06-003277 Department Of Business And Professional Regulation vs. Clifford Grandmont
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, November 28, 2006.


View Dockets  
Summary: Respondent contracted with three elderly persons to repair their homes subsequent to Hurricane Wilma, despite having no license. Respondent accepted payment but did no work.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND )

13PROFESSIONAL REGULATION , )

16)

17Petitioner , )

19)

20vs. ) Case Nos. 06 - 3277

27) 06 - 3278

31CLIFFORD GRANDMONT , ) 06 - 3279

37)

38Respondent . )

41)

42RECOMMENDED ORDER

44This cause came on for formal hearing before Harry L.

54Hooper, Administrative Law Judge with the Division of

62Administrative Hearings, on November 2, 2006, in West Palm

71Beach, Florida.

73APPEARANCES

74For Petiti oner: Brian A. Higgins, Esquire

81Department of Business and

85Professional Regulation

871940 North Monroe Street

91Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 2202

96For Respondent: Clifford Grandmont, pro se

102(No Appearance)

104STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

108The issue i s whether Respondent undertook to act as a

119contractor without a license as charged in the Administrative

128Complaints, and if so, what disciplinary action should be taken .

139PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

141This matter had its genesis in the filing, on May 15, 2006,

153of three Administrative Complaints, asserting that Respondent

160Clifford Grandmont (Mr. Grandmont), had acted as a contractor

169without having a license. Respondent demanded a hearing in each

179of the cases. They were forwarded to the Division of

189Administrative Hearings on August 30, 2006, and consolidated in

198an Order of Consolidation filed September 11, 2006. T he cases

209were set for hearing on November 2, 2006, and were heard on that

222date.

223At the hearing, Petitioner presented the testimony of three

232witnesses and offered Exhibits numbered 1 through 10 in to

242evidence and all were accepted .

248A Transcript was filed on November 8, 2006 . After the

259hearing, Petitioner filed its Proposed Findings of Fact and

268Conclusions of Law on November 16, 2006.

275References to statu tes are to Florida Statutes (2005)

284unless otherwise noted.

287FINDINGS OF FACT

2901. Pursuant to Section 20.165, the Division of Professions

299is a subordinate unit of the Department of Business and

309Professional Regulation (the Department). The Department

315pro vides administrative support, including prosecutorial support

322to the Construction Industry Licensing Board (the Board) , which

331is also located within the Department .

3382. Mr. Grandmont is not currently licensed as a State

348Registered or State Certified Con tractor in this state, nor has

359he ever been licensed by the Board.

3663. Mr. Grandmont's last known address is 355 China Berry

376Circle, Davenport, Florida. He was provided notice of the

385hearing at that address, and at 7733 Park Road, Charlotte, North

396Carol ina 28210, which is the address he used when demanding a

408hearing on disputed facts in two of the se cases. In DOAH Case

421N o. 06 - 3279, he provided no address in his demand for a hearing.

4364. All attempts by U. S. Mail to notify Mr. Grandmont of

448the hearing, were returned. Mr. Grandmont is deemed to have

458known of the time, date, and place of the hearing , and is deemed

471to have waived his appearance at the hearing .

4805 . On November 11, 2005, subsequent to Hurricane Wilma,

490Robert L. Coe , of Lake Worth, Florida , was contacted by

500Mr. Grandmont, who offered to repair his damaged mobile home.

510He provided a written estimate of $10, 500. The estimate

520contained a list of 11 items requiring repair , and stated that

531he would accomplish the repair of them . He demanded a $4,200

544down payment, which Mr. Coe provided in a draft drawn on

555Fidelity Cash Reserves , and dated November 11, 2005.

5636 . Mr. Coe never saw Mr. Grandmont again. The repairs set

575forth in the written estimate were not accomplished. The draft ,

585however, w as negotiated by Mr. Grandmont .

5937. On November 12, 2005, subsequent to Hurricane Wilma,

602Joseph Webster, of Lake Worth, Florida, was contacted by

611Mr. Grandmont, who offered to repair his damaged residence.

620Mr. Grandmont discussed charging $1 3 ,500 in r eturn for repairing

632Mr. Webster's residence. After negotiations, Mr. Grandmont

639agreed to do it for $11,500. No written estimate or contract

651was prepared. Mr. Grandmont demanded $ 5 , 750 payment in advance .

663Mr. Webster rounded off the down payment to $6,0 00 and present ed

677Mr. Grandmont an official check of the Taunton Federal Credit

687Union, of Taunton, Massachusetts , for that amount .

6958. The check was negotiated by Mr. Grandmont , but the

705promised repairs were not accomplished.

7109 . On November 4, 2005, sub sequent to Hurricane Wilma,

721Ella Arseneau , of Lake Worth, Florida, was contacted by

730Mr. Grandmont, who offered to replace h er roof. He provided an

742estimate of $5,500 in return for repairing Ms. Arseneau's

752residence. He demanded that she pay $ 3,500 in ad vance , which

765Ms. Arseneau provided by presenting Mr. Grandmont a check for

775$3,500, drawn on an account in Wachovia Bank.

78410. The check was negotiated by Mr. Grandmont , but the

794roof was not repaired as promised.

80011. Mr. Coe is 78 years of age, Mr. Webst er is 85, and

814Ms. Arseneau is 77.

818CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

8211 2 . The Division of Administrative Hearings has

830jurisdiction over the subject matter of and the parties to this

841proceeding. § 120.57(1), Fla. Stat.

84613. Petitioner has the burden of proving by c le ar and

858convincing evidence the allegations against Respondent. Section

865120.57(1)( j ) , Ferris v. Turlington , 510 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 1987);

877and Department of Banking and Finance v. Osborne Stern and Co. ,

888670 So. 2d 932( Fla. 1996). .

8951 4 . Section s 489.105(3) a nd (6) , provide as follows:

907489.105. Definitions

909As used in this part:

914* * *

917(3) ' Contractor ' means the person who is

926qualified for, and shall only be responsible

933for, the project contracted for and means,

940except as exempted in this part, the perso n

949who, for compensation, undertakes to,

954submits a bid to, or does himself or herself

963or by others construct, repair, alter,

969remodel, add to, demolish, subtract from, or

976improve any building or structure, including

982related improvements to real estate, for

988o thers or for resale to others; and whose

997job scope is substantially similar to the

1004job scope described in one of the subsequent

1012paragraphs of this subsection. For the

1018purposes of regulation under this part,

"1024demolish" applies only to demolition of

1030steel t anks over 50 feet in height; towers

1039over 50 feet in height; other structures

1046over 50 feet in height, other than buildings

1054or residences over three stories tall; and

1061buildings or residences over three stories

1067tall. Contractors are subdivided into two

1073divis ions, Division I, consisting of those

1080contractors defined in paragraphs (a) - (c),

1087and Division II, consisting of those

1093contractors defined in paragraphs (d) - (q):

1100(a) 'General contractor' means a contractor

1106whose services are unlimited as to the type

1114of wo rk which he or she may do, who may

1125contract for any activity requiring

1130licensure under this part, and who may

1137perform any work requiring licensure under

1143this part, except as otherwise expressly

1149provided in s. 489.113 .

1154(b) ' Building contractor ' means a

1161co ntractor whose services are limited to

1168construction of commercial buildings and

1173single - dwelling or multiple - dwelling

1180residential buildings, which commercial or

1185residential buildings do not exceed three

1191stories in height, and accessory use

1197structures in con nection therewith or a

1204contractor whose services are limited to

1210remodeling, repair, or improvement of any

1216size building if the services do not affect

1224the structural members of the building.

1230(c) ' Residential contractor ' means a

1237contractor whose services a re limited to

1244construction, remodeling, repair, or

1248improvement of one - family, two - family, or

1257three - family residences not exceeding two

1264habitable stories above no more than one

1271uninhabitable story and accessory use

1276structures in connection therewith.

1280* * *

1283(6) ' Contracting ' means, except as exempted

1291in this part, engaging in business as a

1299contractor and includes, but is not limited

1306to, performance of any of the acts as set

1315forth in subsection (3) which define types

1322of contractors. The attempted sale of

1328c ontracting services and the negotiation or

1335bid for a contract on these services also

1343constitutes contracting. If the services

1348offered require licensure or agent

1353qualification, the offering, negotiation for

1358a bid, or attempted sale of these services

1366requir es the corresponding licensure.

1371However, the term "contracting" shall not

1377extend to an individual, partnership,

1382corporation, trust, or other legal entity

1388that offers to sell or sells completed

1395residences on property on which the

1401individual or business ent ity has any legal

1409or equitable interest, if the services of a

1417qualified contractor certified or registered

1422pursuant to the requirements of this chapter

1429have been or will be retained for the

1437purpose of constructing such residences.

14421 5 . Section 489.127 (1) (f) provides as follows:

1452§ 489.127. Prohibitions; penalties

1456(1) No person shall:

1460* * *

1463(f) Engage in the business or act in the

1472capacity of a contractor or advertise

1478himself or herself or a business

1484organization as available to engage in the

1491busine ss or act in the capacity of a

1500contractor without being duly registered or

1506certified or having a certificate of

1512authority;

1513* * *

15161 6 . Section 489.113(2), provides as follows:

1524489.113. Qualifications for practice;

1528restrictions

1529* * *

1532(2) No person wh o is not certified or

1541registered shall engage in the business of

1548contracting in this state. However, for

1554purposes of complying with the provisions of

1561this chapter, a person who is not certified

1569or registered may perform construction work

1575under the supervi sion of a person who is

1584certified or registered, provided that the

1590work is within the scope of the supervisor's

1598license and provided that the person being

1605supervised is not engaged in construction

1611work which would require a license as a

1619contractor under an y of the categories

1626listed in s. 489.105(3)(d) - (o ) . This

1635subsection does not affect the application

1641of any local construction licensing

1646ordinances. To enforce this subsection:

1651* * *

16541 7 . The evidence of record proves by clear and convincing

1666evidence t hat Mr. Grandmont engaged in contracting without a

1676license on three occasions in 2005, in Lake Worth, Florida, in

1687violation of Section 489.127(1)(f) , Florida Statutes .

169418 . Section 489.13(3) , Florida Statutes , authorizes the

1702Department to impose an admini strative fine in the amount of up

1714to $10,000 for any person found guilty of unlicensed

1724construction contracting. It further provides for reasonable

1731investigative and legal cost s in prosecuting violations.

1739However, no evidence of the amount of investigati ve and legal

1750expense was produced, so no recommendation in that regard is

1760made.

1761RECOMMENDATION

1762Based upon the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it

1773is

1774RECOMMENDED that the Department of Business and

1781Professional Regulation impose a fine upon Cli fford Grandmont in

1791the amount of $30,000.

1796DONE AND ENTERED this 28th day of November, 2006, in

1806Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

1810S

1811HARRY L. HOOPER

1814Administrative Law Judge

1817Division of Administrative Hearings

1821The DeSoto Building

18241230 Apalachee Parkway

1827Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 3060

1832(850) 488 - 9675 SUNCOM 278 - 9675

1840Fax Filing (850) 921 - 6847

1846www.doah.state.fl.us

1847Filed with the Clerk of the

1853Division of Administrative Hearings

1857this 28th of November , 2006 .

1863COPIES FURNISHED :

1866Brian A. Higgins, Esquire

1870D epartment of Business and

1875Professional Regulation

1877Northwood Centre

18791940 North Monroe Street

1883Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 2202

1888Clifford Grandmont

18907733 Park Road

1893Charlotte, North Carolina 28210

1897Nancy S. Terrel, Hearing Officer

1902Office of the General Coun sel

1908Department of Business and

1912Professional Regulation

1914Northwood Centre

19161940 North Monroe Street

1920Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 0792

1925Simone Marstiller, Secretary

1928Department of Business and

1932Professional Regulation

1934Northwood Centre

19361940 North Monroe St reet

1941Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 0792

1946Josefina Tamayo, General Counsel

1950Department of Business and

1954Professional Regulation

1956Northwood Centre

19581940 North Monroe Street

1962Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 0792

1967NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

1973All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

198315 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions

1994to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that

2005will issue the Final Order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
PDF:
Date: 02/27/2007
Proceedings: Final Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/23/2007
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 12/06/2006
Proceedings: Undeliverable envelope returned from the Post Office.
PDF:
Date: 11/28/2006
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 11/28/2006
Proceedings: Recommended Order (hearing held November 2, 2006). CASE CLOSED.
PDF:
Date: 11/28/2006
Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
PDF:
Date: 11/16/2006
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Date: 11/08/2006
Proceedings: Transcript filed.
Date: 11/02/2006
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Date: 10/31/2006
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Proposed Hearing Exhibits filed (not available for viewing).
PDF:
Date: 10/18/2006
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Witness List filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/04/2006
Proceedings: Undeliverable envelope returned from the Post Office.
PDF:
Date: 09/22/2006
Proceedings: Undeliverable envelope returned from the Post Office.
PDF:
Date: 09/22/2006
Proceedings: Undeliverable envelope returned from the Post Office.
PDF:
Date: 09/11/2006
Proceedings: Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
PDF:
Date: 09/11/2006
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing (hearing set for November 2, 2006; 9:00 a.m.; West Palm Beach, FL).
PDF:
Date: 09/11/2006
Proceedings: Order of Consolidation (DOAH Case Nos. 06-3277, 06-3278 and 06-3279).
PDF:
Date: 09/07/2006
Proceedings: Unilateral Response to the Initial Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/31/2006
Proceedings: Initial Order.
PDF:
Date: 08/31/2006
Proceedings: Administrative Complaint filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/31/2006
Proceedings: Election of Rights filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/31/2006
Proceedings: Agency referral filed.

Case Information

Judge:
HARRY L. HOOPER
Date Filed:
08/31/2006
Date Assignment:
08/31/2006
Last Docket Entry:
02/27/2007
Location:
West Palm Beach, Florida
District:
Southern
Agency:
ADOPTED IN PART OR MODIFIED
 

Counsels

Related Florida Statute(s) (6):