01-003087 Ray Hill And Gloria Hill vs. Department Of Children And Family Services
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, February 14, 2002.


View Dockets  
Summary: Corporal punishment plus pattern of inability to cope with foster children resulted in loss of foster care license.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8RAY HILL AND GLORIA HILL, )

14)

15Petitioner, )

17)

18vs. ) Case No. 01 - 3087

25)

26DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND )

31FAMILY SERVICES, )

34)

35Respondent. )

37)

38RECOMMENDED ORDER

40Upon due notice, a disputed - fact hearing was held in this

52case before Ella Jane P. Davis, a duly - assigned Administrative

63Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings, on

72September 14, 2001, and November 27, 2001, in Quincy, Florida.

82APPEARA NCES

84For Petitioner: Ray and Gloria Hill, pro se

92812 West Laura Street

96Quincy, Florida 32351

99For Respondent: John R. Perry, Esquire

105Department of Children and Family Services

1112639 Nort h Monroe Street, Room 252 - A

120Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 2949

125STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

129May the Department of Children and Family Services revoke

138Petitioners' foster home license for cause?

144PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

146The Department of Children and Fa mily Services (DCF)

155referred this case to the Division of Administrative Hearings on

165or about August 6, 2001. Despite the style of this cause, DCF

177had the duty to go forward and the burden of proof herein.

189The disputed - fact hearing began on September 14 , 2001. At

200that time, DCF presented its case - in - chief in the testimony of

214J.B. and A.W. Mr. and Mrs. Hill testified on their own behalf at

227that time and had one exhibit (R - 1) admitted in evidence.

239However, due to the sudden and unexpected refusal of on e of

251Mr. and Mrs. Hill's witnesses to appear without a subpoena, the

262parties agreed to suspend the hearing until that witness's

271testimony could be compelled. After considerable difficulty in

279compelling the attendance of the recalcitrant witness,

286Sydney Smith, her testimony was presented on November 27, 2001.

296No rebuttal was offered by DCF.

302A Transcript was provided by DCF on December 19, 2001.

312Mr. and Mrs. Hill filed a Proposed Recommended Order on

322January 15, 2002. DCF filed its Proposed Recommend ed Order on

333January 17, 2002. Both proposals have been considered in the

343preparation of this Recommended Order.

348FINDINGS OF FACT

3511. Petitioners Ray and Gloria Hill have operated a licensed

361foster care home in Gadsden County, Florida, for approximate ly

371two years. Their home is licensed by DCF through Boys and Girls

383Town of Tallahassee, a private, not - for - profit organization which

395provides foster home placements for DCF.

4012. During all or part of these two years, Petitioners had

412two teenage gir ls placed in their foster care by Boys and Girls

425Town. These girls were J.B. (twelve years old) and A.W.

435(fourteen years old).

4383. Two altercations allegedly occurred between J.B. and

446Gloria Hill, who were the only witnesses to either event.

4564. J.B. resided with the Hills for the better part of the

468two years. Two days before Christmas 2000, Mrs. Hill had an

479argument with J.B. as a result of J.B. having opened every

490holiday - wrapped Christmas present under the tree. When Mrs. Hill

501asked her if she had done this, J.B. would not respond. There is

514no dispute that J.B. had Chinese food, prepared by Mrs. Hill, in

526her hands at that point. J.B. denied throwing the food at

537Mrs. Hill and asserted that Mrs. Hill slapped the food out of

549J.B.'s hands, and that, after several misses, Mrs. Hill slapped

559J.B.'s face with an open hand, at which point, J.B. began hitting

571Mrs. Hill. Mrs. Hill denied "initiating" the violence, but it is

582uncontested and both witnesses testified to hitting each other

591several ti mes at that point. Mrs. Hill requested that night that

603J.B. immediately be removed from her care. A mark was found on

615J.B.'s face when she was removed from the Hills' home by

626authorities that night. There is no clear evidence as to what

637caused the mark.

6405. According to J.B.'s initial testimony at the final

649hearing, Gloria Hill, in a rage, pushed J.B.'s face into the

660dashboard airbag area of a car driven by Mrs. Hill while J.B. was

673riding in the front passenger seat, causing J.B.'s lip to bleed.

684Gloria Hill denied doing so. J.B. did not report this alleged

695incident to anyone for many months. She only reported it the

706night she was removed from the Hills' home after the Christmas

7172000 incident.

7196. After J.B.'s removal from the Hills' home, and after

729interrogation by Boys and Girls Town social worker, Sydney Smith,

739J.B. recanted her accusation that Mrs. Hill had deliberately

748pushed her face into the dashboard airbag area of the car. At

760that time, J.B. stated to Mrs. Smith that Mrs. Hill had , in fact,

773extended her arm to keep J.B. from falling forward into the

784dashboard and windshield when Mrs. Hill was forced to suddenly

794apply the brakes to avoid a collision.

8017. Accordingly, on the basis of the prior inconsistent

810statement, J.B.'s te stimony about the dashboard incident is not

820credited as a true account, and the veracity of her version of

832the Christmas 2000 incident is thrown into doubt.

8408. A.W. lived with Mr. and Mrs. Hill for only part of the

853two years that J.B. was with them. In August 2000, contrary to

865Mrs. Hill's prior instructions, A.W. showed J.B. an unflattering

874internet jailhouse photograph of J.B.'s natural mother. The

882printout of this photograph also revealed J.B.'s natural mother's

891criminal record, which J.B. did no t yet know about at that time.

904Although A.W. testified with less clarity than might be wished,

914her most coherent and credible version of subsequent events is

924that Mrs. Hill swung at her three times with the paper computer

936printout and one of those swings made contact with A.W.'s face.

9479. A.W. also asserted that Mrs. Hill slapped her once in

958the face with her open hand before A.W. began striking and

969kicking Mrs. Hill. A.W. testified that she did not know if

980Mrs. Hill had been trying to grab her or hit her, but that

993Mrs. Hill's hands were "in my face." J.B. was present during

1004this altercation, and she corroborated A.W.'s assertion that

1012Mrs. Hill slapped A.W. before A.W. struck Mrs. Hill.

102110. Once again, Mrs. Hill denied "initiating" any viole nce,

1031but she offered no other explanation of her actions, and no

1042specific denial that she hit A.W. with the computer photograph

1052before the general fight broke out.

105811. It is not disputed, however, that Mr. Hill, who was in

1070another room, heard the co mmotion between Mrs. Hill and A.W. over

1082the photograph, and came to Mrs. Hill's rescue by bodily removing

1093A.W. to another area of the house. Apparently, neither A.W. nor

1104J.B. thought Mr. Hill's actions were out of line, although he

1115allegedly touched A.W.' s stomach when he carried her out of the

1127room to cool - off. A.W.'s testimony that Mr. Hill hung her upside

1140down but placed her upright on her feet without hurting her is

1152incredible, but also immaterial, because even A.W. admits that

1161she was out of control, that she was unharmed by Mr. Hill, and

1174that Mr. Hill placed her upright on her feet once she was out of

1188striking distance of Mrs. Hill.

119312. Mrs. Hill called Boys and Girls Town and demanded that

1204A.W. be removed the night of the incident of the pho tograph, due

1217to A.W.'s violent behavior. After counseling with both of them,

1227Boys and Girls Town authorities talked Mrs. Hill into keeping

1237A.W. until she could be placed elsewhere. A.W.'s stay with the

1248Hills extended to two weeks, with Boys and Girls Tow n's approval.

1260This indicates to the undersigned that Boys and Girls Town's

1270social worker had no real - world concern for A.W.'s health and

1282safety while in the Hills' care at that time.

129113. After she was removed from the Hills' foster care, A.W.

1302wrot e a letter to Mrs. Hill thanking her for her care and

1315apologizing for hitting Mrs. Hill. At the final hearing, A.W.

1325insisted this missive was not inconsistent with her testimony

1334that Mrs. Hill hit her first and she merely retaliated.

134414. The remov al of J.B. near Christmas 2000, resulted in

1355either a foster care license revocation investigation or child

1364abuse registry investigation or both types of investigation by

1373DCF. Moreover, it appears that Boys and Girls Town mounted an

1384investigation of its ow n.

138915. The outcome of any abuse investigation was not

1398presented at the final hearing herein.

140416. However, after DCF's licensing authorities determined

1411that Petitioner's foster care license would not be renewed,

1420another DCF employee contacte d Mrs. Smith of Boys and Girls Town,

1432seeking to place a third child, L.T., with Petitioners. Due to

1443her sensitivity to confidentiality issues, Mrs. Smith gave very

1452vague information to the DCF placement employee concerning the

1461status of one or more of the investigations against Petitioners.

1471DCF then either directly placed L.T. with Petitioners or placed

1481L.T. with Petitioners through Boys and Girls Town. The placement

1491of L.T. with Petitioners after A.W. and J.B. had complained

1501against them does not repudi ate or mitigate the foregoing

1511Findings of Fact concerning Mrs. Hill's use of corporal

1520punishment. The placement of L.T. with the Hills was purely a

1531mistake which was corrected by the removal of L.T. from

1541Petitioners' care soon thereafter.

154517. Both Mr. and Mrs. Hill testified that they had severe

1556behavioral problems with L.T. while he was with them. It is not

1568clear whether they asked for his removal from their home or not.

1580CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

158318. The Division of Administrative Hearings has

1590juri sdiction over the parties and subject matter of this cause,

1601pursuant to Section 120.57(1) and Section 409.175, Florida

1609Statutes.

161019. The duty to go forward is upon DCF. The burden of

1622proof in a license revocation case is by clear and convincing

1633evidenc e.

163520. Section 409.175(8)(b) 1., Florida Statutes, provides

1642as follows:

1644(b) Any of the following actions by a

1652[foster] home or agency or its personnel is a

1661ground for denial, suspension, or revocation

1667of a license:

16701. An intentional or negligent act

1676materially affecting the health or safety of

1683children in the home or agency.

16892. A violation of the provisions of this

1697section or of licensing rules promulgated

1703pursuant to this section.

170721. Rule 65C - 13.010(1)(b)5.a.,c.,e., and f.,

1716Florida Administ rative Code, provide guidelines for

1723discipline of foster children as follows:

1729a. The substitute care parents must

1735discipline children with kindness,

1739consistency, and understanding, and with the

1745purpose of helping the child develop

1751responsibility with self control.

1755* * *

1758c. Substitute care parents should use

1764positive methods of discipline, including the

1770following:

1771(I) Reinforcing acceptable behavior.

1775(II) Verbal disappointment of the child's

1781behavior.

1782(III) Loss of privileges.

1786(IV) Grounding, restri cting the child to the

1794house or yard, or sending the child out of

1803the room and away from the family activity;

1811and

1812(V) Redirecting the child's activity, for

1818example, if a child is playing with a sharp

1827object, take the object away, and replace it

1835with a saf e toy.

1840* * *

1843e. The substitute care parents must not

1850subject the children to cruel, severe,

1856humiliating or unusual punishment, for

1861example, to use soap to wash out the mouth,

1870eating hot sauces or pepper, placing in hot

1878water, kneeling on stones, etc.

1883f . The substitute care parents must not use

1892corporal punishment of any kind. (Emphasis

1898supplied).

189922. J.B.'s testimony concerning the dashboard incident is

1907entirely incredible and causes the undersigned not to believe her

1917version of the Christmas 20 00 incident as well. Since she and

1929Mrs. Hill were the only witnesses to those alleged incidents,

1939those allegations are not proven.

194423. Likewise, J.B.'s lack of credibility for the two

1953incidents in which she was allegedly directly involved casts

1962doub t on the rest of her testimony concerning the photograph

1973incident. Without J.B.'s corroboration of the photograph

1980incident, accounts of that altercation amount to A.W. stating

1989that Mrs. Hill slapped her face with a photograph and slapped her

2001face with an open hand and Mrs. Hill denying at least the slap

2014with an open hand.

201824. It is hard to conceive of how slapping A.W. with a

2030photograph could have any material affect on A.W.'s health or

2040safety. Mrs. Hill's slapping A.W. in the face with the

2050photograph d oes, however, amount to humiliating corporal

2058punishment which clearly escalated merely argumentative

2064circumstances into a violent situation. A.W.'s violent

2071retaliation to Mrs. Hill's slap with the photograph may have been

2082excessive, but the entire inciden t does not bespeak Mrs. Hill's

2093self - defense so much as it does her failure to manage a foster

2107child's behavior by positive methods outlined in the foster care

2117rules.

211825. Moreover, the pattern observed here is that of three

2128children placed in Petitioner s' home, two (A.W. and J.B.) were

2139considered unmanageable by Petitioners, who asked to have them

2148removed, and even a third child, (L.T.), was considered by

2158Petitioners to have severe behavioral problems.

216426. There is no legal right to a foster care l icense.

2176Section 409.175(2)(f), Florida Statutes, states:

2181(f) "License" means "license" as defined in

2188Section 120.52 [Florida Statutes]. A license

2194under this section is issued to a family

2202foster home or other facility and is not a

2211professional license of any individual.

2216Receipt of a license under this section shall

2224not create a property right in the recipient.

2232A license under this act is a public trust

2241and a privilege, and is not an entitlement.

2249This privilege must guide the finder of fact

2257or trier of law at any administrative

2264proceeding or court action initiated by the

2271department. (Emphasis supplied)

2274RECOMMENDATION

2275Upon the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law,

2285it is

2287RECOMMENDED

2288That the Department of Children and Family Services enter a

2298final order revoking Petitioners' foster care license.

2305DONE AND ENTERED this 14th day of February, 2002, in

2315Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

2319___________________________________

2320ELLA JANE P. DAVIS

2324Administrative Law Judge

2327Division of Administrativ e Hearings

2332The DeSoto Building

23351230 Apalachee Parkway

2338Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 3060

2343(850) 488 - 9675 SUNCOM 278 - 9675

2351Fax Filing (850) 921 - 6847

2357www.doah.state.fl.us

2358Filed with the Clerk of the

2364Division of Administrative Hearings

2368this 14th day of Februar y, 2002.

2375COPIES FURNISHED :

2378Ray Hill and Gloria Hill

2383812 West Laura Street

2387Quincy, Florida 32351

2390John R. Perry, Esquire

2394Department of Children and Family Services

24002639 North Monroe Street, Suite 252 - A

2408Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 2949

2413Peggy Sanford, A gency Clerk

2418Department of Children and Family Services

24241317 Winewood Boulevard

2427Building 2, Room 204B

2431Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 0700

2436Josie Tomayo, General Counsel

2440Department of Children and Family Services

24461317 Winewood Boulevard

2449Building 2, Room 204

2453Tal lahassee, Florida 32399 - 0700

2459NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

2465All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15

2476days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to

2487this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will

2498issue the Final Order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
PDF:
Date: 06/19/2002
Proceedings: Final Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/17/2002
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 02/14/2002
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 02/14/2002
Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
PDF:
Date: 02/14/2002
Proceedings: Recommended Order issued (hearing held September 14 and November 27, 2001) CASE CLOSED.
PDF:
Date: 01/17/2002
Proceedings: Letter to J. Perry from Judge E. J. Davis regarding enclosing a copy of a letter filed with DOAH on January 15, 2002 from R. and G. Hill sent out.
PDF:
Date: 01/17/2002
Proceedings: Respondent`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 01/15/2002
Proceedings: Proposed Recommended Order (filed by Petitioners via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 01/03/2002
Proceedings: Order issued (the parties shall file their proposed recommended orders by January 15, 2002).
PDF:
Date: 12/24/2001
Proceedings: Respondent`s Motion for Enlargement of Time Within Which to File Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 12/20/2001
Proceedings: Post-Hearing Order issued.
Date: 12/19/2001
Proceedings: Final Hearing Transcript Volumes I and II filed.
Date: 11/27/2001
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
PDF:
Date: 10/23/2001
Proceedings: Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing issued (hearing set for November 27, 2001; 10:30 a.m.; Quincy, FL).
PDF:
Date: 10/22/2001
Proceedings: Notice of No Objection to Service of Witness Subpoena filed by Respondent
PDF:
Date: 10/10/2001
Proceedings: Subpoena Duces Tecum, S. Smith filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/10/2001
Proceedings: Letter to Judge Davis from G. Hill requesting continuance filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/09/2001
Proceedings: Letter to Judge Davis from G. Hill requesting a continuance of the hearing (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 09/18/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for October 10, 2001; 10:30 a.m.; Quincy, FL).
Date: 09/14/2001
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Partially Held; continued to date not certain.
PDF:
Date: 09/10/2001
Proceedings: Respondent`s Unilateral Response to Order of Prehearing Instructions filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/13/2001
Proceedings: Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
PDF:
Date: 08/13/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for September 14, 2001; 9:30 a.m.; Quincy, FL).
PDF:
Date: 08/09/2001
Proceedings: Response to Initial Order filed by Respondent
PDF:
Date: 08/06/2001
Proceedings: Initial Order issued.
PDF:
Date: 08/06/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Intent to Revoke Foster Home License filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/06/2001
Proceedings: Petition for Administrative Hearing filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/06/2001
Proceedings: Notice (of Agency referral) filed.

Case Information

Judge:
ELLA JANE P. DAVIS
Date Filed:
08/06/2001
Date Assignment:
08/06/2001
Last Docket Entry:
06/19/2002
Location:
Quincy, Florida
District:
Northern
Agency:
ADOPTED IN PART OR MODIFIED
 

Counsels

Related Florida Statute(s) (3):