03-000291
Young America Homestead Daycare Center vs.
Department Of Children And Family Services
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Monday, June 30, 2003.
Recommended Order on Monday, June 30, 2003.
1STATE OF FLORIDA
4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
8YOUNG AMERICAN DAYCARE CENTER, )
13)
14Petitioner, )
16)
17vs. ) Case No. 03 - 0075
24)
25DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND )
30FAMILY SERVICES, )
33)
34Respondent. )
36_______________________________)
37YOUNG AMERICAN HOMESTEAD )
41DAYCARE CENTER, )
44)
45Petitioner, )
47)
48vs. ) Case No. 03 - 0291
55)
56DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND )
61FAMILY SERVICES, )
64)
65Respondent. )
67_______________________________)
68RECOMMENDED ORDER
70Pursuant to notice, a hearing was held in this case on
81April 8, 2003, by video teleconference at sites in Miami and
92Tallahassee, Florida, before Florence Snyder Rivas, a duly -
101designated Administrative Law Judge of the Division of
109Administrative Hearings.
111APPEARANCES
112For Petitioner: Bianca Rodriguez, pro se
118Juanita Ramirez, pro se
122Young American Day Care Center
1271905 West 35th Street, No. 120
133Hialeah, Florida 33012
136For Respondent: Rosemarie Rinaldi, Esquire
141Department of Children and
145Family Services
147401 Northwest 2nd Avenue, Suite N - 1014
155Miami, Florida 33128
158STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
162Whether the Petitioner committed a violation of minimum
170child care standards, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.
181PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
183By le tters dated September 30, 2002, and October 3, 2002,
194the Department of Children and Family Services (the Department
203or DCFS) served notice of its intention to impose civil
213penalties totaling $1,000.00 on Petitioner Young American Day
222Care Center (Petition er or Young American) for violation of
232state law governing minimum child care standards at its day care
243facilities located in Hialeah and Homestead, respectively.
250More specifically, DCFS alleged that Young American had
258negligently supervised a two - year - o ld in care at its Hialeah
272facility, and had failed to adequately report and document an
282injury to that child, and, further, had violated state mandated
292requirements governing the ratio of child care workers to
301children in care.
304Petitioner timely requested a hearing to contest the
312charges.
313At the video teleconference on April 8, 2003, Petitioner
322presented the testimony of Blanca Rodriguez and Juanita Ramirez.
331The Department presented the testimony of Dr. Walter Lambert,
340L.F. and O.F., Belkis Molina, Cassale e Eccles, and Benjamin
350Diaz, and offered five exhibits, which were accepted into
359evidence .
361At the conclusion of the evidentiary portion of the
370hearing, the parties were given ten days from the date of the
382filing of the transcript to file proposed recommend ed orders.
392The transcript was filed on May 27, 2003, and the Department
403thereafter timely requested an enlargement of time to file its
413proposed recommended order. The deadline was extended to
421June 16, 2003, and the Department timely filed. No submission
431was made on behalf of Petitioner.
437FINDINGS OF FACT
4401. On the morning of March 19, 2002, B.F., then age two,
452was in the care of Petitioner's Hialeah day care center. There
463she sustained a non - displaced spiral tibia fracture on her left
475leg.
4762. The tibi a is the bone which bears the majority of the
489weight of the lower leg. The fracture sustained by B.F. was of
501sufficient magnitude that she was unable to bear weight on her
512lower leg, and therefore was unable to stand, walk, or run.
523Such fractures are pai nful. They are expected to, and in this
535case did, render the child tearful to the point of
545inconsolability.
5463. A fracture of the kind B.F. suffered is also known as a
"559toddler's fracture." When such a fracture is found in a non -
571ambulatory child, the pro bability is that it was intentionally
581inflicted. That presumption does not arise, however, for
589healthy children such as B.F.
5944. Petitioner claims that B.F. was injured at
602approximately 8:30 a.m. when she "slipped off a chair," but
612thereafter continued to play normally for an hour. Petitioner
621further claims that it was only when a teacher tried to change
633her diaper around 9:30 a.m. that B.F. began to cry and rapidly
645became inconsolable.
6475. The persons who gave that account of the incident did
658not test ify, nor give a sworn statement at any time. There is
671no record evidence from anyone with personal knowledge of the
681conditions and circumstances in B.F.'s day care room on the date
692she suffered the fracture.
6966. The emergency room physicians who treated B.F.'s
704fracture rejected the possibility that the child could have
713played normally for an hour after she fractured her tibia in a
"725fall off a chair."
7297. The medical evidence regarding the fracture, which is
738clear, convincing, and undisputed, established that if the
746fracture sustained by B.F. occurred in the manner Petitioner
755claimed, it would have rendered the child in immediate need of
766medical attention. More specifically, B.F. would have been
774instantly rendered unable to bear weight and thus unable to
784walk, let alone play normally. The pain and attendant crying
794would have begun instantly, not an hour later.
8028. Under Petitioner's version of how the fracture
810occurred, the medical evidence compels the conclusion that
818B.F.'s caregivers allowed her to cry in pain for an hour before
830calling her parents. Negligent is a charitable characterization
838of Petitioner's conduct.
8419. If in fact B.F. played normally for an hour following
852the 8:30 a.m. fall from a chair, the medical evidence compels
863the conclusion t hat she did not sustain the fracture from that
875fall, but rather in some other manner at some other time. Two -
888year - olds must be under the supervision of certified caregivers
899at all times precisely so that if accidents happen, parents,
909treating physicians, and state regulators will know exactly what
918occurred.
91910. It was shortly after 9:30 a.m. when B.F.'s mother was
930called at her office and asked to come to the day care center.
943She summoned the child's father, and both parents were present
953by approximatel y 10:00 a.m. By this time, the parties agree,
964B.F. was hysterical. Her leg was swollen, painful to the touch,
975and she was unable to bear weight on the injured leg.
98611. The parents were not given an incident report
995detailing the accident, either at the time they were summoned to
1006the center, nor at any time thereafter.
101312. B.F.'s parents rushed her to the emergency room at
1023Miami Childrens Hospital where a cast was applied to the
1033injured leg.
103513. On April 15, 2002, Belkis Molina (Molina), a licensing
1045c ounselor assigned to the Hialeah facility, was present in the
1056center for the purpose of further investigating the incident
1065involving B.F., who, by this time, had been withdrawn from the
1076facility. On that date, Molina observed that one staff member
1086was pre sent to supervise 17 toddlers. Florida law requires a
1097staff - to - child ratio for that age group of one to six.
111114. In connection with her investigative duties, Molina
1119asked to see the incident report that was required by law to
1131have been done on March 19 th. The document was produced, but
1143the required parent signature was missing.
114915. Later, on a form requesting a hearing in this matter,
1160Petitioner attached a copy of what appears to be the same
1171incident report; however, this document stated that the fath er
1181refused to sign the document.
118616. On April 30, 2002, Benjamin Diaz (Diaz), the
1195Department licensing counselor assigned to Petitioner's
1201Homestead facility, observed additional violations relating to
1208the staff - to - child ratio requirement. Specifically, on that
1219date, the baby room had a staff - to - child ratio of one to six.
1235Florida law requires a ratio of one to four. Additionally, he
1246observed the three - year - old room with one staff member for 19
1260children. The correct ratio for that age group is one - to -
1273f ifteen.
127517. Having observed these ratio violations, Diaz made a
1284follow - up visit on May 14, 2002. On that day he observed that
1298the two - year - old room had two staff members with 24 children.
1312Florida law requires no les than one staffer for 11 children.
1323CO NCLUSIONS OF LAW
132718. The Division of Administrative Hearings has
1334jurisdiction over the parties to and the subject matter of this
1345proceeding. Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.
135019. In this case, the Department has satisfied its burden
1360to show by clear and convincing evidence that the Petitioner
1370committed the violations alleged in the administrative
1377complaint, and the reasonableness of the proposed penalty.
1385Ferris v. Turlington , 510 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 1987).
139420. Unquestionably, B.F. was negligently sup ervised. No
1402credible explanation for her fracture was provided; instead the
1411explanation offered is completely inconsistent with clear and
1419convincing medical evidence. If in fact B.F. suffered the
1428fracture in the time and manner Petitioner claims, it was
1438profoundly negligent, even cruel, to wait an hour to commence
1448the process of notifying the parents so that medical attention
1458could be provided to B.F.
146321. Petitioner further violated the law in failing to
1472promptly and accurately document the incident.
147822 . Finally, Petitioner was out of compliance on three
1488occasions with state requirements for staff to child ratios.
1497RECOMMENDATION
1498Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
1508Law, it is RECOMMENDED that the Department issue a final order
1519fin ing Petitioner $1,000.00.
1524DONE AND ENTERED this 30th day of June, 2003, in
1534Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
1538S
1539___________________________________
1540FLORENCE SNYDER RIVAS
1543Administrative Law Judge
1546Division of Administrative Hearings
1550The DeSoto Building
15531230 Apalachee Parkway
1556Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 3060
1561(850) 488 - 9675 SUNCOM 278 - 9675
1569Fax Filing (850) 921 - 6847
1575www.doah.state.fl.us
1576Filed with the Clerk of the
1582Division of Administrative Hearings
1586this 30th day of June, 2003.
1592COPIES FURNISHED :
1595Bianca R odriguez
1598Juanita Ramirez
1600Young American Day Care Center
16051905 West 35th Street, No. 120
1611Hialeah, Florida 33012
1614Rosemarie Rinaldi, Esquire
1617Department of Children and
1621Family Services
1623401 Northwest 2nd Avenue, Suite N - 1014
1631Miami, Florida 33128
1634Paul Floun lacker, Agency Clerk
1639Department of Children and
1643Family Services
1645Building 2, Room 204B
16491317 Winewood Boulevard
1652Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 0700
1657Josie Tomayo, General Counsel
1661Department of Children and
1665Family Services
1667Building 2, Room 204
16711317 Winewood Boulevard
1674Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 0700
1679Jerry Regier, Secretary
1682Department of Children and
1686Family Services
1688Building 1, Room 202
16921317 Winewood Boulevard
1695Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 0700
1700NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
1706All parties have the righ t to submit written exceptions within
171715 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions
1728to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that
1739will issue the Final Order in this case.
- Date
- Proceedings
- Date: 04/13/2004
- Proceedings: Notice of Serving Petitioner`s Request for Admissions (filed via facsimile).
- PDF:
- Date: 06/30/2003
- Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
- PDF:
- Date: 06/09/2003
- Proceedings: Order Granting Additional Time to Submit Proposed Recommended Order. (the parties hereto shall have until June 16, 2003, in which to file their proposed recommended orders)
- PDF:
- Date: 06/06/2003
- Proceedings: Respondent`s Motion for Additional Time to Submit Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
- Date: 05/27/2003
- Proceedings: Transcript filed.
- Date: 04/08/2003
- Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/08/2003
- Proceedings: Respondent`s Notice of Filing of Exhibit 1 and Motion to Protect Confidentiality filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 02/18/2003
- Proceedings: Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Video Teleconference issued (video hearing set for April 8, 2003; 12:30 p.m.; Miami and Tallahassee, FL).
- PDF:
- Date: 02/14/2003
- Proceedings: Respondent`s Motion for Continuance Due to Consolidation (filed via facsimile).
- PDF:
- Date: 02/05/2003
- Proceedings: Order of Consolidation issued. (consolidated cases are: 03-000075, 03-000291)
Case Information
- Judge:
- FLORENCE SNYDER RIVAS
- Date Filed:
- 01/27/2003
- Date Assignment:
- 02/04/2003
- Last Docket Entry:
- 04/13/2004
- Location:
- Miami, Florida
- District:
- Southern
- Agency:
- ADOPTED IN TOTO
Counsels
-
Veronica L. Robinson, Esquire
Address of Record -
Bianca Rodriguez
Address of Record