07-004377PL Department Of Business And Professional Regulation, Construction Industry Licensing Board vs. Greg Alan Roach
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Monday, March 31, 2008.


View Dockets  
Summary: Respondent failed to pull the permit, failed to get inspections and abandoned the project.

1Case Nos. 07-4376PL

407-4377PL

5STATE OF FLORIDA

8DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

12DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND )

17PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, RECOMMENDED ORDER )

22CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING )

26BOARD, )

28Petitioner, )

30)

31vs. )

33)

34GREG ALAN ROACH, )

38)

39Respondent. )

41)

42)

43Pursuant to notice, a final hearing was held in this

53consolidated case on February 5, 2008, in Orlando, Florida,

62before Susan B. Harrell, a designated Administrative Law Judge

71of the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH).

78APPEARANCES

79For Petitioner: Collin W. L. Mcleod, Esquire

86Wright, Fulford, Moorhead & Brown, P.A.

92145 North Magnolia Avenue

96Orlando, Florida 32803

99For Respondent: (No appearance)

103STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES

107The issues in Case No. 07-4376PL are whether Respondent

116and 489.129(1)(j), (m), and (o), Florida Statutes (2004), 1 and,

126if so, what discipline should be imposed.

133The issues in Case No. 07-4377PL are whether Respondent

142violated Subsections 489.1425(1), and 489.129(1)(i) and (o),

149Florida Statutes, and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.

159PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

161On March 16, 2006, the Department of Business and

170Professional Regulation (Department) filed a two-count

176Administrative Complaint against Respondent, Greg Alan Roach

183(Mr. Roach), alleging that Mr. Roach violated Subsections

191On June 30, 2006, the Department, filed a five-count

200Administrative Complaint against Mr. Roach, alleging that

207Mr. Roach violated Subsections 489.129(1)(i), 489.119(2),

213(m), and (o), Florida Statutes.

218In both instances, Mr. Roach requested an administrative

226hearing, and the cases were forwarded to DOAH on September 20,

2372007, for assignment to an Administrative Law Judge. The cases

247were originally assigned to Administrative Law Judge, Charles C.

256Adams. The cases were transferred to the undersigned

264Administrative Law Judge on October 9, 2007. For Case No. 07-

2754376PL, a final hearing was initially scheduled for December 4,

2852007, and for Case No. 07-4377PL, a final hearing was initially

296scheduled for December 11, 2007.

301In both cases, a Motion for Substitution of Counsel was

311filed by the Department on October 25, 2007, to request the

322substitution of its counsel, and the requests were granted.

331On November 15, 2007, a Motion to Consolidate and Continue

341Hearings was filed by the Department. A motion hearing was held

352by telephonic conference, and ultimately, on November 21, 2007,

361two orders were issued granting the requests set forth in the

372Department's motion. The first order consolidated Case Nos. 07-

3814376PL and 07-4377PL; the second order granted a continuance to

391the parties and re-scheduled the final hearing to February 5,

4012008.

402On January 16, 2008, the Department filed a Motion for

412Summary Final Order, or in the Alternative Petitioner's Motion

421to Relinquish Jurisdiction. A motion hearing was held by

430telephonic conference, and both of the requests set forth in the

441Department's motion were denied.

445On February 5, 2008, in Orlando, Florida, the final hearing

455was scheduled to commence at 9:00 a.m. Neither the Respondent,

465Mr. Roach, nor a party acting as his representative appeared at

476the scheduled time. The commencement of the final hearing was

486delayed 20 minutes to allow Mr. Roach time to attend the final

498hearing. The undersigned contacted DOAH, but Mr. Roach had not

508contacted DOAH to advise as to why he had not appeared. The

520final hearing commenced at 9:20 a.m., and neither Mr. Roach nor

531a representative of Mr. Roach appeared at the final hearing.

541As a preliminary matter, the requests for admissions

549contained in both of Petitioner's First Requests for Admissions

558to Respondent were deemed admitted pursuant to Florida Rules of

568Civil Procedure 1.370(a), and admitted into evidence as

576Petitioner's Exhibits 1 and 2.

581In Case No. 07-4376PL, the Department presented the

589testimony of one witness, Alywin Pang (Mr. Pang), and

598Petitioner's Exhibits 1 through 12 were admitted into evidence.

607In Case No. 07-4377PL, the Department presented the testimony of

617two witnesses, Nilda Perez (Ms. Perez) and Darlene Talley

626(Ms. Talley), and Petitioner's Exhibits 13 through 16 were

635admitted into evidence.

638The record was held open to allow the Department to file

649the final orders in Mr. Roach's prior disciplinary cases. On

659February 11, 2008, the Department filed the Final Order in DBPR

670No. 2005-041224. This Final Order is admitted as Petitioner's

679Exhibit 14.

681The Transcript of the final hearing was filed on

690February 26, 2008. The Department filed its Proposed

698Recommended Order on March 7, 2008. No proposed recommended

707order has been filed by Mr. Roach. The Department's Proposed

717Recommended Order has been given consideration in the

725preparation of this Recommended Order.

730FINDINGS OF FACT

7331. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating

742the practice of contracting pursuant to Section 20.165 and

751Chapters 455 and 489, Florida Statutes.

7572. Mr. Roach is, and was at all times material to this

769action, a certified roofing contractor in the State of Florida

779having been issued License No. CCC1326005.

7853. Mr. Roach's Certified Roofing Contractor License

792No. CCC1326005 is current and active.

7984. Mr. Roach's current addresses of record are Post Office

808Box 345, Orange Springs, Florida, and 22204 U.S. Highway 301,

818Hawthorne, Florida.

8205. At all times material to this action, Mr. Roach was a

832licensed qualifier for All Florida Roofing Contractors, Inc.

840(All Florida).

8426. There is evidence in the record sufficient to establish

852that Mr. Roach has been previously disciplined for a violation

862under Chapter 489, Florida Statutes. Notably, Mr. Roach has

871been previously disciplined for, among other things, violations

879of Subsections 489.129(1)(m) and (o), Florida Statutes.

886Case No. 07-4376PL

8897. Mr. Roach failed to obtain a Certificate of Authority

899for All Florida, as required by Subsection 489.119(2), Florida

908Statutes.

9098. On or about August 23, 2004, Mr. Pang contracted with

920Mr. Roach, to remove and replace the hurricane-damaged roof of

930his hotel property located at 1620 West Vine Street, Kissimmee,

940Florida.

9419. The contract price for the aforementioned project was

950$40,000.00. Mr. Pang made an initial payment of $2,250.00 on

962August 22, 2004, and another payment of $20,000.00 on August 23,

9742004.

97510. As part of the contract, All Florida was required to

986pull the building permits for the project, and Mr. Roach failed

997to do this.

100011. Mr. Roach commenced work on the project on or about

1011September 7, 2004. On or about late September 2004, he ceased

1022work on the project, and the project remained unfinished.

103112. Mr. Pang paid All Florida an additional $10,000.00 on

1042September 16, 2004.

104513. On October 1, 2004, the City of Kissimmee issued a

1056Notice of Violation against Mr. Pang for failure to have a

1067building permit for the work that had been performed by

1077Mr. Roach on the roof.

108214. Mr. Roach scheduled repairs on the project, but did

1092not return to the project.

109715. Mr. Roach did not have any inspections performed on

1107the roof.

110916. Later, another contractor hired by Mr. Pang finished

1118the roofing project at a cost of an additional $32,975.00.

1129Case No. 07-4377PL

113217. On or about September 15, 2004, Ms. Perez contracted

1142with Mr. Roach to repair roof damage to her residence at 1502

1154Golden Poppy Court, Orlando, Florida.

115918. The contract price for the aforementioned project was

1168$7,268.32, of which Mr. Roach was paid $3,634.16 on

1179September 18, 2004.

118219. The contract entered into between Ms. Perez and

1191Mr. Roach failed to inform the homeowner of the Construction

1201Industry Recovery Fund.

120420. On or about October 27, 2004, the Orange County

1214Building Department issued Mr. Roach a permit for the

1223aforementioned project (Permit No. T04018050).

122821. Mr. Roach did not have any inspections performed on

1238the roof.

124022. On September 25, 2004, Ms. Perez paid $3,614.16 to All

1252Florida, which was the remaining amount of the contract.

126123. Another contractor was hired by Ms Perez to correct

1271deficient aspects of Mr. Roach's work on the roof at a cost of

1284$900.00.

1285CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

128824. The Division of Administrative Hearings has

1295jurisdiction over the parties to and the subject matter of this

1306proceeding. §§ 120.569 and 120.57, Fla. Stat. (2007).

131425. The Department has the burden to establish the

1323allegations in the Administrative Complaints by clear and

1331convincing evidence. Department of Banking and Finance v.

1339Osborne Stern and Co. , 670 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 1996). In Case

1351No. 07-4376PL, the Department alleged that Mr. Roach violated

1360Subsection 489.129(1)(i), Florida Statutes, by failing to comply

1368with Subsection 489.119(2), Florida Statutes, and Subsection

1375489.126(2)(a), Florida Statutes. The Department also alleged

1382Florida Statutes.

138426. In Case No. 07-4377PL, the Department alleged that

1393Mr. Roach violated Subsection 489.129(1)(i), Florida Statutes,

1400by failing to comply with Subsection 489.1425(1), Florida

1408Statutes. The Department also alleged that Mr. Roach violated

1417Subsection 489.129(1)(o), Florida Statutes.

142127. Subsection 489.129(1), Florida Statutes, provides that

1428the following constitutes grounds for disciplinary action:

1435(i) Failing in any material respect to

1442comply with the provisions of this part or

1450violating a rule or lawful order of the

1458board.

1459* * *

1462(j) Abandoning a construction project in

1468which the contractor is engaged or under

1475contract as a contractor. A project may be

1483presumed abandoned after 90 days if the

1490contractor terminates the project without

1495just cause or without proper notification to

1502the owner, including the reason for

1508termination, or fails to perform work

1514without just cause for 90 consecutive days.

1521* * *

1524(m) Committing incompetency or misconduct

1529in the practice of contracting.

1534* * *

1537(o) Proceeding on any job without obtaining

1544applicable local building department permits

1549and inspections.

155128. Subsection 489.119(2), Florida Statutes, provides:

1557(2) If the applicant proposes to engage in

1565contracting as a business organization,

1570including any partnership, corporation,

1574business trust, or other legal entity, or in

1582any name other than the applicant's legal

1589name or a fictitious name where the

1596applicant is doing business as a sole

1603proprietorship, the business organization

1607must apply for a certificate of authority

1614through a qualifying agent and under the

1621fictitious name, if any.

162529. Subsection 489.126(2)(a), Florida Statutes, provides:

1631(2) A contractor who receives, as initial

1638payment, money totaling more than 10 percent

1645of the contract price for repair,

1651restoration, improvement, or construction to

1656residential real property must:

1660(a) Apply for permits necessary to do work

1668within 30 days after the date payment is

1676made. . . .

168030. Subsection 489.1425(1), Florida Statutes, provides:

1686(1) Any agreement or contract for repair,

1693restoration, improvement, or construction to

1698residential real property must contain a

1704written statement explaining the consumer's

1709rights under the recovery fund, except where

1716the value of all labor and materials does

1724not exceed $2,500. . . .

173131. The clear and convincing evidence established that

1739Mr. Roach was the primary qualifying agent for All Florida at

1750all materially relevant times. Subsection 489.1195(1)(a),

1756Florida Statutes, provides:

1759(1) A qualifying agent is a primary

1766qualifying agent unless he or she is the

1774secondary qualifying agent under this

1779section.

1780(a) All primary qualifying agents for a

1787business organization are jointly and

1792equally responsible for supervision of all

1798operations of the business organization; for

1804all field work at all sites; and for

1812financial matters, both for the organization

1818in general and for each specific job.

1825As the primary qualifying agent for All Florida, Mr. Roach is

1836jointly and equally responsible for the work that was performed

1846on the roofs of Mr. and Mrs. Pang and Ms. Perez.

1857Case No. 07-4376PL

186032. In regard to Case No. 07-4376PL, the Department

1869established by clear and convincing evidence that Mr. Roach

1878engaged in the business of contracting via the corporate entity

1888of All Florida without first obtaining a Certificate of

1897Authority, as required by Subsection 489.119(2), Florida

1904Statutes. In so doing, Mr. Roach violated Subsection

1912489.129(1)(i), Florida Statutes, by failing, in a material

1920respect, to comply with the provisions of Chapter 489, Part I,

1931Florida Statutes.

193333. The Department concedes in its Proposed Recommended

1941Order that Subsection 489.126(2)(a) cannot apply to Mr. Roach in

1951this instance. 2

195434. The Department established by clear and convincing

1962evidence that Mr. Roach violated Subsection 489.129(1)(j),

1969Florida Statutes. Mr. Roach abandoned work on the project, in

1979late September 2004, and never returned. The project remained

1988unfinished at that time, with scheduled repairs yet to be

1998completed.

199935. The Department established by clear and convincing

2007evidence that Mr. Roach violated Subsection 489.129(1)(o),

2014Florida Statutes, by failing to obtain the appropriate

2022permitting or inspection for the roofing project.

202936. The Department established by clear and convincing

2037evidence that Mr. Roach violated Subsection 489.129(1)(m),

2044Florida Statutes, through incompetency and misconduct in the

2052contracting work he performed for Mr. Pang. The record

2061evidences that Mr. Roach failed to pull the proper permits,

2071abandoned the project, and failed to set inspections.

2079Case No. 07-4377PL

208237. In regard to Case No. 07-4377PL, the Department

2091established by clear and convincing evidence that Mr. Roach

2100entered into a contract, exceeding $2,500, with Ms. Perez that

2111failed to notify her of her rights under the Construction

2121Industry Recovery Fund, as required by Subsection 489.1425(1),

2129Florida Statutes. In so doing, Mr. Roach violated Subsection

2138489.129(1)(i), Florida Statutes, by failing, in a material

2146respect, to comply with the provisions of Chapter 489, Part I,

2157Florida Statutes.

215938. The Department established by clear and convincing

2167evidence that Mr. Roach violated Subsection 489.129(1)(o),

2174Florida Statutes, by failing to obtain the appropriate

2182inspection of the roofing project.

218739. The Department has established that Mr. Roach has been

2197previously disciplined for violations under Chapter 489, Florida

2205Statutes, including, but not limited to, violations of

2213Subsections 489.129(1)(i), (m) and (o), Florida Statutes;

2220Subsection 489.119(3)(a), Florida Statutes; and Subsection

2226489.1425(1), Florida Statutes (Petitioner's Exhibit 14).

2232Florida Administrative Code Rule 61G4-17.003 provides:

2238(1) As used in this rule, a repeat

2246violation is any violation on which

2252disciplinary action is being taken where the

2259same licensee had previously had

2264disciplinary action taken against him or

2270received a letter of guidance in a prior

2278case; and said definition is to apply

2285regardless of whether the violations in the

2292present and prior disciplinary actions are

2298of the same or different subsections of the

2306disciplinary statutes.

2308(2) The penalty given in the above list for

2317repeat violations is intended to apply only

2324to situations where the repeat violation is

2331of a different subsection of Chapter 489,

2338F.S., than the first violation. Where, on

2345the other hand, the repeat violation is the

2353very same type of violation as the first

2361violation, the penalty set out above will

2368generally be increased over what is

2374otherwise shown for repeat violations in the

2381above list.

2383The increased administrative penalties for repeat offenders

2390provided in the guidelines of Rule 61G4-17.001, Florida

2398Administrative Code are applicable when recommending the

2405appropriate penalties for Mr. Roach. Moreover, pursuant to

2413Florida Administrative Code Rule 61G4-17.003(2), the violations

2420of Subsections 489.129(1)(m) and (o) may have their penalties

2429increased over and above those listed in Florida Administrative

2438Code Rule 61G4-17.001, as these are repeat violations of the

2448same subsection.

245040. The costs of investigation and prosecution, excluding

2458attorney time, in this consolidated case are to be assessed by

2469the board pursuant to Florida Administrative Code Rule 61G4-

247817.001(4), (2007), which provides:

2482(4) In addition, the board shall assess the

2490costs of investigation and prosecution,

2495excluding costs related to attorney time.

2501However, since no evidence was presented at the final hearing on

2512the Department's costs, no reasonable basis can be formed as to

2523what the costs may have been.

252941. The board is required to order Mr. Roach to make

2540restitution to Mr. and Mrs. Pang and Ms. Perez for the financial

2552losses to them suffered as a result of contracting with All

2563Florida to repair their roofs, pursuant to Florida

2571Administrative Code Rule 61G4-17.001(4), which provides:

2577(4) For any violation occurring after

2583October 1, 1998, the board shall order the

2591contractor to make restitution in the amount

2598of financial loss suffered by the consumer.

2605Such restitution shall be ordered in

2611addition to the penalties provided by these

2618guidelines upon demonstration of aggravating

2623factors set forth in the subsection 61G4-

263017.002(1), F.A.C., and to the extent that

2637such order does not contravene federal

2643bankruptcy law.

2645The evidence showed that All Florida was paid a total of

2656$32,250.00 by Mr. Pang for work that in the end had to be almost

2671entirely redone. After Mr. Roach fled the scene, later

2680corrective work performed on the roof totaled $32,750. It's

2690unclear what, if any, work of actual value was provided by

2701Mr. Roach to Mr. Pang, but assuming that what Mr. Pang

2712ultimately received was a $40,000 roof, then Mr. Pang's economic

2723loss is $25,000. As for Ms. Perez, the evidence showed that she

2736paid an additional $900 to another contractor to correct the

2746work Mr. Roach performed on her roof, so that is her economic

2758loss.

275942. Florida Administrative Code Rule 61G4-17.002 contains

2766the relevant aggravating and mitigating factors used in

2774determining whether restitution should be given to a wronged

2783consumer and provides,

2786Circumstances which may be considered for

2792the purposes of mitigation or aggravation of

2799penalty shall include, but are not limited

2806to, the following:

2809(1) Monetary or other damage to the

2816licensee's customer, in any way associated

2822with the violation, which damage the

2828licensee has not relieved, as of the time

2836the penalty is to be assessed. (This

2843provision shall not be given effect to the

2851extent it would contravene federal

2856bankruptcy law.)

2858(2) Actual job-site violations of building

2864codes, or conditions exhibiting gross

2869negligence, incompetence, or misconduct by

2874the licensee, which have not been corrected

2881as of the time the penalty is being

2889assessed.

2890(3) The danger to the public.

2896(4) The number of complaints filed against

2903the licensee.

2905(5) The length of time the licensee has

2913practiced.

2914(6) The actual damage, physical or

2920otherwise, to the licensee's customer.

2925(7) The deterrent effect of the penalty

2932imposed.

2933(8) The effect of the penalty upon the

2941licensee's livelihood.

2943(9) Any efforts at rehabilitation.

2948(10) Any other mitigating or aggravating

2954circumstances.

2955Of the above, factors (1), (2), and (4) are the most applicable

2967to the facts of these cases. Both the Pangs and Ms. Perez

2979suffered unrelieved money damages. Also, Mr. Pang was issued a

2989Notice of Violation for a lack of permitting on the roof work

3001conducted by Mr. Roach that doubled the fee for obtaining the

3012permit in the future.

3016RECOMMENDATION

3017Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of

3027Law, it is

3030RECOMMENDED that a final order be entered whose outcome is

3040the following:

30421. That in Case No. 07-4376PL Respondent violated

30502. Dismiss Count II of the Administrative Complaint in

3059Case No. 07-4376PL;

30623. In Case No. 07-4376PL, imposing an administrative fine

3071of $1,000.00 for the violation of Subsection 489.129(1)(i),

3080Florida Statutes; imposing an administrative fine of $5,000.00

3089for the violation of Subsection 489.129(1)(j), Florida Statutes;

3097imposing an administrative fine of $2,500 for the violation of

3108Subsection 489.129(1)(o), Florida Statutes; no administrative

3114fine is recommended for the violation of 489.129(1)(m), Florida

3123Statutes, because the violation is included in the violations of

3133Subsections 489.129(1)(j) and (o), Florida Statutes;

31394. That in Case No. 07-4377PL, Respondent violated

3147Subsections 489.129(1)(i) and (o), Florida Statutes;

31535. In Case No. 07-4377PL, imposing an administrative fine

3162of $1,000 for the violation of Subsection 489.129(1)(i), Florida

3172Statutes; imposing an administrative fine of $2,500 for the

3182violation of Subsection 489.129(1)(o), Florida Statutes;

31886. Requiring Respondent to make Restitution to Mr. and

3197Mrs. Pang in the amount of $25,000;

32057. Requiring Respondent to make Restitution to Ms. Perez

3214in the amount of $900; and

32208. Revoking Respondent's contractor license.

3225DONE AND ENTERED this 31st day of March, 2008, in

3235Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

3239S

3240SUSAN B. HARRELL

3243Administrative Law Judge

3246Division of Administrative Hearings

3250The DeSoto Building

32531230 Apalachee Parkway

3256Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

3259(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

3263Fax Filing (850) 921-6847

3267www.doah.state.fl.us

3268Filed with the Clerk of the

3274Division of Administrative Hearings

3278this 31st day of March, 2008.

3284ENDNOTES

32851/ All references to Florida Statutes and Florida Administrative

3294Code are to 2004, unless otherwise indicated.

33012/ Subsection 489.126(a) applies only to residential buildings,

3309whereas this roofing repair was performed on a commercial

3318building.

3319COPIES FURNISHED :

3322Collin W. L. Mcleod, Esquire

3327Wright, Fulford, Moorhead & Brown, P.A.

3333145 North Magnolia Avenue

3337Orlando, Florida 32803

3340Greg Alan Roach

3343Post Office Box 345

3347Orange Springs, Florida 32182

3351Ned Luczynski, General Counsel

3355Department of Business and

3359Professional Regulation

3361Northwood Centre

33631940 North Monroe Street

3367Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792

3370G. W. Harrell, Executive Director

3375Construction Industry Licensing Board

3379Department of Business and

3383Professional Regulation

3385Northwood Centre

33871940 North Monroe Street

3391Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792

3394NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

3400All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

341015 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions

3421to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that

3432will issue the Final Order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
PDF:
Date: 11/26/2008
Proceedings: Final Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 11/25/2008
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 04/07/2008
Proceedings: Undeliverable envelope returned from the Post Office.
PDF:
Date: 03/31/2008
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 03/31/2008
Proceedings: Recommended Order (hearing held February 5, 2008). CASE CLOSED.
PDF:
Date: 03/31/2008
Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
PDF:
Date: 03/07/2008
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Date: 02/26/2008
Proceedings: Transcript filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/11/2008
Proceedings: Notice of Filing (Final Order issued against Respondent) filed.
Date: 02/05/2008
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
PDF:
Date: 01/31/2008
Proceedings: Undeliverable envelope returned from the Post Office.
PDF:
Date: 01/29/2008
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Disclosure of Witnesses filed.
PDF:
Date: 01/25/2008
Proceedings: Notice of Telephonic Motion Hearing (motion hearing set for February 1, 2008; 8:30 a.m.).
PDF:
Date: 01/16/2008
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Motion for Summary Final Order, or in the Alternative Petitioner`s Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
PDF:
Date: 12/04/2007
Proceedings: Petitioner`s First Request for Admissions to Respondent filed.
PDF:
Date: 12/04/2007
Proceedings: Petitioner`s First Request for Production to Respondent filed.
PDF:
Date: 12/04/2007
Proceedings: Notice of Service of Interrogatories filed.
PDF:
Date: 12/04/2007
Proceedings: Petitioner`s First Request for Admissions to Respondent filed.
PDF:
Date: 12/04/2007
Proceedings: Petitioner`s First Request for Production to Respondent filed.
PDF:
Date: 12/04/2007
Proceedings: Notice of Service of Interrogatories filed.
PDF:
Date: 11/21/2007
Proceedings: Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for February 5, 2008; 9:00 a.m.; Orlando, FL).
PDF:
Date: 11/21/2007
Proceedings: Order of Consolidation (DOAH Case Nos. 07-4376PL and 07-4377PL).
PDF:
Date: 11/15/2007
Proceedings: Motion to Consolidate and Continue Hearings filed.
PDF:
Date: 11/02/2007
Proceedings: Petitioner`s First Request for Production to Respondent filed.
PDF:
Date: 11/02/2007
Proceedings: Notice of Service of Interrogatories filed.
PDF:
Date: 11/02/2007
Proceedings: Petitoner`s First Request for Admissions to Respondent filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/30/2007
Proceedings: Order Granting Motion for Substitution of Counsel.
PDF:
Date: 10/25/2007
Proceedings: Motion for Substitution of Counsel (filed by R. Crabill) filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/09/2007
Proceedings: Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
PDF:
Date: 10/09/2007
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing (hearing set for December 11, 2007; 9:00 a.m.; Orlando, FL).
PDF:
Date: 10/09/2007
Proceedings: Notice of Transfer.
PDF:
Date: 10/02/2007
Proceedings: Unilateral Response to Initial Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 09/21/2007
Proceedings: Initial Order.
PDF:
Date: 09/20/2007
Proceedings: Administrative Complaint filed.
PDF:
Date: 09/20/2007
Proceedings: Election of Rights filed.
PDF:
Date: 09/20/2007
Proceedings: Agency referral filed.

Case Information

Judge:
SUSAN BELYEU KIRKLAND
Date Filed:
09/20/2007
Date Assignment:
10/02/2007
Last Docket Entry:
11/26/2008
Location:
Orlando, Florida
District:
Middle
Agency:
ADOPTED IN TOTO
Suffix:
PL
 

Counsels

Related DOAH Cases(s) (2):

Related Florida Statute(s) (10):

Related Florida Rule(s) (3):