02-000454CON Hca Health Services Of Florida, Inc., D/B/A Oak Hill Hospital vs. Agency For Health Care Administration And Hernando Hma, Inc., D/B/A Brooksville Regional Hospital
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, December 24, 2002.


View Dockets  
Summary: Hernando demonstrated need to replace and relocate hospital to site three miles from existing location. Error in project cost in letter of intent is not significant. Applicants (audited) financial statements are required by and submitted to AHCA.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF )

13FLORIDA, INC., d/b/a OAK HILL )

19HOSPITAL, )

21)

22Petitioner, )

24)

25vs. ) Case No. 02 - 0454CON

32)

33AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE )

38ADMINISTRATION and HERNANDO HMA, )

43INC., d/b/a BROOKSVILLE REGIONAL )

48HOSPITAL, )

50)

51Respondents. )

53__________________________________)

54RECOMMENDED ORDER

56Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings,

64by its designated Administrative Law Judge, Eleanor M. Hunter,

73held a final hearing in the above - styled case on June 3 - 7 and

8910 - 14, 2002, in Tallahassee, Florida.

96APPEARANCES

97For Petitioner: Stephen A. Ecenia, Esquire

103R. David Prescott, Esquire

107Rutledge, Ecenia, Purnell & Hoffman, P.A.

113215 South Monroe Street, Suite 420

119Post Office Box 551

123Tallahassee, Florida 32302 - 0551

128For Respondent Hernando HMA, Inc., d/b/a Brooksville

135Regional Hospital:

137James C. Hauser, Esquire

141Susan C. Hauser, Esquire

145Metz, Hauser & Husband, P.A.

150215 South Monroe Street, Suite 505

156Post Office Box 10909

160Tallahassee, Florida 32302 - 2902

165For Respondent Agency for Health Care Administration:

172Gerald L. Pickett, Esquire

176Agency for Health Care Administration

181525 Mirror Lake Drive, No rth

187Sebring Building, Suite 310H

191St. Petersburg, Florida 33701

195STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

199Whether Certificate of Need (CON) Application Number 9478

207filed by Hernando HMA, Inc. (HMA or Hernando HMA), d/b/a

217Brooksvi lle Regional Hospital (Brooksville Regional) for approval

225to replace and relocate its existing 91 - bed hospital in Hernando

237County, Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) District 3,

246Subdistrict 6, meets the applicable criteria for approval.

254PRELIMINA RY STATEMENT

257In September 2001, Hernando HMA filed CON Application Number

2669478 to relocate and rebuild Brooksville Regional on a different

276site, approximately three miles from its current location, in

285Hernando County. AHCA published its intent to approve the

294application in the Florida Administrative Weekly, Volume 27,

302Number 52, on December 28, 2001.

308On January 18, 2002, HCA Health Services of Florida, Inc.,

318d/b/a Oak Hill Hospital (Oak Hill) timely filed a Petition for

329Administrative Hearing to contest the action of AHCA. The

338Petition with a request to assign an administrative law judge

348(ALJ) was forwarded to the Division of Administrative Hearings

357(DOAH) on February 5, 2002. Initially set for hearing on May 21 -

37024 and 27 - 31, 2002, by the previously ass igned ALJ, the case was

385re - scheduled for the following week by the current ALJ due to

398scheduling conflicts and difficulties in securing court reporters

406for a holiday.

409At the final hearing, Brooksville Regional presented the

417testimony of Wittie E. McNeil; C hristopher A. Kingsley;

426Gary Bell; Robert Foreman; Ted Lincks, expert in transportation

435engineering; Joe Nelson, M.D., expert in emergency medicine and

444emergency medical services; Susan Frimmel; Jacqueline Lindsey,

451M.D., expert in emergency medicine and qu ality assurance;

460Thomas Barb, expert in hospital administration and operations;

468Russell Heiken, expert in mechanical engineering; Kerry Blind,

476expert in landscape architecture, land planning, and

483environmental design; Kenneth Rigby, expert in electrical

490en gineering; Chuck Braun, expert in hospital architecture and

499hospital building costs; Donald Lacey, Jr., expert in land use

509planning; Clifford Manuel, expert in civil engineering; Daniel J.

518Sullivan, expert in health care planning and health care finance;

528a nd Jaime Wesolowski. Brooksville Regional and AHCA jointly

537presented the testimony of Jeffrey N. Gregg of AHCA, an expert in

549health planning, CON review, and health care regulation.

557Brooksville Regional's Exhibits 1 - 20, 22 - 27, 29 - 36, 38 - 42, 44 - 59,

57563, an d 69 were received in evidence.

583Oak Hill presented the testimony of Jaime Wesolowski, expert

592in hospital administration; Patricia Greenberg, expert in health

600care planning and health care finance; and Rick D. Knapp, expert

611in health care finance and accoun ting. Oak Hill's Exhibits 1 - 26

624were received in evidence.

628The transcript of the final hearing was filed on August 23,

6392002. After an unopposed request for an extension of time was

650granted, the parties filed proposed recommended orders on

658September 23, 20 02. HMA's Memorandum of Law was also filed on

670that date. It included a request for judicial notice that Oak

681Hill has terminated its OB program.

687On October 1, 2002, Oak Hill Hospital's Motion to Strike

697Portion of HMA's Proposed Recommended Order and Respo nse to HMA's

708Request for Judicial Notice was filed, opposing the Request which

718relied for factual support of the matter to be noticed on a

730newspaper article published after the conclusion of the final

739hearing. HMA's Response in Opposition to Oak Hill's Mo tion to

750Strike Portion of Brooksville's Proposed Recommended Order was

758filed on October 4, 2002. The Motion to Strike is granted and

770the Request for Judicial Notice is denied. Page 9 of the

781Memorandum of Law, Attachment C to the Memorandum, footnote 2 of

792Brooksville's Proposed Recommended Order, and Attachment 2 to

800Brooksville's Proposed Recommended Order are stricken.

806FINDINGS OF FACT

8091. The Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) is the

819state agency authorized to administer the certificate of nee d

829(CON) law in Florida. AHCA is the designated state health

839planning agency. See Subsections 408.034(1) and 408.035(1),

846Florida Statutes.

8482. AHCA Health Services Planning District 3 is composed of

858Hamilton, Suwannee, Lafayette, Dixie, Columbia, Gilchris t, Levy,

866Union, Bradford, Putnam, Alachua, Marion, Citrus, Hernando,

873Sumter, and Lake Counties. See Subsection 408.032(5), Florida

881Statutes.

8823. Within District 3, Hernando County is designated acute

891care subdistrict 6. The three acute care hospitals in the County

902are Hernando HMA, Inc., d/b/a Brooksville Regional Hospital

910(Brooksville Regional) which was previously operated under the

918name of Lykes Memorial Hospital, Spring Hill Regional Hospital

927(Spring Hill), and HCA Health Services of Florida, Inc., d/ b/a

938Oak Hill Hospital (Oak Hill).

943HMA

9444. Hernando HMA is the applicant for CON Number 9478 to

955replace and relocate Brooksville Regional, an existing 91 - bed

965hospital in Brooksville, Florida. Constructed over a 40 - year

975time period to a maximum size of 16 6 beds, Brooksville Regional

987is currently licensed to operate 91 beds. In the early 1990s, 75

999beds were transferred from Brooksville Regional to establish

1007Spring Hill. Spring Hill is located in southwest Hernando County

1017near the Hernando/Pasco County lin e.

10235. Health Management Associates, Inc., the parent of

1031Hernando HMA, is a publicly traded for profit corporation, with

1041headquarters in Naples, Florida. Hernando HMA leases and

1049operates, under a single state license, both Brooksville Regional

1058and Spring Hill. Both are owned by Hernando County. In 1998,

1069the County entered into a 30 - year lease agreement for HMA to

1082assume the management of the hospitals which were then bankrupt.

1092HMA acquires primarily non - urban area hospitals in need of

1103capital and/or new management strategies to reverse patient out -

1113migration. The corporation owns or operates 43 hospitals in 14

1123states, including 13 in Florida. HMA has rebuilt and replaced 8

1134of the 43 hospitals it has acquired since its establishment in

11451977.

11466. In addit ion to Brooksville Regional and Spring Hill, in

1157Hernando County, HMA also operates Pasco Regional Medical Center

1166(Pasco Regional), in adjacent northeast Pasco County, in AHCA

1175D istrict 5. See Subsection 408.032(5), Florida Statutes. Pasco

1184Regional, a 120 - bed hospital located on U.S. Highway 301, in Dade

1197City, Florida, serves residents of eastern Hernando and Pasco

1206Counties who reside along the four - lane corridor, in the

1217communities of San Antonio, St. Leo, Trilby, Lacoochee, Ridge

1226Manor, Dade City, Zephyrh ills, and Wesley Chapel. Because of the

1237emergency medical transport policy of taking patients to the

1246nearest hospital, over 85% of those transported from eastern

1255Hernando County are taken to Pasco County hospital emergency

1264rooms.

12657. Hernando HMA's 1998 l ease agreement with Hernando County

1275required HMA to pay the debts necessary for the hospitals to

1286emerge from bankruptcy, to provide Medicaid and charity care for

1296Hernando County residents, and to provide $25 million in capital

1306improvements to the two hospi tals. To date, $15 million has been

1318spent, $7 million for improvements to Brooksville Regional and $8

1328million for Spring Hill. Under the terms of the lease, the

1339proposal to relocate the hospital required County approval. At a

1349meeting held on September 2 5, 2001, Hernando County Commissioners

1359vote unanimously to allow the filing of CON Number 9478.

13698. Hernando HMA proposes to replace and relocate

1377Brooksville Regional to a 95 - acre site on which it has a purchase

1391option for $25,000 an acre. The total est imated project cost is

1404$52 million, $33 million of that for construction. The parcel is

1415located at the intersection of Lykes Dublin Road and a four - lane

1428stretch of State Road 50. The proposed new site is 2.7 miles

1440west of the existing site and 1.8 miles west of Cobb Road where

1453the southern Brooksville City bypass of State Road 50 ends. HMA

1464has agreed to donate the hospital, and approximately 25 acres of

1475underlying and surrounding land to Hernando County. HMA will

1484continue, under the terms of the lease, to manage the hospital,

1495and also plans to build medical offices on the remainder of the

1507parcel of land.

15109. Brooksville Regional is currently located, on

1517approximately 11 acres on Ponce De Leon Boulevard in downtown

1527Brooksville, a mile east of the State Ro ad 50 bypass and one -

1541tenth of a mile from U.S. Highway 41 which is being increased

1553from four to six lanes. The City of Brooksville opposes the

1564relocation of the hospital to the new site which is 1.5 miles

1576beyond the city limits.

1580Oak Hill

158210. Oak Hill is a 204 - bed hospital, located just off State

1595Road 50, in western Hernando County. Oak Hill was constructed 18

1606years ago on a 40 - acre campus which includes two medical office

1619buildings, related structures for staff offices and plant

1627operations, and a cancer institute. Oak Hill is approximately

1636five miles west of Brooksville's proposed new site, and eight

1646miles west of its existing location.

165211. Oak Hill, like many Florida hospitals, experiences

1660seasonal variations in occupancy. Typically, utilization re aches

1668up to 90% in the first quarter of the year and goes down to 60%

1683in the fall. Occupancy rates have been growing approximately 4%

1693a year from 1997 to 2000, but from 2000 to 2001, patient days at

1707Oak Hill increased 8%.

171112. Oak Hill has also recently received CON approval to

1721establish an open heart surgery program, which is expected to

1731reverse the out - migration of open heart surgery and other cardiac

1743patients, primarily to another HCA facility, Bayonet Point in

1752Pasco County. Bayonet Point is 17 miles or a 30 - minute drive

1765from Oak Hill. With the anticipated reversal of some out -

1776migration, and a 2% annual increase in patient days, Oak Hill

1787will have over 100% occupancy in the first quarter of 2005, going

1799down to 74% occupancy in the fall of that year.

180913. Oak Hill opposes the proposal to relocate Brooksville

1818Regional. Oak Hill asserts (1) that the proposed new location is

1829less desirable than alternative sites suggested by the City of

1839Brooksville; (2) that Brooksville Regional failed to demonstrate

1847tha t replacement rather than renovation of the existing building

1857is necessary; (3) that the proposed site will decrease access for

1868residents in eastern Hernando County; and (4) that the

1877replacement and relocation will adversely impact Oak Hill.

188514. The pu blished fixed need pool for the subdistrict

1895indicated no need for additional acute care beds. Brooksville

1904Regional's proposal to relocate, but not add beds, is not

1914inconsistent with the fixed need pool.

192015. CON review is required and is not expedited in this

1931case because Brooksville Regional is proposing to relocate to a

1941different site which is more than one mile from its current site.

1953Review criteria

195516. The parties, in a prehearing stipulation, agreed that

1964Brooksville Regional and Oak Hill have good records of providing

1974quality care and can be expected to continue, as required by

1985Subsections 408.035(2) and (3), Florida Statutes (2001).

199217. The parties agreed that Brooksville Regional's staffing

2000projections are reasonable and sufficient based on its p rojected

2010utilization, but Oak Hill disputed the accuracy of the

2019utilization projections.

202118. The parties agreed that the design and schematic

2030drawings for the new hospital are reasonable.

203719. The parties acknowledged that there will be an adverse

2047impact on Oak Hill as a result of a loss of some employees,

2060physicians, and patients, the magnitude of which has to be

2070considered under Subsection 408.035(9), Florida Statutes (2001).

207720. The parties stipulated that Brooksville Regional has

2085sufficient resources, including personnel and funds, to

2092accomplish the project and operate the facility, as required by

2102Subsection 408.035(6), Florida Statutes (2001).

210721. The parties agreed that Subsection 408.035(5), related

2115to the needs of research and educational faciliti es; and

2125Subsection 408.035(12), Florida Statutes (2001), related to

2132nursing home beds, are not at issue in this proceeding.

214222. The parties stipulated that, at issue, are the criteria

2152in Subsections 408.035(1), (2), (4), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11);

2162and Sub sections 408.037(1)(b)3. and (c), Florida Statutes (2001);

2171and Florida Administrative Code Rules 59C - 1.008(3) and (5), 59C -

21831.030(2)(a) through (f), and 59C - 1.038(6)(a).

2190District health plan

219323. District 3 health plan criteria related to the

2202establishment or expansion of services, the establishment of

2210services in a community with no current service, the addition of

2221beds, and the establishment of new facilities are not applicable

2231to this project. Oak Hill's health planning consultant noted,

2240however, that c riteria related to bed transfers could also relate

2251to a proposal to relocate an entire hospital. Those

2260considerations include whether Medicare and private pay markets

2268of disproportionate share charity and Medicaid hospitals will be

2277adversely affected, whe ther access generally, and access

2285particularly for Medicaid and indigent patients, or other

2293traditionally underserved groups, will be improved. The criteria

2301also overlap those in other applicable statutes and rules. See

2311also Subsections 408.035(2), (7), and (11), Florida Statutes

2319(2001); Rule 59C - 1.038(6)(a) and Rule 59C - 1.030(2)(a) through

2330(f), Florida Administrative Code. Other relevant considerations

2337include whether the transfer is needed and is more cost - efficient

2349than renovation or expansion of the existing facility, and

2358whether the proposal is financially feasible. See also

2366Subsections 408.035(1), (4), (8), (9), and (10), Florida Statutes

2375(2001).

2376Medicaid and indigent care

238024. Hernando HMA, at Brooksville Regional and Spring Hill

2389combined, provid ed approximately 71% of total charity care in the

2400County in 2000, and 79% in 2001. Brooksville Regional is a

2411disproportionate share provider of Medicaid, having provided

2418approximately 8% of its total care to Medicaid patients.

242725. Brooksville Regional se parately provided more Medicare,

2435but half as much Medicaid as Spring Hill which, unlike

2445Brooksville Regional, has obstetrics and neonatal intensive care

2453programs which typically provide services to a large number of

2463economically disadvantaged mothers and n ewborns.

246926. Oak Hill provided the remaining 20 to 30 percent of the

2481charity care in Hernando County. Approximately 6% of Oak Hill's

2491patients are in the Medicaid payor category, but Oak Hill is not

2503a disproportionate share provider. Oak Hill provided al most 2%

2513of its total revenues for charity care in 2000, and its Medicaid

2525care increased from approximately $7.4 million in 2000, to $12.3

2535million in 2001.

253827. Although Hernando HMA did not offer a CON condition

2548related to a specific level of Medicaid and charity care, its

2559historic levels and Hernando County's continued

2565ownership of the hospital provide the assurances required by the

2575criteria.

2576Geographical access

257828. Hernando County had a population of 130,810 people in

25892,000, which increased to 136,552 in February of 2002, and is

2602projected to be 159,400 people in 2010. There are 7,227

2614residents of the City of Brooksville, and 129,313 in

2624unincorporated areas of the County. The population is more

2633dense, more growth is projected, and more development is allowed

2643under the comprehensive plan, in the central and western portions

2653of the County.

265629. The population in the zip codes east of Interstate 75

2667was, in 2001, 4,301 of the total of 132,590. By 2010, the

2681eastern area is projected to have 1,295 more peop le as compared

2694to a projected increase of 19,401 people in areas west of Highway

270741. The projected areas of most intense population growth are in

2718western Hernando County, clustered around U.S. Highway 19, to the

2728north of State Road 50, and Highway 41, to the south of State

2741Road 50. These are also areas with a high concentration of the

2753population over 65 in a "retirement belt."

276030. East of Interstate 75, the population of Hernando

2769County is more sparsely settled, younger, and has a lower

2779mortality rate. More eastern area residents who need inpatient

2788acute care, on an elective or emergency basis use the closest

2799hospitals, Pasco Regional in Dade City and East Pasco Community

2809Hospital (East Pasco) in Zephyrhills. In recent years, the trend

2819towards utilizat ion of Pasco county hospitals by eastern Hernando

2829County residents has increased. Residents in the area also use

2839hospitals in Lake County.

284331. The Hernando County Board of County Commissioners hired

2852Tribrook Healthcare Consultants to report on the reloca tion

2861proposal, including consideration of access for residents of

2869eastern Hernando County. Residents of the three eastern zip

2878codes accounted for 83 discharges from Hernando County hospitals

2887from the second quarter of 1999 through the first quarter of

2898200 0. Of those, 43% or 36 discharges were from Brooksville

2909Regional, 18% or 15 from Spring Hill, and 39% or 32 from Oak

2922Hill. For the year ending June 30, 2001, fifty - three discharges

2934from Brooksville Regional and 28 from Oak Hill originated in the

2945three ea stern zip codes.

295032. From January through August 2001, the Hernando County

2959Fire and Rescue service responded to 259 emergency health care

2969calls from the eastern area, which represents approximately 5% of

2979its total volume of 4,863 transports. Of the 259 t ransports, 109

2992people were taken to the emergency room (ER) at Brooksville

3002Regional, and an equal number to the Pasco Regional ER, 14 to the

3015East Pasco ER, and eight to the Oak Hill ER. Level one trauma

3028patients, such as those with severe injuries from In terstate car

3039accidents, are air lifted to trauma centers at Orlando hospitals,

3049Tampa General Hospital or Bayfront Medical Center in

3057St. Petersburg.

305933. If Brooksville Regional is relocated to the proposed

3068new site, the increase in average peak travel ti mes from various

3080locations in the County will range from four to six minutes, for

3092total average travel times ranging between 10 and 21 minutes.

3102For the majority of the County residents, the average peak travel

3113times will decrease, saving from one to six m inutes, since the

3125new location is closer to more densely populated residential

3134areas. The acute care travel time goal is to have most residents

3146able to reach the service within 30 minutes. The standard is

3157already met and will, with Brooksville Regional's proposed

3165relocation, continue to be met in District 3, Subdistrict 6.

317534. The residents of the County in the eastern areas will

3186not be adversely affected by the relocation because relatively

3195few use Brooksville Regional, and because, for many residents

3204a long the U.S. 301 corridor, Pasco Regional is more accessible.

321535. In addition, in return for approval of the Brooksville

3225Regional relocation proposal, Hernando County required HMA to

3233purchase an ambulance with advanced life support equipment to

3242station i n the eastern area near Interstate 75. There is

3253credible evidence that, in some cases, the time it takes for

3264paramedics to reach an emergency patient and begin treatment can

3274be more important in saving lives than the actual travel time to

3286a hospital emerg ency room.

329136. The conditions imposed by the County also required a

3301$20,000 contribution from HMA for an indigent patient clinic and

3312recruitment of a physician to staff a clinic in the eastern area.

3324Relocation and replacement vs. renovation;

3329alternative s ites

333237. The proposed relocation site was criticized as

3340inappropriate geologically. The property includes wetlands.

3346Agricultural land across the street drains through a ditch under

3356the road into a pond on one corner of the property. The

3368elevation of t he land at State Road 50 is 90 feet above sea

3382level, increases to 95 feet but then slopes down to 65 feet at

3395Wiscon Road. There are sinkhole - like depressions towards the

3405back of the property. To meet state disaster preparedness

3414standards, the elevation of a hospital must be equal to or above

3426the major thoroughfare leading to the entrance.

343338. Brooksville Regional can be constructed on the proposed

3442site with its main entrance facing and above the elevation of

3453State Road 50. Other entrances can also be elevated using fill

3464dirt.

346539. In general, the site meets the County land use criteria

3476and has sufficient uplands. It also meets the criteria developed

3486by HMA and its land planning consultant for (1) a minimum of 40

3499acres, (2) the potential for traffic si gnalization, (3) proximity

3509to population growth centers, and (4) good visibility from

3518passing traffic.

352040. Currently, Brooksville Regional is located on 11 acres

3529in two separate three - story towers connected through a central

3540building on the ground floor. The building is constructed from

355010 to 15 feet below the street it faces, Ponce De Leon Boulevard.

3563The entrance floods in heavy rains and lacks good visibility from

3574street traffic.

357641. During the last four years, improvements at Brooksville

3585Regional hav e included a new roof, lobby renovations, electrical

3595upgrades in the operating room, the installation of new air

3605handlers, and substantial investments in new equipment.

361242. Despite the improvements, the physical plant cannot be

3621renovated to meet current c odes and the layout of the building

3633inevitably results in inefficiencies. Oak Hill noted, however,

3641that the building is not technically violating any code but is

"3652grandfathered." In addition, none of deficiencies affect

3659Brooksville Regional's ability to provide excellent care, as

3667measured by it score of 97 out of 100 on the most recent survey

3681by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care

3690Organizations.

369143. Patient corridors, in one tower, are less than eight

3701feet wide as required by the Nationa l Life Safety Code. The

3713building is not in compliance with the Americans With

3722Disabilities Act (ADA). The parking area exceeds the level for a

3733ramp to the building. Electrical, heating, ventilation and air

3742conditioning (HVAC) systems require major upgra des to meet codes.

3752Improvements are limited by the inadequately sized ceiling spaces

3761for ductwork and pipes. The HVAC inefficiencies are estimated to

3771cost Brooksville Regional from $400,000 to $500,000 a year.

378244. The major functional inefficiencies at Brooksville

3789Regional result from the configuration in two separate towers.

3798Staff must cross the central core and use one of two elevators in

3811each tower to provide care, deliver food, remove trash and soiled

3822linens, and transport patients. The elevators and corridors are

3831shared with visitors. The separate towers divide patients into

3840smaller, inefficient groupings which require more staff.

384745. One witness cited a cost estimate of $250,000 for a

3859pedestrian walkway to connect the second and third floors o f the

3871two towers. Oak Hill criticized the absence of any other cost

3882estimates for renovation of the existing building. If any major

3892renovations are undertaken, all "grandfathered" code exemptions

3899will be lost. The hospital would have to be closed and re built.

391246. Inadequate space compromises patient privacy in various

3920areas, including the emergency room and surgical suite. Spaces

3929are inadequate for modern equipment in appropriate locations, so,

3938for example, a CT scan, is located outside the radiology

3948d epartment, and 140 feet from the emergency room

395747. Brooksville Regional proposes to increase the size of

3966the radiology department from approximately 6,400 square feet in

3976the existing building to 16,000 square feet in the new building.

3988Operating rooms cu rrently range from 245 to 345 square feet as

4000compared to code requirements of 450 to 600 square feet, with the

4012larger rooms necessary to accommodate surgeries, such as

4020orthopedics, which require larger equipment. The total size of

4029surgical department is a pproximately 6,200 square feet while the

4040guidelines suggest it should be 10,800 square feet. The new plan

4052includes 6,300 square feet for the pharmacy and laboratory

4062combined, which now occupy approximately 3,000 square feet.

4071Overall, the new building wil l be almost 182,000 square feet,

408365,000 square feet larger than the existing facility. The new

4094plan also offers all private patient rooms, except one semi -

4105private room, consistent with the current industry trend which is

4115intended to allow family members t o spend the night with

4126patients. The design is taken from a prototype used by HMA to

4138construct five other replacement hospitals in the last five

4147years. Therefore, HMA is certain that the estimated construction

4156cost is reasonably accurate and that the des ign works well for

4168patients, visitors, and staff.

417248. Considering the deficiencies in the current structure

4180which could only be corrected by closing the hospital completely

4190and rebuilding it on site, taking five to six times as long as

4203construction of a n ew facility, renovation of the existing

4213structure is not a viable alternative.

421949. The City of Brooksville suggested other sites it

4228favored over that selected by Brooksville Regional. The first

4237parcel examined was 32 acres, not HMA's required minimum of 40

4248acres for the prototype. It would require assembling separate

4257parcels and closing streets. The second, with 49 acres, is

4267located on a two - lane city street and has a large pond in the

4282center of the tract. A third, with 55 acres, would have to be

4295share d with a post office carrier facility and lacks good

4306visibility because of its location on a curve. The fourth site

4317has 38 acres, but is too narrow for the prototype and is well

4330below the elevation of State Road 50. The fifth tract is south

4342of the fourth . It has 46 acres which, if acquired with the 38

4356acres to the north would be more than adequately sized, but is

4368even lower than the parcel to the north and has a lake in the

4382center. A sixth site with 66 acres is too long and narrow for

4395the prototype.

439750 . Finally, the City suggested assembling more parcels

4406surrounding the existing building, which would require the

4414acquisition of 38 to 40 lots, but that tract would be long and

4427narrow. As previously noted, the hospital would have to close

4437for reconstructi on for a substantially longer period of time than

4448required for new construction. The possibility that the City

4457would donate a portion of an adjacent park was discussed but it

4469was never formally offered. It is also currently the location of

4480fire and polic e stations. That acquisition also would have

4490required the condemnation of roads.

4495Costs, financial feasibility, adverse impact

4500and cost - effectiveness competition

450551. The cost for the new facility is estimated at $52

4516million. The parties stipulated that HMA can fund and operate

4526the project. And, though previously bankrupt, Brooksville

4533Regional had pre - tax profit of $5 million in 2001.

454452. The financial feasibility of the project was

4552questioned. Oak Hill's expert criticized an underlying

4559assumption tha t Medicare reimbursement would increase 6.4% from

4568the first to second year. Taken in isolation, the increase looks

4579unrealistic, but viewed over the entire time period from the base

4590year to the second year of operation, the average annual rate of

4602inflation is 2.5%, and is reasonable, as is the resulting

4612projected Medicare revenues.

461553. Brooksville Regional's financial schedules included a

4622management fee of 3% of gross revenues, although HMA has recently

4633charged up to 4% to individual hospitals. HMA can a ssess a

4645management fee of 3% rather than 4%, which one of its officers

4657described as conservative considering that its actual corporate

4665overhead is less than one percent of revenues. The assessment is

4676based on tax considerations more than on actual costs.

468554. In addition to the management fee, Brooksville

4693Regional's start - up costs, equipment costs, and depreciation

4702costs were questioned as too low. Even when deducted from

4712projected revenues, however, the additional expenses do not

4720render the project finan cially infeasible.

472655. The proposed project is financially feasible

4733considering either the CON - projected incremental increases in

4742profit, $437 thousand in the first year and $868 thousand in the

4754second year, or the revised estimates in HMA/Brooksville

4762R egional's Exhibit 56. In Exhibit 56, the projected increase in

4773profits, after relocation, are $860 thousand in the first year

4783and $1.3 million in the second year. See Conclusion of Law 79.

479556. Brooksville Regional currently operates at a

4802competitive di sadvantage. In 1999, Brooksville Regional had

48103,758 discharges, which increased to 3,794 in 2000. By contrast,

4822Oak Hill increased its discharges from 10,575 in 1999, to 11,376

4835in 2000, and up to 12,743 in 2001. Excluding approximately 400

4847newborns, the increase in discharges is not entirely attributable

4856to population growth. It also reflects Oak Hill's increase in

4866market share. Overall occupancy rates were 80% at Spring Hill,

487670% at Oak Hill, and 62% at Brooksville Regional in 2001.

488757. If the new hos pital is built, Brooksville Regional

4897projected it would have 405 more discharges in the first year of

4909the project and 413 more in the second year, for an increase in

4922revenue of $1.3 million in the second year. Oak Hill suggested

4933the incremental increase i n the number of patients was

4943insufficient to justify a $52 million expenditure, yielding only

4952$1.3 million or 2.5% return on investment, while HMA returns

4962average approximately 15%.

496558. Oak Hill also maintained that Brooksville Regional

4973underestimated the projected increase in discharges which would

4981result from the proposed relocation and replacement. Oak Hill's

4990expert estimated that Brooksville Regional would have 770

4998discharges in the first year and 1,146 in the second year of

5011operations. If Brooksvill e Regional has more discharges, its

5020revenues and profits will also be higher. Of those 1,146 year

5032two discharges, Oak Hill estimated that it would have captured

5042823 admissions in the absence of a new Brooksville Regional

5052hospital. Oak Hill's expert plann er also asserted that the loss

5063of patients would make Oak Hill less efficient and less cost -

5075effective, and result in higher charges at Brooksville Regional.

508459. In addition to opening a new open heart surgery

5094program, Oak Hill is undergoing $10 million in emergency room

5104renovations. With these, Oak Hill is projected to reach between

511482 and 83% average occupancy, in 2004 and 2005, before

5124Brooksville Regional could become fully operational. The optimum

5132is around 75%.

513560. Oak Hill argued that it could abso rb the projected

5146growth through the CON - exempt addition of 20 beds which would

5158return occupancy to reasonable levels between 75 and 76%. The

5168costs incurred for the addition, however, will be unnecessary if

5178Brooksville Regional is more competitive and util ized more

5187efficiently.

518861. As estimated by Oak Hill's expert, the proposed

5197relocation of Brooksville Regional will leave Oak Hill with

520612,243 discharges in 2005, and 12,265 discharges in 2006.

5217Assuming the estimate is correct, Oak Hill will be at

5227approxi mately the same volume as it currently experiences. There

5237is no suggestion that its operations are not cost - effective or

5249efficient at between 11,000 and 13,000 discharges. The pre - tax

5262income decrement could be as high as $1.93 million. In the

5273context of the Oak Hill budget of $17.1 million for 2002, and

5285considering its competitive advantages, the adverse impact to Oak

5294Hill is outweighed by the need for improvements at Brooksville

5304Regional.

530562. Oak Hill's expert estimated that Brooksville Regional's

5313proj ected volume was understated and that additional admissions

5322should be expected based on more recent trends in utilization.

5332If Brooksville Regional reached that volume, then revenues at the

5342new facility would increase an additional $1.8 million, to a

5352preta x total exceeding $6 million. The project is financially

5362feasible, therefore, and the costs are justified to enhance the

5372efficiency and competitiveness of Brooksville Regional.

537863. Oak Hill noted that the impact of the development of

5389the entire 95 - acre site is likely to be greater than that of the

540425 - acre hospital tract. Whether the same owner held the entire

5416tract or not, there is no reason to expect that land surrounding

5428a hospital would not become medical office buildings and related

5438health care ser vices.

544264. Oak Hill will face competition from a 60 - bed

5453Healthsouth comprehensive medical rehabilitation hospital

5458currently under development approximately two miles away on State

5467Road 50 in the direction of the Brooksville Regional site. The

5478impact of the rehabilitation hospital, a reduction in acute care

5488lengths of stay, will apparently be felt by all acute care

5499hospitals throughout the region not just Oak Hill. There is no

5510evidence to indicate that the combined impact of Healthsouth and

5520Brooksville Regional on Oak Hill justifies the denial of the

5530proposed relocation of Brooksville Regional.

5535HMA's letter of intent and financial statements

554265. HMA's letter of intent indicated that the project costs

5552would not exceed $40 million, but the CON project co st is $52

5565million.

556666. Since letters of intent are not required to include

5576project costs, AHCA has taken the position that the error in the

5588letter of intent is insignificant as long as the project was

5599identified with sufficient specificity.

560367. AHCA rece ived the audited financial statements for

5612Hernando H.M.A., the applicant, but not separate audited

5620financial statements for Brooksville Regional. Oak Hill's expert

5628suggested that AHCA received inadequate information to determine

5636the financial feasibility of the project.

564268. Hernando HMA's audited financial statement and Schedule

56502, with its other financial commitments, demonstrated its ability

5659to provide the funds. The separate financial schedules related

5668to Brooksville Regional's operations, especially S chedules 7 and

56778 provided the information necessary for AHCA to determine if the

5688project is financially feasible.

569269. Hernando HMA has demonstrated that it met the letter of

5703intent and application content requirements, and that, on

5711balance, it meets the criteria to relocate and replace

5720Brooksville Regional as proposed in CON Application No. 9478.

5729CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

573270. The Division of Administrative Hearings has

5739jurisdiction over the parties to and the subject matter of these

5750proceedings. Subsections 4 08.039(5), and 120.57(1), Florida

5757Statutes.

575871. An applicant for a certificate of need has the burden

5769of demonstrating that its application should be granted. Boca

5778Raton Artificial Kidney Center v. Department of Health and

5787Rehabilitative Services , 475 So . 2d 260 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). The

5799award of a C ertificate of N eed must be based on a balanced

5813consideration of all statutory and rule criteria. Department of

5822Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Johnson and Johnson Home

5831Healthcare, Inc. , 447 So. 2d 261 ( Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Balsam v.

5844Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services , 486 So. 2d 1341

5854(Fla. 1st DCA 1988). The weight to be given each criterion is

5866not fixed but depends on the facts and circumstances of each

5877case. Collier Medical Center, Inc. v. Department of Health and

5887Rehabilitative Services , 462 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

589772. Oak Hill has standing because the program at Oak Hill

5908will be substantially affected, consistent with the prehearing

5916stipulation of the parties and the evidence of an adverse impact

5927of $1.9 million in last revenues.

593373. Despite the error in the project cost, Hernando HMA's

5943letter of intent met the requirements of the following:

5952(c) Letters of intent must describe the

5959proposal; specify the number of beds sought,

5966i f any; identify the services to be provided

5975and the specific subdistrict location; and

5981identify the applicant.

5984Subsection 408.039(2)(c), Florida Statutes.

598874. Hernando HMA, as the applicant, was required to submit

5998its audited financial statements whic h demonstrated its ability

6007to fund the project. Both Subsection 408.037(1)(c), Florida

6015Statutes, and Rule 59C - 1.008(5)(c)3., Florida Administrative

6023Code, require the audited financial statement of the applicant.

6032In fact, the rule provides that:

6038Only audi ted financial statements of the

6045applicant will be accepted. Audited

6050financial statements of any part of the

6057applicant, including but not limited to

6063subsidiaries, divisions, specific facilities

6067or cost centers, will not qualify as an audit

6076of the applicant . Nor shall the financial

6084statements of the applicant's parent

6089corporation qualify as an audit of the

6096applicant.

609775. The criteria from the District 3 health plan related to

6108the need to transfer beds, arguably applicable to this case,

6118overlap the other s tatutory and rule criteria. Subsection

6127408.035(1), Florida Statutes.

613076. Brooksville Regional will, based on its history of

6139commitments and obligation to Hernando County, continue to meet

6148the needs of Medicaid and charity patients, consistent with

6157Subsec tions 408.035(1) and (11), Florida Statutes, and Rules 59C -

61681.030(2)(a), (b), (c), (d), and (e); and 59C - 1.038(6)(a), Florida

6179Administrative Code.

618177. Geographical access will be enhanced by the relocation

6190of Brooksville Regional closer to areas of more de nse population

6201and higher expected growth, in compliance with Subsections

6209408.035(2) and (7), Florida Statutes; and Rule 59C - 1.030(2)(f),

6219Florida Administrative Code.

622278. For residents of eastern Hernando County, acute care

6231services are reasonably and eco nomically accessible in adjoining

6240Pasco County, and not adversely affected by the proposed

6249relocation of Brooksville Regional. See Subsection 408.035(4),

6256Florida Statutes.

625879. In the proposed recommended order, Oak Hill renewed its

6268objection to HMA/Brook sville Regional's Exhibit 56, asserting

6276that it is an impermissible amendment to the financial

6285information in the CON. The rule is that:

6293The agency shall deem the application

6299complete or withdrawn within 7 calendar days

6306of the receipt of the requested inf ormation.

6314Subsequent to an application being deemed

6320complete by the agency, no further

6326application information or amendment will be

6332accepted by the agency.

6336Rule 59C - 1.010(3)(b), Florida Administrative Code. Exhibit 56

6345consists of revised S chedule 7A, projected revenues, and S chedule

63568A, projected income and expenses. The revisions are

6364mathematical corrections, the addition of approximately $5.6

6371million in other managed care revenues (shown in the CON on

6382Schedule 7A, column 7, but not included in the t otal of

6394approximately $125.7 million in the CON in Schedule 7A, column

640410), which increases the corrected total inpatient hospital

6412service revenue to approximately $131.3 million. The

6419mathematical correction is not an impermissible amendment to the

6428CON. No information beyond that included in the initial CON was

6439required to correct the mistake. Similarly, the corrections to

6448Schedule 8A, regardless of how substantial, were also generated

6457solely as a result of the mathematical correction of revenues on

6468Sche dule 7A using the same methodology which was the basis for

6480the initial projections. The revisions to Schedule 8A are not

6490impermissible amendments.

649280. The Brooksville Regional relocation project will

6499increase utilization and revenues at the hospital. Based on

6508either the data in the CON or that in HMA Exhibit 56, the project

6522is financially feasible incrementally and will allow the hospital

6531to increase overall profitability. See Subsection 408.035(9),

6538Florida Statutes.

654081. Some deficiencies at Brooksv ille Regional's existing

6548site, lack of compliance with various codes and the ADA, flooding

6559due to inadequate elevation, inadequate size, and location on a

6569two - lane street, cannot reasonably be corrected onsite. Others

6579including electrical upgrades, improv ements in the HVAC system

6588and enlarged spaces would necessitate closing the hospital to

6597make substantial renovations. The only cost - efficient

6605alternative is relocation and construction of a new hospital,

6614consistent with Subsection 408.035(10), Florida Sta tutes.

662182. Brooksville Regional will be more competitive, and more

6630cost - efficient if it relocates and replaces the existing facility

6641as proposed in the CON application. See Subsection 408.035(9),

6650Florida Statutes.

665283. On balance, Hernando HMA demonstrat ed that it meets the

6663criteria for the approval of CON Application No. 9478.

6672RECOMMENDATION

6673Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of

6683Law, it is

6686RECOMMENDED that the Agency for Health Care Administration

6694enter a final order approving CON A pplication No. 9478 for

6705Hernando HMA to relocate and replace Brooksville Regional as

6714proposed in the application.

6718DONE AND ENTERED this 24th day of December, 2002, in

6728Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

6732______________________ _____________

6734ELEANOR M. HUNTER

6737Administrative Law Judge

6740Division of Administrative Hearings

6744The DeSoto Building

67471230 Apalachee Parkway

6750Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 3060

6755(850) 488 - 9675 SUNCOM 278 - 9675

6763Fax Filing (850) 921 - 6847

6769www.doah.state .fl.us

6771Filed with the Clerk of the

6777Division of Administrative Hearings

6781this 24th day of December, 2002.

6787COPIES FURNISHED:

6789James C. Hauser, Esquire

6793Metz, Hauser & Husband, P.A.

6798215 South Monroe Street, Suite 505

6804Post Office Box 10909

6808Tallahassee, Florida 32302 - 2902

6813Stephen A. Ecenia, Esquire

6817R. David Prescott, Esquire

6821Thomas W. Conrad, Esquire

6825Rutledge, Ecenia, Purnell & Hoffman, P. A.

6832215 South Monroe Street, Suite 420

6838Post Office Box 551

6842Tallahassee, Florida 32302 - 0551

6847Gerald L. Pickett, Esquire

6851Agency for Health Care Administration

6856525 Mirror Lake Drive, North

6861Sebring Building, Suite 310H

6865St. Petersburg, Florida 33701

6869Lealand McCharen, Agency Clerk

6873Agency for Health Care Administration

68782727 Mahan Drive, Mail Stop 3

6884Tallahassee, Florida 32308 - 5403

6889Valda Clark Christian, General Counsel

6894Agency for Health Care Administration

68992727 Mahan Drive, Mail Stop 3

6905Tallahassee, Florida 32308 - 5403

6910NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

6916All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15

6927days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to

6938this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will

6949issue the Final Order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
PDF:
Date: 02/21/2003
Proceedings: Final Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/19/2003
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 12/24/2002
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 12/24/2002
Proceedings: Recommended Order issued (hearing held June 3-7 and 10-14, 2002) CASE CLOSED.
PDF:
Date: 12/24/2002
Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
PDF:
Date: 10/04/2002
Proceedings: Brooksville`s Response in Opposition to Oak Hill`s Motion to Strike Portion of Brooksville`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/01/2002
Proceedings: Oak Hill Hospital`s Motion to Strike Portion of HMA`s Proposed Recommended Order, and Response to HMA`s Request for Judicial Notice filed.
PDF:
Date: 09/26/2002
Proceedings: Letter to Judge Hunter from J. Hauser enclosing disk of proposed recommended order filed.
PDF:
Date: 09/23/2002
Proceedings: HMA`s Memorandum of Law filed.
PDF:
Date: 09/23/2002
Proceedings: Joint Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommended Order of the Agency and Brooksville (filed by J. Hauser).
PDF:
Date: 09/23/2002
Proceedings: Oak Hill Hospital`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 09/11/2002
Proceedings: Order Extending the Time to File Proposed Recommended Orders issued. (parties shall have up to and including September 23, 2002 to file proposed recommended orders)
PDF:
Date: 09/10/2002
Proceedings: Unopposed Request for Brief Extension to File Post-Hearing Briefs filed J. Hauser.
PDF:
Date: 09/05/2002
Proceedings: Order Extending the Time to File Proposed Recommended Orders issued. (parties shall have up to and including September 20, 2002 to file proposed recommended orders)
PDF:
Date: 09/04/2002
Proceedings: Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline for Filing Proposed Recommended Order filed by Petitioner.
Date: 08/23/2002
Proceedings: Transcript (Volumes 1-2, and 5-15) filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/23/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Filing Transcript sent out.
Date: 08/19/2002
Proceedings: Transcript (Volume 4) filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/16/2002
Proceedings: Letter to Judge Hunter from R. Prescott requesting PRO preparation time not be reduced filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/16/2002
Proceedings: Order Extending Time for Filing Proposed Recommended Orders issued. (parties shall file their proposed recommended orders by September 13, 2002)
PDF:
Date: 08/14/2002
Proceedings: Letter to Judge Hunter from J. Hauser requesting new deadline for filing post-hearing briefs filed.
Date: 08/13/2002
Proceedings: Transcript of Hearing (Volumes 2, 3) filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/08/2002
Proceedings: Letter to Judge Hunter from J. Hauser requesting telephone hearing on extension of time to file due date of post hearing briefs filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/02/2002
Proceedings: Letter to Judge Hunter from R. Prescott requesting extension of time to file proposed recommended order (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 08/01/2002
Proceedings: Letter to Judge Hunter from J. Hauser requesting an extension to file proposed recommended orders filed.
Date: 06/03/2002
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
PDF:
Date: 06/03/2002
Proceedings: Oak Hill Hospital`s Final Hearing Witness Disclosure filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/03/2002
Proceedings: Brooksville`s Status Report as to Depositions of Lindsey and Newhaller filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/31/2002
Proceedings: Brookville`s Response in Opposition to Oak Hill`s Motion to Quash Subpoena and for Protective Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/29/2002
Proceedings: Motion to Quash Subpoena and for Protective Order filed by Petitioner.
PDF:
Date: 05/28/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Telephonic Deposition (DucesTecum), J. Lindsey filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/24/2002
Proceedings: Joint Prehearing Stipulation filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/23/2002
Proceedings: Order Denying Brooksville`s Motion for Partial Summary Judgement and/or to Otherwise Rule that the Repalcement of Brooksville Regional Medical Hospital is not in Dispute, and Request for Oral Argument, and Granting the Motion to Compel Oak Hill to Answer Brooksville`s First Request for Admission, Numbers 12 and 13, wich is Treated as a Motion for Supplemental Response issued.
PDF:
Date: 05/23/2002
Proceedings: Brooksville`s Response in Opposition to Oak Hill`s Motion to Amend and/or Clarify Order of Prehearing Instructions filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/23/2002
Proceedings: Brooksville`s Response in Opposition to Oak Hill`s Motion to Strike Brooksville`s Reply to Oak Hill`s Response to Brooksville`s Motion for Partial Summary Judgement filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/23/2002
Proceedings: Motion to Strike Brooksville`s Reply to Oak Hill`s Response to Brooksville`s Motion for Partial Summary Judgement, Etc. filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/22/2002
Proceedings: Oak Hill Hospital`s Motion to Amend and/or Clarify Order of Prehearing Instructions filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/22/2002
Proceedings: Brooksville`s Reply to Oak Hill`s Response to the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Motion to Compel Oak Hill to Answer Brooksville`s First Request for Admission and/or to otherwise Rule that the Replacement of Brooksville Regional Hospital is not in Dispute filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/21/2002
Proceedings: Oak Hill Hospital`s Response to Brooksville`s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Motion to Compel Oak Hill to Answer Brooksville`s First Request for Admission and/or to Otherwise Rule that the Replacement of Brooksville Regional Hospital is not in Dispute filed.
Date: 05/20/2002
Proceedings: Request for Oral Argument filed by Respondents.
PDF:
Date: 05/17/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Telephonic Deposition, J. Nelson Filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/14/2002
Proceedings: Brooksville`s Motion for Partial Summary Judgement, or, in the Alternative, Motion to Compel Oak Hill to Answer Brooksville`s First Request for Admission and/or to Otherwise Rule that the Replacement of Brooksville Regional Hospital is not in Dispute filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/14/2002
Proceedings: Cross Notice of Taking Depositions, C. Manuel, D. Lacey, K. Blind, R. Holly filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/10/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum, P. Greenberg, R. Knapp filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/09/2002
Proceedings: Cross Notice of Taking Depositions, R. Farnham, G. Bell filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/08/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition, L. Nichols filed. filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/07/2002
Proceedings: Cross Notice of Taking Deposition, K. Hackler filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/06/2002
Proceedings: Order Denying Motion to Quash Subpoena and for Protective Order issued.
PDF:
Date: 05/06/2002
Proceedings: Brooksville and Agency Joint Exhibit List filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/06/2002
Proceedings: Amended Notice of Taking Deposition, E. Meier filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/06/2002
Proceedings: Oak Hill Hospital`s Exhibit List filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/03/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum, K. Rigby, R. Heiken, C. Kingsley, J. Gregg, R. Holly, K. Blind, D. Sullivan, K. Hackler filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/03/2002
Proceedings: Oak Hill Hospital`s Second Request for Production of Documents to Brooksville Regional Hospital filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/03/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Telephonic Hearing (filed by J. Hauser via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 05/02/2002
Proceedings: Brookville`s Response to Oak Hill`s Motion to Quash Subpoena and for Protective Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/02/2002
Proceedings: Oak Hills` Response to Brooksville`s Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash Subpoenas filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/02/2002
Proceedings: Brooksville`s Emergency Motion in Limine To Declare Certain Legal Issues and Con Criteria are not in Dipute and do not have to be Proven at Final Hearing filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/01/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Telephonic Hearing filed by S. Ecenia.
PDF:
Date: 05/01/2002
Proceedings: Brooksville`s Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash Subpoenas filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/01/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Depositions, A. Knizley, S. Frimmel filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/01/2002
Proceedings: Motion to Quash Subpoena and for Protective Order filed S. Ecenia.
PDF:
Date: 04/30/2002
Proceedings: Amended Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum, T. Barb filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/29/2002
Proceedings: Oak Hill Hospital`s Final Witness List filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/26/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum, E. Hedgtgen, J. Wesolowski filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/26/2002
Proceedings: Brooksville and Agency Joint Final Witness List filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/25/2002
Proceedings: Order issued. (on May 3, 2002, each party shall file with the court and shall serve all other parties, by facsimile or hand-delivery, its final list of exhibits)
PDF:
Date: 04/24/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition, E. Meier filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/23/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum, T. Links, K. Mason, R. Farnham, G. Bell, D. Lacey, C. Manuel filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/23/2002
Proceedings: Joint Motion to Supplement Order of Prehearing Instructions filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/22/2002
Proceedings: Notice and Cross Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum, M. Carroll filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/22/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition, D. Miller filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/19/2002
Proceedings: Subpoena ad Testificandum filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/19/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition, D. Hill, B. Geiger, B. Selph filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/19/2002
Proceedings: (Joint) Stipulation Agreement filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/18/2002
Proceedings: Brooksville`s Supplemental Response to Oak Hill`s Written Discovery Requests filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/18/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Depositions Duces Tecum, J. Johnston, B. Selph, D. Hill filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/18/2002
Proceedings: Notice and Cross Notice of Taking Depositions, M. Mehta, Dr. Amarchand, J. Nico, W. McNeil filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/16/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition, J. Johnston filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/16/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum, T. Barb filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/16/2002
Proceedings: Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing issued (hearing set for June 3 through 7 and 10 through 14, 2002; 9:00 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL).
PDF:
Date: 04/16/2002
Proceedings: Subpoena ad Testificandum, J. Johnston filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/16/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Depositions Duces Tecum, M. Mehta, Dr. Amarchand, J. Nico, W. McNeil, M. Carroll, E. Carr, C. Braun filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/15/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Telephonic Hearing (filed by T. Konrad via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 04/15/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum, J. Wesolowski filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/05/2002
Proceedings: Oak Hill Hospital`s Responses to Brookville Regional Hospital`s Second Request for Production of Documents filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/04/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Appearance (filed by G. Pickett via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 04/04/2002
Proceedings: Oak Hill Hospital`s Preliminary Witness List filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/04/2002
Proceedings: Brooksville Preliminary Witness List filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/02/2002
Proceedings: Certificate of Service of Brooksville`s Answsers to Oak Hill`s First Set of Interrogatories filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/01/2002
Proceedings: Brooksville`s Response to Oak Hill`s First Request for Production of Documents and First Set of Interrogatories filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/01/2002
Proceedings: HCA Health Services, Inc. d/b/a Oak Hill Hospital`s Responses to Brooksville Regional Hospital`s First Request for Production of Documents filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/01/2002
Proceedings: HCA Health Services, Inc. d/b/a Oak Hill Hospital`s Responses to Brooksville Regional Hospital`s First Request for Admissions filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/01/2002
Proceedings: HCA Health Services of Flordia, Inc. d/b/a Oak Hill Hospital`s Notice of Service of Answers to Brooksville Regional Hospital`s First Set of Interrogatories filed.
PDF:
Date: 03/18/2002
Proceedings: Order Granting Motion to Amend and Supplement Order of Prehearing Instructions issued.
PDF:
Date: 03/15/2002
Proceedings: Joint Motion to Amend and Supplement Order of Prehearing Instructions filed.
PDF:
Date: 03/06/2002
Proceedings: Brookville`s Second Request for Production of Documents to Oak Hill filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/25/2002
Proceedings: Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
PDF:
Date: 02/25/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for May 21 through 24 and 27 through 31, 2002; 9:00 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL).
PDF:
Date: 02/22/2002
Proceedings: Oak Hill Hospital`s First Request for Production of Documents to Brooksville Regional Hospital filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/22/2002
Proceedings: Oak Hill Hospital`s Notice of Service of First Set of Interrogatories to Brooksville Regional Hospital filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/22/2002
Proceedings: Brookville`s First Request for Production of Documents to Oak Hill filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/22/2002
Proceedings: Brookville`s First Request for Admission to Oak Hill filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/22/2002
Proceedings: Certificate of Service of Brookville`s First Set of Interrogatories to Oak Hill filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/12/2002
Proceedings: (Joint) Requested Dates for Final Administrative Hearing filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/12/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Appearance (filed by J. Hauser).
PDF:
Date: 02/07/2002
Proceedings: Initial Order issued.
PDF:
Date: 02/05/2002
Proceedings: Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/05/2002
Proceedings: Notice (of Agency referral) filed.

Case Information

Judge:
ELEANOR M. HUNTER
Date Filed:
02/05/2002
Date Assignment:
04/11/2002
Last Docket Entry:
02/21/2003
Location:
Tallahassee, Florida
District:
Northern
Agency:
ADOPTED IN TOTO
Suffix:
CON
 

Counsels

Related Florida Statute(s) (6):