01-003928 Maria Oliveras vs. Aero Decal
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Wednesday, November 28, 2001.


View Dockets  
Summary: Division without jurisdiction to conduct formal hearing if Respondent does not meet definition of "employer"; and claim is time barred if not filed within 35 days of Commission`s determination.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8MARIA OLIVERAS, )

11)

12Petitioner, )

14)

15vs. ) Case No. 01 - 3928

22)

23AERO DEC AL, )

27)

28Respondent. )

30___________________________)

31RECOMMENDED ORDER OF DISMISSAL

35THIS CAUSE came on to be heard by Daniel M. Kilbride,

46Administrative Law Judge, on the Motion to Dismiss filed

55Oc tober 29, 2001, by Respondent, before the Division of

65Administrative Hearings, in Tallahassee, Florida. Petitioner

71was advised of the Motion; the Administrative Law Judge issued

81an Order to Show Cause, dated October 31, 2001, and Petitioner

92did not file a response within the required time, pursuant to

103Rules 28 - 106.204(1) and (4), Florida Administrative Code. The

113arguments presented in the Motion have been fully considered.

122The following appearances were entered:

127APPEARANCES

128For Petitioner: No appearance

132For Respondent: Christopher J. Coleman, Esquire

138Schillinger & Coleman, P.A.

1421329 Bedford Drive, Suite 1

147Melbourne, Florida 32940

150STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES

154Whether the Division of Administrative Heari ngs has

162jurisdiction to conduct a formal hearing under the provisions

171of Sections 120.569 and 120.57(1), Florida Statutes, if the

180Petition for Relief does not allege that Respondent is an

"190employer" under Section 760.02(7), Florida Statutes, and if

198the Pet ition for Relief was not timely filed pursuant to

209Section 760.11(7), Florida Statutes.

213PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

215On February 22, 2001, Petitioner filed with the Florida

224Commission on Human Relations (the "Commission") a Charge of

234Discrimination against Respond ent based on her sex and her

244personal life. The Charge alleged that Respondent had eight

253employees. The Commission then conducted an investigation.

260Upon completion of its investigation, the Commission issued

268its Notice of Determination: No Jurisdiction . The

276Commission's investigation determined that Respondent did not

283employ 15 or more employees for each working day over the

294current year and preceding year. The Commission mailed a copy

304of its Notice of Determination: No Jurisdiction to Petitioner

313on August 30, 2001. Petitioner was advised that she must file

324a Petition for Relief within 35 days of the date of the Notice

337or her claim would be barred. Section 760.11(7), Florida

346Statutes. The 35th day following the date of issuance of the

357Notice of Det ermination was October 4, 2001. Petitioner filed

367her Petition for Relief with the Commission on October 5,

3772001. Petitioner requested a formal hearing under the

385provisions of Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes. In her

393Petition, Petitioner acknowledged that Respondent has less

400than 15 employees on its payroll. The Commission referred

409this matter to the Division of Administrative Hearings on

418October 11, 2001, for resolution of the issues. Respondent

427filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Petit ion for

438Relief on October 24, 2001. Respondent filed its Motion to

448Dismiss on the same date. On October 31, 2001, an Order to

460Show Cause was issued directing Petitioner to respond to the

470Motion to Dismiss within ten days of the date of the Order or

483the c ase would be dismissed. The Motion and the Order were

495sent to Petitioner's last known address. Petitioner has not

504filed a response to the Motion or to the Order to Show Cause

517as of the date of this Recommended Order. It is, therefore,

528FOUND AND DETERMIN ED that Petitioner had until October 4,

5382001, to file her petition, pursuant to the statute. The

548Petition was not filed with the Commission until October 5,

5582001. Petitioner has not filed a response to the Motion to

569Dismiss or the Order to Show Cause, an d has not shown good

582cause for her delay in filing the Petition, nor has she

593alleged that Respondent was an "employer" within the meaning

602of Section 760.02(7), Florida Statutes. Therefore, the

609Petition for Relief is time barred for failure to file the

620Pet ition within 35 days of the date of determination of no

632reasonable cause by the Commission. Section 760.11(7),

639Florida Statutes (2001); Wright v. HCA Central Florida

647Regional Hospital, Inc. , 18 FALR 1160 (1995), cf. St.

656Petersburg Motor Club v. Cook , 567 So. 2d 488 (Fla. 2d DCA

6681990) and Joshua v. City of Gainesville , 768 So. 2d 432 (Fla.

6802000); see Blakely v. United States Automobile Ass'n , 1999 WL

6901053122 (M.D. Fla., October 4, 1999); Dawkins v. Bellsouth

699Telecommunications, Inc. , 53 F.Supp.2d 1356, 1360 - 61 (M.D.

708Fla. 1999). This procedure has been determined to be

717constitutional, under Florida law. McElhath v. Burley , 707

725So. 2d 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Further, and equally

735important, DOAH and the Commission lack jurisdiction over the

744Petition for Rel ief and the Charge of Discrimination based on

755the fact that Respondent is not an "employer" within the

765meaning of Section 760.02(7), Florida Statutes. Regency

772Towers Owners Association, Inc. v. Pettigrew , 436 So. 2d 266

782(Fla. 1st DCA 1983), rev. den. 444 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 1984).

794RECOMMENDATION

795Based on the foregoing facts and conclusions of law, it

805is

806RECOMMENDED that a final order be entered dismissing with

815prejudice the Petition of Maria Oliveras in DOAH Case

824No. 01 - 3928; FCHR Case No. 21 - 01229.

834DONE AN D ENTERED this 28th day of November, 2001, in

845Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

849_____________________________________

850DANIEL M. KILBRIDE

853Administrative Law Judge

856Division of Administrative Hearings

860The DeSoto Building

8631230 Apa lachee Parkway

867Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 3060

872(850) 488 - 9675 SUNCOM 278 - 9675

880Fax Filing (850) 921 - 6847

886www.doah.state.fl.us

887Filed with the Clerk of the

893Division of Administrative Hearings

897this 28th day of November, 2001.

903COPIES FURNI SHED:

906Denise Crawford, Agency Clerk

910Florida Commission on Human Relations

915325 John Knox Road

919Building F, Suite 240

923Tallahassee, Florida 32303 - 4149

928Cecil Howard, General Counsel

932Florida Commission on Human Relations

937325 John Knox Road

941Building F, Suite 2 40

946Tallahassee, Florida 32303 - 4149

951Christopher J. Coleman, Esquire

955Schillinger & Coleman, P.A.

9591329 Bedford Drive, Suite 1

964Melbourne, Florida 32940

967Maria Oliveras

969339 Galicia Street Southwest

973Palm Bay, Florida 32908

977NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTI ONS

984All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

99415 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any

1004exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the

1014agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
PDF:
Date: 11/21/2003
Proceedings: Final Order Dismissing Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice filed.
PDF:
Date: 11/20/2003
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 12/06/2001
Proceedings: Letter to Judge Kilbride from M. Oliveras in response to recommended order of dismissal filed.
PDF:
Date: 11/28/2001
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 11/28/2001
Proceedings: Recommended Order of Dismissal issued. CASE CLOSED.
PDF:
Date: 10/31/2001
Proceedings: Order to Show Cause issued (Petitioner shall respond within 10 days from the date of this order).
PDF:
Date: 10/29/2001
Proceedings: Motion to Dismiss filed by Respondent
PDF:
Date: 10/29/2001
Proceedings: Answer filed by C. Coleman
PDF:
Date: 10/11/2001
Proceedings: Initial Order issued.
PDF:
Date: 10/11/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Respondent of Filing of Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Ermployment Practice filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/11/2001
Proceedings: Petition for Relief filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/11/2001
Proceedings: Determination: No Jurisdiction filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/11/2001
Proceedings: Notice of Determination: No Jurisdiction filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/11/2001
Proceedings: Charge of Discrimination filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/11/2001
Proceedings: Transmittal of Petition filed by the Agency.

Case Information

Judge:
DANIEL M. KILBRIDE
Date Filed:
10/11/2001
Date Assignment:
10/11/2001
Last Docket Entry:
11/21/2003
Location:
Palm Bay, Florida
District:
Northern
Agency:
ADOPTED IN TOTO
 

Counsels

Related Florida Statute(s) (4):