08-001627
Peace Industry Group, Inc., And Mobility Tech, Inc. vs.
Discount Scooters, Inc.
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Wednesday, November 19, 2008.
Recommended Order on Wednesday, November 19, 2008.
1STATE OF FLORIDA
4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
8PEACE INDUSTRY GROUP, INC., )
13AND MOBILITY TECH, INC., )
18)
19Petitioners, )
21)
22vs. ) Case No. 08-1627
27)
28DISCOUNT SCOOTERS, INC., )
32)
33Respondent. )
35)
36RECOMMENDED ORDER
38Pursuant to notice, a hearing was conducted in this case
48before Carolyn S. Holifield, a duly-designated Administrative
55Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings on
64October 7, 2008, in Tampa, Florida.
70APPEARANCES
71For Petitioners: No appearance
75For Respondent: Brooke S. Gentile
80Discount Scooters, Inc.
835908 North Armenia Avenue
87Tampa, Florida 33603
90STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
94The issue is whether Petitioners should be permitted to
103establish an additional dealership for the sale of motorcycles
112manufactured by Astronautical Bashan Motorcycle Manufacturer
118Company, Ltd., at 5720 North Florida Avenue, Tampa, Florida.
127PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
129On March 7, 2008, a notice was published in the Florida
140Administrative Weekly that pursuant to Section 320.642, Florida
148Statutes (2007), 1 Petitioner, Peace Industry Group, Inc. ("Peace
158Industry"), intended "to allow the establishment of [Petitioner]
167Mobility Tech, Inc. ["Mobility Tech"], as a dealership for the
179sale of motorcycles manufactured by Astronautical Bashan
186Motorcycle Manufacture Company, Ltd. (BASH), at 5720 North
194Florida Avenue, Tampa (Hillsborough County), Florida
20033604. . . ." On March 31, 2008, Respondent, Discount Scooters,
211Inc. ("Respondent"), filed with the Department of Highway Safety
222and Motor Vehicles ("Department") a "petition or complaint"
232protesting the establishment of the additional dealership at the
241proposed location. The matter was referred to the Division of
251Administrative Hearings on April 3, 2008, to conduct the final
261hearing.
262This final hearing was scheduled for October 7, 2008.
271Petitioners and Respondent were provided with written notice in
280accordance with Subsection 120.569(2)(b), Florida Statutes. The
287notice, in the form of a Notice of Hearing, was mailed on
299May 27, 2008, to Petitioners and to Respondent at their
309respective addresses of record.
313As noted above, the final hearing in the case was held, as
325noticed, on October 7, 2008. Despite the undersigned's waiting
334about an hour to convene the hearing, Petitioners did not appear
345to present their case. Respondent appeared at hearing through
354its representative, Brooke S. Gentile.
359Respondent presented the testimony of Brooke S. Gentile,
367owner of Discount Scooters, Inc., and offered and had four
377exhibits received into evidence.
381The proceeding was recorded, but was not transcribed.
389Neither of the parties submitted proposed recommended orders.
397FINDINGS OF FACT
400Based on the evidence adduced at hearing and the record as
411a whole, the following Findings of Fact are made:
4201. On March 7, 2008, the Florida Administrative Weekly
429published a notice that Peace Industry Group intended to allow
439the establishment of Mobility Tech as a dealership for the sale
450of motorcycles manufactured by BASH at 5720 North Florida Avenue
460in Tampa (Hillsborough County), Florida. The notice also stated
469that the "new point" location for the proposed dealership is in
480a "county of more than 300,000 population, according to the
491latest population estimates of the University of Florida, Bureau
500of Economic and Business Research."
5052. Respondent is an existing franchised dealer of
513motorcycles manufactured by BASH.
5173. Respondent's dealership is located at 5908 North
525Armenia Avenue in Tampa, Florida.
5304. The driving distance between Respondent's dealership
537and the location of the new dealership that Peace Industry
547proposes to establish is 2.05 miles.
553CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
5565. The Division of Administrative Hearings has
563jurisdiction of the subject matter of and the parties to this
574proceeding. §§ 120.569 and 120.57(1), Fla. Stat. (2008).
5826. The Department is the agency responsible for regulating
591the licensing and franchising of motor vehicle dealers.
599§ 320.60 through 320.70, Fla. Stat.
6057. Peace Industry Group and Mobility Tech are seeking the
615Department's approval of a proposal to establish a new
624dealership for the sale of motorcycles manufactured by BASH at
6345720 North Florida Avenue in Tampa, Florida, pursuant to Section
644320.642, Florida Statutes.
6478. Subsection 320.642(1), Florida Statutes, requires a
654motor vehicle dealer who proposes to establish an additional
663motor vehicle dealership within an area already represented by
672the same line-make vehicle to give written notice to the
682Department of its intent. The Department is then required to
692publish the notice in the Florida Administrative Weekly.
700§ 320.642, Fla. Stat.
7049. Subsection 320.642(2)(a), Florida Statutes, provides
710that approval of a motor vehicle dealer's proposal to establish
720an additional dealership within an area where the same line-make
730dealer is represented shall be denied if:
7371. A timely protest is filed by a
745presently existing franchised motor vehicle
750dealer with standing to protest as defined
757in subsection (3); and
7612. The licensee fails to show that the
769existing franchised dealer or dealers who
775register new motor vehicle retail sales or
782retail leases of the same line-make in the
790community or territory of the proposed
796dealership are not providing adequate
801representation of such line-make motor
806vehicles in such community or territory.
812The burden of proof in establishing
818inadequate representation shall be on the
824licensee.
82510. Subsection 320.642(3), Florida Statutes, sets forth
832the requirements an existing franchised motor vehicle dealer
840must meet in order to have standing to protest a proposed
851additional dealership. That section provides in pertinent part:
859(3) An existing franchised motor vehicle
865dealer or dealers shall have standing to
872protest a proposed additional or relocated
878motor vehicle dealer where the existing
884motor vehicle dealer or dealers have a
891franchise agreement for the same line-make
897vehicle to be sold or serviced by the
905proposed additional or relocated motor
910vehicle dealer and are physically located so
917as to meet or satisfy any of the following
926requirements or conditions:
929* * *
932(b) If the proposed additional or
938relocated motor vehicle dealer is to be
945located in a county with a population of
953more than 300,000 according to the most
961recent data of the United States Census
968Bureau or the data of the Bureau of Economic
977and Business Research of the University of
984Florida:
9851. Any existing motor vehicle dealer or
992dealers of the same line-make have a
999licensed franchise location within a radius
1005of 12.5 miles of the location of the
1013proposed additional or relocated motor
1018vehicle dealer; or . . . .
102511. In this case, the evidence established that Respondent
1034is an existing motor vehicle dealer which has a franchise
1044agreement for the same line-make vehicle to be sold by the
1055proposed additional motor vehicle dealer. The record also
1063established that the proposed additional motor vehicle dealer is
1072to be located in a county with a population of more than 300,000
1086according to the most recent data of the Bureau of Economic
1097Research of the University of Florida. Finally, the evidence
1106established that Respondent, the existing dealership, has a
1114licensed franchise location within a radius of 12.5 miles of the
1125location of the proposed additional motor vehicle dealer.
113312. For the reasons stated in paragraph 11, Respondent has
1143standing to file a protest in this case.
115113. Where, as in this case, Respondent filed a protest and
1162established that it has standing to do so, Petitioners, as
1172licensees, must meet the burden of proof enunciated in
1181Subsection 320.642(2)(a)2., Florida Statutes. According to that
1188provision, Respondent must establish that the existing
1195franchised dealer is not providing adequate representation of
1203the line-make motor vehicles in the subject territory.
121114. In this case, Petitioners, as licensees, failed to
1220appear at the hearing after proper notice of the hearing was
1231issued. Thus, no evidence was presented to establish that
1240Respondent was not providing adequate representation of the
1248line-make motor vehicles in the territory in which the proposed
1258dealership intends to locate. Absent such evidence, Petitioners
1266failed to meet their burden of proof.
127315. Having failed to meet their burden of proof, the
1283RECOMMENDATION
1284Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
1294Law, it is
1297RECOMMENDED that the Department of Highway Safety and Motor
1306Vehicles issue a final order denying Petitioners, Peace Industry
1315Group, Inc., and Mobility Tech, Inc.'s, approval to establish a
1325new BASH motorcycle dealership at 5720 North Florida Avenue,
1334Tampa, Florida.
1336DONE AND ENTERED this 19th day of November, 2008, in
1346Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
1350S
1351CAROLYN S. HOLIFIELD
1354Administrative Law Judge
1357Division of Administrative Hearings
1361The DeSoto Building
13641230 Apalachee Parkway
1367Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
1370(850) 488-9675
1372Fax Filing (850) 921-6847
1376www.doah.state.fl.us
1377Filed with the Clerk of the
1383Division of Administrative Hearings
1387this 19th day of November, 2008.
1393ENDNOTE
13941/ All references are to 2007 Florida Statutes, unless
1403otherwise indicated.
1405COPIES FURNISHED :
1408Carl Ford, Director
1411Department of Highway Safety
1415and Motor Vehicles
1418Neil Kirkman Building, Room B-439
14232900 Apalachee Parkway
1426Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0635
1429Robin Lotane, General Counsel
1433Department of Highway Safety
1437and Motor Vehicles
1440Neil Kirkman Building
14432900 Apalachee Parkway
1446Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0500
1449Michael J. Alderman, Esquire
1453Department of Highway Safety
1457and Motor Vehicles
1460Neil Kirkman Building, Room A-432
14652900 Apalachee Parkway
1468Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0635
1471Carlos Urbizu
1473Mobility Tech, Inc., d/b/a Charlie's
1478Scooter Depot
14805720 North Florida Avenue, Unit 2
1486Tampa, Florida 33604
1489Brooke S. Gentile
1492Discount Scooters, Inc.
14955908 North Armenia Avenue
1499Tampa, Florida 33603
1502Lily Ji
1504Peace Industry Group, Inc.
15086600-B Jimmy Carter Boulevard
1512Norcross, Georgia 30071
1515NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
1521All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within
153115 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions
1542to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that
1553will issue the Final Order in this case.
- Date
- Proceedings
- PDF:
- Date: 11/19/2008
- Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
- Date: 10/07/2008
- Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/27/2008
- Proceedings: Notice of Hearing (hearing set for October 7, 2008; 9:30 a.m.; Tampa, FL).
- PDF:
- Date: 04/03/2008
- Proceedings: Written Petition or Complaint Against the Intent to Establish a Dealership filed.
Case Information
- Judge:
- CAROLYN S. HOLIFIELD
- Date Filed:
- 04/03/2008
- Date Assignment:
- 04/04/2008
- Last Docket Entry:
- 02/17/2009
- Location:
- Tampa, Florida
- District:
- Middle
- Agency:
- ADOPTED IN TOTO
Counsels
-
Michael James Alderman, Esquire
Address of Record -
Brooke S. Gentile
Address of Record -
Lily Ji
Address of Record -
Carlos Urbizu
Address of Record