06-003665 Teesha Williams vs. North Broward Hospital District
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, November 21, 2006.


View Dockets  
Summary: Petitioner filed a Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice 36 days after the date of the Right to Sue letter send by the Florida Commission on Human Relations. The Petition for Relief was filed untimely and should be dismissed.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8TEESHA WILLIAMS, )

11)

12Petitioner, )

14)

15vs. ) Case No. 06 - 3665

22)

23NORTH BROWARD HOSPITAL )

27DISTRICT, )

29)

30Respondent. )

32_________________________________)

33RECOMMENDED ORDER OF DISMISSAL

37This Recommended Or der is entered on the Respondent's

46Revised Motion for Recommended Order of Di smissal, filed

55October 12, 2006; the Petitioner's Response to Respondent's

63Revised Motion for Recommended Order of Dismissal; the

71Respondent's Reply to Petitioner's Response to Re spondent's

79Revised Motion for Recommended Order of Dismissal; and the

88United States Postal Service receipt provided by the Petitioner.

97APPEARANCES

98For Petitioner: Teesha Williams, pro se

1042701 Tarpon Drive

107M iramar, Florida 33023

111For Respondent: Wendy Delvecchio, Esquire

116Conrad & Scherer, LLP

120633 South Federal Highway

124Post Office Box 14723

128Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33302

132STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

136Whether the Petitioner timely filed her Petition for Relief

145from an Unlawful Employment Practice with the Florida Commission

154on Human Relations ("Commission") .

161PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

163On September 19, 2006, Teesha Williams fil ed a Petition for

174Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice with the Commission ,

183in which she alleged that the North Broward Hospital District

193("Hospital District") had discriminated against her on the basis

204of disability. T he Commission transmitted the matter to the

214Division of Administrative Hearings for assignment of an

222administrative law judge on September 25, 2006, and a final

232hearing was scheduled for December 7 and 8, 2006. On

242October 12, 2006, the Hospital District filed Respondent's

250Revised Mot ion for Recommended Order of Dismissal, in which it

261argued that Ms. Williams had filed her petition for relief

271untimely. There was some confusion regarding Ms. William's

279correct address, and the revised motion was not served until

289November 3, 2006. Ms. W illiams filed a response in opposition

300to the motion on November 8, 2006, and the Hospital District

311filed a reply to the response on November 13, 2006.

321Ms. Williams included several factual assertions in her

329response in opposition to the revised motion, an d a telephone

340conference was held on November 13, 2006, with Ms. Williams and

351counsel for the Hospital District. During the telephone

359conference, Ms. Williams was asked to provide the undersigned

368with the receipt she had received from the United States Po stal

380Service ("USPS") when she mailed the petition for relief to the

393Commission. Ms. Williams filed the receipt by facsimile

401transmittal on November 14, 2006.

406FINDINGS OF FACT

409Based on the oral and documentary evidence presented at the

419final hearing and on the entire record of this proceeding, the

430following findings of fact are made:

4361. The Commission is the state agency charged with

445investigating and acting upon complaints filed under Florida's

453Civil Rights Act, Sections 760. 01 - 760.11, Florida Statutes

463(2006). 1 § 760.06, Fla. Stat.

4692. On August 14, 2006, the Commission issued a Right to

480Sue notice, in which it informed Ms. Williams, among other

490things, that

492the FCHR hereby issues this Right to Sue.

500Since it has been more than 180 days since

509your comp laint was filed, and since no

517determination was made within 180 days, you

524are entitled to pursue the case as if the

533FCHR issued a Determination of Reasonable

539Cause. . . . ( Citation omitted).

546You may pursue this case in the Division of

555Administrative Heari ngs by filing a Petition

562for Relief with the FCHR within 35 days from

571the date of this Right to Sue letter, or you

581may file a lawsuit in a circuit court of the

591State of Florida anytime within one year

598from the date of this Right to Sue letter,

607provided suc h time period is not more than

616four years from the date the alleged

623violation occurred.

6253 . Pursuant to the terms of this notice, Ms. Williams was

637required to file her Petition for Relief with the FCHR no later

649than 35 days from the date of the August 14, 2006, notice, that

662is, no later than Septemb er 18, 2006.

6704 . Ms. Williams completed and signed a Petition for Relief

681from an Unlawful Employment Practice on September 14, 2006.

6905 . A receipt from the USPS establishes that, on

700September 17, 2006, the USPS accepted a letter from Ms. Williams

711addressed to the Commission; that the letter was sent via

721express mail; that neither next - day nor second - day delivery was

734selected; that a third opt ion for delivery, "Add Del Day," was

746selected . The scheduled date of de livery stated on the receipt

758was September 20, 2006.

7626 . Ms. Williams's Petition for Relief from an Unlawful

772Employment Practice was received by the Commission on

780September 19, 2006.

7837 . The USPS tracking web site shows that the letter

794assigned number EQ 62 8681913 US was delivered on September 19,

8052006.

806CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

8098 . The Division of Administrative Hearings has

817jurisdiction over the subject matter of this proceeding and of

827the parties thereto pursuant to Sections 120.569 and 1 20.57(1),

837Florida Stat utes .

8419 . Section 760.11, Florida Statutes, provides in pertinent

850part:

8514) In the event that the commission

858determines that there is reasonable cause to

865believe that a discriminatory practice has

871occurred in violation of the Florida Civil

878Rights Act of 19 92, t he aggrieved person may

888either:

889(a) Bring a civil action against the person

897named in the complaint in any court of

905competent jurisdiction; or

908(b) Request an administrative hearing under

914ss. 120.568 and 120.57.

918The election by the aggrieved perso n of

926filing a civil action or requesting an

933administrative hearing under this subsection

938is the exclusive procedure available to the

945aggrieved person pursuant to this act

951* * *

954(6) Any administrative hearing brought

959pursuant to paragraph (4)(b) shall be

965conducted under ss. 120.569 and 120.57. The

972commission may hear the case provided that

979the final order is issued by members of the

988commission who did not conduct the hearing

995or the commission may request that it be

1003heard by an administrative law judge

1009pu rsuant to s. 120.569 (2)(a). If the

1017commission elects to hear the case, it may

1025be heard by a commissioner. If the

1032commissioner, after the hearing, finds that

1038a violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act

1046of 1992 has occurred, the commissioner shall

1053issue an appropriate proposed order in

1059accordance with chap ter 120 prohibiting the

1066practice and providing affirmative relief

1071from the effects of the practice, including

1078back pay. If the administrative law judge,

1085after the hearing, finds that a violation of

1093the Fl orida Civil Rights Act of 1992 has

1102occurred, the administrative law judge shall

1108issue an appropriate recommended order in

1114accordance with chapter 120 prohibiting the

1120practice and providing affirmative relief

1125from the effects of the practice, including

1132back pay. Within 90 days of the date the

1141recommended or proposed order is rendered,

1147the commission shall issue a final order by

1155adopting, rejecting, or modifying the

1160recommended order as provided under

1165ss. 120.569 and 120.57. The 90 - day period

1174may be extende d with the consent of all the

1184parties. An administrative hearing pursuant

1189to paragraph (4)(b) must be requested no

1196later than 35 days after the date of

1204determination of reasonable cause by the

1210commission. In any action or proceeding

1216under this subsection , the commission, in

1222its discretion, may allow the prevailing

1228party a reasonable attorney's fee as part of

1236the costs. It is the intent of the

1244Legislature that this provision for

1249attorney's fees be interpreted in a manner

1256consistent with federal case law i nvolving a

1264Title VII action .

1268(Emphasis added.)

127010 . The Commission did not make its determination as to

1281whether there was reasonable cause to believe that Ms. Williams

1291had been subjected to unlawful discrimination within the

1299statutorily - required 180 days from the date Ms. Williams filed

1310her complaint. Ms. Williams was, therefore, permitted to

1318proceed as though the Commission had issued a Determination of

1328Reasonable Cause. § 760.11(8), Fla. Stat.

133411 . In Wilson v. Brevard County Clerk of the Circuit

1345Cour t , 31 Fla. L. Weekly D2452 (Fla. 5th DCA September 26,

13572006), the court held that a petition for relief from an

1368unlawful unemployment practice seeking an administrative hearing

1375under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes, must be

1384received by the Co mmission no later than 35 days after the date

1397of the notice of the Commission's determination and that a

1407petition filed 36 days after the date of the notice was properly

1419dismissed as untimely.

142212 . The court in Wilson found that the doctrine of

1433equitable t olling could be applied to excuse the late - filing of

1446a petition for relief. Quoting the court in Machules v.

1456Department of Administration , 523 So. 2d 1132 , 1134 (Fla. 1988),

1466the court in Wilson noted that one of three circumstances must

1477be proven in order for the doctrine of equitable tolling to

1488apply : "'Generally, the tolling doctrine has been applied when

1498the plaintiff has been mislead or lulled into inaction, has in

1509some extraordinary wa y been prevented from asserting his rights,

1519or has timely asserted his rights mistakenly in the wrong

1529forum.'"

153013 . Ms. Williams has not established any circumstance that

1540would excuse the late - filing of her Petition for Relief from an

1553Unlawful Employment Practice under th e doctrine of equitable

1562tolling . In her response in opposition to the Hospital

1572District's Revised Motion f or Recommended Order of Dismissal ,

1581Ms. Williams stated that "[t]he additional time required for the

1591US Postal Service to deliver the Petition was not within the

1602control of the Petitioner." The USPS receipt provided by

1611Ms. Williams clearly shows, however, that she did not ask for

"1622next - day" delivery, which would have ensured timely delivery of

1633her petition on September 18, 2006, but, rather, requested a

1643different option that would guarantee delivery o n September 20,

16532006. Under these circumstances, the late - filing of the

1663petition cannot be excused, and her Petition for Relief from an

1674Unlawful Employment Practice should be dismissed.

1680RECOMMENDATION

1681Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusio ns of

1692Law, it is RECOMMENDED that the Florida Commission on Human

1702Relations enter a final order dismissing the Petition for Relief

1712from an Unlawful Employment Practice filed by Teesha Williams.

1721DONE AND ENTERED this 21st day of November , 2 006 , in

1732Tallahas see, Leon County, Florida.

1737S

1738___________________________________

1739PATRICIA M. HART

1742Administrative Law Judge

1745Division of Administrative Hearings

1749The DeSoto Building

17521230 Apalachee Parkway

1755Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 3060

1760(850) 488 - 9675 SUNCOM 278 - 9675

1768Fax Filing (850) 921 - 6847

1774www.doah.state.fl.us

1775Filed with the Clerk of the

1781Division of Administrative Hearings

1785thi s 21st day of November , 200 6 .

1794ENDNOTE

17951 / All references to the Florida Statutes shall be to the 2006

1808edition unless otherwise noted.

1812COPIES FURNISHED:

1814Denise Crawford, Agency Clerk

1818Florida Commission on Human Relations

18232009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100

1828Tallahassee, Florida 32301

1831William R. Scherer, III, Esquire

1836Wendy A. Delvecchio, Esquire

1840Co nrad & Scherer

1844633 South Federal Highway

1848Post Office Box 14723

1852Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33302

1856Teesha Williams

18582701 Tarpon Drive

1861Miramar, Florida 33023

1864Cecil Howard, General Counsel

1868Florida Commission on Human Relations

18732009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 10 0

1879Tallahassee, Florida 32301

1882NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

1888All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

189815 days from the date of this recommended order. Any exceptions

1909to this recommended order should be filed with the agency that

1920will issue the final order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
PDF:
Date: 02/15/2007
Proceedings: Final Order Dismissing Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/14/2007
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 11/21/2006
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 11/21/2006
Proceedings: Recommended Order of Dismissal. CASE CLOSED.
PDF:
Date: 11/21/2006
Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
PDF:
Date: 11/15/2006
Proceedings: Letter to Judge Hart from W. Delvecchio regarding the telephone status conference filed.
PDF:
Date: 11/14/2006
Proceedings: Letter to Judge Hart from T. Williams enclosing requested information filed.
PDF:
Date: 11/13/2006
Proceedings: Respondent`s Reply to Petitioner`s Response to Revised Motion for Recommended Order of Dismissal, and Request to Continue Final Hearing filed.
PDF:
Date: 11/08/2006
Proceedings: Petition Response to Respondents Revised Motion for Recommended Order of Dismissal filed.
PDF:
Date: 11/08/2006
Proceedings: Petitioner Response to Initial Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 11/06/2006
Proceedings: Letter to Judge Hart from W. Delvecchio enclosing a copy of the November 3, 2006 "Contractor Daily Manifest/Invoice" filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/30/2006
Proceedings: Letter to Judge Hart and D. Crawford from W. Delvecchio regarding possible address for the Petitioner filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/12/2006
Proceedings: Respondent`s Revised Motion for Recommended Order of Dismissal filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/12/2006
Proceedings: Respondent`s Answer to Petition for Relief filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/12/2006
Proceedings: Respondent`s Motion for Recommended Order of Dismissal filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/12/2006
Proceedings: Agency`s court reporter confirmation letter filed with the Judge.
PDF:
Date: 10/09/2006
Proceedings: Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
PDF:
Date: 10/09/2006
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for December 7 and 8, 2006; 9:00 a.m.; Lauderdale Lakes and Tallahassee, FL).
PDF:
Date: 10/02/2006
Proceedings: Respondent`s Response to Initial Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/02/2006
Proceedings: Notice of Appearance (filed by W. Delvecchio).
PDF:
Date: 09/25/2006
Proceedings: Initial Order.
PDF:
Date: 09/25/2006
Proceedings: Charge of Discrimination filed.
PDF:
Date: 09/25/2006
Proceedings: Right to Sue filed.
PDF:
Date: 09/25/2006
Proceedings: Petition for Relief filed.
PDF:
Date: 09/25/2006
Proceedings: Transmittal of Petition filed by the Agency.

Case Information

Judge:
PATRICIA M. HART
Date Filed:
09/25/2006
Date Assignment:
09/25/2006
Last Docket Entry:
02/15/2007
Location:
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida
District:
Southern
Agency:
ADOPTED IN TOTO
 

Counsels

Related Florida Statute(s) (4):