91-000415 Department Of Highway Safety And Motor Vehicles vs. Bernard J. Haney, D/B/A Southern Auto Sales
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, August 27, 1991.


View Dockets  
Summary: Agency failed to show that respondent acted fraudulently or wilfully misrepresented facts in application for license or that acts were of such frequency to establish pattern of wrongdoing.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY )

12SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, )

17DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, )

22)

23Petitioner, )

25)

26vs. ) CASE NO. 91-0415

31)

32BERNARD J. HANEY, d/b/a )

37SOUTHERN AUTO SALES, )

41)

42Respondent. )

44____________________________)

45RECOMMENDED ORDER

47Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings by its duly

58designated Hearing Officer, William R. Cave, held a formal hearing in the above-

71captioned matter on June 26, 1991 in Lakeland, Florida.

80APPEARANCES

81For Petitioner: Michael J. Alderman, Esquire

87Assistant General Counsel

90Department of Highway Safety

94and Motor Vehicles

97Neil Kirkman Building, Rm. A432

102Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0504

105For Respondent: Charles R. Mayer, Esquire

111Post Office Box 267

115 Highland City, Florida 3384

120STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES

124Whether Respondent's independent motor vehicle dealer license should be

133revoked or suspended under the facts and circumstances of this case.

144PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

146By an administrative complaint dated December 17, 1990 and filed with the

158Division of Administrative Hearings on January 18, 1991, the Petitioner,

168Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Division of Motor Vehicles

179(Department) charged the Respondent, Bernard J. Haney d/b/a Southern Auto Sales

190with violating Section 320.27(9)(b) and (q), Florida Statutes, and as grounds

201therefor alleged: (a) that Respondent had been arrested several times under his

213name and the name of William J. Butler; (b) that Respondent while using the name

228William J. Butler was convicted of uttering a forged instrument, a felony, and

241sentenced to four years confinement; and (c) that Respondent failed to

252acknowledge or explain the arrests, conviction or use of fictitious personal

263identification at anytime during the initial licensure or renewal application

273process. Haney filed a Request For Administrative Proceeding with the

283Department which, along with the Administrative Complaint, was referred to the

294Division of Administrative Hearings for formal hearing, and this proceeding

304ensued.

305At the hearing, the Department presented the testimony of Neil C.

316Chamberlin, Nathan Dawson and Gary Floyd (Floyd is not listed as a witness in

330the Index of the transcript, however, he was called as the Department's witness

343and his testimony begins on page 156 in Volume II of the transcript).

356Department's exhibits 1, 2, 3 and 4 were received into evidence. Respondent

368testified in his own behalf and presented the testimony of Carolyn McDaniel.

380Respondent's composite exhibit 1 was received into evidence. Respondent's

389Motion to Dismiss presented at the close of the Department's case in chief was

403denied.

404A transcript of this proceeding was filed with the Division of

415Administrative Hearings on July 15, 1991. Additional time was allowed the

426Respondent for filing his proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law and

439such time added to the time within which the Recommended Order was to be filed.

454The parties timely submitted their proposed findings of fact and conclusions of

466law within the extended time frame. A ruling on each of the proposed findings

480of fact have been made as reflected in an Appendix to the Recommended Order.

494FINDINGS OF FACT

497Upon consideration of the oral and documentary evidence adduced at the

508hearing, the following relevant findings of fact are made:

5171. On November 16, 1987, the Respondent signed, under oath, an application

529for an independent motor vehicle dealer license for the business name of

541Southern Auto Sales which was submitted to the Department, and, based upon that

554application, the Department issued an independent motor vehicle dealer license,

564number 7VI-011359, to Respondent d/b/a Southern Auto Sales on November 30, 1987.

5762. In the application referred to above, Respondent answered no to the

588question, Has the applicant or any partner or corporate officer or director:

600A. Been arrested on a felony or equivalent charge

609anywhere?;

610B. Been convicted of a felony or equivalent anywhere?

6193. In 1988, 1989, and 1990, Respondent submitted to the Department a Short

632Form Application, commonly referred to as a renewal application, and the

643Department renewed license number 8VI-011359 in 1988, 9VI-011359 in 1989, and

6540VI-011359 in 1990. The number before the prefix VI indicates the year of

667issuance.

6684. Respondent signed each of these renewal applications under oath wherein

679the affirmation stated " . . . the information contained in this application is

692true and correct and that nothing has occurred since I filed my last application

706for a license or application for renewal of said license, as the case may be,

721which would change the answers given in such previous application."

731Additionally, the instructions for the renewal application advised the applicant

741that the short form could be used if the applicant was currently licensed and,

755among other things, there were no changes in the applicant's personal background

767such a criminal conviction.

7715. Respondent, currently holds an independent motor vehicle dealer

780license, number 1VI-011359, issued by the Department on May 1, 1991.

7916. Respondent, using the name William J. Butler, was arrested and charged

803in December 1977 with uttering a forgery. The Respondent pled guilty to the

816charge of uttering a forgery in April 1978 before the Circuit Court, Harrison

829County, Mississippi and was sentenced to four years in the Mississippi

840Department of Corrections.

8437. In 1978, the Respondent, using the name William J. Butler, was arrested

856and charged with uttering a forgery. Respondent was subsequently convicted and

867sentenced by the Circuit Court, Jackson County, Mississippi to four years in the

880Mississippi Department of Corrections, said sentence to run concurrently with

890the sentence imposed by the Circuit Court, Harrison County, Mississippi.

9008. William J. Butler and Bernard J. Haney, the Respondent in this case,

913are one in the same person.

9199. On October 25, 1979, after serving only approximately 1 1/2 years of

932the two four-year sentences, Respondent was paroled by the Mississippi Parole

943Board with conditions for supervision made a part of the parole.

95410. In 1981 Respondent sought and received treatment for alcoholism,

964having been an alcoholic for a period of twenty years. After treatment, with

977the help of Alcoholics' Anonymous, Respondent has maintained a life of sobriety.

98911. In November 1988 a Warrant for Retaking a Paroled Prisoner was issued

1002against Respondent, and he was recommitted to the Mississippi Department of

1013Corrections for "absconding supervision" of his parole. However, with the help

1024of some "new" friends, gained after his treatment for alcoholism, Respondent was

1036incarcerated for only a short period, and was "honorably discharged" from the

1048Mississippi Department of Corrections on December 20, 1984.

105612. The Harrison County charge of uttering a forgery was in connection

1068with a check for $169.92, and the Jackson County charge of uttering a forgery

1082was in connection with a check for $139.36.

109013. There is nothing stated in the Discharge Certificate that should have

1102led the Respondent to believe or understand that his criminal record had been

1115expunged and his rights restored upon receiving his "honorable discharge" from

1126the Mississippi Department of Corrections in December 1984. However,

1135considering the circumstances surrounding his commitment in the first place, his

1146recommitment in 1984 and his immediate release thereafter, Respondent's

1155testimony that such was his belief and understanding is credible.

116514. There is insufficient evidence to show that at the time of his initial

1179application for licensure in 1987 or at the time of his renewal applications in

11931988, 1989 and 1990, that Respondent acted fraudulently or willfully

1203misrepresented the facts when he answered no to the questions concerning any

1215prior arrests or convictions for a felony.

122215. After the release in 1979 and up to the date of his initial

1236application for licensure, the Respondent's criminal record is clear except for

1247the arrest in 1984 where the charges were dropped but the arrest resulted in his

1262recommitment. From the date of his initial application until the date of the

1275hearing the Respondent's criminal record is clear except for an arrest in 1990

1288concerning charges of tampering with an odometer. Apparently, these charges

1298have been dropped and the matter handled civilly through the Polk County Citizen

1311Dispute Settlement Center.

1314CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

131716. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the

1327parties to, and the subject matter of, this proceeding pursuant to Section

1339120.57(1), Florida Statutes.

134217. Section 320.27(9), Florida Statutes, empowers the Department to

1351suspend or revoke the license of the Respondent upon proof that he has failed to

1366comply with any of the enumerated acts listed in Section 320.27(9)(a) through

1378(5), Florida Statutes, with sufficient frequency so as to establish a pattern of

1391wrongdoing on the part of the Respondent.

139818. The administrative complaint charges Respondent with violating Section

1407320.27(9)(b) and (q), Florida Statutes, which provides as follows:

1416(b) Commission of fraud or willful

1422misrepresentation in application for or in

1428obtaining a license.

1431. . . .

1435(q) Conviction of a felony.

144019. In disciplinary proceedings, the burden is upon the regulatory agency

1451to establish facts upon which its allegations of misconduct are based by clear

1464and convincing evidence. Ferris v. Turlington, 510 So.2d 293 (Fla. 1987). In

1476the instant case the Department has clearly shown that Respondent was charged,

1488arrested and convicted on two separate charges of uttering a forgery which is a

1502felony and sentenced to two four-year sentences. Also, the Department has

1513clearly shown that Respondent failed to advise the Department of his arrests and

1526the felony convictions in his initial application in 1987 wherein he obtained an

1539independent motor vehicle dealer license. What the Department has not clearly

1550shown is that: (a) the Respondent acted fraudulently or willfully misrepresented

1561facts in filing his initial application for licensure and renewals thereof; or

1573(b) the Respondent's failure to comply with the provisions of Section

1584320.27(9)(b) and (q), Florida Statutes, was with such sufficient frequency so as

1596to establish a pattern of wrongdoing on his part. The Department has failed to

1610sustain its burden of proof.

1615RECOMMENDATION

1616Having considered the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it

1628is,

1629RECOMMENDED that the Department enter a Final Order dismissing the

1639administrative complaint filed herein.

1643DONE and ENTERED this 27th day of August, 1991, in Tallahassee, Florida.

1655_________________________________

1656WILLIAM R. CAVE

1659Hearing Officer

1661Division of Administrative Hearings

1665The DeSoto Building

16681230 Apalachee Parkway

1671Tallahassee, FL 32399-1550

1674(904) 488-9675

1676Filed with the Clerk of the

1682Division of Administrative Hearings

1686this 27th day of August, 1991.

1692APPENDIX TO RECOMMENDED ORDER

1696The following constitutes my specific rulings pursuant to Section

1705120.59(2), Florida Statutes, on all of the Proposed Findings of Fact submitted

1717by the parties in the case.

1723Rulings on Proposed Finding of Fact

1729Submitted by the Petitioner

17331. - 9. Adopted in Findings of Fact 5, 6, 7, 8, 1, 1, 2, 3, and 4,

1751respectively.

175210. Stated more as an argument than a finding of fact, otherwise rejected

1765since there was no substantial competent evidence in the record to prove that

1778there was fraudulent or willful misrepresentation of the facts in the

1789application.

1790Rulings on Proposed Findings of Fact

1796Submitted by the Respondent

1800Respondent's Proposed Recommended Order is divided into three principal

1809parts: (a) Proposed Findings of Fact; (b) Comments on Testimony and Evidence;

1821and (c) Proposed Conclusions of Law. Only the Proposed Findings of Fact will be

1835addressed to in this Appendix.

18401. Adopted in substance in Finding of Fact 1.

18492. - 3. Unnecessary.

18534. Adopted in substance in Finding of Fact 1.

18625. - 7. Covered in Preliminary Statement.

18698. Conclusion of Law.

18739. Covered in the Preliminary Statement, otherwise unnecessary.

188110. Covered in the Preliminary Statement.

188711. - 12. Covered in the Preliminary Statement, otherwise unnecessary or

1898not material or relevant.

1902COPIES FURNISHED:

1904Michael J. Alderman, Esquire

1908Assistant General Counsel

1911Department of Highway Safety

1915and Motor Vehicles

1918Neil Kirkman Building, Rm. A432

1923Tallahassee, FL 32399-0504

1926Charles R. Mayer, Esquire

1930Post Office Box 267

1934Highland City, FL 33846

1938Leonard R. Mellon, Executive Director

1943Department of Highway Safety

1947and Motor Vehicles

1950Neil Kirkman Building

1953Tallahassee, FL 32399-0500

1956Enoch Jon Whitney, General Counsel

1961Department of Highway Safety

1965and Motor Vehicles

1968Neil Kirkman Building

1971Tallahassee, FL 32399-0500

1974Charles J. Brantley, Director

1978Division of Motor Vehicles

1982Neil Kirkman Building

1985Tallahassee, FL 32399-0500

1988NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

1994ALL PARTIES HAVE THE RIGHT TO SUBMIT WRITTEN EXCEPTIONS TO THIS RECOMMENDED

2006ORDER. ALL AGENCIES ALLOW EACH PARTY AT LEAST 10 DAYS IN WHICH TO SUBMIT

2020WRITTEN EXCEPTIONS. SOME AGENCIES ALLOW A LARGER PERIOD WITHIN WHICH TO SUBMIT

2032WRITTEN EXCEPTIONS. YOU SHOULD CONTACT THE AGENCY THAT WILL ISSUE THE FINAL

2044ORDER IN THIS CASE CONCERNING AGENCY RULES ON THE DEADLINE FOR FILING EXCEPTIONS

2057TO THIS RECOMMENDED ORDER. ANY EXCEPTIONS TO THIS RECOMMENDED ORDER SHOULD BE

2069FILED WITH THE AGENCY THAT WILL ISSUE THE FINAL ORDER IN THIS CASE.

2082=================================================================

2083AGENCY FINAL ORDER

2086=================================================================

2087STATE OF FLORIDA

2090DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES

2097DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY CASE NO.: 91-0415

2103SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES

2107DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES,

2111Petitioner,

2112vs.

2113BERNARD J. HANEY d/b/a/

2117SOUTHERN AUTO SALES,

2120Respondent.

2121___________________________/

2122FINAL ORDER

2124This matter is before the Department pursuant to s. 120.57(1)(b) 10, Fla.

2136Stat., for the purpose of considering the Hearing Officer's Recommended Order

2147and Petitioner's Exceptions To Recommended Order. Authority to enter this Final

2158Order is pursuant to the delegation to the Executive Director, Rule 15-1.012

2170F.A.C., and his designation of the undersigned.

2177Upon review of the Recommended Order, the Exceptions, and after a review of

2190the complete record in this case, the Department makes the following findings

2202and conclusions:

2204RULINGS ON EXCEPTIONS

22071. The Department accepts Petitioner's Exception 1. Based upon a review

2218of the complete record, and particularly pages 180-197 and 211-216 of the

2230transcript of hearing, the Department finds that the second sentence of Finding

2242of Fact 13 is not supported by competent substantial evidence and is therefore

2255rejected. Haney testified that he assumed everything had been dropped (T-184)

2266and that no one told him he was not convicted (T-195). The discharge

2279certificate (part of Pet. Ex. 4) that Haney received in December, 1984, states

2292that he was convicted in Circuit Court in Harrison and Jackson County and

2305sentenced to four years (T-215). This testimony, together with findings 6, 7,

231711 and 12 provide competent substantial evidence to support the first sentence

2329of finding paragraph 13, but not the second sentence, which is hereby rejected.

23422. The Department accepts Petitioner's Exception 2. Based

2350upon a review of the complete record, the Department rejects

2360Finding of Fact 14 and substitutes in its place the following:

237114. There is sufficient evidence to show

2378that at the time of his initial application

2386for licensure in 1987 and at the time of his

2396renewal applications in 1988, 1989 and 1990,

2403that Respondent acted fraudulently or

2408wilfully misrepresented the facts when he

2414answered no to the questions concerning any

2421prior arrests or convictions for a felony.

2428The Department accepts the construction of "willful" as set forth in State

2440of Florida, Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Taylor, 456 So.

24532d 550, 552 (Fla. 3d DCA, 1984). The rejection of the second sentence of

2467Finding of Fact 13 eliminates the basis for any excuse of Respondent in failing

2481to disclose his prior arrest and conviction. Thus, he acted consciously and

2493wilfully in completing the application and renewal forms without the necessary

2504disclosure.

25053. The Department accepts Petitioner's exception 3 regarding the

2514Conclusions of Law. The Department concludes that Respondent wilfully

2523misrepresented facts in filing his initial application for licensure and

2533subsequent renewals.

2535Furthermore, the Department concludes that Respondent did so with

2544sufficient frequency so as to establish a pattern of wrongdoing. Respondent

2555engaged in such a pattern by filing renewals for 1988, 1989 and 1990, following

2569his initial non-disclosure in 1987.

2574In addition, the Department concludes that the two felony convictions

2584incurred by Respondent adequately establish a pattern of wrongdoing as

2594contemplated by s. 320.27(9) Fla. Stat. The Department relies on the provisions

2606of ss. 320.27(9)(s), 320.27(3) and 320.605 Fla. Stat., in concluding that these

2618convictions are sufficient for license revocation, based upon the seriousness

2628of felony conduct and the need to protect the public welfare by unscrupulous

2641motor vehicle dealers. A similar determination was made by the Department

2652involving a single conviction in Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles

2664v. Dick's Auto Sales, Case No.: 90-0175, Amended Final Order entered August 29,

26771990, Supplement entered September 24, 1990.

2683FINDINGS OF FACT

26861. Except as modified above, Findings of Fact set forth in the Recommended

2699Order are approved and adopted and incorporated herein.

27072. There is competent substantial evidence to support the

2716Findings of Fact of the Department.

2722CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

27251. The Department has jurisdiction of this matter pursuant to ss,

2736120.57(1) and 320.27, Fla. Stat.

27412. Paragraphs 1-3 of the Conclusions of Law set forth in the Recommended

2754Order are approved, adopted and incorporated herein.

27613. The Department accepts paragraph 4 of the Conclusion of Law, except for

2774the last two sentences thereof on page 8 of the Recommended Order, as determined

2788by the ruling of Petitioner's exception 3.

2795PENALTY

2796Based upon the foregoing Finding of Fact and Conclusions of Law it is

2809hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:

28141. Respondent is guilty of a violation of s. 322.27(9)(b) and (q), Fla.

2827Stat.

28282. Respondent's motor vehicles dealer license is hereby revoked. This

2838penalty is appropriate based upon a review of the complete record and the

2851following reasons:

2853a. The seriousness of the underlying offenses and the continued

2863pattern of their misrepresentation, as it relates to the business of operating a

2876motor vehicle dealership in the context of s. 320.605, Fla. Stat.

2887b. The rejection of the second sentence of Finding of Fact 13 and

2900modification of Finding 14.

2904c. The recognition that upon a showing of good cause and proof of

2917rehabilitation and compliance with s. 320.27(3), Fla. Stat., Respondent is

2927entitled to seek reinstatement of its license. Section 320.273, Fla. Stat.

2938DONE AND ORDERED this __6__ day of __ January__, 1992, in

2949Tallahasseee, Leon County, Florida.

2953__________________________________

2954CHARLES J. BRANTLEY, Director

2958Division of Motor Vehicles

2962Department of Highway Safety

2966and Motor Vehicles

2969Neil Kirkman Building

2972Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0504

2975NOTICE OF APPEAL RIGHTS

2979Judicial review of this order may be had pursuant to section 120.68, Florida

2992Statutes, in the District Court of Appeal for the First District, State of

3005Florida, or in any other District Court Appeal of this state in an appellate

3019district where a party resides. In order to initiate such review, one copy of

3033the Notice of Appeal must be filed with the Department and the other copy of

3048the Notice of Appeal, together with the filing fee, must be filed with the

3062court within thirty days of the filing date of this order as set out above,

3077pursuant to Rule 9.110, Rules of Appellate Procedure.

3085Copies furnished to:

3088Charles R. Mayer, Esquire

3092Post Office Box 267

3096Highland City, Florida 33846

3100Michael J. Alderman, Esquire

3104Assistant General Counsel

3107Department of Highway Safety

3111and Motor Vehicles

3114Neil Kirkman Building, A-342

3118Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0504

3121William R, Cave

3124Hearing Officer

3126Division of Administrative Hearings

3130Desoto Building, 1230 Apalachee Parkway

3135Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
Date: 01/09/1992
Proceedings: Final Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 01/06/1992
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 08/27/1991
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 08/27/1991
Proceedings: Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 6/26/91.
Date: 08/09/1991
Proceedings: Proposed Recommended Order (1 binder) TAGGED filed. (From Charles R.Mayer)
Date: 08/07/1991
Proceedings: Letter to C. R. Mayer from WRC sent out. (RE: Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law due dates).
Date: 08/06/1991
Proceedings: Letter to WRC from Charles R. Mayer (re: when to prepare Proposed Order w/Proposed Findings) filed.
Date: 07/26/1991
Proceedings: (Petitioner) Proposed Recommended Order filed. (From Michael J. Alderman)
Date: 07/15/1991
Proceedings: Transcript (volumes I & II) filed.
Date: 06/28/1991
Proceedings: Letter to Parties of Record from WRC sent out. (Re: Petitioner's Exhibit 3 & Composite Exhibit 1).
Date: 06/28/1991
Proceedings: Post-Hearing Order sent out.
Date: 06/27/1991
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Date: 06/26/1991
Proceedings: (Petitioner) Motion For Imposition of Sanctions; Respondent's Response to First Request for Admissions; Petitioner's First Request for Admissions & attachments filed. (From Michael J. Alderman)
Date: 06/24/1991
Proceedings: (Petitioner) Motion For Imposition of Sanctions w/Exhibits 1&2 filed.(From Michael J. Alderman)
Date: 05/29/1991
Proceedings: Order Compelling Answers to Interrogatories sent out.
Date: 05/16/1991
Proceedings: Petitioners Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories filed.
Date: 05/10/1991
Proceedings: Petitioner's Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories filed. (FromMichael J. Alderman)
Date: 04/30/1991
Proceedings: Order sent out. (Petitioner's Motion for Official Recognition granted).
Date: 04/15/1991
Proceedings: Notice of Serving Petitioner`s Answers to Respondent`s First Interrogatories and Response to Respondent`s Request to Produce; Motion For Official Recognition & attachments filed. (From Michael J. Alderman)
Date: 04/05/1991
Proceedings: Order sent out. (respondent's motion to strike DENIED)
Date: 04/02/1991
Proceedings: Objection to Interrogatories and Request for Admissions and Motion to Strike filed.
Date: 03/21/1991
Proceedings: Petitioners Response to Motion to Strike filed.
Date: 03/19/1991
Proceedings: Order of Continuance and Rescheduling Hearing sent out. (hearing rescheduled for 6/26/91; at 9:00am; in Lakeland)
Date: 03/18/1991
Proceedings: (Petitioner) Motion for Continuance filed.
Date: 03/04/1991
Proceedings: cc: Letter to C. Mayer from M. Alderman (re: admissions, interrogatories & production of documents) filed.
Date: 02/22/1991
Proceedings: Petitioners Motion to Shorten Time for Response to Discovery; Petitioners First Request to Produce; Notice of Service of Interrogatories; First Interrogatories to Respondent; Petitioners First Request for Admissions filed.
Date: 02/14/1991
Proceedings: (petitioner) Response to Initial Order filed.
Date: 02/12/1991
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for March 15, 1991: 9:00 am: Lakeland)
Date: 02/01/1991
Proceedings: (Respondent) Response to Initial Order filed. (From Charles R. Mayer)
Date: 01/31/1991
Proceedings: (Petitioner) Notice of Appearance filed. (From Michael J. Alderman)
Date: 01/23/1991
Proceedings: Initial Order issued.
Date: 01/18/1991
Proceedings: Agency referral letter; Administrative Complaint; Request for Administrative Proceeding filed.

Case Information

Judge:
WILLIAM R. CAVE
Date Filed:
01/18/1991
Date Assignment:
01/23/1991
Last Docket Entry:
01/09/1992
Location:
Lakeland, Florida
District:
Middle
Agency:
ADOPTED IN PART OR MODIFIED
 

Related DOAH Cases(s) (1):

Related Florida Statute(s) (6):

Related Florida Rule(s) (1):