00-004700 Eric Aach vs. Department Of Children And Family Services
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, March 27, 2001.


View Dockets  
Summary: Petitioner is eligible for developmental services due to his autism; funding for urgently needed services are not available due to policy directive and lack of funding.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8ERIC AACH, )

11)

12Petitioner, )

14)

15vs. ) Case No. 00-4700

20)

21DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND )

26FAMILY SERVICES, )

29)

30Respondent. )

32)

33RECOMMENDED ORDER

35A formal hearing was held by Daniel M. Kilbride,

44Administrative Law Judge, Division of Administrative Hearings,

51in the above-styled case on February 2, 2001, by video

61conference between Tallahassee and Orlando, Florida.

67APPEARANCES

68For Petitioner : Lori Aach, parent of Petitioner

765777 Craindale Drive

79Orlando, Florida 32819

82For Respondent : Eric Dunlap, Esquire

88Department of Children and

92Family Services

94400 West Robinson Street

98Suite S-1106

100Orlando, Florida 32801-1782

103STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES

107Whether Petitioner is entitled to services from the

115Developmental Disabilities Program.

118Whether adequate funds are available to provide these

126services given Respondent's existing appropriations.

131PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

133Petitioner applied for developmental services in July 2000.

141By letter dated September 29, 2000, Petitioner's application for

150services was denied. Petitioner filed a request for a hearing

160to challenge the denial of services on October 20, 2000. This

171matter was referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings

180for adjudication on November 17, 2000, and was set for hearing.

191Following a continuance granted at the request of Respondent, a

201formal hearing was held on February 2, 2001.

209At the hearing, Petitioner's mother, Lori Aach, testified

217on behalf of Petitioner. Rene Johnson, Senior Human Services

226Counselor, was also called as a witness, and two exhibits were

237admitted into evidence. One exhibit was admitted in evidence on

247behalf of Respondent. At the behest of the Administrative Law

257Judge (ALJ), three additional exhibits were admitted.

264The hearing was recorded but not transcribed. Petitioner

272has not filed post-hearing submittals as of the date of this

283Order. Respondent filed its Proposed Recommended Order on

291February 6, 2001.

294FINDINGS OF FACT

2971. The Petitioner is a seven-year-old boy who has a

307diagnosis of autism. In addition, he has been diagnosed with

317mild mental retardation and severe intractable seizure disorder.

3252. Approximately on July 7, 2000, Petitioner's parents

333requested services for toilet training, incontinent supplies,

340behavioral training, respite services, speech therapy, and

347occupation and physical assessments. Upon receipt of the

355application and review of relevant documentation, Petitioner was

363determined to be eligible for developmental services under the

372provisions of Chapter 393, Florida Statutes (2000).

3793. By letter dated September 29, 2000, Respondent advised

388Petitioner that his request for services had been denied. The

398reason identified for the denial was as follows: "There are not

409adequate funds available for the service(s), given the

417Department's existing appropriations." Petitioner requested a

423hearing to challenge Respondent's denial of services.

4304. At the hearing, it was established that, although

439Petitioner is eligible for services, the Florida Legislature

447appropriated additional funding only to be used to provide

456needed services for individuals who were clients of Respondent

465and were waiting for services on July 1, 1999.

4745. In order to comply with the mandate of the Legislature,

485Respondent issued Policy Directive PD number 00-07, dated

493August 30, 2000, which authorizes services be provided only to

503individuals who were clients on July 1, 1999, and were awaiting

514services. Respondent will not provide services to individuals

522who become clients after July 1, 1999, until approximately

531June 30, 2001, unless the new clients are determined to be in

543immediate crisis or danger.

5476. No evidence was presented to demonstrate that

555Petitioner was in immediate crisis or danger. However, the need

565for these services is urgent.

5707. Petitioner's mother made a telephone call to the

579Respondent approximately three years ago inquiring about

586services available for her son. Following that phone call,

595Petitioner did not submit an application for services and was

605never denied services or eligibility. The only application for

614services submitted by Petitioner was in July of 2000 and

624eligibility was approved. Petitioner cannot be considered as a

633client of Respondent until after July 1, 1999.

641CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

6448. The Division of Administrative Hearings has

651jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter pursuant to

661Sections 120.569, 120.57(1), and 393.065, Florida Statutes.

6689. Respondent is the agency of state government charged

677with providing services for the developmentally disabled who

685qualify. Section 393.065, Florida Statutes.

69010. Petitioner has the burden of proof to demonstrate that

700he is eligible for services under the Developmental Disabilities

709Program of Respondent and that there were adequate funds

718available and appropriated by the legislature to provide the

727requested services. Florida Department of Transportation v.

734J.W.C. Company, Inc. , 396 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

74511. Petitioner has demonstrated that he is eligible for

754services under the program. However, he was not able to

764demonstrate that adequate funds for the services were available,

773given the Respondent's existing appropriations.

77812. Respondent may not expend funds from its budget unless

788there has been the requisite appropriation. Funding is only

797available for individuals who were clients prior to July 1,

8071999. To date, the Legislature has not funded services for

817those individuals, like Petitioner, that became clients after

825July 1, 1999, even though those services are urgently needed.

835RECOMMENDATION

836Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of

846Law, it is

849RECOMMENDED that Petitioner's application for services be

856approved and Petitioner be placed on the waiting list for

866services when new funding becomes available.

872DONE AND ENTERED this 27th day of March, 2001, in

882Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

886___________________________________

887DANIEL M. KILBRIDE

890Administrative Law Judge

893Division of Administrative Hearings

897The DeSoto Building

9001230 Apalachee Parkway

903Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

906(850) 488- 9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

911Fax Filing (850) 921-6847

915www.doah.state.fl.us

916Filed with the Clerk of the

922Division of Administrative Hearings

926this 27th day of March, 2001.

932COPIES FURNISHED :

935Eric Aach

937c/o Lori Aach

9405777 Craindale Drive

943Orlando, Florida 32819

946Eric Dunlap, Esquire

949Department of Children and

953Family Services

955400 West Robinson Street

959Suite S-1106

961Orlando, Florida 32801-1782

964Virginia A. Daire, Agency Clerk

969Department of Children and

973Family Services

975Building 2, Room 204B

9791317 Winewood Boulevard

982Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700

985Josie Tomayo, General Counsel

989Department of Children and

993Family Services

995Building 2, Room 204

9991317 Winewood Boulevard

1002Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700

1005NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

1011All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

102115 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions

1032to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that

1043will issue the Final Order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
PDF:
Date: 06/21/2001
Proceedings: Final Order Adopting Recommended Order Denying Services filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/19/2001
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 03/27/2001
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 03/27/2001
Proceedings: Recommended Order issued (hearing held February 2, 2001) CASE CLOSED.
PDF:
Date: 03/27/2001
Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
Date: 02/07/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Filing Exhibits filed by Respondent.
PDF:
Date: 02/06/2001
Proceedings: Agency`s Proposed Recommended Order (filed by via facsimile).
Date: 02/02/2001
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
PDF:
Date: 12/29/2000
Proceedings: Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing issued (hearing set for February 2, 2001; 9:30 a.m.; Orlando, FL).
PDF:
Date: 12/22/2000
Proceedings: Respondent`s Amended Motion for Continuance (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 12/22/2000
Proceedings: Respondent`s Motion for Continuance (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 11/27/2000
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for January 18, 2001; 9:30 a.m.; Orlando, FL).
PDF:
Date: 11/17/2000
Proceedings: Agency Action Letter filed.
PDF:
Date: 11/17/2000
Proceedings: Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing, letter form filed.
PDF:
Date: 11/17/2000
Proceedings: Notice filed by the Agency.
Date: 11/17/2000
Proceedings: Initial Order issued.

Case Information

Judge:
DANIEL M. KILBRIDE
Date Filed:
11/17/2000
Date Assignment:
02/01/2001
Last Docket Entry:
06/21/2001
Location:
Ocala, Florida
District:
Northern
Agency:
ADOPTED IN TOTO
 

Counsels

Related DOAH Cases(s) (1):

Related Florida Statute(s) (2):