08-000467TTS Seminole County School Board vs. Michelle S. Mcghee
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, March 6, 2009.


View Dockets  
Summary: Petitioner did not meet its burden of proof. Respondent`s actions warrant sanctions, but not termination.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8SEMINOLE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, )

13)

14Petitioner, )

16)

17vs. ) Case No. 08-0467

22)

23MICHELLE S. MCGHEE, )

27)

28Respondent. )

30)

31RECOMMENDED ORDER

33Pursuant to notice, a final hearing was conducted in this

43case on January 12, 2009, in Sanford, Florida, before

52Administrative Law Judge R. Bruce McKibben of the Division of

62Administrative Hearings.

64APPEARANCES

65For Petitioner: Ned N. Julian, Jr., Esquire

72Seminole County School Board

76400 East Lake Mary Boulevard

81Sanford, Florida 32773-7127

84For Respondent: Matthew Haynes, Esquire

89Chamblee, Johnson & Haynes, P.A.

94510 Vonderburg Drive, Suite 200

99Brandon, Florida 33511

102STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

106The issue in this case is whether Respondent's employment

115should be terminated by Petitioner.

120PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

122On December 19, 2007, Bill Vogel, Superintendent of

130Seminole County Public Schools, advised Respondent, Michelle S.

138McGhee, via letter that Vogel intended to recommend to

147Petitioner, Seminole County School Board, that Respondent's

154employment be terminated. Respondent timely filed a response to

163the letter, asking for a formal administrative hearing.

171Petitioner then filed a Petition for Termination with the

180Division of Administrative Hearings ("DOAH"), seeking to

189terminate the employment of Respondent.

194At the final hearing, Petitioner called five witnesses:

202Lorry Coats, school secretary at Heathrow Elementary School

210(hereinafter "Heathrow"); Dr. Barbara Nixon, principal at

218Heathrow; Beverly Perrault, executive director of Elementary

225Education; Michelle McGhee; and Dr. Bill Vogel, superintendent

233of Seminole County Public Schools. Petitioner's Exhibits 1, 2,

2425, 6, and 11 through 15 were admitted into evidence. Respondent

253presented the testimony of three witnesses: Neil McGhee,

261Respondent's husband; Barbara Johnson, former teacher at

268Heathrow; and Shannon McGhee, Respondent's daughter. Respondent

275offered Exhibits 1, 3, 4, 7 through 9, and 12, each of which was

289admitted into evidence.

292The parties advised the undersigned that a transcript would

301be ordered of the final hearing. Upon request, the parties were

312given 30 days from the date the transcript was filed at DOAH to

325submit Proposed Recommended Orders. The Transcript was filed at

334DOAH on January 26, 2009. Each party timely submitted a

344Proposed Recommended Order and they were given due consideration

353in the preparation of this Recommended Order.

360FINDINGS OF FACT

3631. Petitioner, Seminole County School Board (the "School

371Board") is the public body responsible for, inter alia , hiring

382and monitoring school teachers for Seminole County Public

390Schools ("SCPS"). Bill Vogel is the superintendent of SCPS.

4012. Respondent is a certified school teacher and has been

411teaching school (primarily for grades 1 through 6) for 24 1/2

422years. Respondent taught school at Heathrow for 16 1/2 years,

432beginning with second grade for three years, first grade for two

443years, then third grade for the duration.

4503. On December 11, 2007, Respondent was suspended from her

460position as a teacher at Heathrow, because she brought a loaded

471handgun to school. Respondent has not worked as a school

481teacher since that day. The circumstances surrounding this

489incident form the issues in this case.

4964. Respondent has a valid concealed weapon or firearm

505license from the State of Florida. The license allows

514Respondent to carry her weapon into public places. Respondent

523owns a Smith & Wesson brand .357 caliber revolver which will be

535referred to hereinafter as the Handgun.

5415. Respondent first obtained her concealed weapons permit

549as a result of two incidents in her life: First, she was

561traveling with her husband and while staying at a motel,

571encountered a very threatening and frightening group of people.

580Respondent and her husband feared for their life and honestly

590believed the group of people may attempt to force their way into

602Respondent's motel room. Respondent and her husband felt

610extremely vulnerable and unable to defend themselves. Second,

618Respondent's home was broken into in 2004 or 2005. As a result

630of these incidents, both Respondent and her husband purchased

639handguns, took the requisite classes and training, and then

648obtained concealed weapons permits.

6526. Respondent took all appropriate safety classes after

660purchasing the Handgun. She trains monthly by firing the

669Handgun at a firing range and routinely reviews safety rules

679relating to ownership and discharge of a firearm.

6877. On December 11, 2007, Respondent was having plumbing

696work done at her home. Respondent met the plumber at her house

708at around 3:00 in the afternoon. Respondent's husband was not

718home at that time. Feeling uncomfortable with the presence of

728the plumber inside her house, Respondent took the Handgun from

738its secure location in her bedroom and placed it in a table

750drawer in the living room. Respondent sat next to that table

761while the plumber was in her home. Respondent's husband arrived

771home about 4:30 p.m.

7758. After dinner, Respondent and her husband sat in the

785living room for after-dinner coffee. At that time, the husband

795noticed the Handgun in the table drawer. It was highly unusual

806for the Handgun to be anywhere except its secured location in

817Respondent's nightstand, so he questioned Respondent as to why.

826Respondent told him about her discomfort with the plumber, then

836said she was going grocery shopping later and would be taking

847the Handgun with her (in accordance with her normal practice).

8579. Respondent then set the Handgun on her purse, a large

868black leather bag. The Handgun, in a black holster, set atop

879the purse and blended into the black leather of the purse.

89010. Respondent and her husband sat in the living room for

901a while, but Respondent began to feel ill and decided not to go

914shopping after all. (Respondent had recently had knee

922replacement surgery and was still in some pain and using pain

933medications.) Instead, Respondent fell asleep in the living

941room and then later moved to her bedroom for the night.

95211. The next morning, Respondent prepared for school as

961normal. She normally kept her school papers and work materials

971in a collapsible crate which had wheels and an extended handle.

982As she regularly did, Respondent placed her purse and cell phone

993on top of the crate and wheeled it out to her car. The Handgun

1007was still on top of the purse, but Respondent did not notice it.

102012. Upon arrival at Heathrow, Respondent parked in the

1029same parking lot she normally used, the one adjacent to the "bus

1041loop" where school buses dropped off students each morning.

1050Respondent took her crate out of her car and wheeled it toward

1062the school building. As she crossed a short strip of grass just

1074before reaching the bus loop, the Handgun and cell phone

1084apparently jostled off the purse and fell onto the ground.

1094Respondent did not notice the items fall and went on into the

1106school building. 1

110913. A few minutes later, Lorry Coats, the school secretary

1119at Heathrow, also parked her car in the same lot. As she walked

1132toward the school, she saw something on the ground. Upon closer

1143examination she found two items, Respondent's cell phone and

1152the Handgun. Coats picked up both items and took them into the

1164school administration building, being careful to conceal the

1172Handgun so as not to alarm anyone.

117914. Once inside the administration building, Coats

1186notified Dr. Barbara Nixon, Heathrow's principal, about the

1194Handgun and cell phone. A search was conducted and Nixon

1204determined that Respondent was the owner of the cell phone.

1214Nixon called Respondent in Respondent's classroom and let her

1223know that the items had been found.

123015. Respondent was very distraught when she discovered

1238that she had 1) brought her Handgun to school, and 2) dropped it

1251on the premises. She knows better than to bring a weapon on

1263campus and had no intention of doing so.

127116. Nixon called Respondent to the office and then called

1281the police to report the incident. Respondent was then placed

1291under arrest for possession of a firearm on school property and

1302culpable negligence (exposing a person to possible injury). The

1311first charge was a third-degree felony; the second was a second-

1322degree misdemeanor. Both charges were eventually dismissed

1329(nolle prossed) by the State Attorney's Office.

133617. Respondent was then placed on suspension by the

1345superintendent of SCPS pending a final decision by the School

1355Board.

135618. Possession of a loaded firearm on campus is, according

1366to the superintendent, the most serious offense a person could

1376commit. It is the most dangerous situation for students, staff,

1386and visitors. Respondent committed an "extreme act of

1394carelessness" that warrants a severe penalty, according to

1402Superintendent Vogel.

140419. Vogel addressed two other incidents involving the

1412possession of weapons on campus, but distinguished them as less

1422serious.

142320. The first weapons incident involved the possession of

1432a replica weapon by a student. The student intentionally

1441brought the replica weapon to school and brandished it in a

1452threatening manner. The student emerged from a school restroom

1461and took a "shooting stance" toward police officers. After

1470failing to heed warnings and continuing to point his replica

1480weapon at SWAT team members, the student was shot to death by

1492police.

149321. The second weapons incident involved another teacher

1501at Heathrow. The teacher, Mr. Diesbourg, drove to school with a

1512BB rifle on the roof of his car. Diesbourg had placed the BB

1525rifle on his car after shooting at a raccoon or squirrel at his

1538house. He forgot about the rifle being on his car and drove to

1551school. The rifle was noticed by another staff member and

1561safely put away before being seen by students or visitors. This

1572incident happened just eight days after the incident involving

1581Respondent.

158222. Later, Diesbourg drove to school with a pruning saw in

1593his car. The pruning saw, left in plain sight in his unlocked

1605vehicle, was a "weapon" as far as school policy is concerned.

1616Again, once it was discovered by someone, the weapon was safely

1627put away. 2

163023. Diesbourg was given a ten-day suspension without pay

1639for the BB rifle incident. He was given a letter of concern for

1652the pruning saw incident.

165624. Clearly, a loaded .357 caliber revolver is more

1665dangerous than a replica firearm, or a BB rifle, or a pruning

1677saw.

167825. Respondent is extremely sorry that she inadvertently

1686brought the Handgun onto the Heathrow campus. She certainly did

1696not intend to do so and knows better than to do so. Her remorse

1710is clear and sincere.

171426. Further, after suffering the consequences of her

1722action (suspension from the job she loves, arrest by law

1732enforcement, depression and loss of self esteem), there is

1741little chance Respondent would ever make the same mistake.

1750There is probably no teacher under contract with SCPS who would

1761be more careful about such things than Respondent.

176927. Nonetheless, Principal Nixon has some concerns about

1777Respondent returning to Heathrow. She was concerned that

1785something like this might happen again (although that seems

1794unlikely when viewing the demeanor and sincerity of Respondent).

1803Nixon also thinks that some parents may ask to have their

1814children transferred from Respondent's class due to their (the

1823parents') fear that Respondent would bring the Handgun to school

1833again. There is no competent substantial evidence to support

1842Nixon's concern, but, of course, the possibility exists that

1851some parents would be more fearful than others.

185928. Respondent has a clear record as a teacher. She has

1870not been reprimanded or sanctioned in any fashion during her

188024 plus years in the classroom. She is respected by peers and

1892by her students and their parents. Importantly, Respondent

1900loves her profession and is deeply committed to teaching

1909children.

191029. While no one was injured or physically harmed by the

1921incident involving Respondent's Handgun, the possibility of some

1929harm did exist.

1932CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

193530. The Division of Administrative Hearings has

1942jurisdiction over the parties to and the subject matter of this

1953proceeding pursuant to Section 120.569 and Subsection 120.57(1),

1961Florida Statutes (2008). 3

196531. McGhee is a classroom teacher under the definition of

1975instructional personnel as set forth in Subsection

19821012.01(2)(a), Florida Statutes.

198532. The School Board has the authority to terminate a

1995classroom teacher pursuant to Section 1012.33, Florida Statutes.

2003However, a teacher may only be terminated for just cause. Just

2014cause includes immorality, misconduct in office, incompetency,

2021gross insubordination, willful neglect of duty, or conviction of

2030a crime involving moral turpitude. § 1012.33(1)(a).

203733. The burden of proof is on the party asserting the

2048affirmative of an issue before an administrative tribunal.

2056Florida Department of Transportation v. J.W.C. Company, Inc. ,

2064396 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). In this matter, Petitioner

2076has the burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that

2088the allegations against Respondent are true and warrant

2096termination of Respondent's contract. See Sublett v. Sumter

2104County School Board , 664 So. 2d 1178 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); and

2116Dileo v. School Board of Dade County , 569 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 3rd

2129DCA 1990).

213134. Teachers or students who bring weapons onto school

2140property are subject to punishment. The greater the danger, the

2150greater the degree of punishment. However, as opined by

2159Superintendent Vogel at the final hearing, "Every circumstance

2167is different." Therefore, the facts of each case must be

2177examined before the proper penalty can be imposed.

218535. No one argues that Respondent's failure to secure her

2195firearm and to allow it on campus was a serious breach of

2207safety. There is a "zero tolerance" at SCPS schools for

2217teachers or students who bring weapons on campus. That is, it

2228is a violation to bring a weapon on campus, and each violation

2240of that policy will be punished. The question in the instant

2251matter is what degree of punishment should be meted out.

226136. In the Diesbourg case (discussed above), the teacher

2270did not bring an inherently dangerous weapon on campus. The BB

2281rifle, while a dangerous instrument, will not normally be used

2291to fatally wound a person. A .357 handgun, on the other hand,

2303will easily inflict mortal damage. But consider the case of the

2314student with the replica firearm: A replica will not inflict

2324mortal injury, but, in that case, the end result was death of

2336the student. That scenario could easily have been repeated with

2346Diesbourg's BB rifle. Yet his punishment was a ten-day

2355suspension. And when he brought yet another weapon, the pruning

2365saw, to school later, his punishment was again less than the

2376maximum.

237737. Conversely, Respondent's weapon was deadly in and of

2386itself. If a child or other person had found the Handgun, they

2398could have intentionally or accidentally killed someone with it.

2407Luckily the Handgun was only on the ground for a few short

2419minutes and was found by a responsible individual.

242738. To-date, Respondent has lost over one year's pay while

2437on suspension. She has suffered depression and loss of self

2447esteem and confidence. Despite that fact, she continues to

2456yearn for the opportunity to resume her chosen profession. She

2466is, clearly, remorseful for her mistake and had no intention to

2477violate the policy.

248039. The facts of this case are very similar to those in

2492Hernando County School Board v. Ellison , DOAH Case No. 05-4195

2502(February 23, 2006). Ellison unintentionally left a firearm in

2511the glove box of his truck. When the school's auto mechanics

2522class removed the glove box while working on the truck, the

2533firearm was discovered. The students turned the weapon over to

2543their teacher who, in turn, gave it to a Sheriff's deputy. The

2555school board sought termination of Ellison's contract. As in

2564the instant case, Ellison was found to be remorseful, to have

2575been an excellent teacher, and to have committed the violation

2585unintentionally. Deputy Chief Judge Hooper, in his Recommended

2593Order, stated:

2595If one balances this single careless act

2602committed by Mr. Ellison with the overall

2609good to be gained by allowing Mr. Ellison

2617to continue his career as a teacher in the

2626Hernando County School District, the

2631inevitable conclusion is that just cause

2637for termination is absent.

264140. Judge Hooper's eloquent statement is equally

2648applicable to the facts of this case. Respondent has a long,

2659unblemished history with SCPS and is well respected as a

2669teacher. It makes no sense to terminate her teaching contract

2679on the basis of a single mistake.

268641. Further, just as in the case of School Board of

2697Pinellas County v. Hollis , DOAH Case No. 89-2447 (September 25,

27071989), the scienter of intent is missing in the present action.

2718The evidence in the instant case is clear, bringing the weapon

2729on campus occurred due to a series of events which are

2740understandable. Respondent testimony as to those facts is

2748credible and persuading. She did not intend to bring the weapon

2759on campus, period. So, like Hollis, Respondent was guilty of

"2769[s]erious negligence, but under the terms and Rules applicable

2778in this case, negligence does not, under the circumstances of

2788this case, equate to misconduct sufficient to justify dismissal

2797after an honorable and long-standing period of employment."

2805Hollis , at Par. 37-40.

280942. It has even been held that an intentional violation of

2820the no-weapons-on-campus policy does not warrant termination of

2828a contract. See Polk County School Board v. Bradley , DOAH Case

2839No. 07-3721 (December 6, 2007). Respondent's unintentional

2846violation certainly does not warrant a more severe penalty.

285543. Petitioner has not met its burden of proof in this

2866case to establish that termination of Respondent's employment

2874contract is the appropriate sanction for Respondent's singular

2882act of negligence.

2885RECOMMENDATION

2886Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of

2896Law, it is

2899RECOMMENDED that a final order be entered by Petitioner,

2908Seminole County School Board, imposing the following punishment

2916against Respondent, Michelle S. McGhee:

29211. Written letter of reprimand for her negligence;

29292. Suspension from teaching from December 12, 2007, until

2938the commencement of the 2009-2010 school year in August 2009;

29483. A period of probation for her first year back in the

2960classroom.

2961DONE AND ENTERED this 6th day of March, 2009, in

2971Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

2975R. BRUCE MCKIBBEN

2978Administrative Law Judge

2981Division of Administrative Hearings

2985The DeSoto Building

29881230 Apalachee Parkway

2991Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

2994(850) 488-9675

2996Fax Filing (850) 921-6847

3000www.doah.state.fl.us

3001Filed with the Clerk of the

3007Division of Administrative Hearings

3011this 6th day of March, 2009.

3017ENDNOTES

30181/ It should be noted that the Handgun fell onto the ground on

3031the side of the bus loop away from the school bus doors. That

3044is, students being dropped off by the bus would not be walking

3056on the side of the loop on which the Handgun was found. That is

3070not to say a student would not spot the Handgun through the bus

3083window and go to investigate, but the Handgun was not in an area

3096normally used by students getting to school.

31032/ Coincidentally, the pruning saw was discovered by a

3112Department of Education prosecutor who was on campus to

3121investigate another incident.

31243/ Unless otherwise stated herein, all references to Florida

3133Statutes shall be to the 2008 version.

3140COPIES FURNISHED :

3143Dr. Eric Smith

3146Commissioner of Education

3149Department of Education

3152Turlington Building, Suite 1514

3156325 West Gaines Street

3160Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400

3163Deborah K. Kearney, General Counsel

3168Department of Education

3171Turlington Building, Suite 1514

3175325 West Gaines Street

3179Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400

3182Dr. Bill Vogel

3185Superintendent of Schools

3188Seminole County School Board

3192400 East Lake Mary Boulevard

3197Sanford, Florida 32773-7127

3200Ned N. Julian, Jr., Esquire

3205Seminole County School Board

3209400 East Lake Mary Boulevard

3214Sanford, Florida 32773-7127

3217Matthew Haynes, Esquire

3220Chamblee, Johnson & Haynes, P.A.

3225510 Vonderburg Drive, Suite 200

3230Brandon, Florida 33511

3233NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

3239All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

324915 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions

3260to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that

3271will issue the Final Order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
PDF:
Date: 04/17/2009
Proceedings: (Agency) Final Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/14/2009
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 03/11/2009
Proceedings: Letter to parties of record from Judge Mckibben enclosing the originals of Petitioner`s Exhibits 5 and 6.
PDF:
Date: 03/06/2009
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 03/06/2009
Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
PDF:
Date: 03/06/2009
Proceedings: Recommended Order (hearing held January 12, 2009). CASE CLOSED.
PDF:
Date: 02/25/2009
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/17/2009
Proceedings: Respondent`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Date: 01/26/2009
Proceedings: Transcript filed.
PDF:
Date: 01/20/2009
Proceedings: Letter to Judge McKibben from N. Julian enclosing Petitioner`s Exhibits 5 and 6 filed.
Date: 01/12/2009
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
PDF:
Date: 01/07/2009
Proceedings: Addendum to Respondent`s Witness List filed.
PDF:
Date: 01/07/2009
Proceedings: Respondent`s Supplement to Exhibit List filed.
PDF:
Date: 11/24/2008
Proceedings: Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for January 12, 2009; 9:00 a.m.; Sanford, FL).
PDF:
Date: 11/21/2008
Proceedings: Emergency Motion for Continuance filed w/judge at hearing.
Date: 11/21/2008
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Partially Held; continued to January 12, 2009; 9:00 a.m.; Sanford, FL.
PDF:
Date: 11/19/2008
Proceedings: Respondent`s Supplement To Exhibit List filed.
PDF:
Date: 11/17/2008
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Supplement to Exhibit List filed.
PDF:
Date: 11/17/2008
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Notice of Request to Take Judicial Notice filed.
PDF:
Date: 11/14/2008
Proceedings: Notice of Transfer.
PDF:
Date: 11/12/2008
Proceedings: Joint Pre-Hearing Stipulation filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/10/2008
Proceedings: Notice of Service of Answers to Interrogatories (1st Set) filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/10/2008
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Response to Respondent`s First Request for Production of Documents and Things filed.
PDF:
Date: 09/30/2008
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition filed.
PDF:
Date: 09/02/2008
Proceedings: Order Granting Continuance, Re-scheduling Hearing, and Denying Request for Scheduling Conference (hearing set for November 21, 2008; 9:30 a.m.; Sanford, FL).
PDF:
Date: 08/29/2008
Proceedings: Joint Motion for Rescheduling (Continuance) of the Final Hearing and Request for Scheduling Conference filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/21/2008
Proceedings: Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
PDF:
Date: 08/21/2008
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing (hearing set for September 19, 2008; 9:30 a.m.; Sanford, FL).
PDF:
Date: 08/11/2008
Proceedings: Status Report filed.
PDF:
Date: 07/28/2008
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition (M. McGhee) filed.
PDF:
Date: 07/16/2008
Proceedings: Notice of Change of Address filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/16/2008
Proceedings: Order Continuing Case in Abeyance (parties to advise status by August 11, 2008).
PDF:
Date: 06/16/2008
Proceedings: Status Report filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/20/2008
Proceedings: Order Continuing Case in Abeyance (parties to advise status by June 16, 2008).
PDF:
Date: 05/05/2008
Proceedings: Status Report filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/21/2008
Proceedings: Order Granting Continuance and Placing Case in Abeyance (parties to advise status by May 5, 2008).
PDF:
Date: 02/15/2008
Proceedings: Motion for Continuance filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/14/2008
Proceedings: Petitioner`s First Request for Production of Documents filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/14/2008
Proceedings: Notice of Service of Interrogatories (First Set) filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/04/2008
Proceedings: Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
PDF:
Date: 02/04/2008
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing (hearing set for April 4, 2008; 9:30 a.m.; Sanford, FL).
PDF:
Date: 01/29/2008
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Response to Initial Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 01/28/2008
Proceedings: Notice of Appearance (filed by M. Haynes).
PDF:
Date: 01/25/2008
Proceedings: Request for Administrative Hearing filed.
PDF:
Date: 01/25/2008
Proceedings: Petition for Termination filed.
PDF:
Date: 01/25/2008
Proceedings: Agency referral filed.
PDF:
Date: 01/25/2008
Proceedings: Initial Order.

Case Information

Judge:
R. BRUCE MCKIBBEN
Date Filed:
01/25/2008
Date Assignment:
01/06/2009
Last Docket Entry:
04/17/2009
Location:
Sanford, Florida
District:
Middle
Agency:
ADOPTED IN TOTO
Suffix:
TTS
 

Counsels

Related DOAH Cases(s) (4):

Related Florida Statute(s) (4):