86-004866 St. Johns River Water Management District vs. Stanley U. Monds
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Monday, September 28, 1987.


View Dockets  
Summary: Well contractor's license revoked for repeated failure to comply with well construction standards after repeated directives to correct-equals willfull violation.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER )

13MANAGEMENT DISTRICT , )

16)

17Petitioner , )

19)

20vs. ) CASE NO. 86-4866

25)

26STANLEY U. MONDS , )

30)

31Respondent. )

33___________________________________)

34RECOMMENDED ORDER

36Pursuant to notice, this cause came on for formal hearing before P. Michael

49Ruff, duly designated Hearing Officer, in Jacksonville, Florida, on August 18,

601987. The appearances were as follows:

66APPEARANCES

67For Petitioner : Wayne E. Flowers, Esquire

74St. Johns River Water

78Management District

80Post Office Box 1429

84Palatka, Florida 32078-1429

87For Respondent : Stanley U. Monds:

93No appearance

95This is a license revocation proceeding whereby the St. Johns River Water

107Management District (District) seeks to revoke the water well contractor license

118and water well driller's registration issued to the Respondent by the District.

130The District maintains in essence that revocation is appropriate because of

141repeated failures by Respondent to conform to well construction standards and

152related rules enacted by the District in connection with the construction of

164water wells by the Respondent or wells constructed under his supervision, as

176well as incorrect, unlawful abandonment of wells.

183At the hearing, after being given approximately one-half hour after the

194noticed starting time to appear, the Respondent failed to appear. The Notice of

207Hearing was sent to the Respondent at the Respondent's last known address.

219At the hearing the Petitioner, St. Johns River Water Management District,

230offered the testimony of witnesses Danisse Kemp, J. C. Varnes and James Frazee.

243The District also introduced Exhibits 1-15, all of which were admitted into

255evidence.

256The issue to be resolved in this proceeding concerns whether the Respondent

268has committed acts or omissions which constitute violations of the pertinent

279provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 40C-3, Florida

289Administrative Code, so as to justify revocation or other disciplinary action

300against his licensure status as a water well driller and water well contractor.

313FINDINGS OF FACT

3161. The State of Florida Department of Environmental Regulation is the

327administrative agency of the State of Florida charged with the duty to protect

340the water resources of the State and to administer and enforce the Florida Water

354Resources Act of 1972, embodied in Chapters 373, Florida Statutes, as well as

367the rules promulgated thereunder. The St. Johns River Water Management District

378is a unit of government established by Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, also

390charged with the duty to administer and enforce that chapter and related rules.

403The Department of Environmental Regulation, pursuant to Section 373.103, Florida

413Statutes, and Section 317.104(8), Florida Administrative Code, has delegated to

423the District the power and authority to administer and enforce Part III of

436Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, and the rules and regulations adopted pursuant to

448that part which implement it. Those rules are embodied in Chapter 40C-3,

460Florida Administrative Code.

4632. Stanley U. Monds is a licensed water well contractor licensed by St.

476Johns River Water Management District. He has been issued license number 2257.

488Mr. Monds is also registered by the District as a "water well driller ." That

503registration bears the number 2257.

5083. The Respondent on various dates in 1984-1986 contracted to construct

519and constructed water wells from which water was to be drawn for drinking or

533other domestic purposes, within the geographical boundaries of the District, for

544the following named individuals:

548WELL OWNER COUNTY YEAR CONSTRUCTED

553Ray Howell Clay 1986

557Clayton McCumbers Clay 1986

561Joe Eddy Nassau 1986

565Joe Eddy Nassau 1986

569Kevin Brooks Clay 1984

573Nancy Harris Duval 1985

577Marcus Rhoden Baker 1985

581Cecil Hagen Baker 1985

585Ken Tenson Baker 1985

589Jim Griffis Baker 1985

593Tom Scott Baker 1985

597Tom Ott Baker 1985

601J. Ray Gatlin Baker 1984

606J. Ray Gatlin Baker 1984

6114. The Respondent never filed "well completion reports" with the District

622for these wells, as required by District rules.

6305. The Respondent also contracted to construct and constructed wells for

641domestic water use, including drinking, located within the geographical

650boundaries of the District for the following named individuals and thereafter

661filed well completion reports, however, the reports were actually filed more

672than 30 days after the wells were completed and thus in violation of District

686rules:

687COMPLETION

688REPORT

689WELL OWNER COUNTY DATE COMPLETED FILED

695James Hall Clay 3/10/86 5/06/86

700Dennis Bennett Duval 6/16/83 5/04/85

705Bennett's Hardware Duval 6/17/83 5/23/85

710Don Tenbush Clay 1/08/86 10/1/86

7156. In March 1986, the Respondent installed a water well for a Mr. Joe Eddy

730in Nassau County, Florida. This well was abandoned by the Respondent and a

743second well was drilled nearby in June 1986. The Respondent failed to properly

756abandon the first well by filling it from top to bottom with grout. The

770Respondent was warned of this condition and reminded to correct it by certified

783letter sent him by District personnel concerning his improper abandonment of the

795first well. He acknowledged receiving that letter in a conversation with

806witness J. C. Varnes, a District field representative. The Respondent, however,

817refused or failed to later properly abandon the first well by filling it with

831grout from bottom to top.

8367. In June 1986, the Respondent contracted to construct and did construct

848a second water well for the same Mr. Eddy on his property in Nassau County.

863That well penetrated multiple aquifers, but the Respondent refused or failed to

875complete the well so as to prevent cross-contamination of different aquifers or

887water-bearing strata by water of significantly different quality. This should

897have been prevented by proper casing of the well which Respondent failed to do.

911Further, the Respondent used PVC ( polyvinylchlride) plastic casing instead of

922metallic casing in constructing the well and seated the casing by driving it

935into the ground which resulted in the plastic casing being cracked. The

947Respondent also failed to grout and seal the annular space between the well

960casing and the naturally occurring geological formations through which the well

971bore passed. Another certified letter was sent him by District personnel

982advising him of these violations of District rules which he acknowledged. He

994refused or failed to correct the well construction violations, however. Failing

1005to case a well to the bottom of a well or having cracks in the casing allows

1022water and/or other materials from one geological strata to enter the casing,

1034migrate upward or downward and enter aquifers or water-bearing strata at other

1046levels, thus posing a potential of cross-contamination of different aquifers or

1057water-bearing strata due to improper "short casing" or due to cracked casing.

10698. In 1984, the Respondent constructed a water well for Kevin Brooks on

1082his property in Clay County, Florida. The well was constructed into an

"1094unconsolidated aquifer," but the Respondent failed to attach a well screen to

1106the bottom of the casing as a filtering device, in violation of well

1119construction standards promulgated by the District.

11259. In June 1983, the Respondent contracted to construct and did construct

1137a well for Bennett's Hardware on its property in Duval County. He failed to

1151grout and seal the annular space between the well casing and the naturally

1164occurring geological formations from the bottom to the top of the well in

1177violation of District well construction standards.

118310. In 1984, the Respondent constructed two four-inch water wells for J.

1195Ray Gatlin on his property in Baker County, Florida. The Respondent failed to

1208grout and seal the upper three feet of annular space in each of these two wells.

1224He was sent a certified letter on July 14, 1986, advising him of the

1238deficiencies in the well construction. He acknowledged receiving that letter in

1249a conversation with witness J. C. Varnes, but failed to grout the well properly

1263anyway.

126411. Also in 1984, he constructed an eight-inch water well for J. Ray

1277Gatlin on property in Baker County, Florida. He failed to grout and seal the

1291annular space between this well's casing and the surrounding geological

1301formations from the bottom to the top of the casing. He also failed to install

1316a water tight seal at the top of the well casing. After being sent a certified

1332letter advising of these violations by District personnel, he acknowledged to

1343Mr. Varnes once again that he had received that letter. He still failed to

1357properly grout or seal the well after being so warned. On September 16, 1986,

1371he was sent a second certified letter which he acknowledged receiving which

1383instructed him to properly abandon the well. He refused to follow that

1395instruction.

139612. In January 1986, the Respondent constructed a water well for Don

1408Tenbush on his property in Clay County. He failed to grout and seal the annular

1423space between the well casing and the geological formation surrounding the

1434casing in this well from top to bottom. This well penetrated multiple aquifers

1447or water-bearing zones and yet the Respondent failed to complete the well so as

1461to prevent potential cross-contamination of different zones or aquifers by water

1472of significantly different quality. He did not case the well all the way down

1486to the producing aquifer at the bottom of the well. Here, again, he

1499acknowledged receiving a certified letter advising him of these violations and

1510requiring correction and yet failed to correct the violations.

151913. The Respondent began construction of a second well for Mr. Tenbush on

1532the same parcel of property in January 1986 after abandoning the first well

1545described above. He failed to properly abandon the first well by filling it

1558from bottom to top with grout. He was notified of that deficiency or failure,

1572but refused to correct that condition.

157814. In constructing the second well for Mr. Tenbush, he refused to or

1591failed to extend the well casing from the land surface all the way down to the

1607producing aquifer and to seat it. After being sent a certified letter advising

1620him of this violation, receipt of which he acknowledged to Mr. Varnes, he again

1634refused or failed to correct the violation. Both wells drilled by Respondent

1646for Mr. Tenbush subsequently had to be abandoned by another water well

1658contractor.

1659CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

166215. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction of the

1672parties to and the subject matter of this proceeding. Section 120.57(1),

1683Florida Statutes.

168516. The Respondent is licensed by the District as a water well contractor

1698and is registered as a water well- driller by the District and is subject to the

1714requirements of Part III of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 4C-3 and

172717-20, Florida Administrative Code. Each of the wells referred to in the

1739complaint were drilled within the geographical boundaries of the St. Johns River

1751Water Management District. Each of the allegations of the Administrative

1761Complaint have been substantiated by clear and convincing proof. Ferris vs.

1772Turlington, _____ So.2d _____ (Fla. 1987), (Case No. 69,561; Fla. Sup. Ct.

17857/16/87)

178617. Failure to file the subject well completion reports, referenced above,

1797within 30 days of completion of the wells constitutes a violation of Section

181040C-3.411, Florida Administrative Code. The repeated failure by the Respondent

1820to file well completion reports within the specified time constitutes "willful

1831disregard of a rule or regulation of the district" justifying revocation of his

1844contractor's license and driller's registration in this instance, especially in

1854view of the repeated warnings regarding these and the other violations he was

1867proven to have committed. See Section 40C-3.0391(4) and 40C-3.752(1)(c),

1876Florida Administrative Code.

187918. The repeated failure by Respondent to construct water wells in

1890conformance with duly adopted well construction standards of the District, as

1901outlined in the above Findings of Fact, constitutes gross incompetency in the

1913performance of work justifying the revocation of his contractor's license and

1924driller's registration as envisioned by Sections 40C-3.0391(4) and 40C-3.752(c),

1933Florida Administrative Code.

193619. The failure of the Respondent to correct the violations of the well

1949construction standards delineated in the above Findings of Fact, after having

1960been repeatedly advised of the violations verbally and in writing and given an

1973opportunity to correct them, clearly constitutes willful disregard of an order

1984issued by the District, for purposes of Section 40C-3.0391(2), Florida

1994Administrative Code.

199620. In view of the above Findings of Fact and the evidence of record, the

2011multiple violations committed and the failure to correct them after a

2022reasonable, good faith opportunity was extended to him by District personnel to

2034do so, and upon consideration of the totality of the evidence presented, it is,

2048therefore

2049RECOMMENDED that Respondent's water well contractor's license number 2257

2058issued to the Respondent be revoked and that his water well driller's

2070registration number 30354 be revoked by Final Order entered by the St. Johns

2083River Water Management District.

2087DONE and ORDERED this 28th day of September 1987, in Tallahassee, Florida.

2099___________________________________

2100P. MICHAEL RUFF

2103Hearing Officer

2105Division of Administrative Hearings

2109The Oakland Building

21122009 Apalachee Parkway

2115Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550

2118904/488-9675

2119FILED with the Clerk of the

2125Division of Administrative Hearings

2129this 28th day of September 1987.

2135COPIES FURNISHED:

2137Wayne E. Flowers, Esquire

2141St. Johns River Water

2145Management District

2147Post Office Box 1429

2151Palatka, Florida 32078-1429

2154Stanley U. Monds

2157Post Office Box 331

2161Macclenny, Florida 32063

2164Henry Dean, Executive Director

2168St. Johns River Water

2172Management District

2174Post Office Box 1429

2178Palatka, Florida 32078-1429

2181Dale Twachtmann, Secretary

2184Department of Environmental

2187Regulation

21882600 Blair Stone Road

2192Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
PDF:
Date: 11/19/1987
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 11/19/1987
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 09/28/1987
Proceedings: Recommended Order (hearing held , 2013). CASE CLOSED.

Case Information

Judge:
P. MICHAEL RUFF
Date Filed:
12/16/1986
Date Assignment:
12/18/1986
Last Docket Entry:
09/28/1987
Location:
Jacksonville, Florida
District:
Northern
Agency:
ADOPTED IN TOTO
 

Related DOAH Cases(s) (1):

Related Florida Statute(s) (2):

Related Florida Rule(s) (1):