02-004163PL Department Of Health, Board Of Nursing vs. Gregory Norton, R.N.
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, February 14, 2003.


View Dockets  
Summary: Lack of clear and convincing evidence militates that complaint against Respondent should be dismissed.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF )

14NURSING, )

16)

17Petitioner, )

19)

20vs. ) Case No. 02 - 4163PL

27)

28GREGORY NORTON, R.N., )

32)

33Respondent. )

35)

36RECOMMENDED ORD ER

39Administrative Law Judge Don W. Davis of the Division of

49Administrative Hearings conducted a formal administrative

55hearing in this case on December 17, 2002, in Jacksonville,

65Florida.

66APPEARANCES

67For Petitioner: Amy M. Pietrodangelo, Esquire

73M ichael T. Flurry, Esquire

78Department of Health

81Bureau of Health Care Practitioner

86Regulation - Legal

894052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin C - 65

97Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 3265

102For Respondent: Harvey L. Jay, III, Esquire

109Eric a Vitsky, Esquire

113Saalfield, Coulson, Shad & Jay, P.A.

1191000 First Union Tower

123225 Water Street

126Jacksonville, Florida 32202 - 4458

131STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES

135The issue to be resolved in this proceeding concerns

144whether discipli nary action should be taken against Respondent's

153nursing license based on an alleged violation of Section

162464.018(1)(h), Florida Statutes.

165PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

167On July 29, 2002, an Administrative Complaint was filed

176against Respondent, Gregory Norton, seeking to permanently

183revoke, suspend, or otherwise discipline his license to practice

192nursing.

193Respondent timely requested a formal hearing and the matter

202was referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings for a

212formal hearing. The Administrative Complaint alleges that

219Respondent practiced below the minimal acceptable standards of

227prevailing nursing practice, specifically Section 464.018(1)(h),

233Florida Statutes. The single charge in the Administrative

241Complaint is premised on Respondent's treatme nt of patient, M.E.

251on December 6, 2001.

255At the hearing, Petitioner called five witnesses: M.E.,

263the patient; R.A., the patient’s mother; Jeanne Baranek, a

272Wolfson Children’s Hospital nurse without an independent

279recollection of M.E.; Fern Rossello, a W olfson Children’s

288Hospital nurse without an independent recollection of M.E.; and

297Worthlyn White, an expert contracted with the Agency for Health

307Care Administration to provide expert testimony. Petitioner

314offered two exhibits: Exhibit 1 was M.E.’s medic al records at

325Wolfson Children’s Hospital from December 5, 2001, to

333December 7, 2001; Exhibit 2 was a copy of Worthlyn White’s

344abbreviated resume.

346Respondent called three witnesses: Kip Deckerhoff, a nurse

354manager at Wolfson Children’s Hospital; Gregory Norton,

361Respondent; and Cynthia Gerdik, an expert witness in pediatric

370nursing. Respondent did not offer any exhibits.

377A Transcript of the hearing was ordered and filed with the

388Division of Administrative Hearings on January 16, 2003. The

397parties reques ted and were granted leave to file proposed

407recommended orders more than ten days after the filing of the

418Transcript. Both parties filed Proposed Recommended Orders

425which have been reviewed in the preparation of this Recommended

435Order.

436FINDINGS OF FACT

4391. Respondent, Gregory Norton, is a licensed registered

447nurse in the State of Florida holding License No. RN 2219032.

4582. On December 5, 2001, M.E. presented at Wolfson

467Children’s Hospital with complaints of pneumonia and fever and

476was admitted for treatm ent. M.E. had been previously diagnosed

486with sickle cell disease prior to his admission to the hospital.

4973. Respondent was not working at Wolfson Children’s

505Hospital on December 5, 2001.

5104. In compliance with his duties at Wolfson Children’s

519Hospital, R espondent performed a full assessment on M.E. on

529December 6, 2001.

5325. M.E. was discharged from the hospital on December 7,

5422001. Again, Respondent was not working at Wolfson Children’s

551Hospital on December 7, 2001.

5566. At the final hearing, M.E. stated u nder oath that he

568had no recollection of any events at Wolfson Children’s Hospital

578on December 6, 2001, the only date alleged in the Administrative

589Complaint. Specifically, M.E. testified that he did not

597remember any examination by or discussion with Resp ondent on

607December 6, 2001.

6107. On December 6, 2001, M.E., in R.A.’s presence, denied

620to Kip Deckerhoff that Respondent had engaged in any

629inappropriate conduct during his examination. M.E.’s denial is

637confirmed by sworn testimony provided by both R.A. a nd Kip

648Deckerhoff, the nurse manager of M.E.’s floor at Wolfson

657Children’s Hospital.

6598. R.A. has no personal knowledge regarding Respondent's

667examination of her son, M.E.

6729. Worthlyn White, an expert witness presented by

680Petitioner, has no current clin ical nursing role or consulting

690contracts with any other employers at this time. White has a

701contract/fee agreement with Petitioner to serve as an expert

710witness. This is the only Florida case in which White has

721offered an expert opinion. Before she bec ame a consultant for

732Petitioner, White worked at the facility, Express Care , where

741she rarely saw pediatric sickle cell patients. Her primary area

751of certification is neonatal nursing. A neonate is a newborn

761child up to 28 days of age. Teenagers are not classified as

773neonates.

77410. At the final hearing, White conceded that according to

784Stedman’s Medical Dictionary for the Health Professional ,

791perineum is defined as the area between the thighs extending

801from the coccyx to the pubis and lying below the pe lvic

813diaphragm and, accordingly, Respondent's care and examination of

821M.E.’s perineum was appropriate. Respondent’s total examination

828of M.E. was within the standard of care and Respondent's femoral

839pulse check on M.E. was not below the standard of care.

85011. Respondent testified regarding his treatment of M.E.

858on December 6, 2001. Respondent has worked clinically at

867Wolfson Children’s Hospital for 20 years. He has practiced as a

878registered nurse in the State of Florida for 12 years. There

889has never b een an investigation of Respondent’s license prior to

900Petitioner’s allegations in this case.

90512. Respondent testified that he performed a required

913physical examination on M.E on December 6, 2001. When asked his

924personal opinion on the standard of care, Respondent testified

933that his treatment of M.E. on December 6, 2001, was appropriate.

94413. Cynthia Gerdik, an expert in the area of pediatric

954nursing, has practiced as a registered nurse for 30 years. She

965is currently the nurse manager of Pediatric Servi ces at Shands

976Jacksonville and the manager of the only sickle cell clinic in

987North Florida.

98914. Testimony of Gerdik establishes that Respondent's full

997head - to - toe assessment on M.E., including an examination of all

1010body systems was within the standard of care. Further, it was

1021within the standard of care for Respondent to perform a femoral

1032pulse check and assess M.E.’s perineum. None of Respondent's

1041actions, pertaining to the treatment of M.E. on December 6,

10512001, fell below the standard of care.

1058CONCLUSI ONS OF LAW

106215. The Division of Administrative Hearings has

1069jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this

1078proceeding, pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.

1085Disciplinary licensing proceedings are penal in nature. State

1093ex rel. Vining v . Florida Real Estate Commission , 281 So. 2d 487

1106(Fla. 1973). In this disciplinary licensing proceeding,

1113Petitioner has the burden of proving by clear and convincing

1123evidence the allegations against Respondent. Ferris v.

1130Turlington , 510 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

113916. The standard of "clear and convincing evidence"

1147requires that:

1149[T]he evidence must be found to be credible;

1157the facts to which the witnesses testify

1164must be distinctly remembered, the testimony

1170must be precise and explicit and the

1177wit nesses must be lacking in confusion as to

1186the facts in issue. The evidence must be of

1195such weight that it produced in the mind of

1204the trier of fact a firm belief or

1212conviction, without hesitancy, as to the

1218truth of the allegations sought to be

1225established .

1227Slomowitz v. Walker , 429 So. 2d 797, 800

1235(Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (emphasis added).

124117. The Administrative Complaint alleges that Respondent

1248practiced below the minimal acceptable standards of prevailing

1256nursing practice by improperly performing a femoral pulse check

1265and exam on M.E.’s genitals on December 6, 2001.

127418. Under the definition of clear and convincing evidence,

1283Petitioner has not proven that Respondent’s treatment of M.E.

1292fell below the standard of care.

1298RECOMMENDATION

1299Based upon the foregoin g findings of fact and conclusions

1309of law, it is RECOMMENDED

1314That a final order be entered dismissing the complaint

1323against Respondent Gregory Norton.

1327DONE AND ENTERED this 14th day of February, 2003, in

1337Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

1341_______________ ____________________

1343DON W. DAVIS

1346Administrative Law Judge

1349Division of Administrative Hearings

1353The DeSoto Building

13561230 Apalachee Parkway

1359Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 3060

1364(850) 488 - 9675 SUNCOM 278 - 9675

1372Fax Filing (850) 921 - 6847

1378www.doah.state.fl.us

1379File d with the Clerk of the

1386Division of Administrative Hearings

1390this 14th day of February, 2003.

1396COPIES FURNISHED :

1399Amy M. Pietrodangelo, Esquire

1403Michael T. Flurry, Esquire

1407Department of Health

1410Bureau of Health Care

1414Practitioner Regulation - Legal

14184052 Ba ld Cypress Way, Bin C - 65

1427Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 3265

1432Harvey L. Jay, Esquire

1436Erica Vitsky, Esquire

1439Saalfield, Coulson, Shad & Jay, P.A.

14451000 First Union Tower

1449225 Water Street

1452Jacksonville, Florida 32202 - 4458

1457Dan Coble, Executive Director

1461Board of N ursing

1465Department of Health

14684052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin C02

1474Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 3252

1479R.S. Power, Agency Clerk

1483Department of Health

14864052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin A02

1492Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 1701

1497NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

1503All parties hav e the right to submit written exceptions within

151415 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions

1525to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that

1536will issue the final order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
PDF:
Date: 07/06/2004
Proceedings: Final Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/22/2003
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 02/14/2003
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 02/14/2003
Proceedings: Recommended Order issued (hearing held December 17, 2002) CASE CLOSED.
PDF:
Date: 02/14/2003
Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
PDF:
Date: 02/05/2003
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/05/2003
Proceedings: Respondent`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Date: 01/16/2003
Proceedings: Transcript filed.
Date: 12/17/2002
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
PDF:
Date: 12/16/2002
Proceedings: Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Carla D. Roberts-Jones (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 12/12/2002
Proceedings: (Joint) Prehearing Stipulation (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 12/11/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Filing Petitioner`s Response to Respondent`s Request for Admissions (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 12/06/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Filing Petitioner`s Response to Respondent`s First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Expert Interrogatories (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 12/05/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Serving Verified Answers to Petitioner`s First Set of Expert Interrogatories (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 12/05/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Serving Answers to Petitioner`s First Set of Interrogatories (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 12/05/2002
Proceedings: Respondent`s Motion to Compel (filed via facsimile)
PDF:
Date: 11/22/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Respondent`s Assertion of His Fifth Amendment Right (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 11/22/2002
Proceedings: Respondent`s Motion for Protective Order (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 11/21/2002
Proceedings: Emergency Motion for Case Conference (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 11/19/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition (R. Ali and M. Everett) filed via facsimile.
PDF:
Date: 11/08/2002
Proceedings: Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
PDF:
Date: 11/08/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for December 17 and 18, 2002; 10:00 a.m.; Jacksonville, FL).
PDF:
Date: 11/04/2002
Proceedings: Joint Response to Initial Order (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 11/01/2002
Proceedings: Notice of Serving Respondent`s First Set of Expert Interrogatories to Petitioner filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/25/2002
Proceedings: Initial Order issued.
PDF:
Date: 10/24/2002
Proceedings: Administrative Complaint (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 10/24/2002
Proceedings: Election of Rights (filed via facsimile).
PDF:
Date: 10/24/2002
Proceedings: Agency referral (filed via facsimile).

Case Information

Judge:
DON W. DAVIS
Date Filed:
10/24/2002
Date Assignment:
12/16/2002
Last Docket Entry:
07/06/2004
Location:
Jacksonville, Florida
District:
Northern
Agency:
ADOPTED IN TOTO
Suffix:
PL
 

Counsels

Related Florida Statute(s) (2):