96-005179CON Mederi Of Dade County, Inc. vs. Agency For Health Care Administration
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Monday, June 30, 1997.


View Dockets  
Summary: Petitioners failed to timely seek renewal of license which, once expired, may not be transferred to new owner.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8MEDERI OF DADE COUNTY, INC., and )

15HOME HEALTH LINK, INC., )

20)

21Petitioners, )

23)

24vs. ) Case Nos. 96-5179

29) 96-5486

31AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE )

36ADMINISTRATION, )

38)

39Respondent. )

41__________________________________)

42RECOMMENDED ORDER

44Pursuant to notice, a formal hearing was held in this case

55on April 10, 1997, at Miami, Florida, before J. D. Parrish, a

67designated Administrative Law Judge of the Division of

75Administrative Hearings.

77APPEARANCES

78For Petitioners: Louise T. Jeroslow, Esquire

84Zack, Sparber, Kosnitzky,

87Spratt & Brooks, P.A.

91100 Southeast Second Street, Suite 2800

97Miami, Florida 33131

100For Respondent: Jean Claude Dugue, Esquire

106Agency for Health Care Administration

1118355 Northwest 53rd Street, First Floor

117Manchester Building

119Miami, Florida 33166

122STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES

126Whether the Medicare-certified, home health agency license

133held by Petitioner, Mederi of Dade County, Inc. (Mederi),

142terminated such that it may not, as a matter of law, be

154transferred to Petitioner, Home Health Link, Inc. (HHL), pursuant

163to a request for change of ownership application.

171PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

173This matter began on August 28, 1996, when the Respondent,

183the Agency for Health Care Administration (Department or Agency),

192issued a letter to Petitioner which denied Mederi’s request to

202reinstate its license #20689-95. Prior to its expiration,

210Mederi’s license had authorized it to do business as a Medicare-

221certified, home health agency. Because Mederi failed to timely

230renew the license, the Department advised Petitioner that it

239could not be reinstated. Thereafter, Mederi filed a petition for

249formal administrative hearing challenging this decision. This

256case, DOAH Case No. 96-5179, was forwarded to the Division of

267Administrative Hearings for formal proceedings on November 4,

2751996.

276As to DOAH Case No. 96-5486, that matter began on

286October 16, 1996, when the Agency advised HHL that its

296application for licensure as a home health agency had been denied

307because it had failed to submit information necessary to complete

317the application process. The denial was based, in part, on the

328Department’s consideration of the application as an initial

336application (as opposed to a request for change of ownership

346application). Since the home health agency’s license whose

354license was to be transferred (Mederi) had expired, the

363Department had reviewed the application as an initial

371application. In this regard, HHL was required to provide a copy

382of its certificate of need (CON) which it had failed to timely

394produce.

395HHL then filed a petition for formal administrative hearing

404challenging the agency’s denial, asserting its claim for

412licensure (and exemption from the CON requirement) through

420Mederi, and maintaining that it satisfied all applicable

428statutory and rule criteria for licensure as a Medicare-

437certified, home health agency. This case was forwarded to the

447Division of Administrative Hearings for formal proceedings on

455November 18, 1996.

458At the hearing, the cases were consolidated for the

467presentation of evidence. The Petitioners presented testimony

474from David Nesslein, the corporate secretary/treasurer for

481Mederi; Lois Mill, the administrator for Mederi and proposed

490administrator of HHL; John Jansak, an attorney employed by HHL;

500and David Templeton, a health services and facility consultant

509who is a team leader in processing licensure files for renewal,

520initial licenses, and change of ownership applications for the

529Department. Petitioners’ Exhibits 1 through 9 were received into

538evidence. The Agency presented testimony from Molly McKinstry, a

547former human services program specialist employed with the

555Department’s long term care unit/health facility regulations

562section, and David Templeton. Its Exhibits 1 through 5 were also

573received.

574The transcript of the proceeding was filed on May 1, 1997.

585Thereafter the parties requested, and leave was granted, for them

595to file their proposed recommended orders not later than June 2,

6061997. Both parties timely filed proposed orders which have been

616considered in the preparation of this recommended order.

624FINDINGS OF FACT

6271. The Department is the state authority charged with the

637responsibility of regulating and licensing entities pursuant to

645Chapter 400, Florida Statutes. Such entities include home health

654care agencies.

6562. Mederi was licensed, license #20689-95, as a home health

666care agency and was Medicare certified. Mederi did not have a

677CON but was nevertheless "grandfathered" under the law to

686operate.

6873. Mederi has provided services in Dade and Monroe Counties

697since December of 1973. It offered a full range of skilled

708nursing services as well as physical therapy, speech therapy,

717home health aide services, occupational therapy, and medical

725social workers. In 1994, Mederi generated approximately five

733million dollars in revenue. As of the time of hearing, the

744company was not operating.

7484. HHL sought to obtain the license held by Mederi and

759filed an application with the Agency to do so on or about May 10,

7731996.

7745. The license issued to Mederi in 1995 was valid through

785April 30, 1996. The renewal for this license was due sixty days

797prior to its expiration date.

8026. In January or February 1996, the Department sent HHL a

813letter together with a change of ownership application in order

823for Petitioner to initiate the proposed license transaction with

832Mederi. At that time HHL did not have a formal written agreement

844with Mederi but had contacted the Department to ascertain whether

854Mederi’s grandfathered status under the CON provisions could be

863transferred to HHL. Such letter advised Mr. Jansak that the

873application would be due sixty days prior to the effective date

884of the change of ownership.

8896. In response to the letter, the Department received the

899application for change of ownership filed by HHL on May 10, 1996.

9117. Typically, the Department sends a notice to a licensee

921ninety days prior to the expiration of a license with an

932application for renewal. In this case, the Department cannot

941establish that such notice was provided; however, there is no

951evidence that it was not issued. Historically, Mederi had timely

961filed applications for license renewal.

9668. On or about July 9, 1996, Ms. McKinstry sent Mederi a

978letter notifying it that it had failed to renew its license.

9899. Also on July 9, 1996, Ms. McKinstry sent HHL a letter

1001notifying it that the change of ownership could not be accepted

1012since Mederi’s license had expired. Instead, the Department

1020suggested that the application be reviewed and considered as an

1030initial application for licensure.

103410. The renewal application for Mederi was due on or about

1045February 28, 1996. For every day thereafter in which the

1055application for renewal was not filed, Mederi could be subject to

1066a fine of $100.00 per day up to the amount of $5,000.00. In this

1081instance, Mederi did not file a renewal application within the

1091time allotted ( prior to its license expiration or May 1, 1996)

1103and no fine was imposed. The Department does not fine holders of

1115expired licenses.

111711. HHL did not reply to Ms. McKinstry’s letter of July 9,

11291996. On September 20, 1996, she sent a letter advising HHL that

1141the application would be considered an initial application and

1150requested additional documentation.

115312. The Agency then sent a letter to HHL on October 16,

11651996, denying the initial application for licensure as the

1174requested additional documentation had not been provided.

118113. The Department ex pects licensed agencies to understand,

1190and comply with, applicable provisions of Florida law.

119814. Because Mederi failed to timely seek renewal of its

1208license, the value of it as an asset has plummeted from

1219approximately $250,000 to nothing.

122415. Under the agreement between Mederi and HHL, it was

1234Mederi’s responsibility to keep the license current.

1241CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

124416. The Division of Administrative Hearings has

1251jurisdiction over the parties to, and the subject matter of,

1261these proceedings.

126317. Section 400.464, Florida Statutes , provides, in part:

1271(1) Any home health agency must be licensed

1279by the Agency for Health Care Administration

1286to operate in this state. A license issued

1294to a home health agency, unless sooner

1301suspended or revoked, expires 1 year after

1308its date of issuance. However, any home

1315health agency that is operated by the Federal

1323Government is exempt from this part.

1329* * *

1332(5)(a) It is unlawful for any person to

1340offer or advertise home health services to

1347the public unless he or she has a valid

1356license under this part. It is unlawful for

1364any holder of a license issued under this

1372part to advertise or indicate to the public

1380that it holds a home health agency license

1388other than the one it has been issued.

1396(b) A person who violates paragraph (a)

1403is subject to an injunctive proceeding under

1410s. 400.515. A violation of paragraph (a) is

1418a deceptive and unfair trade practice and

1425constitutes a violation of the Florida

1431Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.

1437(c) A person who violates paragraph (a)

1444commits a misdemeanor of the second degree,

1451punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s.

1459775.083. Any person who commits a second or

1467subsequent violation commits a misdemeanor of

1473the first degree, punishable as provided in

1480s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

1485Each day of continuing violation constitutes

1491a separate offense. (Emphasis added.)

149618. Section 400.471, Florida Statutes , provides, in

1503pertinent part:

1505Application for license; fee; provisional

1510license; temporary permit.

1513(1) Applic ation for an initial license or

1521for renewal of an existing license must be

1529made under oath to the Agency for Health Care

1538Administration on forms furnished by it and

1545must be accompanied by the appropriate

1551license fee as provided in subsection (7).

1558The agency must take final action on an

1566initial licensure application within 60 days

1572after receipt of all required documentation.

1578* * *

1581(5) Sixty days before the expiration date,

1588an application for renewal must be submitted

1595to the Agency for Health Care Administration

1602under oath on forms furnished by it, and a

1611license must be renewed if the applicant has

1619met the requirements established under this

1625part and applicable rules. The home health

1632agency must file with the application

1638satisfactory proof that it is in compliance

1645with this part and applicable rules. The

1652home health agency must submit satisfactory

1658proof of its financial ability to comply with

1666the requirements of this part.

1671(6) When transferring the ownership of a

1678home health agency, the transferee must

1684submit an application for a license at least

169260 days before the effective date of the

1700transfer. If the home health agency is being

1708leased, a copy of the lease agreement must be

1717filed with the application.

1721* * *

1724(10) The department shall not issue a

1731license designated as certified to a home

1738health agency which fails to receive a

1745certificate of need under the provisions of

1752ss. 408.031-408.045 . (Emphasis added.)

175719. Rule 59A-8.0086, Florida Administrative Code, pr ovides,

1765in pertinent part:

1768Denial, Suspension, Revocation of License and

1774Imposition of Fines.

1777(1) The AHCA shall deny an initial or renewal

1786application for license, or impose a fine,

1793(a) if the applicant fails to submit all the

1802information required for an application

1807within time frames specified in Section

1813120.60, F.S.,

1815* * *

1818(e) if the applicant fails to comply with

1826other provisions of the statute, Chapter 400,

1833Part IV, F.S., or this rule.

1839(2) The AHCA shall suspend or revoke a

1847license or impose a fine,

1852* * *

1855(c) if the home health agency fails to comply

1864with the other provisions of this rule or

1872Home Health Services Act (Chapter 400, Part

1879IV, F.S.).

1881* * *

1884(4) Failure to file an application within the

1892time frames specified in this rule shall

1899result in an administrative fine in the

1906amount of $100 per day, each day constituting

1914a separate violation. In no event shall such

1922fines aggregate more than $5,000 . (Emphasis

1930added.)

193120. The facts in t his matter are undisputed. The

1941Petitioner, Mederi, did not timely file a request to renew its

1952license. In fact, the license had expired before the application

1962to transfer it was filed by HHL. The Agency maintains that it

1974does not have the authority to breathe life back into the license

1986so that it can be transferred to the new applicant. Moreover,

1997Petitioners have not cited any legal authority for their

2006position. Instead, Petitioners argue that it would be

2014unreasonable to allow a property right valued by them at

2024$250,000.00 to lapse based upon the errors of not timely filing

2036their requests. In this regard Petitioners cite professional

2044licenses which, by law, allow licensees in an inactive status to

2055reactivate their licenses, however, the provisions of Chapter

2063400, Florida Statutes, do not contemplate an inactive status

2072which may be reactivated.

207621. Regrettably, the Petitioners lost a valuable asset

2084through oversight. The Department does not have the authority to

2094renew a license which has expired. The Division of

2103Administrative Hearings does not have the authority to fashion an

2113equitable remedy to the issue presented by this case.

2122RECOMMENDATION

2123Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of

2133Law, it is RECOMMENDED that the Agency for Health Care

2143Administration enter a final order denying Petitioners the

2151remedies sought.

2153DONE AND ENTERED this 30th day of June, 1997, in

2163Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

2167___________________________________

2168J. D. PARRISH

2171Administrative Law Judge

2174Division of Administrative Hearings

2178The DeSoto Building

21811230 Apalachee Parkway

2184Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

2187(904) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

2191Fax Filing (904) 921-6847

2195Filed with the Clerk of the

2201Division of Administrative Hearings

2205this 30th day of June, 1997.

2211COPIES FURNISHED:

2213Jean Claude Dugue, Esquire

2217Agency for Health Care Administration

22228355 Northwest 53rd Street

2226Miami, Florida 33166

2229Louise T. Jeroslow, Esquire

2233Zack, Sparber, Kosnitzky,

2236Spratt & Brooks, P.A.

2240100 Southeast Second Street, Suite 2800

2246Miami, Florida 33131

2249Sam Power, Agency Clerk

2253Agency For Health Care Administration

22582727 Mahan Drive, Suite 3431

2263Fort Knox Building III

2267Tallahassee, Florida 32308-5403

2270Jerome W. Hoffman, General Counsel

2275Agency For Health Care Administration

22802727 Mahan Drive, Suite 3431

2285Fort Knox Building III

2289Tallahassee, Florida 32308-5403

2292NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

2298All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15

2309days from the date of this recommended order. Any exceptions to

2320this recommended order should be filed with the agency that will

2331issue the final order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
Date: 08/29/1997
Proceedings: Final Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/26/1997
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 08/26/1997
Proceedings: Recommended Order
Date: 07/02/1997
Proceedings: (Respondent) Status Report; Settlement Agreement filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/30/1997
Proceedings: Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held April 10, 1997.
Date: 06/02/1997
Proceedings: (AHCA) Proposed Recommended Order (for judge signature) (filed via facsimile).
Date: 06/02/1997
Proceedings: (From L. Jeroslow) Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Date: 05/19/1997
Proceedings: (Petitioner) Motion for Continuance filed.
Date: 05/16/1997
Proceedings: Order sent out. (PRO`s due by 6/2/97)
Date: 05/09/1997
Proceedings: (Petitioner) Motion for Continuance (filed via facsimile).
Date: 05/01/1997
Proceedings: Transcript filed.
Date: 04/10/1997
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Date: 04/10/1997
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Date: 04/10/1997
Proceedings: (Public Service Commission) Exhibits
Date: 04/08/1997
Proceedings: Amended Notice of Hearing by Video sent out. (Video Hearing set for 4/10/97; 9:00am; Miami & Tallahassee; Cases Consolidated are: 96-005179 & 96-005486). CONSOLIDATED CASE NO - CN002723
Date: 04/04/1997
Proceedings: Order sent out. (Motion to Dismiss denied)
Date: 03/12/1997
Proceedings: (Petitioner) Response to Motion to Dismiss (filed via facsimile).
Date: 01/22/1997
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 4/10/97; 9:00am; Miami)
Date: 12/30/1996
Proceedings: (Petitioner) Response to Initial Order filed.
Date: 11/12/1996
Proceedings: Initial Order issued.
Date: 11/04/1996
Proceedings: Notice; Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing; Agency Action letter filed.

Case Information

Judge:
J. D. PARRISH
Date Filed:
11/04/1996
Date Assignment:
11/12/1996
Last Docket Entry:
08/29/1997
Location:
Miami, Florida
District:
Southern
Agency:
ADOPTED IN TOTO
Suffix:
CON
 

Related DOAH Cases(s) (2):

Related Florida Statute(s) (5):

Related Florida Rule(s) (1):