08-002710 Department Of Business And Professional Regulation, Division Of Hotels And Restaurants vs. Brisas Del Yunque
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, September 5, 2008.


View Dockets  
Summary: Failure to provide proof of food safety training requires a fine.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND )

13PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, )

16DIVISION OF HOTELS AND )

21RESTAURANTS, )

23)

24Petitioner, )

26)

27vs. ) Case No. 08-2710

32)

33BRISAS DEL YUNQUE, )

37)

38Respondent. )

40)

41RECOMMENDED ORDER

43On July 29, 2008, an administrative hearing in this case

53was held by video teleconference between Tallahassee and

61Orlando, Florida, before William F. Quattlebaum, Administrative

68Law Judge, Division of Administrative Hearings.

74APPEARANCES

75For Petitioner: Ethan Chase Bender,

80Qualified Representative

82Department of Business and

86Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street

92Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202

95For Respondent: Tomas Lopez, pro se

101Brisas del Yunque

10429 South Semoran Boulevard

108Orlando, Florida 32807

111STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES

115The issues in the case are whether the allegations of the

126Administrative Complaint are correct, and, if so, what penalty

135should be imposed.

138PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

140By Administrative Complaint dated February 8, 2008, the

148Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of

156Hotels and Restaurants (Petitioner), alleges that Brisas Del

164Yunque (Respondent), a restaurant owned by Tomas Lopez, was

173found to be in violation of food safety regulations related to

184training of food service employees and to cleaning of microwave

194ovens. 1

196Mr. Lopez disputed the allegations and requested a formal

205administrative hearing. The Petitioner forwarded the matter to

213the Division of Administrative Hearings, which scheduled and

221conducted the formal hearing.

225At the hearing, the Petitioner presented the testimony of

234one witnesses and had Exhibits 1 through 3 admitted into

244evidence. Mr. Lopez testified on behalf of the Respondent.

253The Transcript of the hearing was filed on August 14, 2008.

264The Petitioner filed a Proposed Recommended Order on August 20,

2742008.

275FINDINGS OF FACT

2781. The Petitioner is the state agency charged with

287regulation of hotels and restaurants pursuant to Chapter 509,

296Florida Statutes (2007).

2992. At all times material to this case, the Respondent was

310a restaurant holding Food Service license number 5803705 and

319operating at 29 South Semoran Boulevard, Orlando, Florida 32807.

3283. On October 23, 2007, Alphonso Rullan, a sanitation

337safety specialist employed by the Petitioner, performed a

345routine inspection of the Respondent at which time there were

355employees engaged in food preparation.

3604. At the time of the October 23 inspection, the

370Respondent was unable to provide any evidence that the employees

380had received training in food safety protection.

3875. Mr. Rullan also observed during the October 23

396inspection that the interior of the microwave oven was soiled

406with crusted food material indicating that the oven was not

416being routinely cleaned at least every 24 hours.

4246. Mr. Rullan noted the deficiencies in an inspection

433report, a copy of which was provided to the manager, who was

445identified as "Victor Montenegro."

4497. On January 11, 2008, Mr. Rullan returned to the

459Respondent to perform a call back inspection, during which the

469Respondent was still unable to provide evidence that employees

478had received training in food safety protection. Mr. Rullan

487again observed that the microwave oven was soiled with crusted

497food material indicating that the oven was not being cleaned at

508least every 24 hours. The deficiencies were cited in an

518inspection report which was provided to Mr. Lopez at the time of

530the inspection.

5328. On February 8, 2008, the Petitioner issued an

541Administrative Complaint against the Respondent for failure to

549correct the deficiencies cited herein.

554CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

5579. The Division of Administrative Hearings has

564jurisdiction over the parties to and the subject matter of this

575proceeding. § 120.57, Fla. Stat. (2008).

58110. The Petitioner is the state agency charged with the

591regulation of food service establishments in the State of

600Florida. See Ch. 509, Fla. Stat. (2007). The Petitioner has

610adopted by incorporation the various provisions of the Food Code

620referenced herein. Fla. Admin. Code R. 61C-4.010(1). The

628Petitioner has the burden of proving by clear and convincing

638evidence the allegations set forth in the Administrative

646Complaint against the Respondent. Department of Banking and

654Finance v. Osborne Stern and Company , 670 So. 2d 932 (Fla.

6651996); Ferris v. Turlington , 510 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 1987). In

676this case, the burden has been met.

68311. The Administrative Complaint charged the Respondent

690with a violation of Subsection 509.049(5), Florida Statutes

698(2007), which provides as follows:

703It shall be the duty of each public food

712service establishment to provide training in

718accordance with the described rule to all

725food service employees of the public food

732service establishment. The public food

737service establishment may designate any

742certified food service manager to perform

748this function. Food service employees must

754receive certification within 60 days after

760employment. Certification pursuant to this

765section shall remain valid for 3 years. All

773public food service establishments must

778provide the division with proof of employee

785training upon request, including, but not

791limited to, at the time of any division

799inspection of the establishment. Proof of

805training for each food service employee

811shall include the name of the trained

818employee, the date of birth of the trained

826employee, the date the training occurred,

832and the approved food safety training

838program used.

84012. The evidence establishes that at the time of both the

851initial and the call back inspections, the Respondent failed to

861provide evidence that food service employees had received the

870required food safety training.

87413. The Administrative Complaint also charged the

881Respondent with a violation of Food Code Rule 4-602.12(b), which

891provides as follows:

894The cavities and door seals of microwave

901ovens shall be cleaned at least every

90824 hours by using the manufacturer's

914recommended cleaning procedure.

91714. The evidence establishes that at the time of both the

928initial and the call back inspections, observation of the

937microwave oven indicated that the cavities and door seals were

947not being cleaned in compliance with the rule.

95515. Subsection 509.261(1), Florida Statutes (2007),

961provides that each violation is treated as a separate offense

971and that each offense is punishable by a fine not to exceed

983$1,000 per offense. In addition, offenses may be disciplined by

994required attendance at an educational program sponsored by the

1003Hospitality Education Program, or by suspension, revocation, or

1011refusal of a license.

101516. The Petitioner's Proposed Recommended Order recommends

1022imposition of a total fine of $1,000 in this case. There is no

1036evidence that the penalty sought by the Petitioner is

1045inappropriate according to the range set forth in the statute.

1055RECOMMENDATION

1056Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of

1066Law, it is RECOMMENDED that the Department of Business and

1076Professional Regulation enter a final order imposing a fine of

1086$1,000 against the Respondent and requiring the Respondent to

1096complete an appropriate educational program related to the

1104violations identified herein.

1107DONE AND ENTERED this 5th day of September, 2008, in

1117Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

1121S

1122WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM

1125Administrative Law Judge

1128Division of Administrative Hearings

1132The DeSoto Building

11351230 Apalachee Parkway

1138Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

1141(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

1145Fax Filing (850) 921-6847

1149www.doah.state.fl.us

1150Filed with the Clerk of the

1156Division of Administrative Hearings

1160this 5th day of September, 2008.

1166ENDNOTE

11671/ Additionally, the Administrative Complaint included an

1174allegation related to an "uncovered electrical box behind the

1183cook's line," but the Petitioner withdrew the allegation at the

1193commencement of the hearing and offered no evidence related

1202thereto.

1203COPIES FURNISHED :

1206Ethan Chase Bender

1209Department of Business and

1213Professional Regulation

12151940 North Monroe Street

1219Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202

1222Tomas Lopez

1224Brisas del Yunque

122729 South Semoran Boulevard

1231Orlando, Florida 32807

1234Ned Luczynski, General Counsel

1238Department of Business and

1242Professional Regulation

1244Northwood Centre

12461940 North Monroe Street

1250Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792

1253William L. Veach, Director

1257Division of Hotels and Restaurants

1262Department of Business and

1266Professional Regulation

1268Northwood Centre

12701940 North Monroe Street

1274Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792

1277NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

1283All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

129315 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions

1304to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that

1315will issue the Final Order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
PDF:
Date: 10/20/2008
Proceedings: Final Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/17/2008
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 09/05/2008
Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
PDF:
Date: 09/05/2008
Proceedings: Recommended Order (hearing held July 29, 2008). CASE CLOSED.
PDF:
Date: 09/04/2008
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 08/20/2008
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Date: 08/14/2008
Proceedings: Transcript filed.
Date: 07/29/2008
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
PDF:
Date: 07/22/2008
Proceedings: Order Accepting Qualified Representative.
PDF:
Date: 07/22/2008
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Exhibit List filed.
PDF:
Date: 07/22/2008
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Witness List filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/25/2008
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Motion to Accept Qualified Representative filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/18/2008
Proceedings: Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
PDF:
Date: 06/18/2008
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for July 29, 2008; 9:30 a.m.; Orlando and Tallahassee, FL).
PDF:
Date: 06/17/2008
Proceedings: Response to Initial Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/09/2008
Proceedings: Initial Order.
PDF:
Date: 06/06/2008
Proceedings: Election of Rights filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/06/2008
Proceedings: Administrative Complaint filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/06/2008
Proceedings: Agency referral filed.

Case Information

Judge:
WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM
Date Filed:
06/06/2008
Date Assignment:
06/09/2008
Last Docket Entry:
10/20/2008
Location:
Orlando, Florida
District:
Middle
Agency:
ADOPTED IN TOTO
 

Counsels

Related DOAH Cases(s) (1):

Related Florida Statute(s) (3):

Related Florida Rule(s) (1):