97-004378
Division Of Alcoholic Beverages And Tobacco vs.
Vampire Cafe, Inc., D/B/A Vampire Cafe
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Monday, April 6, 1998.
Recommended Order on Monday, April 6, 1998.
1STATE OF FLORIDA
4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
8DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND )
13PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION )
17OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO, )
23)
24Petitioner, )
26)
27vs. ) Case No. 97-4378
32)
33VAMPIRE CAFE, INC., d/b/a )
38VAMPIRE CAFE, )
41)
42Respondent. )
44____________________________________)
45RECOMMENDED ORDER
47Pursuant to notice, a formal hearing was held in this case
58on January 28, 1998, in Vero Beach, Florida, before Patricia Hart
69Malono, a duly-designated Administrative Law Judge of the
77Division of Administrative Hearings.
81APPEARANCES
82For Petitioner: Miguel Oxamendi
86Assistant General Counsel
89Department of Business and
93Professional Regulation
951940 North Monroe Street
99Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1007
102For Respondent: Eric Lappalainen, pro se
1083865 North Highway A1A
112Fort Pierce, Florida 34949
116STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES
120Whether the Respondent committed the violation alleged in
128the Administrative Action dated June 30, 1997, and, if so, the
139penalty which should be imposed.
144PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
146On June 30, 1997, the Department of Business and
155Professional Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages and
162Tobacco ("Department"), filed an Administrative Action charging
171that, on or about May 14, 1997, an agent or employee of the
184Vampire Cafe, Inc., d/b/a Vampire Cafe, sold an alcoholic
193beverage to a person under the age of twenty-one years, in
204violation of Section 562.11(1)(a), Florida Statutes. The Vampire
212Cafe, through Eric Lappalainen, its secretary/treasurer,
218requested a formal hearing, and the Department forwarded the case
228to the Division of Administrative Hearings for assignment of an
238administrative law judge. Pursuant to notice, a hearing was held
248on January 28, 1998.
252At the hearing, the Department presented the testimony of
261Special Agent Charlene Murphy, an employee of the Department, and
271Detective Richard Boyd, an officer with the Vero Beach Police
281Department. The Petitioner did not offer any exhibits into
290evidence. The Vampire Cafe presented the testimony of Jason
299Richard Thatcher and Eric Lappalainen, and Respondent's Exhibit 1
308was offered and received into evidence. At the request of the
319Department, official recognition was taken of Rule 61A-2.022,
327Florida Administrative Code.
330No transcript was filed in this case, but the parties timely
341filed proposed recommended orders, which have been duly
349considered.
350FINDINGS OF FACT
353Based on the oral and documentary evidence presented at the
363final hearing and on the entire record of this proceeding, the
374following findings of fact are made:
3801. The Department of Business and Professional Regulation,
388Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, is the state agency
398charged with enforcing Florida's Beverage Law, and, specifically,
406with regulating the sale of alcoholic beverages in the state.
416Sections 561.02 and .11(1), Florida Statutes.
4222. At all times material to this proceeding, the Vampire
432Cafe held alcoholic beverage license number 41-01242, series
4402-COP, which authorized the sale of alcoholic beverages on the
450premises of the Vampire Cafe, located at 1306 20th Street, Vero
461Beach, Indian River County, Florida. At all times material to
471this proceeding, Eric Lappalainen was the secretary/treasurer of
479the Vampire Cafe, holding twenty percent ownership interest.
4873. At approximately 10:30 p.m. on May 14, 1997, Detective
497Richard Boyd of the Vero Beach Police Department entered the
507Vampire Cafe to conduct an undercover investigation of underage
516drinking on the premises; he was alone. Detective Boyd observed
526that no one was checking identification at the door of the
537establishment, which was a coffee house open to persons of all
548ages and in which both nonalcoholic and alcoholic beverages were
558served.
5594. Detective Boyd sat at the bar and observed that Eric
570Lappalainen was tending bar; although Detective Boyd thought
578Mr. Lappalainen was the only employee in the cafe at the time, a
591part-time employee named Nathan Palmer was working also. The
600cafe was a small establishment, and it was crowded, with
610approximately forty people standing or sitting at tables and at
620the bar. Even though the lights were low, Detective Boyd could
631distinguish facial features from one end of the bar to the other.
6435. Detective Boyd observed a young man approach the bar
653about seven feet from where he was seated and hand
663Mr. Lappalainen two one-dollar bills, which he put into the cash
674register. Detective Boyd could not hear the conversation between
683Mr. Lappalainen and the young man, but the young man did not show
696Mr. Lappalainen any identification. Mr. Lappalainen drew two
704glasses of dark liquid from a tap labeled "Guinness Stout," and
715he handed them to the young man. Detective Boyd tested the
726liquid drawn from the tap by ordering a Guinness Stout, and he
738confirmed that it was an alcoholic beverage.
7456. Detective Boyd believed that the young man he saw
755purchase the beers was Jason Thatcher. He based this
764identification on his contact with Jason several weeks prior to
774May 14, 1997, when he had arrested Jason for possession and
785cultivation of drugs.
7887. Jason was born on October 10, 1978, and was nineteen
799years old on May 14, 1997. Based upon my observation of Jason at
812the hearing, his appearance suggests that he could have been
822twenty-one years of age.
8268. Detective Boyd did not arrest either Mr. Lappalainen or
836Jason at the time he observed the sale because he was still
848conducting his undercover investigation. However, Jason was
855arrested two weeks after the incident, and Mr. Lappalainen was
865arrested on June 25, 1997, over a month after the incident.
8769. It was Mr. Lappalainen's habit to ask for identification
886from each person purchasing an alcoholic beverage in the Vampire
896Cafe to verify that he or she was of legal age; the only
909exception to this practice was when Mr. Lappalainen knew the
919person and knew that he or she was twenty-one years of age or
932older. Mr. Lappalainen asked for identification when a person
941purchased his or her first alcoholic beverage and did not usually
952require further identification from the same person during the
961evening.
96210. Jason Thatcher was in the Vampire Cafe at the time
973Detective Boyd entered the premises.
97811. The evidence presented by the Department is sufficient
987to establish that Mr. Lappalainen sold an alcoholic beverage to a
998Jason Thatcher, who is under the age of twenty-one years.
1008However, the evidence is not sufficient to establish that
1017Detective Boyd observed Jason purchase his first beer at the cafe
1028on the night of May 14, 1997.
103512. Mr. Lappalainen was first confronted with the charges
1044of sale of an alcoholic beverage to a minor at the time of his
1058arrest on June 25, 1997. He could not, therefore, be expected to
1070recall precisely whether he had asked for Jason's identification
1079and whether the identification produced showed that Jason was
1088twenty-one years of age. Under these circumstances, the evidence
1097presented by Mr. Lappalainen that it was his habit to request
1108identification before selling an alcoholic beverage is sufficient
1116to give rise to the inference that he asked Jason to provide
1128identification before he purchased his first beer on May 14,
11381997. Had Jason produced false identification in response to the
1148request, his appearance is such that Mr. Lappalainen could
1157reasonably have believed him to be twenty-one years old.
1166CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
116913. The Division of Administrative Hearings has
1176jurisdiction over the subject matter of this proceeding and of
1186the parties thereto pursuant to section 120.57(1), Florida
1194Statutes (1997).
119614. Section 562.11(1)(a), Florida Statutes, makes it
1203unlawful for any person to sell, give, serve or permit to be
1215served alcoholic beverages to a person under the age of 21 years
1227of age.
122915. Section 562.11(1)(b) provides in pertinent part:
1236A licensee who violates paragraph (a)
1242shall have a complete defense to any civil
1250action therefor, except for an administrative
1256action by the division under the Beverage
1263Law, if, at the time the alcoholic beverage
1271was sold, given, served, or permitted to be
1279served, the person falsely evidenced that he
1286was of legal age to purchase or consume the
1295alcoholic beverage and the appearance of the
1302person was such that an ordinarily prudent
1309person would believe him to be of legal age
1318to purchase or consume the alcoholic beverage
1325and if the licensee carefully checked one of
1333the following forms of identification with
1339respect to the person: a drivers license,
1346an identification card . . ., a passport, or
1355a United States Uniformed Services
1360identification card, and acted in good faith
1367and reliance upon the persons representation
1373and appearance of the person in the belief
1381that he was of legal age to purchase or
1390consume the alcoholic beverage. . . .
1397The Department, in Rule 61A-3.052(1), Florida Administrative
1404Code, has provided a defense to an administrative action which
1414contains virtually identical elements.
141816. Because the Department seeks to impose administrative
1426penalties which may include the suspension or revocation of
1435Vampire Cafe's license to sell alcoholic beverages and/or the
1444imposition of an administrative fine, the Department has the
1453burden of proving the allegations in the Administrative Action by
1463clear and convincing evidence. Osborne Stern and Company v.
1472Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of
1480Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco , 670 So. 2d 932, 935 (Fla. 1996);
1491Ferris v. Turlington , 510 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 1987).
150017. Based on the facts found herein, the Department has met
1511its burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that
1521Mr. Lappalainen violated Section 562.11(1)(a) when he sold two
1530glasses of Guinness Stout to Jason Thatcher on the premises of
1541the Vampire Cafe.
154418. However, based on the facts found herein, the Vampire
1554Cafe has proven the elements set forth in Rule 61A-3.052(1),
1564thereby establishing a complete defense to this administrative
1572action.
1573RECOMMENDATION
1574Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
1584Law, it is RECOMMENDED that the Department of Business and
1594Professional Regulation enter a final order dismissing the
1602Administrative Action against the Vampire Cafe, Inc., dated
1610June 30, 1997.
1613DONE AND ENTERED this 6th day of April, 1998, in
1623Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
1627___________________________________
1628PATRICIA HART MALONO
1631Administrative Law Judge
1634Division of Administrative Hearings
1638The DeSoto Building
16411230 Apalachee Parkway
1644Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
1647(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675
1651Fax Filing (850) 921-6847
1655Filed with the Clerk of the
1661Division of Administrative Hearings
1665this 6th day of April, 1998.
1671COPIES FURNISHED:
1673Miguel Oxamendi, Esquire
1676Department of Business and
1680Professional Regulation
16821940 North Monroe Street
1686Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1007
1689Eric Lappalainen, pro se
16933865 North Highway A1A
1697Fort Pierce, Florida 34949
1701Lt. Bob Young
1704800 Virginia Avenue, Suite 7
1709Fort Pierce, Florida 34982
1713Lynda L. Goodgame, General Counsel
1718Department of Business and
1722Professional Regulation
17241940 North Monroe Street
1728Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792
1731Richard Boyd, Director
1734Division of Alcoholic Beverages
1738and Tobacco
17401940 North Monroe Street
1744Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792
1747NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
1753All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15
1764days from the date of this recommended order. Any exceptions to
1775this recommended order should be filed with the agency that will
1786issue the final order in this case.
- Date
- Proceedings
- Date: 08/17/1998
- Proceedings: Final Order filed.
- Date: 06/17/1998
- Proceedings: Cover Letter to L. Goodgame from A. Cole (& enclosed hearing transcript) sent out.
- Date: 04/22/1998
- Proceedings: Transcript of Proceedings filed.
- Date: 02/26/1998
- Proceedings: (Respondent) (Untitled) Issue Presented filed.
- Date: 02/17/1998
- Proceedings: (E. Lappalainen) Misdemeanor Ticket Entry filed.
- Date: 02/17/1998
- Proceedings: Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
- Date: 02/10/1998
- Proceedings: Letter to E. Lappalainen from M. Oxamendi Re: Re Enclosing a redacted copy of a Proposed Recommended Order and a copy of the relevant portions of the Division`s penalty guidelines in Rule 61A-2.022 (No enclosure) filed.
- Date: 02/02/1998
- Proceedings: Post-Hearing Order sent out. (PRO`s due by 2/18/98)
- Date: 01/28/1998
- Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
- Date: 10/20/1997
- Proceedings: Order of Prehearing Instructions sent out.
- Date: 10/20/1997
- Proceedings: Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 1/28/98; 10:00am; Vero Beach)
- Date: 09/25/1997
- Proceedings: (Petitioner) Response to Initial Order (filed via facisimile) filed.
- Date: 09/23/1997
- Proceedings: Initial Order issued.
- Date: 09/16/1997
- Proceedings: Agency Referral Letter; Administrative Action; Request for Hearing Form filed.
Case Information
- Judge:
- PATRICIA M. HART
- Date Filed:
- 09/16/1997
- Date Assignment:
- 09/23/1997
- Last Docket Entry:
- 08/17/1998
- Location:
- Vero Beach, Florida
- District:
- Southern
- Agency:
- ADOPTED IN PART OR MODIFIED