09-002749TTS
Palm Beach County School Board vs.
Rebecca Sorenson
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Wednesday, November 18, 2009.
Recommended Order on Wednesday, November 18, 2009.
1STATE OF FLORIDA
4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
8PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, )
14)
15Petitioner, )
17)
18vs. ) Case No. 09-2749
23)
24REBECCA SORENSEN, )
27)
28Respondent. )
30)
31RECOMMENDED ORDER
33Pursuant to notice, a formal administrative hearing was
41conducted by video teleconference on September 9, 2009, between
50West Palm Beach and Tallahassee, Florida, before Administrative
58Law Judge Claude B. Arrington of the Division of Administrative
68Hearings (DOAH).
70APPEARANCES
71For Petitioner: Vicki L. Evans-Pare, Esquire
77Palm Beach County School Board
82Post Office Box 19239
86West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-9239
91For Respondent: Peter Perettine, Esquire
96190 West Palmetto Park Road
101Boca Raton, Florida 33432
105STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
109Whether Petitioner, Palm Beach County School Board
116(Petitioner or School Board), has just cause to discipline the
126employment of Rebecca Sorensen (Respondent or Ms. Sorensen)
134based on the conduct alleged in the Petition. Also at issue
145is the appropriate penalty, if any.
151PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
153At the times relevant to this proceeding, Ms. Sorensen was
163an assistant principal at Hagen Road Elementary School (Hagen
172Road). On May 15, 2009, the School Board filed a Petition
183against Respondent alleging certain facts pertaining to
190information received by Respondent regarding an allegation of
198sexual abuse against a male fifth-grade student at Hagen Road,
208who, to protect his privacy, will be referred to as Student J.
220Also in an effort to protect the students privacy, Student J.s
231grandfather, who served as his guardian, will be referred to as
242Student J.s grandfather. The alleged abuse occurred at the
251residence of Student J.s grandfather and involved a male adult
261who was serving as a sitter for Student J. while the grandfather
273was hospitalized for medical tests. The male caretaker also
282worked as a counselor at the Hagen Road School Age Child Care
294Program (the after-school care program) during the school day,
303including the hours the after-school program was open. The
312adult sitter will be referred to as the male counselor.
322Based on the factual allegations of the Petition,
330Petitioner asserts that Respondents employment should be
337suspended without pay for ten days.
343By letter dated March 24, 2009, Arthur C. Johnson, Ph.D.,
353Petitioners Superintendent of Schools, advised Respondent in
360writing that he intended to recommend to the School Board at a
372special meeting to take place on April 8, 2009, that he would
384recommended that Respondents employment be suspended without
391pay for ten days. The letter reflects that the recommendation
401was based on allegations of
406. . . failure to exercise best professional
414judgment, failure to report child abuse,
420failure to safeguard a student, misconduct-
426careless disregard for policy/directive/rule
430and violation of 6B-1.001(3), Florida
435Administrative Code, [and] The Code of
441Ethics of the Education Profession in
447Florida. Furthermore, the allegations
451included a violation of School Board Policy
4581.013(1), Responsibility of the School
463District Personnel and Staff and 5.3,
469Reporting Child Abuse, Abandonment, or
474Neglect.
475The letter further reflected the following:
481Sufficient just cause exists for you to be
489disciplined pursuant to Sections
4931012.22(1)(f) and 1012.27(5), Florida
497Statutes; Palm Beach County School District
503Policies 1.013 and 3.27 for violations of
510the foregoing.
512The School Board voted to adopt Superintendent Johnsons
520recommendation. Respondent thereafter requested a formal
526administrative hearing, Petitioner filed its formal petition,
533and the matter was referred to DOAH and this proceeding
543followed.
544The Petition alleges that on September 3, 2008, Respondent
553became aware of Student J.s disclosure that he had been the
564victim of a lewd and lascivious sex act by the male counselor.
576The Petition charges Respondent with failing to report the child
586abuse as required by Section 39.201, Florida Statutes, and
595School Board Policy 5.30. The Petition further charges that the
605failure to report constituted a breach of Respondents
613obligation to the student . . . (to) make reasonable effort to
625protect the student from conditions harmful to learning and/or
634to the students mental and/or physical health and/or safety as
644required by Florida Administrative Code Rule 6B-1.003(3)(a).
651The Petition further alleged that the breach was sufficiently
660serious to impair her effectiveness as an assistant principal at
670the school and constituted a failure to exercise her best
680professional judgment. The Petition alleged that Respondent
687violated School District Policies 1.013 and 5.30; Florida
695Administrative Code Rules 6B-1.001, 6B-1.006(3), and 6B-4-.009;
702and Section 39.201, Florida Statutes.
707At the final hearing, Petitioner presented the testimony of
716Respondent; Cheri Rosen (Assistant Director of the after school
725program); Nicole Lamb (Director of the after school program);
734Richard Hughes (Principal of Hagen Road); Vincent Mintus (a
743Detective on Petitioners police force); and Angelette Green
751(Director of Employee Relations for Petitioner). Petitioner
758offered the following pre-marked Exhibits, each of which was
767admitted into evidence: 1, 2, 6, 7, 10, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 20,
78123, 24, 27, and 28. Respondent offered no further testimony,
791but she offered one exhibit, which was admitted into evidence.
801Unless otherwise noted, all statutory references are to
809Florida Statutes (2009). References to rules are to the rules
819in effect as of the entry of this Recommended Order. The
830relevant statutes and rules have not changed since the date of
841the events at issue.
845As part of their Prehearing Stipulation, the parties
853stipulated to certain facts. Those factual stipulations have
861been incorporated as findings of fact.
867A Transcript of the proceedings, consisting of one volume,
876was filed on October 15, 2009. On a joint motion, the deadline
888for the filing of Proposed Recommended Orders was extended to
898October 30, 2009. Each party filed a Proposed Recommended
907Order, which has been duly-considered by the undersigned in the
917preparation of this Recommended Order.
922FINDINGS OF FACT
9251. At all times material hereto, Petitioner was the
934constitutional entity authorized to operate, control, and
941supervise the public schools in Palm Beach County, Florida.
9502. Respondent has been an employee of the Petitioner since
9601987. At all times relevant to this proceeding, Respondent was
970an assistant principal employed by Petitioner at Hagen Road,
979which is a public elementary school in Palm Beach County,
989Florida.
9903. Petitioners Policy No. 5.30 requires that, (a)
998District employees who know or have reasonable cause to suspect,
1008that a child is an abused, abandoned, or neglected child shall
1019immediately report such knowledge or suspicion to the Department
1028of Children and Families [sic] Florida Abuse Hotline (1-800-
103796ABUSE, 24 hours a day)."
10424. Section 39.201(1)(a), Florida Statutes, provides, as
1049follows:
1050(1)(a) Any person who knows, or has
1057reasonable cause to suspect, that a child is
1065abused, abandoned, or neglected by a parent,
1072legal custodian, caregiver, or other person
1078responsible for the child's welfare,[ 1 ] as
1087defined in this chapter, or that a child is
1096in need of supervision and care and has no
1105parent, legal custodian, or responsible
1110adult relative immediately known and
1115available to provide supervision and care
1121shall report such knowledge or suspicion to
1128the department in the manner prescribed in
1135subsection (2).
1137(b) Reporters in the following occupation
1143categories are required to provide their
1149name to the hotline staff:
1154* * *
11574. School teacher or other school
1163official or personnel;
11665. Respondents position as an Assistant Principal at
1174Hagen Road is included within the definitions of school
1183personnel for purposes of Section 39.201(1)(a), Florida
1190Statutes.
11916. The requirement to report suspected child abuse was
1200reiterated in the Faculty Handbook for Hagen Road for the 2008-
121109 school year.
12147. Cheri Rosen is the assistant director of Hagen Roads
1224after school care program. Ms. Rosens son and Student J. were
1235in the fifth grade during the 2008-09 school year and have been
1247friends since their first grade year. Labor Day fell on
1257September 1 in 2008. On August 28, 2008, the Thursday prior to
1269Labor Day, Student J. spent the night at Ms. Rosens house
1280because his grandfather was hospitalized for medical tests.
1288Student J. told Ms. Rosens daughter of an incident that
1298occurred in December 2007, while Student J. was being baby-sat
1308at his grandfathers house, by the male counselor from the Hagen
1319Road after school care program. Ms. Rosens daughter
1327immediately told her father (Mr. Rosen) who instructed his
1336daughter to tell her mother (Mrs. Rosen). Immediately after her
1346daughter talked to her, Ms. Rosen asked that Student J. come
1357tell her firsthand what had happened.
13638. Student J. told Ms. Rosen that while he was being baby-
1375sat by the male counselor at his grandfathers house in December
13862007, just before winter break, the male counselor had taken a
1397live snake and wrapped it around his (the male counselors)
1407penis and told Student J. to look. Student J. told Ms. Rosen
1419that he looked and then looked away. Student J. related that
1430the male counselor told Student J. now its your turn. Student
1441J. told Ms. Rosen that he said no and walked out of the room.
14559. Ms. Rosen told Student J. that she was going to have to
1468tell his grandfather about the incident, and that she was also
1479going to report this to Ms. Lamb, who was Ms. Rosens supervisor
1491at the after school care program.
149710. Ms. Rosen spoke to Ms. Lamb shortly after her
1507conversation with Student J. Ms. Lamb advised Ms. Rosen that
1517she should tell the Student J.s grandfather that he should
1527contact the police. She further told Ms. Rosen, incorrectly,
1536that she did not have to go through the school because the
1548alleged incident occurred at the residence of Student J.s
1557grandfather, and because Student J. reported the incident at her
1567home.
156811. Two days after Ms. Rosens conversation with Student
1577J., his grandfather returned home from the hospital. Ms. Rosen
1587and her husband visited with the grandfather and related to him
1598the incident as Student J. had related it to them. The
1609grandfather, who tried to remain calm because he has a heart
1620condition, asked what he should do next. Ms. Rosen told him he
1632had to go to the police.
163812. When Ms. Lamb returned to school on September 2, 2008,
1649she had a voice mail from Student J.s grandfather. She tried
1660to return the call, but she could not reach him.
167013. On Thursday, September 4, 2008, Respondent was paged
1679by a Ms. Ciavolino, the school treasurer and bookkeeper.
1688Ms. Ciavolino related that Student J.s grandfather had just
1697called, told her about the incident, and said that he wanted
1708advice from Respondent.
171114. Shortly thereafter on September 4, 2008, Student J.s
1720grandfather called Respondent to talk with her about the
1729incident. The grandfather was hesitant, so Respondent told him
1738what Ms. Ciavolino had told him, and Respondent also told him
1749that she knew he wanted advice. After the grandfather confirmed
1759what Ms. Ciavolino had related to her, Respondent advised the
1769grandfather that the incident needed to be reported right away.
1779She asked the grandfather where he lived in an attempt to
1790determine whether the Delray Beach Police Department (DBPD) or
1799the Palm Beach County Sheriffs Office would have jurisdiction.
1808She also told him that it would need to be reported to the
1821Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS). Although he
1830remained hesitant, the grandfather told Respondent that he would
1839report the incident.
184215. On September 4, 2008, Respondent instructed Ms. Lamb
1851to keep the male counselor away from Student J. and all other
1863students. At that time, the male counselor was preparing to
1873leave in a week or two to join the military. In the interim, he
1887had been assigned to train new counselors, which did not require
1898that he have direct contact with children. The male counselor
1908remained on Hagen Road campus until he was removed as a result
1920of the police investigation that ensued.
192616. Other than her instructions to Ms. Lamb, Respondent
1935took no further action to ensure that the male counselor would
1946have no contact with children.
195117. Respondent did not report the allegation of abuse to
1961her principal (Mr. Hughes), to any law enforcement agency, or to
1972the DCFS. Further, she did not instruct Ms. Rosen, Ms. Lamb, or
1984Ms. Ciavolino to file any type of written report. 2
199418. Respondent testified that she did not feel she had to
2005file a report because Student J.s grandfather agreed to file a
2016report. Respondent further testified that she did not feel she
2026had to file a report because she heard of the allegations from
2038the grandfather and not the student.
204419. On September 9, 2008, Student J.s grandfather
2052reported the incident to the DBPD which immediately began an
2062investigation in conjunction with a DCFS investigator.
206920. As a result of the DBPD/DCFS investigation, Mr. Hughes
2079learned of the allegations and immediately barred the male
2088counselor from the school campus.
209321. Thereafter, Petitioners Police Department began its
2100own investigation of Respondent based on her conduct and failure
2110to act as described in this Recommended Order.
211822. All relevant procedural steps were taken by Petitioner
2127in bringing these charges against Respondent. Part of the
2136procedure requires a pre-disciplinary meeting at which the
2144subject of an investigation is given the opportunity to give his
2155or her version of the events. Respondent declined to attend the
2166pre-disciplinary meeting on advice of counsel because at the
2175time of the meeting a criminal investigation was being
2184conducted. 3
218623. After the pre-disciplinary meeting, the matter was
2194referred to Petitioners Employee Investigatory Committee (EIC), 4
2202who recommended that the subject charges be brought against
2211Respondent with the recommended disposition of a ten-day
2219suspension of employment without pay. That recommendation was
2227forwarded to Dr. Johnson in his capacity of Superintendent of
2237Schools, who agreed with the recommendations of the EIC and
2247submitted the recommendation to the School Board. On April 8,
22572009, the School Board voted to accept the recommendation,
2266subject to Respondents rights pursuant to the provisions of
2275Chapter 120, Florida Statutes.
227924. The greater weight of the credible evidence
2287established that Respondent had a reasonable basis to believe
2296that Student J. had been subjected to sexual abuse and that she
2308did not report that abuse to her principal, the FDCS hotline, or
2320law enforcement.
232225. The greater weight of the credible evidence also
2331established that Respondent took insufficient steps to protect
2339Student J. from the male counselor after she learned of the
2350allegations of abuse. In reaching this finding, the undersigned
2359has considered that Principal Hughes barred the male counselor
2368from school premises as soon as he learned of the allegations.
2379Respondent did not bar the male counselor from the school
2389premises, but merely instructed Ms. Lamb to make sure that the
2400male counselor . . . would not be with children until this was
2413resolved. 5
241526. Respondents employment has not previously been
2422disciplined. Other than the facts set forth above, Respondent
2431has been, in the words of Principal Hughes, a fantastic
2441assistant principal who has performed above expectations. 6
2449CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
245227. The Division of Administrative Hearings has
2459jurisdiction over the subject matter parties to this case
2468pursuant to Sections 120.569 and 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.
247628. Because Petitioner seeks to suspend Respondents
2483employment without pay and does not involve the loss of a
2494license or certification, Petitioner has the burden of proving
2503the allegations in its Administrative Complaint by a
2511preponderance of the evidence, as opposed to the more stringent
2521standard of clear and convincing evidence. McNeill v. Pinellas
2530County School Board , 678 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Allen v.
2543School Board of Dade County , 571 So. 2d 568, 569 (Fla. 3d DCA
25561990); Dileo v. School Board of Lake County , 569 So. 2d 883
2568(Fla. 3d DCA 1990).
257229. The preponderance of the evidence standard requires
2580proof by "the greater weight of the evidence," Black's Law
2590Dictionary 1201 (7th ed. 1999), or evidence that "more likely
2600than not" tends to prove a certain proposition. See Gross v.
2611Lyons , 763 So. 2d 276, 289 n.1 (Fla. 2000)(relying on American
2622Tobacco Co. v. State , 697 So. 2d 1249, 1254 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
2635quoting Bourjaily v. United States , 483 U.S. 171, 175 (1987)).
264530. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1012.27, Florida
2654Statutes, the School Superintendent has the authority to
2662recommend to the School Board that members of the instructional
2672staff be disciplined.
267531. Pursuant to Section 1012.27(1)(f), Florida Statutes,
2682the School Board has the authority to act on such
2692recommendations.
269332. Section 1012.33(6)(b), Florida Statutes, pertains to
2700contracts between school boards and members of the supervisory
2709staff, including school principals, and provides that such a
2718contract can be suspended or terminated for just cause, which
2728includes, relevant to this proceeding, misconduct in office.
273633. Petitioner has charged Respondent with misconduct in
2744office. The State Board of Education has defined the term
2754misconduct in office by Florida Administrative Code Rule 6B-
27634.009(3), as follows:
2766(3) Misconduct in office is defined as a
2774violation of the Code of Ethics of the
2782Education Profession as adopted in Rule 6B-
27891.001, F.A.C., and the Principles of
2795Professional Conduct for the Education
2800Profession in Florida as adopted in Rule 6B-
28081.006, F.A.C., which is so serious as to
2816impair the individuals effectiveness in the
2822school system.
282434. The definition of misconduct in office requires a
2833two-pronged analysis. The first prong is whether the educator
2842violated the Code of Ethics of the Education Profession or the
2853Principles of conduct for the Education Profession in Florida.
2862The second prong is whether the breach is so serious as to
2874impair the individuals effectiveness in the school system.
288235. Petitioner alleged in paragraphs 13 and 14 of its
2892Petition that Respondent failed to file a report of child abuse
2903mandated by Section 39.201, Florida Statutes, and School Board
2912Policy 5.30. Respondent had a reasonable basis for believing
2921that Student J. had been sexually abused in the manner reported
2932to her and consequently she was mandated to file a child abuse
2944report as required by statute and the School Board policy.
2954Respondent failed to do so. The mandatory nature of the rule
2965and the statute did not give Respondent the option she chose,
2976namely, waiting to see if the grandfather would file a complaint
2987with either a law enforcement agency of DFCS.
299536. Petitioner alleged in paragraph 16 through 19 that
3004Respondents failure to report the child abuse violated The
3013Principles of Professional Conduct for the Education Profession
3021in Florida set forth at Florida Administrative Code Rule 6B-
3031the student . . . [to] make reasonable effort to protect the
3043student from conditions harmful to learning and/or to the
3052students mental and/or physical health and/or safety.
3059Petitioner established that Respondent failed to take adequate
3067steps to protect Student J. from the male counselor after
3077Respondent learned of the allegations of abuse from Student J.s
3087grandfather.
308837. Petitioner alleged in paragraph 21 of the Petition
3097that Respondent failed to exercise her best professional
3105judgment in failing to report the allegations of abuse and in
3116failing to protect Student J. from the male counselor.
3125Petitioner relies generally on the provisions of the Code of
3135Conduct of Ethics of the Education Profession in Florida as
3145codified in Florida Administrative Code Rule 6B-1.001.
3152Subsection (2) of the Code includes a requirement that an
3162educator . . . seek to exercise the best professional judgment
3173and integrity. Respondents conduct following her conversation
3180with Student J.s grandfather on September 4, 2008, demonstrated
3189poor judgment and constituted a failure to adhere to the
3199requirements set forth in Florida Administrative Code Rule 6B-
32081.001(2), as alleged in paragraph 21 of the Petition.
321738. Petitioner established the first prong of the two-
3226pronged analysis required by the definition of the term
3235misconduct in office. Petitioner established that
3241Respondents conduct in failing to file mandatory reports
3249required by statute and rule, her failure to take appropriate
3259action to protect Student J. from the male counselor, and her
3270failure to utilize her best professional judgment following her
3279conversation with Student J.s grandfather, violated Florida
3286Administrative Code Rules 6B-1.006(3)(a) and 6B-1.001(2) as
3293alleged in the Petition.
329739. The evidence as to the second prong of the analysis
3308was not as clear as the evidence establishing the first prong.
3319Mr. Hughes received a few calls from members of the public about
3331the incident, and there was at least one newspaper article
3341published about the matter. However, it is clear that
3350Mr. Hughes is pleased with Respondents overall job performance.
3359The only other testimony as to impairment came from Ms. Green,
3370whose background is in law enforcement, not school
3378administration.
337940. Misconduct in office may be established, even in the
3389where the conduct engaged in by the educator is of such a nature
3402that it speaks for itself in terms of its seriousness and its
3414adverse impact on the educators effectiveness. See Purvis v.
3423Marion County School Board , 766 So. 2d 492, 498 (Fla. 5th DCA
34352000); Walker v. Highlands County School Board , 752 So. 2d 127,
3446128-129 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); and Summers v. School Board of
3457Marion County , 666 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). The
3468misconduct at issue in this proceeding is of such a nature.
3479Failing to report an allegation of abuse from an elementary
3489student directed against an employee of that school and failing
3499to immediately take meaningful action to protect that student
3508and the other students from the alleged perpetrator is such a
3519lapse of judgment that it of necessity impairs the effectiveness
3529of an assistant principal.
353341. Petitioner established by the requisite standard that
3541Respondent is guilty of misconduct in office.
3548RECOMMENDATION
3549Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
3559Law, it is RECOMMENDED that Petitioner enter a final order
3569adopting the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law contained
3579in this Recommended Order. It is further RECOMMENDED that the
3589final order suspends Respondents employment without pay for a
3598period of ten days.
3602DONE AND ENTERED this 18th day of November, 2009, in
3612Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
3616___________________________________
3617CLAUDE B. ARRINGTON
3620Administrative Law Judge
3623Division of Administrative Hearings
3627The DeSoto Building
36301230 Apalachee Parkway
3633Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
3636(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675
3640Fax Filing (850) 921-6847
3644www.doah.state.fl.us
3645Filed with the Clerk of the
3651Division of Administrative Hearings
3655this 18th day of November, 2009.
3661ENDNOTES
36621 / Pursuant to Section 30.01(46), Florida Statutes, an adult
3672sitter is an "ther person responsible for the child's welfare."
36822/ Ms. Rosen and Ms. Lamb were subsequently disciplined by
3692Petitioner for their failures to properly report the allegations
3701of abuse.
37033 / On December 8, 2008, an assistant state attorney filed a
3715statement indication that no information would be filed for
3724failure to report child abuse with the following statement:
3733Based on the evidence presented, the State
3740cannot prove the allegations beyond every
3746reasonable doubt. This matter will be
3752handled administratively.
37544 / The EIC is composed of administrators, including an area
3765superintendent, a district administrator, and principals at the
3773high school, middle school, and elementary school levels.
37815 / See Transcript, page 23, beginning at line 16.
37916 / See Transcript, page 63, beginning at line 6.
3801COPIES FURNISHED :
3804Vicki L. Evans-Pare, Esquire
3808Palm Beach County School Board
3813Post Office Box 19239
3817West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-9239
3822Peter Perettine, Esquire
3825190 West Palmetto Park Road
3830Boca Raton, Florida 33432
3834Dr. Arthur C. Johnson, Superintendent
3839Palm Beach County School Board
38443340 Forest Hill Boulevard, C316
3849West Palm Beach, Florida 33406-5869
3854Dr. Eric J. Smith
3858Commissioner of Education
3861Department of Education
3864Turlington Building, Suite 1514
3868325 West Gaines Street
3872Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400
3875Deborah K. Kearney, General Counsel
3880Department of Education
3883Turlington Building, Suite 1244
3887325 West Gaines Street
3891Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400
3894NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
3900All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within
391015 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions
3921to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that
3932will issue the Final Order in this case.
- Date
- Proceedings
- PDF:
- Date: 11/18/2009
- Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
- PDF:
- Date: 10/29/2009
- Proceedings: Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Recommended Orders filed.
- Date: 10/15/2009
- Proceedings: Transcript filed.
- Date: 09/09/2009
- Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
- PDF:
- Date: 09/03/2009
- Proceedings: Petitioner's Exhibit List (exhibits not available for viewing) filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 08/31/2009
- Proceedings: Letter to Judge Arrington from P. Perettine regarding request to file Pre-hearing Stipulations on September 1, 2009 filed.
Case Information
- Judge:
- CLAUDE B. ARRINGTON
- Date Filed:
- 05/19/2009
- Date Assignment:
- 05/19/2009
- Last Docket Entry:
- 04/04/2018
- Location:
- Westbay, Florida
- District:
- Northern
- Agency:
- ADOPTED IN TOTO
- Suffix:
- TTS
Counsels
-
Vicki L. Evans-Pare, Esquire
Address of Record -
Peter Perettine, Esquire
Address of Record -
Peter Edward Perettine, Esquire
Address of Record