of
1737the class: I dont know what your mother teaches you at home,
1749but youre a little, spoiled brat and I am not going to clean up
1763after you. Respondent then took student Mi.s doll away from
1773her and put her in time out for the remainder of the day,
1786approximately 30 minutes.
178917. On another occasion, Respondent had the other members
1798of the class imitate student Mi., after student Mi. had engaged
1809in self-stimulatory behavior. The other students laughed at
1817student Mi.
181918. In October 2011, Ms. Hudson discovered Respondent and
1828student Mi. in Mr. Montalbanos half of the classroom with the
1839lights dimmed. Ms. Hudson thought student Mi. had been crying.
1849Ms. Hudson reported the incident to her principal, but she did
1860not question Respondent, nor did Respondent volunteer to Ms.
1869Hudson an explanation of the circumstances that resulted in
1878Respondent being in the darkened classroom with student Mi. At
1888the formal hearing, Respondent explained that student Mi. had run
1898into traffic while waiting to be transported from school.
1907Respondent testified, credibly, that she was trying to calm down
1917student Mi. /6
192019. Ms. Sorren testified, credibly, that during the short
1929time she was in Respondents classroom (approximately three
1937school days), she heard Respondent address the students as
1946morons, monkeys, jungle monkeys, and animals. That testimony was
1955consistent with the other testimony as to the language used by
1966Respondent in her classroom.
197020. Petitioners established that Respondent repeatedly
1976yelled at her students to shut up, described a students
1987behavior as being stupid, and called at least one student a
1999brat.
200021. Student Mo., a female on the autism spectrum, was new
2011to Respondents class. On an unidentified date, Respondent
2019directed student Mo. to go to timeout. After student Mo. refused
2030to go to timeout, Respondent shoved student Mo. into the timeout
2041area.
204222. During the 2010-2011 school year, Respondent became
2050upset with student C., a female, and ordered her out of her
2062classroom. When student C. talked back to Respondent, Respondent
2071threw student C.s backpack and her shoes over the chalkboard
2081that divided the classroom. Ms. Knighton and her class were in
2092the part of the classroom into which Respondent threw the
2102objects. Student C. became very upset.
210823. Respondent became upset with Ma., a male student. Ma.
2118had a snack on his desk. Respondent knocked the snack to the
2130floor and smashed it with her foot.
213724. Petitioners established that Respondent engaged in a
2145pattern of misconduct.
214825. Respondents effectiveness in the school system has
2156been impaired.
2158CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
216126. DOAH has jurisdiction over the subject matter of and
2171the parties to this case pursuant to sections 120.569 and
2181120.57(1).
2182THE SUPERINTENDENTS BURDEN OF PROOF
218727. Because the School Board, acting through the
2195Superintendent, seeks to terminate Respondents employment, which
2202does not involve the loss of a license or certification, the
2213School Board has the burden of proving the allegations in its
2224Amended Administrative Complaint by a preponderance of the
2232evidence, as opposed to the more stringent standard of clear and
2243convincing evidence. See McNeill v. Pinellas Cnty. Sch. Bd. , 678
2253So. 2d 476 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Allen v. Sch. Bd. of Dade Cnty. ,
2267571 So. 2d 568, 569 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Dileo v. Sch. Bd. of Dade
2282Cnty. , 569 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). 28. The preponderance of the evidence standard requires
2299proof by the greater weight of the evidence, Blacks Law
2310Dictionary 1201 (7th ed. 1999), or evidence that more likely
2320than not tends to prove a certain proposition. See Gross v.
2331Lyons , 763 So. 2d 276, 289 n.1 (Fla. 2000)(relying on American
2342Tobacco Co. v. State , 697 So. 2d 1249, 1254 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
2355quoting Bourjaily v. United States , 483 U.S. 171, 175 (1987)).
2365THE COMMISSIONERS BURDEN OF PROOF
237029. In this proceeding the Commissioner seeks to discipline
2379Respondents Florida Educator Certificate. Consequently, the
2385Commissioner has the burden of proving by clear and convincing
2395evidence the allegations against Respondent. See Ferris v.
2403Turlington , 510 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 1987) and McKinney v. Castor ,
2414667 So. 2d 387 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
2422THE SUPERINTENDENTS ALLEGED VIOLATIONS
242630. Section 1012.33(1)(a) includes the following as just
2434cause to terminate a teachers professional services contract:
2442. . . Just cause includes, but is not
2451limited to, the following instances, as
2457defined by rule of the State Board of
2465Education: immorality, misconduct in office
2470or being convicted or found guilty of, or
2478entering a plea of guilty to, regardless of
2486adjudication of guilt, any crime involving
2492moral turpitude.
249431. The Superintendents Amended Administrative Complaint
2500alleged that Respondent was guilty of:
2506(Count 1) immorality,
2509(Count 2) misconduct in office, and
2515(Count 3) moral turpitude.
2519THE COMMISSIONERS ALLEGED VIOLATIONS
252332. Section 1012.795(1) provides, in relevant part, as
2531follows:
2532(1) The Education Practices Commission may
2538suspend the educator certificate of any
2544person as defined in s. 1012.01(2) or (3) for
2553up to 5 years, thereby denying that person
2561the right to teach or otherwise be employed
2569by a district school board or public school
2577in any capacity requiring direct contact with
2584students for that period of time, after which
2592the holder may return to teaching as provided
2600in subsection (4); may revoke the educator
2607certificate of any person, thereby denying
2613that person the right to teach or otherwise
2621be employed by a district school board or
2629public school in any capacity requiring
2635direct contact with students for up to 10
2643years, with reinstatement subject to the
2649provisions of subsection (4); may revoke
2655permanently the educator certificate of any
2661person thereby denying that person the right
2668to teach or otherwise be employed by a
2676district school board or public school in any
2684capacity requiring direct contact with
2689students; may suspend the educator
2694certificate, upon an order of the court or
2702notice by the Department of Revenue relating
2709to the payment of child support; or may
2717impose any other penalty provided by law, if
2725the person:
2727* * *
2730(d) Has been guilty of gross immorality or
2738an act involving moral turpitude as defined
2745by rule of the State Board of Education.
2753* * *
2756(g) Upon investigation, has been found
2762guilty of personal conduct that seriously
2768reduces that persons effectiveness as an
2774employee of the district school board.
2780* * *
2783(j) Has violated the Principles of
2789Professional Conduct for the Education
2794Profession prescribed by State Board of
2800Education rules.
280233. The Superintendents Administrative Complaint alleged
2808that Respondent was guilty of:
2813(Count 1) gross immorality or an act
2820involving moral turpitude,
2823(Count 2) personal conduct which seriously
2829reduced her effectiveness as an employee of
2836the school board,
2839(Count 3) violating the Principles of
2845Professional Conduct for the Education
2850Profession prescribed by State Board of
2856Education,
2857(Count 4) failing to make reasonable effort
2864to protect the student from conditions
2870harmful to learning and/or to the students
2877mental health and/physical health and/or
2882safety,
2883(Count 5) intentionally exposing a student
2889to unnecessary embarrassment or
2893disparagement, and
2895(Count 6) harassing or discriminating
2900against a student on the basis of race,
2908color, religion, sexual orientation, or
2913social and family background.
2917IMMORALITY AND MORAL TURPITUDE
292134. Count 1 of the Superintendents Amended Administrative
2929Complaint charges, in relevant part, that:
2935. . . Respondents acts constitute acts of
2943immorality, that is, conduct inconsistent
2948with the standards of public conscience and
2955good morals. Respondents conduct is
2960sufficiently notorious to bring Respondent
2965and/or the educational profession into public
2971disgrace or disrespect, and impair
2976Respondents service in the community.
298135. Count 3 of the Superintendents Amended Administrative
2989Complaint charges, in relevant part, that:
2995. . . Respondents acts constitute acts of
3003moral turpitude, that is, acts of baseness,
3010vileness or depravity in the private and
3017social duties, which, according to the
3023accepted standards of the time, a person owes
3031to his fellow human or to society in general,
3040and the doing of the act itself and not its
3050prohibition by statute fixes the moral
3056turpitude.
305736. Count 1 of the Commissioners Administrative Complaint
3065charges, in relevant part that:
3070. . . Respondent has been guilty of gross
3079immorality or an act involving moral
3085turpitude as defined by rule of the State
3093Board of Education.
309637. Rule 6A-5.056(1) contains the following definition of
3104the term immorality:
3107(2) Immorality means conduct that is
3113inconsistent with the standards of public
3119conscience and good morals. It is conduct
3126that brings the individual concerned or the
3133education profession into public disgrace or
3139disrespect and impairs the individuals
3144service in the community.
314838. Gross immorality has been defined to mean an act of
3159misconduct that is serious, rather than minor in nature; it is a
3171flagrant disregard of proper moral standards. See Educ.
3179Practices Commn v. Knox , 3 FALR 1373-A (Fla. Dept. of Educ.
31901981) and Frank T. Brogan v. Eston Mansfield , Case No. 96-0286
3201(Fla. DOAH Aug. 1, 1996; Fla. Educ. Practices Commn Oct. 18,
32121996).
321339. Florida Administrative Code Rule 6A-5.056(a)-(j) lists
3220the serious crimes that constitute crimes involving moral
3228turpitude. Both Petitioners and Respondent cite rule 6B-4.009(6)
3236for the following definition of the term moral turpitude:
3245Moral turpitude is a crime that is evidenced
3253by an act of baseness; vileness or depravity
3261in the private and social duties, which,
3268according to the accepted standards or the
3275time a man owes to his or her fellow man or
3286to society in general, and the doing of the
3295act itself and not its prohibition by statute
3303fixes moral turpitude.
330640. Rule 6B-4.009 has been amended and transferred to rule
33166A-5.056. The quoted definition of moral turpitude is no
3325longer a part of the Rule.
333141. As will be discussed below, Petitioners proved that
3340Respondent engaged in misconduct. Neither Petitioner proved that
3348Respondents misconduct rose to the level of immorality or
3357acts involving moral turpitude. Consequently, Respondent is
3364not guilty of the violations alleged in Count 1 and 3 of the
3377Superintendents Amended Administrative Complaint. Respondent is
3383also not guilty of the violation alleged in Count 1 of the
3395Commissioners Administrative Complaint.
3398MISCONDUCT IN OFFICE
340142. Rule 6A-5.056(2) defines the term Misconduct in
3409Office as follows:
3412(2) Misconduct in Office means one or
3419more of the following:
3423(a) A violation of the Code of Ethics of
3432the Education Profession in Florida as
3438adopted in [Rule 6A-10.080];
3442(b) A violation of the Principles of
3449Professional Conduct for the Education
3454Profession in Florida as adopted in
3460[Rule 6A-10.081];
3462(c) A violation of the adopted school
3469board rules;
3471(d) Behavior that disrupts the students
3477learning environment; or
3480(e) Behavior that reduces the teachers
3486ability or his or her ability to effectively
3494perform duties.
349643. Rule 6A-10.081, set forth the Principles of
3504Professional Conduct for the Education Profession in
3511Florida, and provide, in relevant part, as follows:
3520(3) Obligation to the student requires
3526that the individual:
3529(a) Shall make reasonable effort to
3535protect the student from conditions harmful
3541to learning and/or to the students mental
3548and/or physical health and/or safety.
3553(b) Shall not unreasonably restrain a
3559student from independent action in pursuit of
3566learning.
3567(c) Shall not unreasonably deny a student
3574access to diverse points of view.
3580(d) Shall not intentionally suppress or
3586distort subject matter relevant to a
3592students academic program.
3595(e) Shall not intentionally expose a
3601student to unnecessary embarrassment or
3606disparagement.
3607(f) Shall not intentionally violate or
3613deny a students legal rights.
3618(g) Shall not harass or discriminate
3624against any student on the basis of race,
3632color, religion, sex, age, national or ethnic
3639origin, political beliefs, marital status,
3644handicapping condition, sexual orientation,
3648or social and family background and shall
3655make reasonable effort to assure that each
3662student is protected from harassment or
3668discrimination.
3669* * *
3672(5) Obligation to the profession of
3678education requires that the individual:
3683(d) Shall not engage in harassment or
3690discriminatory conduct which unreasonably
3694interferes with an individuals performance
3699of professional or work responsibilities or
3705with the orderly processes of education or
3712which creates a hostile, intimidating,
3717abusive, offensive, or oppressive
3721environment; and, further, shall make
3726reasonable effort to assure that each
3732individual is protected from such harassment
3738or discrimination.
374044. Count 2 of the Superintendents Amended Administrative
3748Complaint alleges that Respondent is guilty of Misconduct in
3757Office within the meaning of section 1012.33 because she violated
3767the above-quoted portions of rule 6A-10.081. The Superintendent
3775failed to establish that Respondent was guilty of violating rule
3785misconduct below is not premised on those alleged violations.
379445. Counts 2 and 3 of the Commissioners Administrative
3803Complaint are as follows:
3807Count 2. The Respondent is in violation of
3815[section 1012.795(1)(g)] in that Respondent
3820has been found guilty of personal conduct
3827which seriously reduces her effectiveness as
3833an employee of the school board.
3839Count 3. The Respondent is in violation of
3847[section 1012.795(1)(d)] in that Respondent
3852has violated the Principles of Professional
3858Conduct for the Education Profession
3863prescribed by State Board of Education rules.
387046. Counts 4, 5, and 6 of the Commissioners Administrative
3880Complaint allege that Respondent violated the rules that are now
3890found in the above-quoted rule 6A-10.081(3)(a), (e), and (g).
389947. Petitioners failed to prove that Respondent harassed or
3908discriminated against any of her students as alleged in Count 6
3919of the Commissioners Administrative Complaint and as alleged in
3928Count 2 of the Superintendents Amended Administrative Complaint.
3936The finding of misconduct which follows is not premised on the
3947allegations of discrimination and/or harassment of students.
395448. Petitioners proved that Respondent was guilty of
3962misconduct in office by repeatedly violating the following
3970Principles of Professional Conduct for the Education Profession
3978in Florida set forth in rule 6A-10.081(3)(a) and (e), as alleged
3989in Counts 2 and 3 of the Commissioners Administrative Complaint
3999and in Count 2 of the Superintendents Amended Administrative
4008Complaint.
400949. Respondents reduced effectiveness may be inferred from
4017the nature and seriousness of the conduct. See Walker v.
4027Highlands Cnty. Sch. Bd. , 752 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 2 DCA 2000) and
4040Purvis v. Marion Cnty. Sch. Bd. , 766 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 5th DCA
40532000). Respondents pattern of mistreating her students
4060established that her effectiveness as a school board employee has
4070been impaired.
407250. In making the recommendation that follows as to
4081Case No. 13-0704PL, the undersigned has considered the
4089Disciplinary Guidelines set forth in rule 6B-11.007 and
40976B-11.008.
409851. The undersigned has accepted the recommended
4105dispositions of these matters as set forth in the respective
4115proposed recommended orders submitted by the Commissioner and the
4124Superintendent.
4125RECOMMENDATION
4126The following recommendations are based on the foregoing
4134findings of fact and conclusions of law:
4141As to Case No. 12-2859TTS, it is RECOMMENDED that the School
4152Board of Broward County, Florida, enter a final order adopting
4162the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in this
4174Recommended Order. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the final
4183order uphold the suspension without pay of Rhea Cohens
4192employment and terminate that employment.
4197As to Case No. 13-0704PL, it is RECOMMENDED that the
4207Education Practices Commission enter a final order adopting the
4216findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in this
4227Recommended Order. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the final
4236five years, to be followed by probation for three years with
4247conditions to be set by the Education Practices Commission.
4256DONE AND ENTERED this 12th day of July, 2013, in
4266Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
4270CLAUDE B. ARRINGTON
4273Administrative Law Judge
4276Division of Administrative Hearings
4280The DeSoto Building
42831230 Apalachee Parkway
4286Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
4289(850) 488-9675
4291Fax Filing (850) 921-6847
4295www.doah.state.fl.us
4296Filed with the Clerk of the
4302Division of Administrative Hearings
4306this 12th day of July, 2013.
4312ENDNOTE
43131 / The Superintendents Amended Administrative Complaint cited
4321Rule 6B-4.009, which has been transferred to Rule 6A-5.056.
43302/ The Commissioners Administrative Complaint cited
4336Rule 6B-1.006, which was renumbered as 6A-10.081 after the
4345Administrative Complaint was filed.
43493 / Ms. Sorren is an experienced classroom teacher who had
4360returned to college to become qualified to teach ESE students.
4370Her internship was part of her college curriculum. At the time
4381of the formal hearing, Ms. Sorren was employed as an ESE teacher
4393at a private school.
43974/ This matter was thoroughly investigated by the School Board.
4407Petitioner gave a statement to a school detective, attended an
4417informal conference with a Department of Education
4424representative, and was deposed by Petitioners in preparation for
4433the formal hearing. At the formal hearing, for the first time,
4444Respondent testified that it was Lisa Phillips who made the
4454quoted comment. Respondents contention that Lisa Phillips made
4462the comment is rejected as lacking credibility. The evidence
4471established clearly, and convincingly, that Respondent made the
4479statement.
44805/ In making these findings, the undersigned has considered
4489Respondents version of the events. Respondent contends that she
4498unplugged the wheelchair from its battery because the wheelchair
4507did not have an on/off power switch and because student J was
4519moving the wheelchair in an unsafe manner. Even if those factors
4530motivated the act of unplugging the battery, there is no excuse
4541for Respondent exposing student J to ridicule, as she clearly did
4552by her comment.
45556 / The undersigned accepts this explanation. While Respondent
4564showed poor judgment in being with any student under the
4574circumstances observed by Ms. Hudson, there was no evidence of
4584improper contact between Respondent and the student.
4591Consequently, the undersigned declines to find Respondent guilty
4599of misconduct in office based on this incident.
4607COPIES FURNISHED:
4609Robert F. McKee, Esquire
4613Kelly and McKee
4616Post Office Box 75638
4620Tampa, Florida 33675
4623Charles T. Whitelock, Esquire
4627Charles T. Whitelock, P.A.
4631Suite E
4633300 Southeast 13th Street
4637Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316
4641Kathleen M. Richards, Executive Director
4646Education Practices Commission
4649Department of Education
4652Turlington Building, Suite 224
4656325 West Gaines Street
4660Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400
4663Matthew Carson, General Counsel
4667Department of Education
4670Turlington Building, Suite 1244
4674325 West Gaines Street
4678Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400
4681Robert Runcie, Superintendent
4684Broward County School Board
4688600 Southeast Third Avenue
4692Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
4696Dr. Tony Bennett
4699Commissioner of Education
4702Department of Education
4705Turlington Building, Suite 1514
4709325 West Gaines Street
4713Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400
4716Marian Lambeth, Bureau Chief
4720Bureau of Professional
4723Practices Services
4725Department of Education
4728Turlington Building, Suite 224-E
4732325 West Gaines Street
4736Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400
4739NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
4745All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within
475515 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions
4766to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that
4777will issue the Final Order in this case.
- Date
- Proceedings
- PDF:
- Date: 07/16/2013
- Proceedings: Amended Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Broward County School Board.
- PDF:
- Date: 07/16/2013
- Proceedings: Amended Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Education Practrices Commission.
- PDF:
- Date: 07/15/2013
- Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Education Practices Commission.
- PDF:
- Date: 07/15/2013
- Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Broward County School Board.
- PDF:
- Date: 06/19/2013
- Proceedings: Petitioner's Proposed Recommended Order (filed in Case No. 13-000704PL).
- PDF:
- Date: 06/11/2013
- Proceedings: Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Recommended Orders filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/28/2013
- Proceedings: Letter to Judge Arrington from C. Whitelock regarding filing the proposed recommended order on June 14, 2013 filed.
- Date: 05/23/2013
- Proceedings: Transcript (not available for viewing) filed.
- Date: 05/13/2013
- Proceedings: Petitioner's Proposed Exhibits filed (exhibits not available for viewing).
- Date: 05/09/2013
- Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/25/2013
- Proceedings: Joint Motion for a Protective Order Regarding Student-Identifying Information Disclosure Pursuant to Florida Statues Section 1002.22 filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/24/2013
- Proceedings: Amended Notice of Hearing (hearing set for May 9 and 10, 2013; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL; amended as to Address).
- PDF:
- Date: 04/01/2013
- Proceedings: Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for May 9 and 10, 2013; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
- PDF:
- Date: 03/13/2013
- Proceedings: Respondent's Unopposed Motion to Continue (hearing until May 2013) filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 02/27/2013
- Proceedings: Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for April 25 and 26, 2013; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
- PDF:
- Date: 02/21/2013
- Proceedings: Joint Motion to Continue Hearing (for Purposes of Consolidation) filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 01/30/2013
- Proceedings: Notice of Taking Depositions (of D. Rollins and K. Sorren) filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 12/12/2012
- Proceedings: Order Re-scheduling Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for March 14 and 15, 2013; 9:00 a.m.; Lauderdale Lakes, FL).
- PDF:
- Date: 12/11/2012
- Proceedings: Order Granting Continuance (parties to advise status by December 17, 2012).
- PDF:
- Date: 12/05/2012
- Proceedings: Notice of Taking Depositions (of R. Montalbano and L. Phillips) filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 11/28/2012
- Proceedings: Notice of Petitioner's Response to Respondent's First Set of Interrogatories filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 11/28/2012
- Proceedings: Notice of Petitioner's Response to Respondent's First Request for Production filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 11/07/2012
- Proceedings: Respondent's Answers to Petitioner's First Set of Interrogatories filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 10/16/2012
- Proceedings: Amended Notice of Hearing (hearing set for January 8 and 9, 2013; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL; amended as to Date and Location).
- PDF:
- Date: 09/28/2012
- Proceedings: Notice of Service of Petitioners Request for Admissions to Respondent filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 09/28/2012
- Proceedings: Notice of Service of Petitioner's First Set of Interrogatories to Respondent filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 09/28/2012
- Proceedings: Notice of Service of Petitioner's Request for Production to Respondent filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 09/13/2012
- Proceedings: Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for December 20 and 21, 2012; 9:00 a.m.; Lauderdale Lakes, FL).
Case Information
- Judge:
- CLAUDE B. ARRINGTON
- Date Filed:
- 08/24/2012
- Date Assignment:
- 08/28/2012
- Last Docket Entry:
- 10/25/2013
- Location:
- Fort White, Florida
- District:
- Northern
- Agency:
- ADOPTED IN TOTO
- Suffix:
- TTS
Counsels
-
Robert F. McKee, Esquire
Address of Record -
Kathleen M. Richards, Executive Director
Address of Record -
Charles T. Whitelock, Esquire
Address of Record -
Robert F McKee, Esquire
Address of Record