97-005687 Children`s Charity Fund, Inc. vs. Department Of Revenue
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Monday, May 18, 1998.


View Dockets  
Summary: Agy that spent 35% or less of its operating expenditures on purchasing medical equipment for handicapped children and that provided such equipment to children, regardless of their families? income, is ineligible for a tax exemption as charitable institu.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8CHILDREN'S CHARITY FUND, INC., )

13)

14Petitioner, )

16)

17vs. ) Case No. 97-5687

22)

23DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, )

27)

28Respondent. )

30___________________________________)

31RECOMMENDED ORDER

33On March 19, 1998, a formal administrative hearing was held

43in this case in Sarasota, Florida, before Carolyn S. Holifield,

53Administrative Law Judge, Division of Administrative Hearings.

60APPEARANCES

61For Petitioner: Ken Bowron, Sr.

66Executive Director

68Children's Charity Fund, Inc.

7220 11 Bispham Road

76Sarasota, Florida 34236

79For Respondent: Kevin J. O'Donnell

84Assistant General Counsel

87Department of Revenue

90Post Office Box 6668

94Tallahassee, Florida 32314-6668

97STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

101Whether Petitioner, Children's Charity Fund, Inc., qualifies

108under Section 212.08(7)(o)2.b., Florida Statutes, for a consumer

116certificate of exemption as a charitable institution.

123PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

125On August 27, 1997, Petitioner, Children's Charity Fund,

133Inc. (Children's Charity Fund), filed an application with the

142Respondent, Department of Revenue (Department), for a consumer

150certificate of exemption as a charitable organization. After

158reviewing Petitioner's application, the Department issued a

165notice on or about November 3, 1997, whereby it proposed to deny

177the application. According to the Notice of Intent to Deny, the

188basis of the Department's decision was that Petitioner failed to

198meet the qualifications for exemption from sales and use

207taxation, as set forth in Section 212.08(7), Florida Statutes.

216Specifically, the Department determined that Children's Charity

223Fund: (1) did not expend in excess of 50% of its operational

235expenditures toward qualified charitable services and (2) did not

244provide a reasonable percentage of services free of charge or at

255a substantially reduced cost to persons unable to pay for such

266services. Children's Charity Fund challenged the Department's

273decision and timely requested a formal hearing. On December 5,

2831997, the matter was referred to the Division of Administrative

293Hearings to conduct a formal hearing.

299At the hearing, Petitioner presented the testimony of one

308witness, Kenneth C. Bowron, Sr., Executive Director, Children's

316Charity Fund. Respondent presented the testimony of one witness,

325David Young, Tax Specialist, Office of Central Registration,

333Department of Revenue. Petitioner offered no exhibits into

341evidence and the Department offered and had one exhibit admitted

351into evidence.

353The transcript of the proceeding was f iled on April 1, 1998.

365Both parties filed proposed recommended orders.

371FINDINGS OF FACT

3741. Petitioner, Children's Charity Fund, is a not-for-profit

382corporation and qualifies as a tax-exempt organization pursuant

390to Section 501(c)(3) of the United States Internal Revenue Code.

400Petitioner maintains an office in Sarasota, Florida.

4072. The articles of incorporation specify that the nature of

417the business to be transacted and the purpose to be promoted by

429Children's Charity Fund "shall be exclusively charitable,

436including raising funds in any lawful manner" for the following

446purposes: (1) to educate and inform the public about the needs of

458handicapped and disabled children; (2) to provide referral

466services and maintain a hot-line for handicapped children; (3) to

476provide services "in whatever form possible that the Board may

486deem necessary" for handicapped children and their parents; and

495(4) to buy medical equipment for handicapped and disabled

504children.

5053. The Children's Charity Fund claims entitlement to a

514consumer certificate of exemption based primarily on the fourth

523purpose listed in paragraph 2 above. In carrying out this

533purpose, the Children's Charity Fund purchases various types of

542medical equipment for handicapped and disabled children who

550reside in Florida as well as in other states. The medical

561equipment is provided to children who need the equipment, but

571whose parents have no insurance or their requests for the

581equipment have been turned down by Medicare, Medicaid, or their

591insurance companies.

5934. In determining which applications for medical equipment

601it will approve, the Children's Charity Fund has not established

611income limits for the applicant family. The circumstances of

620each family are considered on a case-by-case basis and factors

630other than income are also considered. To date, Children's

639Charity Fund has never denied an application for medical

648equipment for a handicapped or disabled child, regardless of

657family income, if such equipment was needed by the child.

6675. In addition to purchasing medical equipment for

675handicapped and disabled children, the Children's Charity Fund

683provides Christmas gifts and tickets to events organized and

692promoted by the Children's Charity Fund such as charity softball

702games. The Children's Charity Fund claims that these gifts and

712tickets are charitable services.

7166. During its most recent fiscal year, the Children's

725Charity Fund spent less than 50% of its operational expenditures

735on qualified charitable services. The evidence at hearing

743established that during the relevant time period, Children's

751Charity Fund spent less than 35% of its total operating

761expenditures on qualified charitable services. This percentage

768does not meet the requirements of Rule 12A-1.001(3)(g)3.e.,

776Florida Administrative Code, which mandates that the organization

784seeking tax exempt status as a charitable institution spend "in

794excess of 50.0 percent of [its] operational expenditures toward

803qualified charitable services."

8067. During its most recent fiscal year, Children's Charity

815Fund spent approximately 50% of its operating expenditures to pay

825for fundraising activities.

828CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

8318. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction

839over the parties and the subject matter of this proceeding.

849Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.

8539. The Children's Charity Fund is seeking a consumer

862certificate of exemption as a "charitable institution" as that

871term is defined by Section 212.08(7)(o)2.b., Florida Statutes.

879As an applicant, the Children's Charity Fund bears the burden of

890proving its entitlement to a certificate of exemption by a

900preponderance of the evidence.

90410. Section 212.08(7)(o)2.b., Florida Statutes, defines

"910charitable institutions" for purposes of tax exemptions. That

918section provides the following:

9222. The provisions of this section

928authorizing exemptions from tax shall be

934strictly defined, limited, and applied in

940each category as follows:

944b. "Charitable institutions" means only

949nonprofit corporations qualified as nonprofit

954pursuant to s. 501(c)(3), Internal Revenue

960Code of 1954, as amended, and other nonprofit

968entities, the sole or primary function of

975which is to provide, or raise funds for

983organizations which provide, one or more of

990the following services if a reasonable

996percentage of such service is provided free

1003of charge, or at a substantially reduced

1010cost, to persons, animals, or organizations

1016that are unable to pay for such service:

1024(I) Medical aid for the relief of disease,

1032injury, or disability. . .

103711. Section 213.06(1), Florida Statutes, authorizes the

1044Department to adopt such rules as are necessary to carry out the

1056intent and purposes of all revenue laws which it administers.

1066Pursuant to this authority, the Department has adopted Rule 12A-

10761.001(3)(g), Florida Administrative Code. That rule provides in

1084relevant part the following:

10881. "Charitable institutions" means only

1093nonprofit corporations qualified as a

1098nonprofit pursuant to s.501(c)(3), United

1103States Internal Revenue Code, 1954, as

1109amended, and other nonprofit entities that

1115meet the following requirements:

1119a. the sole or primary function is providing

1127a "qualified charitable service" as defined

1133in this subsection; and

1137b. a reasonable percentage of such service

1144is provided free of charge, or at a

1152substantially reduced cost, to persons,

1157animals, or organizations that are unable to

1164pay for such service.

11682. "Qualified charitable service" means:

1173a. Medical aid for the relief of disease,

1181injury, or disability;

1184* * *

11873.a. For the purpose of this subsection the

1195following terms and phrases shall have the

1202following meaning:

1204I. "Persons unable to pay" means persons

1211whose annual income is 150 percent or less of

1220the current Federal Poverty Guidelines or

1226whose uncompensated hospital charges exceed

123125 percent of their annual family income for

1239the preceding 12 months. . .

1245* * *

1248e. "Sole or primary function" means that a

1256charitable institution, excluding hospitals,

1260must establish and support its function as

1267providing or raising funds for services as

1274outlined in subparagraphs 1. and 2. above, by

1282expending in excess of 50.0 percent of the

1290charitable institution's operational

1293expenditures toward qualified charitable

1297services as defined in subparagraph 2.a.--

1303g. within the charitable institution's most

1309recent fiscal year.

131212. The provisions of law which authorize a tax exemption

1322must be strictly construed against the person claiming the

1331exemption. Asphalt Pavers, Inc. v. Department of Revenue , 584

1340So. 2d 55,57 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). This is consistent with the

1353express language of Section 212.08(7)(o)2., Florida Statutes,

1360which states that "the provisions of this section authorizing

1369exemptions from tax shall be strictly defined, limited, and

1378applied in each category. . ."

138413. To qualify as a charitable institution, the Children's

1393Charity Fund must clearly come within the purview of Section

1403212.08(7)(o)2.b., Florida Statutes. This requires that the

1410organization meet all, not part, of the criteria prescribed in

1420statute.

142114. In this case, the Children's Charity Fund has failed to

1432meet its burden. While it has been established that the

1442organization is a nonprofit corporation, is qualified as a

1451501(c)(3) entity, and provides a qualified charitable service,

1459there are other prescribed criteria that the Children's Charity

1468Fund does not meet.

147215. According to Section 212.08(7)(o)2.b., Florida

1478Statutes, and Rule 12A-1.001(3)(g), Florida Administrative Code,

1485quoted above in paragraphs 10 and 11, respectively, an

1494organization seeking an exemption as a charitable institution

1502must have as its "sole or primary function" to provide or raise

1514funds for organizations which provide a reasonable percentage of

1523qualified charitable services to "persons. . . that are unable to

1534pay for such service." Services which qualify for "charitable

1543services" include medical aid for disabled persons.

155016. The purchase of medical equipment for handicapped or

1559disabled children constitutes a qualified charitable service.

1566However, that alone is not enough to bring the Children's Charity

1577Fund within the purview of the applicable statutory and rule

1587provisions. In this case, the Children's Charity Fund must

1596demonstrate that providing such service is the "sole or primary"

1606function of its organization and that a reasonable percentage of

1616such services are provided free or at a substantially reduced

1626cost to "persons unable to pay."

163217. As defined in Rule 12A-1.001(3)(g)3.e., Florida

1639Administrative Code, a qualified charitable service is deemed to

1648be an organization's sole or primary function if that entity

1658spends more than 50% of its operating funds on that service, as

1670reflected on the audit of its most recent fiscal year. A

1681reasonable percentage of these services must be provided free or

1691at a substantially reduced cost to those who are unable to pay.

"1703Persons unable to pay" are individuals whose annual family

1712income is 150% or less of the Federal Poverty Guidelines or whose

1724uncompensated hospital charges exceed their annual family income

1732for the preceding 12 months. Rule 12A-1.001(3)(g)3.a., Florida

1740Administrative Code. The Children's Charity Fund does not meet

1749either of these criteria.

175318. While the evidence established that the Children's

1761Charity Fund provides a qualified charitable service free of

1770charge, it is undisputed that providing such services is not the

1781agency's "sole or primary function" within the meaning of Rule

179112A-1.001(3)3.e., Florida Administrative Code. To meet this

1798requirement, the Children's Charity Fund must demonstrate that

1806more than 50% of its operating expenditures is spent on providing

1817medical aid. Here, the Children's Charity Fund acknowledges that

1826during its most recent fiscal year, it spent no more than 35% of

1839its total operating expenditures on providing medical equipment

1847to handicapped and disabled children.

185219. Having failed to demonstrate that providing medical aid

1861is its "sole or primary function," the Children's Charity Fund is

1872not eligible for a tax exemption as a charitable institution.

1882However, even if Children's Charity Fund had established that

1891providing a qualified charitable service was its "sole or primary

1901function," the agency failed to show that a reasonable percentage

1911of these services were provided to "persons unable to pay" as

1922that term is defined in Rule 12A-1.001(3)(g)3.a.I., Florida

1930Administrative Code. According to that rule, "persons unable to

1939pay" are limited to individuals whose family incomes do not

1949exceed specified limits--those whose family incomes are 150% or

1958less of the Federal Poverty Guidelines or those who have incurred

1969uncompensated hospital charges which exceed 25% of their annual

1978family income for the preceding 12-month period.

198520. The Children's Charity Fund admits that it provides

1994medical aid in the form of medical equipment to children who

2005require such equipment regardless of the income levels of those

2015families. This fact may not necessarily preclude the

2023organization's qualifying for tax exempt status, if it is

2032established that a reasonable percentage of its qualified

2040charitable services are provided to "persons unable to pay" as

2050that term is defined in Rule 12A-1.001(3)(g)3.a., Florida

2058Administrative Code. Having failed to establish this, the

2066Children's Charity Fund has failed to meet one of the prescribed

2077criteria required to qualify as a "charitable institution."

208521. The Children's Charity Fund argues that the above

2094quoted rule, which interprets "sole or primary purpose" and

"2103persons unable to pay" for purposes of Section 212.08(7)(o)2.b.,

2112Florida Statutes, is not law. In light of this position, the

2123Children's Charity Fund asserts that the definitions in Rule 12A-

21331.001(3), Florida Administrative Code, can not properly serve as

2142a basis for requiring that a certain percentage of operating

2152expenditures be spent for proving medical services. The

2160organization also argues that because the rule is not law, it can

2172not be utilized to require the organization to provide a

2182reasonable percentage of its services to individuals with certain

2191family income limits.

219422. In making the argument discussed in paragraph 21 above,

2204the Children's Charity Fund fails to recognize a well-established

2213legal principle. That principle is that agency rules promulgated

2222under authority of law have the force and effect of law. State

2234of Florida v. Jenkins , 469 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1985). There being

2246no dispute as to the validity of the Rule 12A-1.003, Florida

2257Administrative Code, the rule has the force and effect of law.

2268Thus, the provisions the aforementioned rule must be applied in

2278determining an entity's eligibility for a tax exemption.

228623. Applying the applicable statutory and rule provisions

2294to the Children's Charity Fund, it is clear that the agency does

2306not meet the prescribed eligibility criteria for a tax exemption.

2316RECOMMENDATION

2317Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of

2327Law, it is

2330RECOMMENDED that the Department of Revenue enter a final

2339order denying a consumer certificate of exemption to Petitioner,

2348the Children's Charity Fund, Inc.

2353DONE AND ENTERED this 18th day of May, 1998, in Tallahassee,

2364Leon County, Florida.

2367___________________________________

2368Carolyn S. Holifield

2371Administrative Law Judge

2374Division of Administrative Hearings

2378The DeSoto Building

23811230 Apalachee Parkway

2384Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

2387(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

2391Fax Filing (850) 921-6847

2395Filed with the Clerk of the

2401Division of Administrative Hearings

2405this 18th day of May, 1998.

2411COPIES FURNISHED:

2413Ken Bowron, Sr.

2416Executive Director

2418Children's Charity Fund, Inc.

24222011 Bispham Road

2425Sarasota, Florida 34236

2428Kevin J. O'Donnell

2431Assistant General Counsel

2434Department of Revenue

2437Post Office Box 6668

2441Tallahassee, Florida 32314-6668

2444Linda Lettera

2446General Counsel

2448Department of Revenue

2451204 Carlton Building

2454Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0100

2457Larry Fuchs

2459Executive Director

2461Department of Revenue

2464104 Carlton Building

2467Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0100

2470NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

2476All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15

2487days from the date of this recommended order. Any exceptions to

2498this recommended order should be filed with the agency that will

2509issue the final order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
Date: 08/20/1998
Proceedings: Final Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/19/1998
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 08/19/1998
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 05/18/1998
Proceedings: Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 03/19/98.
Date: 04/10/1998
Proceedings: Respondent`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Date: 04/03/1998
Proceedings: (K. Bowron) Proposed Recommended Orders (letter) filed.
Date: 04/01/1998
Proceedings: Transcript filed.
Date: 03/24/1998
Proceedings: (DOR) Exhibits filed.
Date: 03/19/1998
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing held; see file for applicable time frames.
Date: 03/19/1998
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Date: 12/26/1997
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 3/19/98; 9:00am; Sarasota)
Date: 12/23/1997
Proceedings: Parties` Joint Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
Date: 12/12/1997
Proceedings: (Respondent) Response to Petition for Administrative Hearing filed.
Date: 12/11/1997
Proceedings: Initial Order issued.
Date: 12/05/1997
Proceedings: Agency Referral Letter; Request for Formal Hearing, Letter Form; Agency Action Letter filed.

Case Information

Judge:
CAROLYN S. HOLIFIELD
Date Filed:
12/05/1997
Date Assignment:
03/16/1998
Last Docket Entry:
08/20/1998
Location:
Sarasota, Florida
District:
Middle
Agency:
ADOPTED IN TOTO
 

Related DOAH Cases(s) (1):

Related Florida Statute(s) (3):

Related Florida Rule(s) (2):