93-003970
St. Johns County Board Of County Commissioners vs.
Department Of Environmental Protection
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, November 30, 1993.
Recommended Order on Tuesday, November 30, 1993.
1STATE OF FLORIDA
4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
8BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS )
13OF ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA, )
19)
20Petitioner, )
22)
23vs. ) CASE NO. 93-3970
28)
29DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL )
33PROTECTION, )
35)
36Respondent. )
38___________________________________)
39RECOMMENDED ORDER
41On August 26, 1993, a formal administrative hearing was held in this case
54in Tallahassee, Florida, before J. Lawrence Johnston, Hearing Officer, Division
64of Administrative Hearings.
67APPEARANCES
68For Petitioner: Daniel J. Bosanko, Esquire
74Assistant County Attorney
77St. Johns County
80Post Office Box 1533
84St. Augustine, Florida 32085-1533
88For Respondent: Edwin A. Steinmeyer, Esquire
94Barrie J. Sawyer, Esquire
98Assistant General Counsel
101Department of Environmental Protection
1052600 Blair Stone Road
109Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400
112STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES
116The issue in this case is whether the Respondent, the Department of
128Environmental Regulation (DEP), should prohibit the driving of motor vehicles on
139the beaches on the Atlantic Ocean beaches in St. Johns County that are within
153the Guana River Marsh Aquatic Preserve (the Preserve).
161PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
163On July 8, 1993, the Petitioner, St. Johns County (the County) filed two
176proceedings at the Division of Administrative Hearings: (1) a "Section
186120.535(2), Florida Statutes, Petition to Invalidate an Agency Policy Statement
196on the Grounds that it has not been Adopted as a Rule in Accordance with Section
212120.54, Florida Statutes"; and (2) a "Section 120.56, Florida Statutes, Petition
223to Invalidate Portions of Rule 16D-2.002 Florida Administrative Code in that
234they are an Invalid Exercise of Delegated Authority in Relation to St. Johns
247County." The former was given Case No. 93-3842RU, and the latter was given Case
261No. 93-3875RX. Both were assigned to the undersigned hearing officer on July
27315, 1993.
275At the same time, the County filed with the Department of Environmental
287Protection a "Petition Challenging the Validity of Agency Action and Request for
299Formal Proceedings pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes."
307A prehearing conference was conducted by conference telephone call on July
31821, 1993. The parties advised that the Section 120.57(1) petition was in the
331process of being referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings and
342requested that all three cases be consolidated for final hearing on August 26-
35527, 1993, at the Division of Administrative Hearings in Tallahassee. (The
366Section 120.57(1) case was referred later on July 21, 1993, and was given
379Division of Administrative Hearings Case No. 93-3970.) The parties' request was
390granted by entry of an Order Consolidating Cases, a Notice of Hearing, and a
404Prehearing Order (requiring prehearing conferences and a prehearing
412stipulation.)
413On August 13, 1993, the County filed a "Section 120.54, Florida Statutes,
425Petition Challenging Proposed Amendment to Rule 18-20.004 Florida Administrative
434Code as an Invalid Exercise of Delegated Authority." The proposed amendment
445incorporated by reference the Guana River Marsh Aquatic Preserve Management Plan
456(the Management Plan), including the prohibition against driving on the Atlantic
467Ocean beaches in the Preserve. The proposed rule challenge also was assigned to
480the undersigned hearing officer and was given DOAH Case No. 93-4533RP.
491Unopposed motions for leave to amend the petitions in the other cases, and
504an unopposed Motion to Consolidate Case No. 93-4533RP with the other cases, also
517were filed on August 13, 1993. On August 17, 1993, an Order Consolidating Cases
531and Granting Leave to Amend Petitions was entered.
539On August 23, 1993, the County filed second motions for leave to amend its
553petitions in Case Nos. 93-4533RP and 93-3970. On the record of the final
566hearing, DEP stated that it had no objection, and the motions were granted.
579On August 24, 1993, the County filed a voluntary dismissal of its petition
592in Case No. 93-3842RU. The dismissal was based on the DEP's assurance that it
606was proceeding with the proposed rule amendment challenged in Case No. 93-4533RP
618and that it would not enforce the provisions of the proposed amendment to F.A.C.
632Rule 18-20.004 to prohibit driving on the Atlantic Ocean beaches in the Preserve
645until the resolution of Case No. 93-4533RP.
652At the final hearing, the parties had Joint Exhibits 1 and 2 admitted in
666evidence. Without objection, the County also had Petitioner's Exhibits 1
676through 6 admitted in evidence. (Petitioner's Exhibit 2 was a videotape
687depicting a drive along the beach in question, which was viewed during the
700hearing.) Without objection, the DEP had Respondent's Exhibits 1 and 3 through
7125 admitted in evidence. (Respondent's Exhibit 2 was not identified. It related
724to Case No. 93-3842RU, which was dismissed.) The County called three witnesses,
736and the DEP called one.
741At the end of the presentation of the evidence, the parties ordered the
754preparation of a transcript of the final hearing and requested 20 days from the
768filing of the transcript in which to file proposed orders. The transcript was
781filed on September 9, making the proposed orders due by September 29, 1993.
794Explicit rulings on the proposed findings of fact contained in the parties'
806proposed recommended orders may be found in the attached Appendix to Recommended
818Order, Case No. 93-3970.
822FINDINGS OF FACT
8251. The Guana River Marsh Aquatic Preserve (the Preserve) is state-owned
836property. Title is held by the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement
849Trust Fund. It includes some 13 miles of Atlantic Ocean beach within St. Johns
863County.
8642. Within the boundaries of the Preserve is included the Guana River State
877Park (the Park). It, too, is state-owned. It is managed and operated by the
891Division of Recreation and Parks (the DRP) of the Department of Environmental
903Protection (the DEP). Some of the Preserve's Atlantic Ocean beaches are
914included within the boundaries of the Park.
9213. The "wet sand," or "hard sand," area of the Atlantic Ocean beaches in
935the Preserve is the area of the beach between mean high water and mean low
950water. The mean high water line is essentially the landward extent of the ocean
964at mean high tide; the mean low water line is essentially the landward extent of
979the ocean at mean low tide. When the tide is low, this entire area of the beach
996is exposed. It remains wet and, generally, relatively hard-packed during the
1007time it is exposed. However, there are beds of "red shell" in this part of the
1023beach that are softer. In the summer, this part of the beach averages
1036approximately 50 feet in width. In the winter, when the waves and tides
1049generally are higher, it is narrower.
10554. In the Preserve, the mean high water line usually is indicated both by
1069debris washed up during the highest tides and left on the beach and by a
"1084shelf." This "shelf," made by the erosive action of the ocean waves during the
1098highest tides and during storms, rises at an angle of approximately 45 degrees
1111and can be from one to four or five feet high. Landward of this shelf is the
"1128dry sand" or "soft sand" beach, also sometimes referred to as the "upper
1141beach." It extends landward from the mean high water line to the vegetation
1154line, where the dunes start. Usually, some pioneer vegetation is found in the
1167uppermost reaches of this part of the beach, forming what is called the
"1180foredune" area of the beach.
11855. The tides along the Atlantic Ocean beaches in the Preserve are semi-
1198diurnal, i.e., there usually are two high tides and two low tides a day. These
1213high and low tides last approximately one hour, and each day they occur
1226approximately an hour later than they did the day before.
12366. There are five beach access points with motor vehicle parking areas
1248located along U.S. Highway A1A within the Preserve. Three are within the Park.
1261There is parking for approximately 120, 68, 79, 42 and 25 vehicles in these five
1276parking areas. There also is a current proposal for the addition of three more
1290access points in the Park, with parking for a total of 340 vehicles, five beach
1305bathhouses, and five pedestrian overpasses.
13107. There are many other places where pedestrians can walk from A1A to the
1324beaches, including 30 County-controlled access points. But there are no lawful
1335parking areas adjacent to any of these other access points at this time, and
1349parking on the right-of-way of A1A is prohibited.
13578. Currently, the only lawful motor vehicle access to the Atlantic Ocean
1369beaches in the Preserve is to the south of the Preserve. Prior to the agency
1384action challenged in these proceedings, motor vehicles lawfully could be driven
1395onto the beach at this access point and be driven north into the Preserve, so
1410long as they remained below the mean high water line. A former access near the
1425north end of the Preserve has been cordoned off. To leave the Preserve, motor
1439vehicles would have to be turned around and driven back south to the same motor
1454vehicle access point.
14579. Due to the restricted access to the Atlantic Ocean beaches in the
1470Preserve, not much use is made of those beaches. In comparison, beaches to the
1484south are used much more heavily. Of the relatively few who use the motor
1498vehicle access to the south and drive on the beach north through the Preserve,
1512some ultimately use the beaches to picnic, swim, surf, beach-comb and similar
1524activities; some probably just drive on the beach. There was no evidence
1536quantifying the uses currently being made of the beaches in the Preserve.
154810. In the past, homemade motor vehicles called "skeeters" were built with
1560a light-weight chassis and over-sized wheels. They were used for driving on
1572both the hard and soft areas of the beaches, as well as illegally in the dunes.
1588This practice has been curtailed due to better enforcement of the prohibitions
1600against driving in the dunes, a generally heightened environmental consciousness
1610among the public, and prohibitions against driving the "skeeters" on public
1621highways. Generally, there has been less driving on the beaches of the Preserve
1634in recent years, although the practice persists at a reduced level.
164511. At all times of the year, it sometimes is impossible to drive along
1659the entire length of the beaches in the Preserve without driving on the soft
1673sand area. This is especially true during the winter months when the waves and
1687tides are higher and storms are more frequent. But even in the summer months,
1701there are times when "red shell beds" in the "wet sand" part of the beach must
1717be circumvented to avoid getting stuck. Especially when the tide is not at its
1731lowest, the only way to avoid some of these "red shell" beds is to drive over
1747the "shelf" and onto the "soft sand." Depending on the tides, this may also be
1762necessary in order to turn a vehicle around on the beach. In many places, the
"1777soft sand" area is not very wide, and it would be necessary under those
1791circumstances to drive in the "foredune" area.
179812. The times of the daily high and low tides can be obtained relatively
1812easily by members of the public. But there is no assurance that all persons who
1827would drive on the beaches would know the times of the tides. Nor is there any
1843assurance that persons who drive the "wet sand" or "hard sand" part of the
1857beaches at low tide also would plan to both start their beach drive and their
1872return trip during low enough tides to be able to avoid driving on the "soft
1887sand" part of the beach. For these and other reasons, it would be difficult, if
1902not practically impossible, to effectively monitor beach driving throughout the
1912Preserve and consistently enforce a restriction to driving only on the "wet
1924sand" or "hard sand" areas of the beach.
193213. In the summer months, sea turtles lay eggs in nests dug in the sand of
1948the foredune and dune areas of the Atlantic Ocean beaches in the Preserve.
1961After a period of incubation in the nests, the turtle hatchlings dig themselves
1974out of the nests and crawl to the ocean to begin their lives in the sea.
1990Driving motor vehicles over nests on those parts of the beaches in the summer
2004months could crush eggs in their nests or pack the sand hard enough to reduce
2019the number of hatchlings that emerge from the nest alive. In addition, driving
2032motor vehicles in these area, even in other parts of the year, can leave ruts in
2048the beach that disorient hatchlings that leave the nests in summer so that fewer
2062reach the ocean alive.
206614. Sea turtles crawl out of the ocean to their nest sites at night.
2080Artificial lighting can disturb their nesting and egg-laying activities.
2089However, it seems that moving lights, or lights that turn on and off (in the
2104manner of car lights), create more of a disturbance than stationary lights, such
2117as those more often found at residences along the beaches in the Preserve. The
2131Management Plan does not prohibit artificial lighting along the beaches in the
2143Preserve, but it recommends that further attention be given to this problem and
2156that ways to address the problem be explored and pursued in cooperation with the
2170County.
217115. Various shore birds, including the threatened least tern, make their
2182nests in the foredune area of the beaches in the Preserve. Driving on the
2196foredunes destroys and disturbs nesting habitat and disturbs the nesting
2206activities of these birds. In addition, both these ground nesting shore birds
2218and a variety of migratory birds make use of different areas of the beaches to
2233rest and feed. Driving on the beaches disturbs these activities, as well. The
2246only known nesting colony of least terns in St. Johns County is located in the
2261Park, where beach driving is prohibited.
226716. The Division of Parks and Recreation (DPR) of the Department of
2279Environmental Protection (DEP) has utilized F.A.C. Rule 16D-2.002(4)-(5) to
2288prohibit driving or parking motor vehicles on the beaches of the Park by not
2302designating the beaches as driving or parking areas within the Park. At least
2315parts of the beaches in the Park have been posted as areas where driving motor
2330vehicles is prohibited.
233317. In order to develop a management plan for the Preserve, the manager of
2347the Preserve personally researched the geology, climate and natural resources of
2358the Preserve, as well as the records of the County, and also collected data
2372pertaining to the Preserve from several state agencies. Over the course of a
2385year, the manager's input was taken into consideration, and a management plan,
2397called the Guana River Marsh Aquatic Preserve Management Plan (the Management
2408Plan), was developed for the Preserve. It was adopted by the Board of Trustees
2422of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund on December 17, 1991.
243218. The Management Plan recites in pertinent part:
2440At the present time, motorized vehicular
2446traffic is permitted, by county ordinance,
2452below the natural vegetation line on the
2459beaches adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean in St.
2467Johns County. Vehicles are not allowed on
2474the 4.2 miles of beach within Guana River
2482State Park. The coarse coquina sand and
2489steep profiles of the beaches in the preserve
2497make driving on the wet sand area difficult.
2505Drivers are forced to cross the dry sand
2513area, damaging the foredunes, pioneer dune
2519vegetation and sea turtle nesting habitat.
2525Due to the negative environmental impacts
2531resulting from this activity, motorized
2536vehicular traffic shall not be considered an
2543authorized activity on sovereign submerged
2548lands within [Prime Resource Protection Area]
2554PRPA beach management areas of the preserve,
2561and therefore will be prohibited.
2566Under the Management Plan, all of the Atlantic Ocean beaches in the Preserve are
2580Prime Resource Protection Area, and the driving of motorized vehicles on them is
2593prohibited.
259419. On June 11, 1993, the DEP's DRP sent St. Johns County a letter
2608advising that, based on the Management Plan, DEP no longer would permit the
2621driving of motor vehicles on the Atlantic Ocean beaches in the Preserve. The
2634proposed amendment to F.A.C. Rule 18-20.004(7), incorporating the Management
2643Plan, was noticed in the Florida Administrative Weekly on August 6, 1993. On or
2657about August 18, 1993, the DEP agreed not to enforce the beach driving
2670prohibition in the Preserve until these cases are resolved.
2679CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
268220. F.A.C. Rule 16D-2.002, dealing with vehicles and traffic in state
2693parks, provides in pertinent part:
2698(4) Restriction to Roads. No person shall
2705drive any vehicle on any area except
2712designated roads, parking areas, or other
2718such designated areas.
2721(5) Parking. All vehicles shall be parked
2728only in established parking areas or in such
2736other areas and at such times as the Division
2745may designate.
2747Utilizing this rule, the Division of Parks and Recreation (DPR) of the
2759Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has prohibited driving or parking
2769motor vehicles on the beaches of the Park by not designating the beaches as
2783driving or parking areas within the Park.
279021. The proposed amendment to F.A.C. Rule 18-20.004, dealing with
2800management policies, standards and criteria for state aquatic preserves,
2809incorporates by reference the Guana River Marsh Aquatic Preserve Management Plan
2820(the Management Plan), including the beach driving prohibition in the Management
2831Plan.
283222. In separate proceedings, under DOAH Case Nos. 93-3875RX and 93-4533RP,
2843the County has challenged the validity of both F.A.C. Rule 16D-2.002(4)-(5) and
2855the proposed amendment to F.A.C. Rule 18-20.004. The County argued three
2866essential grounds for its challenges: (1) the County, not the DEP, has
2878jurisdiction over vehicular traffic on the Atlantic Ocean beaches in St. Johns
2890County; (2) even if the County no longer has jurisdiction over vehicular traffic
2903on the coastal beaches, the DEP's jurisdiction is significantly limited, by
2914Section 258.43(1), Fla. Stat. (1991), "provide regulation of human activities
2924within the preserve in such a manner as not to unreasonably interfere with
2937lawful and traditional public uses of the preserve, such as sport and commercial
2950fishing, boating, and swimming"; and (3) that the prohibition of all beach
2962driving on the beaches in the Preserve and in the Park is overly broad in that a
2979prohibition against driving only during the winter season, or a restriction to
2991driving only at low tide, would have been sufficient to achieve the State's
3004purposes.
300523. In a Final Order entered in DOAH Case Nos. 93-3875RX and 93-4533RP on
3019this date, the County's challenges have been denied. First, the Board of
3031Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund has jurisdiction over the Park
3043and has delegated its jurisdiction to the DEP, and the DRP of the DEP has
3058jurisdiction over the Park; the County no longer has jurisdiction to authorize
3070vehicular traffic on beaches within the Park and within the Preserve. Second,
3082the mention of fishing, boating and swimming in Section 258.43(1), Fla. Stat.
3094(1991), was intended to exclude beach driving, and the prohibition against
3105driving motor vehicles on the beaches in the Preserve does not unreasonably
3117interfere with any lawful and traditional public uses of the Preserve. Finally,
3129a complete prohibition against driving motor vehicles on the beaches in the
3141Preserve and in the Park is not unreasonable or overly broad.
3152RECOMMENDATION
3153Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is
3166recommended that the Respondent, the Department of Environmental Protection
3175enter a final order enforcing the prohibitions contained in both F.A.C. Rule
318716D-2.002(4)-(5) and the proposed amendment to F.A.C. Rule 18-20.004 against the
3198driving of motor vehicles on the beaches on the Atlantic Ocean beaches in St.
3212Johns County that are within the Guana River Marsh Aquatic Preserve.
3223RECOMMENDED this 30th day of November, 1993, in Tallahassee, Florida.
3233___________________________
3234J. LAWRENCE JOHNSTON
3237Hearing Officer
3239Division of Administrative Hearings
3243The DeSoto Building
32461230 Apalachee Parkway
3249Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550
3252(904) 488-9675
3254Filed with the Clerk of the Division
3261of Administrative Hearings this
326530th day of November, 1993.
3270APPENDIX TO RECOMMENDED ORDER, CASE NO. 93-3970
3277To comply with the requirements of Section 120.59(2), Fla. Stat. (1991),
3288the following rulings are made on the parties' proposed findings of fact:
3300Petitioner's Proposed Findings of Fact.
33051. Accepted and incorporated.
33092.-6. Accepted and incorporated to the extent not subordinate or
3319unnecessary.
33207. Subordinate and unnecessary.
33248.-9. Accepted and incorporated to the extent not subordinate or
3334unnecessary.
333510. First sentence, rejected as not proven. There also is access by boat
3348and, albeit over longer distances, by foot.
335511. Accepted and incorporated to the extent not subordinate or
3365unnecessary.
336612. Accepted in part and rejected in part, as reflected in the Findings of
3380Fact.
338113. Accepted as representative of dead low tide. Subordinate and
3391unnecessary.
339214. Accepted and incorporated.
339615. Rejected in part: in that there are "red shell beds" in summer, too,
3410and they can force drivers onto the "soft sand" areas in summer, too, depending
3424on the tides; in that "dramatically" is argument and not proven; and in that
3438Exhibit 2 depicts dead low tide in summer.
344616. Accepted but subordinate and unnecessary.
345217. Rejected as not proven. (Enforcement of such mitigation would be
3463impracticable or impossible.)
346618. Accepted but subordinate and unnecessary.
347219. Accepted and incorporated.
347620.-21. First sentence, accepted and incorporated. Second sentence,
3484accepted that the County uses "due care," but enforcement of a prohibition
3496against driving anywhere except on the "hard sand" is impracticable or
3507impossible.
350822. Rejected as not proven.
351323. Accepted but subordinate and unnecessary.
351924. Rejected as not proven that there is "no way to get to many beach
3534areas" or that limited access "restricts traditional use." (Access as limited,
3545or more limited, is "traditional.")
355125.-27. Accepted and incorporated.
355528. Rejected as not proven. (How easy it is depends entirely on the tide,
3569the number and location of people on the beach, and the presence of "red shell"
3584beds.)
358529. Accepted and incorporated.
3589Respondent's Proposed Findings of Fact.
35941.-3. Accepted and incorporated except to the extent conclusion of law and
3606unnecessary.
36074. Accepted and incorporated.
36115. Accepted but subordinate and unnecessary.
36176.-20. Accepted and incorporated to the extent not concluson of law,
3628subordinate or unnecessary.
363121.-24. Rejected as being conclusion of law.
363825.-33. Accepted and incorporated to the extent not subordinate or
3648unnecessary.
364934. Rejected as conclusion of law as to who is "responsible."
366035.-54. Accepted and incorporated to the extent not subordinate or
3670unnecessary.
367155. Rejected as not proven. Also, conclusion of law.
3680COPIES FURNISHED:
3682Daniel J. Bosanko, Esquire
3686Assistant County Attorney
3689St. Johns County
3692Post Office Box 1533
3696St. Augustine, Florida 32085-1533
3700Edwin A. Steinmeyer, Esquire
3704Barrie J. Sawyer, Esquire
3708Assistant General Counsel
3711Department of Environmental Protection
3715Mail Station 35
37182600 Blair Stone Road
3722Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400
3725Virginia B. Wetherell, Secretary
3729Department of Environmental Protection
37332600 Blair Stone Road
3737Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400
3740Kenneth Plante, Esquire
3743General Counsel
3745Department of Environmental Protection
37492600 Blair Stone Road
3753Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400
3756NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
3762All parties have the right to submit to the Department of Environmental
3774Protection written exceptions to this Recommended Order. All agencies allow
3784each party at least ten days in which to submit written exceptions. Some
3797agencies allow a larger period within which to submit written exceptions. You
3809should consult with the Department of Environmental Protection concerning its
3819rules on the deadline for filing exceptions to this Recommended Order.
- Date
- Proceedings
- Date: 04/13/1994
- Proceedings: Order Denying Motion to Vacate Automatic Stay sent out.
- Date: 04/11/1994
- Proceedings: Petitioner`s Response to Respondents` Motion to Vacate Automatic Stay filed.
- Date: 04/08/1994
- Proceedings: Petitioner`s Response to Respondents` Motion to Vacate Automatic Stay filed.
- Date: 04/05/1994
- Proceedings: (DEP) Notice of Hearing (motion hearing set for 4/8/94; 10:00am) filed.
- Date: 03/25/1994
- Proceedings: Respondents' Motion to Vacate Automatic Stay filed.
- Date: 02/10/1994
- Proceedings: AGENCY APPEAL, ONCE THE RETENTION SCHEDULE OF -KEEP ONE YEAR AFTER CLOSURE- IS MET, CASE FILE IS RETURNED TO AGENCY GENERAL COUNSEL. -ac
- Date: 02/07/1994
- Proceedings: AGENCY APPEAL, ONCE THE RETENTION SCHEDULE OF -KEEP ONE YEAR AFTER CLOSURE- IS MET, CASE FILE IS RETURNED TO AGENCY GENERAL COUNSEL. -ac
- PDF:
- Date: 11/30/1993
- Proceedings: Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held August 26, 1993.
- Date: 11/30/1993
- Proceedings: Case No/s 93-3842RU, 93-3875RX, 93-4533RP, 93-3970: unconsolidated.
- Date: 08/17/1993
- Proceedings: Order Consolidating Cases and Granting Leave to Amend Petitions (hearing set for Aug. 26-27, 1993) sent out. (Consolidated cases are: 93-3842RU, 93-3875RX, 93-3970 & 93-4533RP)
- Date: 07/21/1993
- Proceedings: Order Consolidating Cases sent out. (Consolidated cases are: 93-3842RU, 93-3875RX, 93-3970)
- Date: 07/21/1993
- Proceedings: Agency referral letter; Petition Challenging The Validity of Agency Action and Request for Formal Proceedings Pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes; Appendix for Petition Challenging The Validity of Agency Action and Request for Formal Proceedin
Case Information
- Judge:
- J. LAWRENCE JOHNSTON
- Date Filed:
- 07/21/1993
- Date Assignment:
- 07/21/1993
- Last Docket Entry:
- 04/13/1994
- Location:
- Tallahassee, Florida
- District:
- Northern
- Agency:
- Department of Environmental Protection