02-000454CON
Hca Health Services Of Florida, Inc., D/B/A Oak Hill Hospital vs.
Agency For Health Care Administration And Hernando Hma, Inc., D/B/A Brooksville Regional Hospital
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, December 24, 2002.
Recommended Order on Tuesday, December 24, 2002.
1STATE OF FLORIDA
4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
8HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF )
13FLORIDA, INC., d/b/a OAK HILL )
19HOSPITAL, )
21)
22Petitioner, )
24)
25vs. ) Case No. 02 - 0454CON
32)
33AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE )
38ADMINISTRATION and HERNANDO HMA, )
43INC., d/b/a BROOKSVILLE REGIONAL )
48HOSPITAL, )
50)
51Respondents. )
53__________________________________)
54RECOMMENDED ORDER
56Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings,
64by its designated Administrative Law Judge, Eleanor M. Hunter,
73held a final hearing in the above - styled case on June 3 - 7 and
8910 - 14, 2002, in Tallahassee, Florida.
96APPEARANCES
97For Petitioner: Stephen A. Ecenia, Esquire
103R. David Prescott, Esquire
107Rutledge, Ecenia, Purnell & Hoffman, P.A.
113215 South Monroe Street, Suite 420
119Post Office Box 551
123Tallahassee, Florida 32302 - 0551
128For Respondent Hernando HMA, Inc., d/b/a Brooksville
135Regional Hospital:
137James C. Hauser, Esquire
141Susan C. Hauser, Esquire
145Metz, Hauser & Husband, P.A.
150215 South Monroe Street, Suite 505
156Post Office Box 10909
160Tallahassee, Florida 32302 - 2902
165For Respondent Agency for Health Care Administration:
172Gerald L. Pickett, Esquire
176Agency for Health Care Administration
181525 Mirror Lake Drive, No rth
187Sebring Building, Suite 310H
191St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
195STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
199Whether Certificate of Need (CON) Application Number 9478
207filed by Hernando HMA, Inc. (HMA or Hernando HMA), d/b/a
217Brooksvi lle Regional Hospital (Brooksville Regional) for approval
225to replace and relocate its existing 91 - bed hospital in Hernando
237County, Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) District 3,
246Subdistrict 6, meets the applicable criteria for approval.
254PRELIMINA RY STATEMENT
257In September 2001, Hernando HMA filed CON Application Number
2669478 to relocate and rebuild Brooksville Regional on a different
276site, approximately three miles from its current location, in
285Hernando County. AHCA published its intent to approve the
294application in the Florida Administrative Weekly, Volume 27,
302Number 52, on December 28, 2001.
308On January 18, 2002, HCA Health Services of Florida, Inc.,
318d/b/a Oak Hill Hospital (Oak Hill) timely filed a Petition for
329Administrative Hearing to contest the action of AHCA. The
338Petition with a request to assign an administrative law judge
348(ALJ) was forwarded to the Division of Administrative Hearings
357(DOAH) on February 5, 2002. Initially set for hearing on May 21 -
37024 and 27 - 31, 2002, by the previously ass igned ALJ, the case was
385re - scheduled for the following week by the current ALJ due to
398scheduling conflicts and difficulties in securing court reporters
406for a holiday.
409At the final hearing, Brooksville Regional presented the
417testimony of Wittie E. McNeil; C hristopher A. Kingsley;
426Gary Bell; Robert Foreman; Ted Lincks, expert in transportation
435engineering; Joe Nelson, M.D., expert in emergency medicine and
444emergency medical services; Susan Frimmel; Jacqueline Lindsey,
451M.D., expert in emergency medicine and qu ality assurance;
460Thomas Barb, expert in hospital administration and operations;
468Russell Heiken, expert in mechanical engineering; Kerry Blind,
476expert in landscape architecture, land planning, and
483environmental design; Kenneth Rigby, expert in electrical
490en gineering; Chuck Braun, expert in hospital architecture and
499hospital building costs; Donald Lacey, Jr., expert in land use
509planning; Clifford Manuel, expert in civil engineering; Daniel J.
518Sullivan, expert in health care planning and health care finance;
528a nd Jaime Wesolowski. Brooksville Regional and AHCA jointly
537presented the testimony of Jeffrey N. Gregg of AHCA, an expert in
549health planning, CON review, and health care regulation.
557Brooksville Regional's Exhibits 1 - 20, 22 - 27, 29 - 36, 38 - 42, 44 - 59,
57563, an d 69 were received in evidence.
583Oak Hill presented the testimony of Jaime Wesolowski, expert
592in hospital administration; Patricia Greenberg, expert in health
600care planning and health care finance; and Rick D. Knapp, expert
611in health care finance and accoun ting. Oak Hill's Exhibits 1 - 26
624were received in evidence.
628The transcript of the final hearing was filed on August 23,
6392002. After an unopposed request for an extension of time was
650granted, the parties filed proposed recommended orders on
658September 23, 20 02. HMA's Memorandum of Law was also filed on
670that date. It included a request for judicial notice that Oak
681Hill has terminated its OB program.
687On October 1, 2002, Oak Hill Hospital's Motion to Strike
697Portion of HMA's Proposed Recommended Order and Respo nse to HMA's
708Request for Judicial Notice was filed, opposing the Request which
718relied for factual support of the matter to be noticed on a
730newspaper article published after the conclusion of the final
739hearing. HMA's Response in Opposition to Oak Hill's Mo tion to
750Strike Portion of Brooksville's Proposed Recommended Order was
758filed on October 4, 2002. The Motion to Strike is granted and
770the Request for Judicial Notice is denied. Page 9 of the
781Memorandum of Law, Attachment C to the Memorandum, footnote 2 of
792Brooksville's Proposed Recommended Order, and Attachment 2 to
800Brooksville's Proposed Recommended Order are stricken.
806FINDINGS OF FACT
8091. The Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) is the
819state agency authorized to administer the certificate of nee d
829(CON) law in Florida. AHCA is the designated state health
839planning agency. See Subsections 408.034(1) and 408.035(1),
846Florida Statutes.
8482. AHCA Health Services Planning District 3 is composed of
858Hamilton, Suwannee, Lafayette, Dixie, Columbia, Gilchris t, Levy,
866Union, Bradford, Putnam, Alachua, Marion, Citrus, Hernando,
873Sumter, and Lake Counties. See Subsection 408.032(5), Florida
881Statutes.
8823. Within District 3, Hernando County is designated acute
891care subdistrict 6. The three acute care hospitals in the County
902are Hernando HMA, Inc., d/b/a Brooksville Regional Hospital
910(Brooksville Regional) which was previously operated under the
918name of Lykes Memorial Hospital, Spring Hill Regional Hospital
927(Spring Hill), and HCA Health Services of Florida, Inc., d/ b/a
938Oak Hill Hospital (Oak Hill).
943HMA
9444. Hernando HMA is the applicant for CON Number 9478 to
955replace and relocate Brooksville Regional, an existing 91 - bed
965hospital in Brooksville, Florida. Constructed over a 40 - year
975time period to a maximum size of 16 6 beds, Brooksville Regional
987is currently licensed to operate 91 beds. In the early 1990s, 75
999beds were transferred from Brooksville Regional to establish
1007Spring Hill. Spring Hill is located in southwest Hernando County
1017near the Hernando/Pasco County lin e.
10235. Health Management Associates, Inc., the parent of
1031Hernando HMA, is a publicly traded for profit corporation, with
1041headquarters in Naples, Florida. Hernando HMA leases and
1049operates, under a single state license, both Brooksville Regional
1058and Spring Hill. Both are owned by Hernando County. In 1998,
1069the County entered into a 30 - year lease agreement for HMA to
1082assume the management of the hospitals which were then bankrupt.
1092HMA acquires primarily non - urban area hospitals in need of
1103capital and/or new management strategies to reverse patient out -
1113migration. The corporation owns or operates 43 hospitals in 14
1123states, including 13 in Florida. HMA has rebuilt and replaced 8
1134of the 43 hospitals it has acquired since its establishment in
11451977.
11466. In addit ion to Brooksville Regional and Spring Hill, in
1157Hernando County, HMA also operates Pasco Regional Medical Center
1166(Pasco Regional), in adjacent northeast Pasco County, in AHCA
1175D istrict 5. See Subsection 408.032(5), Florida Statutes. Pasco
1184Regional, a 120 - bed hospital located on U.S. Highway 301, in Dade
1197City, Florida, serves residents of eastern Hernando and Pasco
1206Counties who reside along the four - lane corridor, in the
1217communities of San Antonio, St. Leo, Trilby, Lacoochee, Ridge
1226Manor, Dade City, Zephyrh ills, and Wesley Chapel. Because of the
1237emergency medical transport policy of taking patients to the
1246nearest hospital, over 85% of those transported from eastern
1255Hernando County are taken to Pasco County hospital emergency
1264rooms.
12657. Hernando HMA's 1998 l ease agreement with Hernando County
1275required HMA to pay the debts necessary for the hospitals to
1286emerge from bankruptcy, to provide Medicaid and charity care for
1296Hernando County residents, and to provide $25 million in capital
1306improvements to the two hospi tals. To date, $15 million has been
1318spent, $7 million for improvements to Brooksville Regional and $8
1328million for Spring Hill. Under the terms of the lease, the
1339proposal to relocate the hospital required County approval. At a
1349meeting held on September 2 5, 2001, Hernando County Commissioners
1359vote unanimously to allow the filing of CON Number 9478.
13698. Hernando HMA proposes to replace and relocate
1377Brooksville Regional to a 95 - acre site on which it has a purchase
1391option for $25,000 an acre. The total est imated project cost is
1404$52 million, $33 million of that for construction. The parcel is
1415located at the intersection of Lykes Dublin Road and a four - lane
1428stretch of State Road 50. The proposed new site is 2.7 miles
1440west of the existing site and 1.8 miles west of Cobb Road where
1453the southern Brooksville City bypass of State Road 50 ends. HMA
1464has agreed to donate the hospital, and approximately 25 acres of
1475underlying and surrounding land to Hernando County. HMA will
1484continue, under the terms of the lease, to manage the hospital,
1495and also plans to build medical offices on the remainder of the
1507parcel of land.
15109. Brooksville Regional is currently located, on
1517approximately 11 acres on Ponce De Leon Boulevard in downtown
1527Brooksville, a mile east of the State Ro ad 50 bypass and one -
1541tenth of a mile from U.S. Highway 41 which is being increased
1553from four to six lanes. The City of Brooksville opposes the
1564relocation of the hospital to the new site which is 1.5 miles
1576beyond the city limits.
1580Oak Hill
158210. Oak Hill is a 204 - bed hospital, located just off State
1595Road 50, in western Hernando County. Oak Hill was constructed 18
1606years ago on a 40 - acre campus which includes two medical office
1619buildings, related structures for staff offices and plant
1627operations, and a cancer institute. Oak Hill is approximately
1636five miles west of Brooksville's proposed new site, and eight
1646miles west of its existing location.
165211. Oak Hill, like many Florida hospitals, experiences
1660seasonal variations in occupancy. Typically, utilization re aches
1668up to 90% in the first quarter of the year and goes down to 60%
1683in the fall. Occupancy rates have been growing approximately 4%
1693a year from 1997 to 2000, but from 2000 to 2001, patient days at
1707Oak Hill increased 8%.
171112. Oak Hill has also recently received CON approval to
1721establish an open heart surgery program, which is expected to
1731reverse the out - migration of open heart surgery and other cardiac
1743patients, primarily to another HCA facility, Bayonet Point in
1752Pasco County. Bayonet Point is 17 miles or a 30 - minute drive
1765from Oak Hill. With the anticipated reversal of some out -
1776migration, and a 2% annual increase in patient days, Oak Hill
1787will have over 100% occupancy in the first quarter of 2005, going
1799down to 74% occupancy in the fall of that year.
180913. Oak Hill opposes the proposal to relocate Brooksville
1818Regional. Oak Hill asserts (1) that the proposed new location is
1829less desirable than alternative sites suggested by the City of
1839Brooksville; (2) that Brooksville Regional failed to demonstrate
1847tha t replacement rather than renovation of the existing building
1857is necessary; (3) that the proposed site will decrease access for
1868residents in eastern Hernando County; and (4) that the
1877replacement and relocation will adversely impact Oak Hill.
188514. The pu blished fixed need pool for the subdistrict
1895indicated no need for additional acute care beds. Brooksville
1904Regional's proposal to relocate, but not add beds, is not
1914inconsistent with the fixed need pool.
192015. CON review is required and is not expedited in this
1931case because Brooksville Regional is proposing to relocate to a
1941different site which is more than one mile from its current site.
1953Review criteria
195516. The parties, in a prehearing stipulation, agreed that
1964Brooksville Regional and Oak Hill have good records of providing
1974quality care and can be expected to continue, as required by
1985Subsections 408.035(2) and (3), Florida Statutes (2001).
199217. The parties agreed that Brooksville Regional's staffing
2000projections are reasonable and sufficient based on its p rojected
2010utilization, but Oak Hill disputed the accuracy of the
2019utilization projections.
202118. The parties agreed that the design and schematic
2030drawings for the new hospital are reasonable.
203719. The parties acknowledged that there will be an adverse
2047impact on Oak Hill as a result of a loss of some employees,
2060physicians, and patients, the magnitude of which has to be
2070considered under Subsection 408.035(9), Florida Statutes (2001).
207720. The parties stipulated that Brooksville Regional has
2085sufficient resources, including personnel and funds, to
2092accomplish the project and operate the facility, as required by
2102Subsection 408.035(6), Florida Statutes (2001).
210721. The parties agreed that Subsection 408.035(5), related
2115to the needs of research and educational faciliti es; and
2125Subsection 408.035(12), Florida Statutes (2001), related to
2132nursing home beds, are not at issue in this proceeding.
214222. The parties stipulated that, at issue, are the criteria
2152in Subsections 408.035(1), (2), (4), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11);
2162and Sub sections 408.037(1)(b)3. and (c), Florida Statutes (2001);
2171and Florida Administrative Code Rules 59C - 1.008(3) and (5), 59C -
21831.030(2)(a) through (f), and 59C - 1.038(6)(a).
2190District health plan
219323. District 3 health plan criteria related to the
2202establishment or expansion of services, the establishment of
2210services in a community with no current service, the addition of
2221beds, and the establishment of new facilities are not applicable
2231to this project. Oak Hill's health planning consultant noted,
2240however, that c riteria related to bed transfers could also relate
2251to a proposal to relocate an entire hospital. Those
2260considerations include whether Medicare and private pay markets
2268of disproportionate share charity and Medicaid hospitals will be
2277adversely affected, whe ther access generally, and access
2285particularly for Medicaid and indigent patients, or other
2293traditionally underserved groups, will be improved. The criteria
2301also overlap those in other applicable statutes and rules. See
2311also Subsections 408.035(2), (7), and (11), Florida Statutes
2319(2001); Rule 59C - 1.038(6)(a) and Rule 59C - 1.030(2)(a) through
2330(f), Florida Administrative Code. Other relevant considerations
2337include whether the transfer is needed and is more cost - efficient
2349than renovation or expansion of the existing facility, and
2358whether the proposal is financially feasible. See also
2366Subsections 408.035(1), (4), (8), (9), and (10), Florida Statutes
2375(2001).
2376Medicaid and indigent care
238024. Hernando HMA, at Brooksville Regional and Spring Hill
2389combined, provid ed approximately 71% of total charity care in the
2400County in 2000, and 79% in 2001. Brooksville Regional is a
2411disproportionate share provider of Medicaid, having provided
2418approximately 8% of its total care to Medicaid patients.
242725. Brooksville Regional se parately provided more Medicare,
2435but half as much Medicaid as Spring Hill which, unlike
2445Brooksville Regional, has obstetrics and neonatal intensive care
2453programs which typically provide services to a large number of
2463economically disadvantaged mothers and n ewborns.
246926. Oak Hill provided the remaining 20 to 30 percent of the
2481charity care in Hernando County. Approximately 6% of Oak Hill's
2491patients are in the Medicaid payor category, but Oak Hill is not
2503a disproportionate share provider. Oak Hill provided al most 2%
2513of its total revenues for charity care in 2000, and its Medicaid
2525care increased from approximately $7.4 million in 2000, to $12.3
2535million in 2001.
253827. Although Hernando HMA did not offer a CON condition
2548related to a specific level of Medicaid and charity care, its
2559historic levels and Hernando County's continued
2565ownership of the hospital provide the assurances required by the
2575criteria.
2576Geographical access
257828. Hernando County had a population of 130,810 people in
25892,000, which increased to 136,552 in February of 2002, and is
2602projected to be 159,400 people in 2010. There are 7,227
2614residents of the City of Brooksville, and 129,313 in
2624unincorporated areas of the County. The population is more
2633dense, more growth is projected, and more development is allowed
2643under the comprehensive plan, in the central and western portions
2653of the County.
265629. The population in the zip codes east of Interstate 75
2667was, in 2001, 4,301 of the total of 132,590. By 2010, the
2681eastern area is projected to have 1,295 more peop le as compared
2694to a projected increase of 19,401 people in areas west of Highway
270741. The projected areas of most intense population growth are in
2718western Hernando County, clustered around U.S. Highway 19, to the
2728north of State Road 50, and Highway 41, to the south of State
2741Road 50. These are also areas with a high concentration of the
2753population over 65 in a "retirement belt."
276030. East of Interstate 75, the population of Hernando
2769County is more sparsely settled, younger, and has a lower
2779mortality rate. More eastern area residents who need inpatient
2788acute care, on an elective or emergency basis use the closest
2799hospitals, Pasco Regional in Dade City and East Pasco Community
2809Hospital (East Pasco) in Zephyrhills. In recent years, the trend
2819towards utilizat ion of Pasco county hospitals by eastern Hernando
2829County residents has increased. Residents in the area also use
2839hospitals in Lake County.
284331. The Hernando County Board of County Commissioners hired
2852Tribrook Healthcare Consultants to report on the reloca tion
2861proposal, including consideration of access for residents of
2869eastern Hernando County. Residents of the three eastern zip
2878codes accounted for 83 discharges from Hernando County hospitals
2887from the second quarter of 1999 through the first quarter of
2898200 0. Of those, 43% or 36 discharges were from Brooksville
2909Regional, 18% or 15 from Spring Hill, and 39% or 32 from Oak
2922Hill. For the year ending June 30, 2001, fifty - three discharges
2934from Brooksville Regional and 28 from Oak Hill originated in the
2945three ea stern zip codes.
295032. From January through August 2001, the Hernando County
2959Fire and Rescue service responded to 259 emergency health care
2969calls from the eastern area, which represents approximately 5% of
2979its total volume of 4,863 transports. Of the 259 t ransports, 109
2992people were taken to the emergency room (ER) at Brooksville
3002Regional, and an equal number to the Pasco Regional ER, 14 to the
3015East Pasco ER, and eight to the Oak Hill ER. Level one trauma
3028patients, such as those with severe injuries from In terstate car
3039accidents, are air lifted to trauma centers at Orlando hospitals,
3049Tampa General Hospital or Bayfront Medical Center in
3057St. Petersburg.
305933. If Brooksville Regional is relocated to the proposed
3068new site, the increase in average peak travel ti mes from various
3080locations in the County will range from four to six minutes, for
3092total average travel times ranging between 10 and 21 minutes.
3102For the majority of the County residents, the average peak travel
3113times will decrease, saving from one to six m inutes, since the
3125new location is closer to more densely populated residential
3134areas. The acute care travel time goal is to have most residents
3146able to reach the service within 30 minutes. The standard is
3157already met and will, with Brooksville Regional's proposed
3165relocation, continue to be met in District 3, Subdistrict 6.
317534. The residents of the County in the eastern areas will
3186not be adversely affected by the relocation because relatively
3195few use Brooksville Regional, and because, for many residents
3204a long the U.S. 301 corridor, Pasco Regional is more accessible.
321535. In addition, in return for approval of the Brooksville
3225Regional relocation proposal, Hernando County required HMA to
3233purchase an ambulance with advanced life support equipment to
3242station i n the eastern area near Interstate 75. There is
3253credible evidence that, in some cases, the time it takes for
3264paramedics to reach an emergency patient and begin treatment can
3274be more important in saving lives than the actual travel time to
3286a hospital emerg ency room.
329136. The conditions imposed by the County also required a
3301$20,000 contribution from HMA for an indigent patient clinic and
3312recruitment of a physician to staff a clinic in the eastern area.
3324Relocation and replacement vs. renovation;
3329alternative s ites
333237. The proposed relocation site was criticized as
3340inappropriate geologically. The property includes wetlands.
3346Agricultural land across the street drains through a ditch under
3356the road into a pond on one corner of the property. The
3368elevation of t he land at State Road 50 is 90 feet above sea
3382level, increases to 95 feet but then slopes down to 65 feet at
3395Wiscon Road. There are sinkhole - like depressions towards the
3405back of the property. To meet state disaster preparedness
3414standards, the elevation of a hospital must be equal to or above
3426the major thoroughfare leading to the entrance.
343338. Brooksville Regional can be constructed on the proposed
3442site with its main entrance facing and above the elevation of
3453State Road 50. Other entrances can also be elevated using fill
3464dirt.
346539. In general, the site meets the County land use criteria
3476and has sufficient uplands. It also meets the criteria developed
3486by HMA and its land planning consultant for (1) a minimum of 40
3499acres, (2) the potential for traffic si gnalization, (3) proximity
3509to population growth centers, and (4) good visibility from
3518passing traffic.
352040. Currently, Brooksville Regional is located on 11 acres
3529in two separate three - story towers connected through a central
3540building on the ground floor. The building is constructed from
355010 to 15 feet below the street it faces, Ponce De Leon Boulevard.
3563The entrance floods in heavy rains and lacks good visibility from
3574street traffic.
357641. During the last four years, improvements at Brooksville
3585Regional hav e included a new roof, lobby renovations, electrical
3595upgrades in the operating room, the installation of new air
3605handlers, and substantial investments in new equipment.
361242. Despite the improvements, the physical plant cannot be
3621renovated to meet current c odes and the layout of the building
3633inevitably results in inefficiencies. Oak Hill noted, however,
3641that the building is not technically violating any code but is
"3652grandfathered." In addition, none of deficiencies affect
3659Brooksville Regional's ability to provide excellent care, as
3667measured by it score of 97 out of 100 on the most recent survey
3681by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care
3690Organizations.
369143. Patient corridors, in one tower, are less than eight
3701feet wide as required by the Nationa l Life Safety Code. The
3713building is not in compliance with the Americans With
3722Disabilities Act (ADA). The parking area exceeds the level for a
3733ramp to the building. Electrical, heating, ventilation and air
3742conditioning (HVAC) systems require major upgra des to meet codes.
3752Improvements are limited by the inadequately sized ceiling spaces
3761for ductwork and pipes. The HVAC inefficiencies are estimated to
3771cost Brooksville Regional from $400,000 to $500,000 a year.
378244. The major functional inefficiencies at Brooksville
3789Regional result from the configuration in two separate towers.
3798Staff must cross the central core and use one of two elevators in
3811each tower to provide care, deliver food, remove trash and soiled
3822linens, and transport patients. The elevators and corridors are
3831shared with visitors. The separate towers divide patients into
3840smaller, inefficient groupings which require more staff.
384745. One witness cited a cost estimate of $250,000 for a
3859pedestrian walkway to connect the second and third floors o f the
3871two towers. Oak Hill criticized the absence of any other cost
3882estimates for renovation of the existing building. If any major
3892renovations are undertaken, all "grandfathered" code exemptions
3899will be lost. The hospital would have to be closed and re built.
391246. Inadequate space compromises patient privacy in various
3920areas, including the emergency room and surgical suite. Spaces
3929are inadequate for modern equipment in appropriate locations, so,
3938for example, a CT scan, is located outside the radiology
3948d epartment, and 140 feet from the emergency room
395747. Brooksville Regional proposes to increase the size of
3966the radiology department from approximately 6,400 square feet in
3976the existing building to 16,000 square feet in the new building.
3988Operating rooms cu rrently range from 245 to 345 square feet as
4000compared to code requirements of 450 to 600 square feet, with the
4012larger rooms necessary to accommodate surgeries, such as
4020orthopedics, which require larger equipment. The total size of
4029surgical department is a pproximately 6,200 square feet while the
4040guidelines suggest it should be 10,800 square feet. The new plan
4052includes 6,300 square feet for the pharmacy and laboratory
4062combined, which now occupy approximately 3,000 square feet.
4071Overall, the new building wil l be almost 182,000 square feet,
408365,000 square feet larger than the existing facility. The new
4094plan also offers all private patient rooms, except one semi -
4105private room, consistent with the current industry trend which is
4115intended to allow family members t o spend the night with
4126patients. The design is taken from a prototype used by HMA to
4138construct five other replacement hospitals in the last five
4147years. Therefore, HMA is certain that the estimated construction
4156cost is reasonably accurate and that the des ign works well for
4168patients, visitors, and staff.
417248. Considering the deficiencies in the current structure
4180which could only be corrected by closing the hospital completely
4190and rebuilding it on site, taking five to six times as long as
4203construction of a n ew facility, renovation of the existing
4213structure is not a viable alternative.
421949. The City of Brooksville suggested other sites it
4228favored over that selected by Brooksville Regional. The first
4237parcel examined was 32 acres, not HMA's required minimum of 40
4248acres for the prototype. It would require assembling separate
4257parcels and closing streets. The second, with 49 acres, is
4267located on a two - lane city street and has a large pond in the
4282center of the tract. A third, with 55 acres, would have to be
4295share d with a post office carrier facility and lacks good
4306visibility because of its location on a curve. The fourth site
4317has 38 acres, but is too narrow for the prototype and is well
4330below the elevation of State Road 50. The fifth tract is south
4342of the fourth . It has 46 acres which, if acquired with the 38
4356acres to the north would be more than adequately sized, but is
4368even lower than the parcel to the north and has a lake in the
4382center. A sixth site with 66 acres is too long and narrow for
4395the prototype.
439750 . Finally, the City suggested assembling more parcels
4406surrounding the existing building, which would require the
4414acquisition of 38 to 40 lots, but that tract would be long and
4427narrow. As previously noted, the hospital would have to close
4437for reconstructi on for a substantially longer period of time than
4448required for new construction. The possibility that the City
4457would donate a portion of an adjacent park was discussed but it
4469was never formally offered. It is also currently the location of
4480fire and polic e stations. That acquisition also would have
4490required the condemnation of roads.
4495Costs, financial feasibility, adverse impact
4500and cost - effectiveness competition
450551. The cost for the new facility is estimated at $52
4516million. The parties stipulated that HMA can fund and operate
4526the project. And, though previously bankrupt, Brooksville
4533Regional had pre - tax profit of $5 million in 2001.
454452. The financial feasibility of the project was
4552questioned. Oak Hill's expert criticized an underlying
4559assumption tha t Medicare reimbursement would increase 6.4% from
4568the first to second year. Taken in isolation, the increase looks
4579unrealistic, but viewed over the entire time period from the base
4590year to the second year of operation, the average annual rate of
4602inflation is 2.5%, and is reasonable, as is the resulting
4612projected Medicare revenues.
461553. Brooksville Regional's financial schedules included a
4622management fee of 3% of gross revenues, although HMA has recently
4633charged up to 4% to individual hospitals. HMA can a ssess a
4645management fee of 3% rather than 4%, which one of its officers
4657described as conservative considering that its actual corporate
4665overhead is less than one percent of revenues. The assessment is
4676based on tax considerations more than on actual costs.
468554. In addition to the management fee, Brooksville
4693Regional's start - up costs, equipment costs, and depreciation
4702costs were questioned as too low. Even when deducted from
4712projected revenues, however, the additional expenses do not
4720render the project finan cially infeasible.
472655. The proposed project is financially feasible
4733considering either the CON - projected incremental increases in
4742profit, $437 thousand in the first year and $868 thousand in the
4754second year, or the revised estimates in HMA/Brooksville
4762R egional's Exhibit 56. In Exhibit 56, the projected increase in
4773profits, after relocation, are $860 thousand in the first year
4783and $1.3 million in the second year. See Conclusion of Law 79.
479556. Brooksville Regional currently operates at a
4802competitive di sadvantage. In 1999, Brooksville Regional had
48103,758 discharges, which increased to 3,794 in 2000. By contrast,
4822Oak Hill increased its discharges from 10,575 in 1999, to 11,376
4835in 2000, and up to 12,743 in 2001. Excluding approximately 400
4847newborns, the increase in discharges is not entirely attributable
4856to population growth. It also reflects Oak Hill's increase in
4866market share. Overall occupancy rates were 80% at Spring Hill,
487670% at Oak Hill, and 62% at Brooksville Regional in 2001.
488757. If the new hos pital is built, Brooksville Regional
4897projected it would have 405 more discharges in the first year of
4909the project and 413 more in the second year, for an increase in
4922revenue of $1.3 million in the second year. Oak Hill suggested
4933the incremental increase i n the number of patients was
4943insufficient to justify a $52 million expenditure, yielding only
4952$1.3 million or 2.5% return on investment, while HMA returns
4962average approximately 15%.
496558. Oak Hill also maintained that Brooksville Regional
4973underestimated the projected increase in discharges which would
4981result from the proposed relocation and replacement. Oak Hill's
4990expert estimated that Brooksville Regional would have 770
4998discharges in the first year and 1,146 in the second year of
5011operations. If Brooksvill e Regional has more discharges, its
5020revenues and profits will also be higher. Of those 1,146 year
5032two discharges, Oak Hill estimated that it would have captured
5042823 admissions in the absence of a new Brooksville Regional
5052hospital. Oak Hill's expert plann er also asserted that the loss
5063of patients would make Oak Hill less efficient and less cost -
5075effective, and result in higher charges at Brooksville Regional.
508459. In addition to opening a new open heart surgery
5094program, Oak Hill is undergoing $10 million in emergency room
5104renovations. With these, Oak Hill is projected to reach between
511482 and 83% average occupancy, in 2004 and 2005, before
5124Brooksville Regional could become fully operational. The optimum
5132is around 75%.
513560. Oak Hill argued that it could abso rb the projected
5146growth through the CON - exempt addition of 20 beds which would
5158return occupancy to reasonable levels between 75 and 76%. The
5168costs incurred for the addition, however, will be unnecessary if
5178Brooksville Regional is more competitive and util ized more
5187efficiently.
518861. As estimated by Oak Hill's expert, the proposed
5197relocation of Brooksville Regional will leave Oak Hill with
520612,243 discharges in 2005, and 12,265 discharges in 2006.
5217Assuming the estimate is correct, Oak Hill will be at
5227approxi mately the same volume as it currently experiences. There
5237is no suggestion that its operations are not cost - effective or
5249efficient at between 11,000 and 13,000 discharges. The pre - tax
5262income decrement could be as high as $1.93 million. In the
5273context of the Oak Hill budget of $17.1 million for 2002, and
5285considering its competitive advantages, the adverse impact to Oak
5294Hill is outweighed by the need for improvements at Brooksville
5304Regional.
530562. Oak Hill's expert estimated that Brooksville Regional's
5313proj ected volume was understated and that additional admissions
5322should be expected based on more recent trends in utilization.
5332If Brooksville Regional reached that volume, then revenues at the
5342new facility would increase an additional $1.8 million, to a
5352preta x total exceeding $6 million. The project is financially
5362feasible, therefore, and the costs are justified to enhance the
5372efficiency and competitiveness of Brooksville Regional.
537863. Oak Hill noted that the impact of the development of
5389the entire 95 - acre site is likely to be greater than that of the
540425 - acre hospital tract. Whether the same owner held the entire
5416tract or not, there is no reason to expect that land surrounding
5428a hospital would not become medical office buildings and related
5438health care ser vices.
544264. Oak Hill will face competition from a 60 - bed
5453Healthsouth comprehensive medical rehabilitation hospital
5458currently under development approximately two miles away on State
5467Road 50 in the direction of the Brooksville Regional site. The
5478impact of the rehabilitation hospital, a reduction in acute care
5488lengths of stay, will apparently be felt by all acute care
5499hospitals throughout the region not just Oak Hill. There is no
5510evidence to indicate that the combined impact of Healthsouth and
5520Brooksville Regional on Oak Hill justifies the denial of the
5530proposed relocation of Brooksville Regional.
5535HMA's letter of intent and financial statements
554265. HMA's letter of intent indicated that the project costs
5552would not exceed $40 million, but the CON project co st is $52
5565million.
556666. Since letters of intent are not required to include
5576project costs, AHCA has taken the position that the error in the
5588letter of intent is insignificant as long as the project was
5599identified with sufficient specificity.
560367. AHCA rece ived the audited financial statements for
5612Hernando H.M.A., the applicant, but not separate audited
5620financial statements for Brooksville Regional. Oak Hill's expert
5628suggested that AHCA received inadequate information to determine
5636the financial feasibility of the project.
564268. Hernando HMA's audited financial statement and Schedule
56502, with its other financial commitments, demonstrated its ability
5659to provide the funds. The separate financial schedules related
5668to Brooksville Regional's operations, especially S chedules 7 and
56778 provided the information necessary for AHCA to determine if the
5688project is financially feasible.
569269. Hernando HMA has demonstrated that it met the letter of
5703intent and application content requirements, and that, on
5711balance, it meets the criteria to relocate and replace
5720Brooksville Regional as proposed in CON Application No. 9478.
5729CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
573270. The Division of Administrative Hearings has
5739jurisdiction over the parties to and the subject matter of these
5750proceedings. Subsections 4 08.039(5), and 120.57(1), Florida
5757Statutes.
575871. An applicant for a certificate of need has the burden
5769of demonstrating that its application should be granted. Boca
5778Raton Artificial Kidney Center v. Department of Health and
5787Rehabilitative Services , 475 So . 2d 260 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). The
5799award of a C ertificate of N eed must be based on a balanced
5813consideration of all statutory and rule criteria. Department of
5822Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Johnson and Johnson Home
5831Healthcare, Inc. , 447 So. 2d 261 ( Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Balsam v.
5844Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services , 486 So. 2d 1341
5854(Fla. 1st DCA 1988). The weight to be given each criterion is
5866not fixed but depends on the facts and circumstances of each
5877case. Collier Medical Center, Inc. v. Department of Health and
5887Rehabilitative Services , 462 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).
589772. Oak Hill has standing because the program at Oak Hill
5908will be substantially affected, consistent with the prehearing
5916stipulation of the parties and the evidence of an adverse impact
5927of $1.9 million in last revenues.
593373. Despite the error in the project cost, Hernando HMA's
5943letter of intent met the requirements of the following:
5952(c) Letters of intent must describe the
5959proposal; specify the number of beds sought,
5966i f any; identify the services to be provided
5975and the specific subdistrict location; and
5981identify the applicant.
5984Subsection 408.039(2)(c), Florida Statutes.
598874. Hernando HMA, as the applicant, was required to submit
5998its audited financial statements whic h demonstrated its ability
6007to fund the project. Both Subsection 408.037(1)(c), Florida
6015Statutes, and Rule 59C - 1.008(5)(c)3., Florida Administrative
6023Code, require the audited financial statement of the applicant.
6032In fact, the rule provides that:
6038Only audi ted financial statements of the
6045applicant will be accepted. Audited
6050financial statements of any part of the
6057applicant, including but not limited to
6063subsidiaries, divisions, specific facilities
6067or cost centers, will not qualify as an audit
6076of the applicant . Nor shall the financial
6084statements of the applicant's parent
6089corporation qualify as an audit of the
6096applicant.
609775. The criteria from the District 3 health plan related to
6108the need to transfer beds, arguably applicable to this case,
6118overlap the other s tatutory and rule criteria. Subsection
6127408.035(1), Florida Statutes.
613076. Brooksville Regional will, based on its history of
6139commitments and obligation to Hernando County, continue to meet
6148the needs of Medicaid and charity patients, consistent with
6157Subsec tions 408.035(1) and (11), Florida Statutes, and Rules 59C -
61681.030(2)(a), (b), (c), (d), and (e); and 59C - 1.038(6)(a), Florida
6179Administrative Code.
618177. Geographical access will be enhanced by the relocation
6190of Brooksville Regional closer to areas of more de nse population
6201and higher expected growth, in compliance with Subsections
6209408.035(2) and (7), Florida Statutes; and Rule 59C - 1.030(2)(f),
6219Florida Administrative Code.
622278. For residents of eastern Hernando County, acute care
6231services are reasonably and eco nomically accessible in adjoining
6240Pasco County, and not adversely affected by the proposed
6249relocation of Brooksville Regional. See Subsection 408.035(4),
6256Florida Statutes.
625879. In the proposed recommended order, Oak Hill renewed its
6268objection to HMA/Brook sville Regional's Exhibit 56, asserting
6276that it is an impermissible amendment to the financial
6285information in the CON. The rule is that:
6293The agency shall deem the application
6299complete or withdrawn within 7 calendar days
6306of the receipt of the requested inf ormation.
6314Subsequent to an application being deemed
6320complete by the agency, no further
6326application information or amendment will be
6332accepted by the agency.
6336Rule 59C - 1.010(3)(b), Florida Administrative Code. Exhibit 56
6345consists of revised S chedule 7A, projected revenues, and S chedule
63568A, projected income and expenses. The revisions are
6364mathematical corrections, the addition of approximately $5.6
6371million in other managed care revenues (shown in the CON on
6382Schedule 7A, column 7, but not included in the t otal of
6394approximately $125.7 million in the CON in Schedule 7A, column
640410), which increases the corrected total inpatient hospital
6412service revenue to approximately $131.3 million. The
6419mathematical correction is not an impermissible amendment to the
6428CON. No information beyond that included in the initial CON was
6439required to correct the mistake. Similarly, the corrections to
6448Schedule 8A, regardless of how substantial, were also generated
6457solely as a result of the mathematical correction of revenues on
6468Sche dule 7A using the same methodology which was the basis for
6480the initial projections. The revisions to Schedule 8A are not
6490impermissible amendments.
649280. The Brooksville Regional relocation project will
6499increase utilization and revenues at the hospital. Based on
6508either the data in the CON or that in HMA Exhibit 56, the project
6522is financially feasible incrementally and will allow the hospital
6531to increase overall profitability. See Subsection 408.035(9),
6538Florida Statutes.
654081. Some deficiencies at Brooksv ille Regional's existing
6548site, lack of compliance with various codes and the ADA, flooding
6559due to inadequate elevation, inadequate size, and location on a
6569two - lane street, cannot reasonably be corrected onsite. Others
6579including electrical upgrades, improv ements in the HVAC system
6588and enlarged spaces would necessitate closing the hospital to
6597make substantial renovations. The only cost - efficient
6605alternative is relocation and construction of a new hospital,
6614consistent with Subsection 408.035(10), Florida Sta tutes.
662182. Brooksville Regional will be more competitive, and more
6630cost - efficient if it relocates and replaces the existing facility
6641as proposed in the CON application. See Subsection 408.035(9),
6650Florida Statutes.
665283. On balance, Hernando HMA demonstrat ed that it meets the
6663criteria for the approval of CON Application No. 9478.
6672RECOMMENDATION
6673Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
6683Law, it is
6686RECOMMENDED that the Agency for Health Care Administration
6694enter a final order approving CON A pplication No. 9478 for
6705Hernando HMA to relocate and replace Brooksville Regional as
6714proposed in the application.
6718DONE AND ENTERED this 24th day of December, 2002, in
6728Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
6732______________________ _____________
6734ELEANOR M. HUNTER
6737Administrative Law Judge
6740Division of Administrative Hearings
6744The DeSoto Building
67471230 Apalachee Parkway
6750Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 3060
6755(850) 488 - 9675 SUNCOM 278 - 9675
6763Fax Filing (850) 921 - 6847
6769www.doah.state .fl.us
6771Filed with the Clerk of the
6777Division of Administrative Hearings
6781this 24th day of December, 2002.
6787COPIES FURNISHED:
6789James C. Hauser, Esquire
6793Metz, Hauser & Husband, P.A.
6798215 South Monroe Street, Suite 505
6804Post Office Box 10909
6808Tallahassee, Florida 32302 - 2902
6813Stephen A. Ecenia, Esquire
6817R. David Prescott, Esquire
6821Thomas W. Conrad, Esquire
6825Rutledge, Ecenia, Purnell & Hoffman, P. A.
6832215 South Monroe Street, Suite 420
6838Post Office Box 551
6842Tallahassee, Florida 32302 - 0551
6847Gerald L. Pickett, Esquire
6851Agency for Health Care Administration
6856525 Mirror Lake Drive, North
6861Sebring Building, Suite 310H
6865St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
6869Lealand McCharen, Agency Clerk
6873Agency for Health Care Administration
68782727 Mahan Drive, Mail Stop 3
6884Tallahassee, Florida 32308 - 5403
6889Valda Clark Christian, General Counsel
6894Agency for Health Care Administration
68992727 Mahan Drive, Mail Stop 3
6905Tallahassee, Florida 32308 - 5403
6910NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
6916All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15
6927days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to
6938this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will
6949issue the Final Order in this case.
- Date
- Proceedings
- PDF:
- Date: 12/24/2002
- Proceedings: Recommended Order issued (hearing held June 3-7 and 10-14, 2002) CASE CLOSED.
- PDF:
- Date: 12/24/2002
- Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
- PDF:
- Date: 10/04/2002
- Proceedings: Brooksville`s Response in Opposition to Oak Hill`s Motion to Strike Portion of Brooksville`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 10/01/2002
- Proceedings: Oak Hill Hospital`s Motion to Strike Portion of HMA`s Proposed Recommended Order, and Response to HMA`s Request for Judicial Notice filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 09/26/2002
- Proceedings: Letter to Judge Hunter from J. Hauser enclosing disk of proposed recommended order filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 09/23/2002
- Proceedings: Joint Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommended Order of the Agency and Brooksville (filed by J. Hauser).
- PDF:
- Date: 09/11/2002
- Proceedings: Order Extending the Time to File Proposed Recommended Orders issued. (parties shall have up to and including September 23, 2002 to file proposed recommended orders)
- PDF:
- Date: 09/10/2002
- Proceedings: Unopposed Request for Brief Extension to File Post-Hearing Briefs filed J. Hauser.
- PDF:
- Date: 09/05/2002
- Proceedings: Order Extending the Time to File Proposed Recommended Orders issued. (parties shall have up to and including September 20, 2002 to file proposed recommended orders)
- PDF:
- Date: 09/04/2002
- Proceedings: Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline for Filing Proposed Recommended Order filed by Petitioner.
- Date: 08/23/2002
- Proceedings: Transcript (Volumes 1-2, and 5-15) filed.
- Date: 08/19/2002
- Proceedings: Transcript (Volume 4) filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 08/16/2002
- Proceedings: Letter to Judge Hunter from R. Prescott requesting PRO preparation time not be reduced filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 08/16/2002
- Proceedings: Order Extending Time for Filing Proposed Recommended Orders issued. (parties shall file their proposed recommended orders by September 13, 2002)
- PDF:
- Date: 08/14/2002
- Proceedings: Letter to Judge Hunter from J. Hauser requesting new deadline for filing post-hearing briefs filed.
- Date: 08/13/2002
- Proceedings: Transcript of Hearing (Volumes 2, 3) filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 08/08/2002
- Proceedings: Letter to Judge Hunter from J. Hauser requesting telephone hearing on extension of time to file due date of post hearing briefs filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 08/02/2002
- Proceedings: Letter to Judge Hunter from R. Prescott requesting extension of time to file proposed recommended order (filed via facsimile).
- PDF:
- Date: 08/01/2002
- Proceedings: Letter to Judge Hunter from J. Hauser requesting an extension to file proposed recommended orders filed.
- Date: 06/03/2002
- Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
- PDF:
- Date: 06/03/2002
- Proceedings: Brooksville`s Status Report as to Depositions of Lindsey and Newhaller filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/31/2002
- Proceedings: Brookville`s Response in Opposition to Oak Hill`s Motion to Quash Subpoena and for Protective Order filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/29/2002
- Proceedings: Motion to Quash Subpoena and for Protective Order filed by Petitioner.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/28/2002
- Proceedings: Notice of Taking Telephonic Deposition (DucesTecum), J. Lindsey filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/23/2002
- Proceedings: Order Denying Brooksville`s Motion for Partial Summary Judgement and/or to Otherwise Rule that the Repalcement of Brooksville Regional Medical Hospital is not in Dispute, and Request for Oral Argument, and Granting the Motion to Compel Oak Hill to Answer Brooksville`s First Request for Admission, Numbers 12 and 13, wich is Treated as a Motion for Supplemental Response issued.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/23/2002
- Proceedings: Brooksville`s Response in Opposition to Oak Hill`s Motion to Amend and/or Clarify Order of Prehearing Instructions filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/23/2002
- Proceedings: Brooksville`s Response in Opposition to Oak Hill`s Motion to Strike Brooksville`s Reply to Oak Hill`s Response to Brooksville`s Motion for Partial Summary Judgement filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/23/2002
- Proceedings: Motion to Strike Brooksville`s Reply to Oak Hill`s Response to Brooksville`s Motion for Partial Summary Judgement, Etc. filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/22/2002
- Proceedings: Oak Hill Hospital`s Motion to Amend and/or Clarify Order of Prehearing Instructions filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/22/2002
- Proceedings: Brooksville`s Reply to Oak Hill`s Response to the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Motion to Compel Oak Hill to Answer Brooksville`s First Request for Admission and/or to otherwise Rule that the Replacement of Brooksville Regional Hospital is not in Dispute filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/21/2002
- Proceedings: Oak Hill Hospital`s Response to Brooksville`s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Motion to Compel Oak Hill to Answer Brooksville`s First Request for Admission and/or to Otherwise Rule that the Replacement of Brooksville Regional Hospital is not in Dispute filed.
- Date: 05/20/2002
- Proceedings: Request for Oral Argument filed by Respondents.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/14/2002
- Proceedings: Brooksville`s Motion for Partial Summary Judgement, or, in the Alternative, Motion to Compel Oak Hill to Answer Brooksville`s First Request for Admission and/or to Otherwise Rule that the Replacement of Brooksville Regional Hospital is not in Dispute filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/14/2002
- Proceedings: Cross Notice of Taking Depositions, C. Manuel, D. Lacey, K. Blind, R. Holly filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/10/2002
- Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum, P. Greenberg, R. Knapp filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/06/2002
- Proceedings: Order Denying Motion to Quash Subpoena and for Protective Order issued.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/03/2002
- Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum, K. Rigby, R. Heiken, C. Kingsley, J. Gregg, R. Holly, K. Blind, D. Sullivan, K. Hackler filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/03/2002
- Proceedings: Oak Hill Hospital`s Second Request for Production of Documents to Brooksville Regional Hospital filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/02/2002
- Proceedings: Brookville`s Response to Oak Hill`s Motion to Quash Subpoena and for Protective Order filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/02/2002
- Proceedings: Oak Hills` Response to Brooksville`s Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash Subpoenas filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/02/2002
- Proceedings: Brooksville`s Emergency Motion in Limine To Declare Certain Legal Issues and Con Criteria are not in Dipute and do not have to be Proven at Final Hearing filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/01/2002
- Proceedings: Brooksville`s Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash Subpoenas filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/01/2002
- Proceedings: Motion to Quash Subpoena and for Protective Order filed S. Ecenia.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/26/2002
- Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum, E. Hedgtgen, J. Wesolowski filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/25/2002
- Proceedings: Order issued. (on May 3, 2002, each party shall file with the court and shall serve all other parties, by facsimile or hand-delivery, its final list of exhibits)
- PDF:
- Date: 04/23/2002
- Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum, T. Links, K. Mason, R. Farnham, G. Bell, D. Lacey, C. Manuel filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/23/2002
- Proceedings: Joint Motion to Supplement Order of Prehearing Instructions filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/22/2002
- Proceedings: Notice and Cross Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum, M. Carroll filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/18/2002
- Proceedings: Brooksville`s Supplemental Response to Oak Hill`s Written Discovery Requests filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/18/2002
- Proceedings: Notice of Taking Depositions Duces Tecum, J. Johnston, B. Selph, D. Hill filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/18/2002
- Proceedings: Notice and Cross Notice of Taking Depositions, M. Mehta, Dr. Amarchand, J. Nico, W. McNeil filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/16/2002
- Proceedings: Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing issued (hearing set for June 3 through 7 and 10 through 14, 2002; 9:00 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL).
- PDF:
- Date: 04/16/2002
- Proceedings: Notice of Taking Depositions Duces Tecum, M. Mehta, Dr. Amarchand, J. Nico, W. McNeil, M. Carroll, E. Carr, C. Braun filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/05/2002
- Proceedings: Oak Hill Hospital`s Responses to Brookville Regional Hospital`s Second Request for Production of Documents filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/02/2002
- Proceedings: Certificate of Service of Brooksville`s Answsers to Oak Hill`s First Set of Interrogatories filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/01/2002
- Proceedings: Brooksville`s Response to Oak Hill`s First Request for Production of Documents and First Set of Interrogatories filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/01/2002
- Proceedings: HCA Health Services, Inc. d/b/a Oak Hill Hospital`s Responses to Brooksville Regional Hospital`s First Request for Production of Documents filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/01/2002
- Proceedings: HCA Health Services, Inc. d/b/a Oak Hill Hospital`s Responses to Brooksville Regional Hospital`s First Request for Admissions filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/01/2002
- Proceedings: HCA Health Services of Flordia, Inc. d/b/a Oak Hill Hospital`s Notice of Service of Answers to Brooksville Regional Hospital`s First Set of Interrogatories filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 03/18/2002
- Proceedings: Order Granting Motion to Amend and Supplement Order of Prehearing Instructions issued.
- PDF:
- Date: 03/15/2002
- Proceedings: Joint Motion to Amend and Supplement Order of Prehearing Instructions filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 03/06/2002
- Proceedings: Brookville`s Second Request for Production of Documents to Oak Hill filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 02/25/2002
- Proceedings: Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for May 21 through 24 and 27 through 31, 2002; 9:00 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL).
- PDF:
- Date: 02/22/2002
- Proceedings: Oak Hill Hospital`s First Request for Production of Documents to Brooksville Regional Hospital filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 02/22/2002
- Proceedings: Oak Hill Hospital`s Notice of Service of First Set of Interrogatories to Brooksville Regional Hospital filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 02/22/2002
- Proceedings: Brookville`s First Request for Production of Documents to Oak Hill filed.
Case Information
- Judge:
- ELEANOR M. HUNTER
- Date Filed:
- 02/05/2002
- Date Assignment:
- 04/11/2002
- Last Docket Entry:
- 02/21/2003
- Location:
- Tallahassee, Florida
- District:
- Northern
- Agency:
- ADOPTED IN TOTO
- Suffix:
- CON
Counsels
-
James C Hauser, Esquire
Address of Record -
Thomas W Konrad, Esquire
Address of Record -
Gerald L. Pickett, Esquire
Address of Record