01-001809 Cathy Ann Ramassar, D/B/A Cathy`s Day Care vs. Department Of Children And Family Services
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Wednesday, September 12, 2001.


View Dockets  
Summary: Recommend Petitioners` request for exemption from disqualification from working in a child care facility and for renewal of child care license be granted.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8BASEDEO RAMASSAR, )

11)

12Petitioner, )

14)

15vs. ) Case No. 01-1888

20)

21DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND )

26FAMILY SERVICES, )

29)

30Respondent. )

32)

33CATHY ANN RAMASSAR, d/b/a )

38CATHY'S DAY CARE, )

42)

43Petitioner, )

45)

46vs. ) Case No. 01-1809

51)

52DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND )

57FAMILY SERVICES, )

60)

61Respondent. )

63)

64RECOMMENDED ORDER

66Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative

73Hearings, by its duly-designated Administrative Law Judge,

80Jeff B. Clark, held a formal hearing in this case on August 3,

932001, in Sanford, Florida.

97APPEARANCES

98For Petitioners : George B. Wallace, Esquire

105George B. Wallace, Esq., P.A.

110700 West First Street

114Sanford, Florida 32771

117For Respondent : Craig A. McCarthy, Esquire

124Department of Children and

128Family Services

130400 West Robinson Street

134Suite S-1106

136Orlando , Florida 32801-1782

139STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

143The issue is whether Petitioner, Basedeo Ramassar, is

151eligible for exemption from disqualification from working in a

160registered or licensed family day care center under Subsection

169402.302(3), Florida Statutes.

172PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

174On January 30, 2001, the Department of Children and Family

184Services ("Respondent") advised Cathy Ramassar that her Family

194Day Care Home Registration had been cancelled because her

203husband, Basedeo Ramassar, had been disqualified from working as

212a caretaker for children. As a result, Cathy Ramassar requested

222an administrative hearing. On May 9, 2001, her request was

232forwarded to the Division of Administrative Hearings and

240assigned Case No. 01-1809. On March 9, 2001, Petitioner,

249Basedeo Ramassar, received notice from Respondent that his

257request for exemption pursuant to Section 435.07, Florida

265Statutes, had been denied. On March 20, 2001, Basedeo Ramassar

275requested an administrative hearing on the denial of his request

285for exemption pursuant to Subsection 435.07(3), Florida

292Statutes. On May 15, 2001, his request for an administrative

302hearing was received by the Division of Administrative Hearings

311and assigned Case No. 01-1888.

316The cases were scheduled for trial on August 3, 2001, in

327Sanford, Florida. As a result of the pre-hearing meeting of

337counsel for the parties and preparing the Joint Pre-Hearing

346Stipulation, the parties agreed that the disposition of Basedeo

355Ramassar's case seeking exemption from disqualification would be

363dispositive of both his case and his wife's case. The cases

374were then consolidated for trial; however, the consolidated case

383was assigned the higher case number because it was the exemption

394case number.

396At the final hearing, Basedeo Ramassar testified on his own

406behalf and presented his wife, Cathy Ramassar, Reverend Bobbie

415Stiver, Mark Templeton, Judy Templeton, Dana Sharpe, and Wanda

424Wilson as additional witnesses. He offered six exhibits which

433were received in evidence as Petitioners' Exhibits B and D-H.

443Respondent presented one witness, Michael Ingram, and offered

451seven exhibits. Respondent's Exhibits A-F were received in

459evidence; Respondent's Exhibit G was not received in evidence

468and all testimony regarding Exhibit G was stricken and not

478considered by the undersigned Administrative Law Judge.

485At the close of the final hearing, the parties were advised

496of their opportunity to submit proposed recommended orders. On

505August 17, 2001, after the parties jointly decided not to order

516a transcript of the proceedings, they jointly requested an

525extension to September 4, 2001, for filing proposed recommended

534orders. The extension was granted. Both parties timely

542submitted Proposed Recommended Orders.

546FINDINGS OF FACTS

5491. Under Sections 402.301-319, Florida Statutes, the

556Department of Children and Family Services is the agency

565responsible for establishing licensing standards for child care

573facilities and child care personnel.

5782. Petitioner, Basedeo Ramassar, is married to Cathy

586Ramassar; they both reside at 2707 West Airport Boulevard,

595Sanford, Florida.

5973. Cathy Ramassar applied to Respondent to renew her

606license as a family day care facility at her home at 2707 West

619Airport Boulevard, Sanford, Florida.

6234. As a result of her application, Respondent conducted a

633Level 2 background screening. As a result of the screening, it

644was determined that, on March 20, 2000 , Basedeo Ramassar had

654pled nolo contendere to the charge of assignation to commit

664prostitution, a violation of Section 796.07, Florida Statutes.

6725. When Cathy Ramassar was advised that her license would

682not be renewed because of her husband's violation of Section

692796.07, Florida Statutes, she requested an administrative

699hearing and, shortly thereafter, Mr. Ramassar requested an

707exemption pursuant to Section 435.07, Florida Statutes.

7146. Michael Ingram, District 7 Screening Coordinator,

721convened a three-person Exemption Review Committee which

728considered the circumstances surrounding the disqualifying

734criminal incident, nature of harm to victim, amount of time

744since the last criminal incident, and the applicant's general

753history. The Exemption Review Committee relies on the applicant

762to provide information on rehabilitation.

7677. The Exemption Review Committee denied Mr. Ramassar's

775exemption request based, in part, on the fact that not enough

786time had elapsed since the 1999 offense and the March 20, 2000,

798nolo contendere plea and a 1990 domestic battery arrest which

808occurred prior to his current marriage. This denial was a

818proper exercise of the authority vested in the Exemption Review

828Committee.

8298. Mr. Ramassar testified that during the afternoon hours

838of November 26, 1999, he approached an undercover female police

848officer and "offered her $20 for straight sex." This resulted

858in his arrest and ultimately, his nolo contendere plea to

868assignation to commit prostitution.

8729. With the help of a supportive wife and members of their

884church, which he regularly attends, Mr. Ramassar has made a good

895start on a rehabilitation program. Apparently, he has a good

905marriage which has withstood the humiliation of public knowledge

914of his infidelity and criminal involvement; each witness

922testified to awareness of his criminal involvement.

92910. As a part of the exemption process, Subsection

938435.07(3), Florida Statutes, requires an assessment of "the

946nature of the harm caused to the victim"; the only "victim" in

958this case is Mr. Ramassar's wife, who has not only suffered the

970public humiliation of her husband's infidelity, but has been

979denied a license renewal for her day care facility.

98811. Mr. Ramassar is regularly employed as a mason and, as

999a result, except on rare occasions, is away from the day care

1011facility during its normal working hours.

101712. Witnesses who had children enrolled in Mr. Ramassar's

1026wife's day care facility expressed little concern with the

1035knowledge that Mr. Ramassar had pled nolo contendere to

1044assignation to commit prostitution.

1048CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

105113. The Division of Administrative Hearings has

1058jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this

1067proceeding pursuant to Subsections 120.57(1) and 435.07(3),

1074Florida Statutes.

107614. The Department of Children and Family Services

1084establishes licensing standards for child care facilities and

1092child care personnel. Section 402.305, Florida Statutes.

109915. Child care personnel in family day care facilities are

1109subject to the applicable screening provisions of Chapter 435,

1118Florida Statutes.

112016. Mr. Ramassar is a "child care personnel" as defined in

1131Subsection 402.302(3), Florida Statutes, which reads, in

1138pertinent part ,:

"1141Child care personnel" means all owners,

1147operators, employees, and volunteers working

1152in a child care facility . . . . For

1162purposes of screening, the term includes any

1169member, over the age of 12 years, of a child

1179care facility operator's family , or person,

1185over the age of 12 years, residing with a

1194child care facility operator if the child

1201care facility is located in or adjacent to

1209the home of the operator or if the family;

1218member of, or person residing with, the

1225child care facility operator has any direct

1232contact with the children in the facility

1239during its hours of operation . . . .

1248[Emphasis added]

125017. If a person suffers disqualification, he or she may

1260request an exemption from disqualification from the licensing

1268agency. This discretionary exemption from disqualification is

1275limited to specific criminal acts and shall not be used unless

1286coupled with clear and convincing evidence from the applicant of

1296rehabilitation. Subsection 435.07(3), Florida Statutes.

130118. The "clear and convincing" evidence standard requires:

1309[T ]hat the evidence must be found to be

1318credible; the facts to which the witnesses

1325testify must be distinctly remembered; and

1331the testimony must be precise and explicit

1338and the witnesses must be lacking in

1345confusion as to the facts in issue. The

1353evidence must be of such weight that it

1361produces in the mind of the trier of fact a

1371firm belief or conviction, without

1376hesitancy, as to the truth of the

1383allegations sought to be established.

1388Slomowitz vs. Walker , 429 So. 2d 797, 800 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

140019. The disqualifying misdemeanor criminal offense

1406adjudicated on March 20, 2000, is uncomfortably recent; however,

1415Mr. Ramassar, through his own testimony, and that of his wife,

1426his pastor, and friends, has presented clear and convincing

1435evidence of rehabilitation.

143820. While it is easy to determine the causal relationship

1448between most criminal offenses listed in Subsection 435.04(2),

1456Florida Statutes, and the potential for harm to children, there

1466is no such apparent relationship between assignation to commit

1475prostitution and harm to children. While not intending to

1484minimize the inappropriateness of Mr. Ramassar's conduct, the

1492admitted offense as revealed in Mr. Ramassar's testimony

1500demonstrated no basis for the conclusion that children would

1509suffer harm as a result of Mr. Ramassar having committed the

1520offense.

152121. There is no "harm caused to the victim" as

1531contemplated by Subsection 435.07(3), Florida Statutes; the real

1539victim is Mr. Ramassar's wife who has suffered considerable

1548humiliation and potential loss of her day care facility license.

1558RECOMMENDATION

1559Based upon the foregoing Findings of Facts and Conclusions

1568of Law, it is

1572RECOMMENDED that the Department of Children and Family

1580Services enter a final order granting Petitioner, Basedeo

1588Ramassar, an exemption from disqualification from employment as

1596a caretaker for children and granting Cathy Ramassar a renewal

1606of her license.

1609DONE AND ENTERED this 12th day of September, 2001, in

1619Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

1623___________________________________

1624JEFF B. CLARK

1627Administrative Law Judge

1630Division of Administrative Hearings

1634The DeSoto Building

16371230 Apalachee Parkway

1640Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

1643(850) 488- 9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

1648Fax Filing (850) 921-6847

1652www.doah.state.fl.us

1653Filed with the Clerk of the

1659Division of Administrative Hearings

1663this 12th day of September, 2001.

1669COPIES FURNISHED :

1672Craig A. McCarthy, Esquire

1676Department of Children and

1680Family Services

1682400 West Robinson Street

1686Suite S-1106

1688Orlando, Florida 32801-1782

1691George B. Wallace, Esquire

1695George B. Wallace, Esq., PA

1700700 West First Street

1704Sanford, Florida 32771

1707Virginia A. Daire, Agency Clerk

1712Department of Children and

1716Family Services

1718Building 2, Room 204B

17221317 Winewood Boulevard

1725Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700

1728Josie Tomayo, General Counsel

1732Department of Children and

1736Family Services

1738Building 2, Room 204

17421317 Winewood Boulevard

1745Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700

1748NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

1754All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

176415 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions

1775to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that

1786will issue the final order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
Date: 10/01/2001
Proceedings: Transcript filed.
PDF:
Date: 09/27/2001
Proceedings: Exceptions to Administrative Law Judge`s Recommended Order (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 09/12/2001
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 09/12/2001
Proceedings: Recommended Order issued (hearing held August 3, 2001) CASE CLOSED.
PDF:
Date: 09/12/2001
Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
PDF:
Date: 09/04/2001
Proceedings: Proposed Recommended Order (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 08/31/2001
Proceedings: Proposed Recommended Order (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 08/20/2001
Proceedings: Order issued (the parties shall file their proposed recommended orders by September 4, 2001).
PDF:
Date: 08/17/2001
Proceedings: Joint Motion for Enlargement of Time for Submitting Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
Date: 08/03/2001
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
Date: 08/03/2001
Proceedings: Consolidated cases are: 01-1809 and 01-1888.
PDF:
Date: 06/28/2001
Proceedings: Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing issued (hearing set for August 3, 2001; 9:00 a.m.; Sanford, FL).
PDF:
Date: 06/26/2001
Proceedings: Joint Stipulation to Continue Hearing Set for July 6, 2001 (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 05/21/2001
Proceedings: Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
PDF:
Date: 05/21/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for July 6, 2001; 9:00 a.m.; Sanford, FL).
PDF:
Date: 05/18/2001
Proceedings: Respondent`s Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 05/18/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Appearance (filed by C. McCarthy via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 05/09/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Department`s Intention to Dismiss Petitioners` Request for Hearing Unless Additional Information is Filed by Petitioners Within Twenty-One Days filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/09/2001
Proceedings: Initial Order issued.
PDF:
Date: 05/09/2001
Proceedings: Request for Administrative Hearing filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/09/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Cancelation of Family Day Care Home Registration filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/09/2001
Proceedings: Notice (of Agency referral) filed.

Case Information

Judge:
JEFF B. CLARK
Date Filed:
05/09/2001
Date Assignment:
05/09/2001
Last Docket Entry:
10/01/2001
Location:
Sanford, Florida
District:
Middle
Agency:
Department of Children and Families
 

Counsels

Related DOAH Cases(s) (2):

Related Florida Statute(s) (6):