09-005335 Department Of Business And Professional Regulation, Division Of Hotels And Restaurants vs. Restaurant El Hondureno Ii
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, December 31, 2009.


View Dockets  
Summary: Petitioner demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated Food Code Rule 6-501.111 as to the failure to control pests. Recommend an administrative fine of $1,000.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND )

13PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, )

16DIVISION OF HOTELS AND )

21RESTAURANTS, )

23)

24Petitioner, )

26)

27vs. ) Case No. 09-5335

32)

33RESTAURANT EL HONDURENO II, )

38)

39Respondent. )

41_______________________________ )

43RECOMMENDED ORDER

45Pursuant to notice, a final hearing was held in this case

56on November 20, 2009, by video teleconference with connecting

65sites in Miami and Tallahassee, Florida, before Errol H. Powell,

75an Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative

84Hearings.

85APPEARANCES

86For Petitioner: Charles F. Tunnicliff, Esquire

92Department of Business and

96Professional Regulation

981940 North Monroe Street, Suite 42

104Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202

107For Respondent: Eva Alvarado, pro se

113Restaurant El Hondureno II

1172298 Northwest 36th Street

121Miami, Florida 33142

124STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

128The issue for determination is whether Respondent committed

136the offense set forth in the Administrative Complaint and, if

146so, what action should be taken.

152PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

154The Department of Business and Professional Regulation,

161Division of Hotels and Restaurants, hereinafter Department,

168issued an Administrative Complaint against Restaurant El

175Hondureno II (Restaurant), dated March 17, 2009. The Department

184charged the Restaurant with violating Food Code Rule 6-501.111,

193Controlling Pests, in that rodent activity was observed as

202evidenced by 70-plus fresh rodent droppings in the kitchen

211behind the chest-type freezer. The Restaurant disputed the

219material allegations of fact and requested a hearing. On

228September 30, 2009, this matter was referred to the Division of

239Administrative Hearings.

241At hearing, the Department presented the testimony of two

250witnesses and entered four exhibits (Petitioner’s Exhibits

257numbered 1 through 4) into evidence. The Restaurant presented

266the testimony of one witness, Eva Alvarado, who testified on her

277own behalf, and entered one composite exhibit (Respondent's

285Composite Exhibit numbered 1) 1 into evidence. The undersigned

294took official recognition of Section 509.032(6), Florida

301Statutes (2008), Florida Administrative Code Rule 61C-1.001(14),

308and Food Code Rule 6-501.111.

313A transcript of the hearing was ordered. At the request of

324the parties, the time for filing post-hearing submissions was

333set for ten days following the filing of the transcript. The

344Transcript, consisting of one volume, was filed on December 10,

3542009. The Department timely filed its post-hearing submission.

362The Restaurant did not file a post-hearing submission. The

371Department's post-hearing submission has been considered in the

379preparation of this Recommended Order.

384FINDINGS OF FACT

3871. At all times material hereto, the Restaurant was

396licensed as a public food service establishment in the State of

407Florida by the Department, having been issued license type 2010

417and license number 2331004.

4212. At all times material hereto, the Restaurant was

430located at 2298 Northwest 36th Street, Miami, Florida 33142.

4393. A critical violation in food service is considered to

449be a violation that is directly related to a food-borne illness

460risk and could cause the threat of health and sanitation issues;

471or any violation that, if left uncorrected, could lead to food

482being contaminated and may cause a food-borne illness or cause

492someone to become sick or harmed.

4984. On March 17, 2009, Mohammad Khan, a senior sanitation

508safety specialist with the Department, conducted an inspection

516of the Restaurant. Another inspector with the Department,

524Maurice Chi, a sanitation safety supervisor, arrived at the

533Restaurant after Mr. Khan and accompanied Mr. Khan during the

543inspection.

5445. During the inspection, among other things, Mr. Khan and

554Mr. Chi found a violation, which they considered to be a

565critical violation. Further, during the inspection, Mr. Khan

573prepared a food inspection report, setting forth the alleged

582critical violation. The inspection report was signed by

590Mr. Khan, Mr. Chi, and Eva Alvarado, the manager of the

601Restaurant. Mr. Khan made Ms. Alvarado aware of the alleged

611critical violation, in addition to other violations, and

619provided her with a copy of the inspection report.

6286. The inspection on March 17, 2009, involved a possible

638immediate closure of the Restaurant due to the alleged critical

648violation.

6497. The alleged critical violation on March 17, 2009, was

65935A-04-1: 2 “Observed rodent activity as evidenced by rodent

668droppings found found [sic] 70 plus fresh rodent droppings in

678kitchen behind chext [sic] type freezer.” Mr. Khan moved the

688freezer, observed the area behind it, and observed approximately

69770 fresh rodent droppings. Mr. Chi also observed the fresh

707rodent droppings. Mr. Khan and Mr. Chi considered this alleged

717violation to be a critical violation because the fresh rodent

727droppings are directly related to food-borne illness in that

736rodents carry a lot of germs and diseases and they could

747contaminate food and preparation areas, causing significant

754health issues for anyone eating in the Restaurant. Their

763testimony is found to be credible and clear and convincing.

7738. The Restaurant was closed on March 17, 2009, as a

784result of the critical violation being found.

7919. The next day, March 18, 2009, the Restaurant was re-

802inspected. The critical violation had been corrected, and the

811Restaurant was allowed to re-open.

81610. Ms. Alvarado testified, among other things, that the

825Restaurant had fumigation performed every 15 days. Her

833testimony does not negate what was found during the inspection

843on March 17, 2009, and the critical violation found.

852CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

85511. The Division of Administrative Hearings has

862jurisdiction over the subject matter of this proceeding and the

872parties thereto pursuant to Sections 120.569 and 120.57(1),

880Florida Statutes (2009).

88312. The Department has the burden of proof to show by

894clear and convincing evidence that the Restaurant committed the

903offense set forth in the Administrative Complaint. Department

911of Banking and Finance, Division of Securities and Investor

920Protection v. Osborne Stern and Company , 670 So. 2d 932 (Fla.

9311996); Ferris v. Turlington , 510 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 1987).

94113. Section 509.032, Florida Statutes (2008), provides in

949pertinent part:

951(1) GENERAL. --The division [Division of

957Hotels and Restaurants of the Department of

964Business and Professional Regulation] shall

969carry out all of the provisions of this

977chapter and all other applicable laws and

984rules relating to the inspection or

990regulation of public lodging establishments

995and public food service establishments for

1001the purpose of safeguarding the public

1007health, safety, and welfare. . . .

1014(2) INSPECTION OF PREMISES.

1018(a) The division has responsibility and

1024jurisdiction for all inspections required by

1030this chapter. The division has

1035responsibility for quality assurance. . .

1041(b) For purposes of performing required

1047inspections and the enforcement of this

1053chapter, the division has the right of entry

1061and access to public lodging establishments

1067and public food service establishments at

1073any reasonable time.

1076(c) Public food service establishment

1081inspections shall be conducted to enforce

1087provisions of this part and to educate,

1094inform, and promote cooperation between the

1100division and the establishment.

1104(d) The division shall adopt and enforce

1111sanitation rules consistent with law to

1117ensure the protection of the public from

1124food-borne illness in those establishments

1129licensed under this chapter. These rules

1135shall provide the standards and requirements

1141for obtaining, storing, preparing,

1145processing, serving, or displaying food in

1151public food service establishments . . .

1158conducting necessary public food service

1163establishment inspections for compliance

1167with sanitation regulations . . . and

1174initiating enforcement actions, and for

1179other such responsibilities deemed necessary

1184by the division. . . .

1190* * *

1193(3) SANITARY STANDARDS; EMERGENCIES;

1197TEMPORARY FOOD SERVICE EVENTS. --The

1202division shall:

1204(a) Prescribe sanitary standards which

1209shall be enforced in public food service

1216establishments.

1217* * *

1220(6) RULEMAKING AUTHORITY. --The division

1225shall adopt such rules as are necessary to

1233carry out the provisions of this chapter.

124014. Florida Administrative Code Rule 61C-1.001 provides in

1248pertinent part:

1250Except when otherwise defined in this rule,

1257the definitions provided in paragraph 1-

1263201.10(B), Food Code, 2001 Recommendations

1268of the United States Public Health

1274Service/Food and Drug Administration; the

12792001 Food Code Errata Sheet (August 23,

12862002); and Supplement to the 2001 FDA Food

1294Code (August 29, 2003) shall apply to

1301Chapters 61C-1, 61C-3 and 61C-4, F.A.C. In

1308addition, the following definitions apply to

1314Chapters 61C-1, 61C-3 and 61C-4, F.A.C.:

1320* * *

1323(14) Food Code - This term is used in

1332Chapters 61C-1, 61C-3, and 61C-4, F.A.C.,

1338means paragraph 1-201.10(B), Chapter 2,

1343Chapter 3, Chapter 4, Chapter 5, Chapter 6,

1351and Chapter 7 of the Food Code, 2001

1359Recommendations of the United States Public

1365Health Service/Food and Drug Administration

1370including Annex 3: Public Health

1375Reasons/Administrative Guidelines; Annex 5:

1379HACCP Guidelines of the Food Code; the 2001

1387Food Code Errata Sheet (August 23, 2002);

1394and Supplement to the 2001 FDA Food Code

1402(August 29, 2003), herein adopted by

1408reference. A copy of the Food Code, as

1416adopted by the division, is available on the

1424division's Internet website

1427www.MyFloridaLicense.com/dbpr/hr. A copy of

1431the entire Food Code is available on the

1439U.S. Food and Drug Administration Internet

1445website. Printed copies of the entire Food

1452Code are available through the National

1458Technical Information Service, 5285 Port

1463Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.

146815. Florida Administrative Code Rule 61C-1.004, “General

1475Sanitation and Safety Requirements,” provides in pertinent part:

1484The following general requirements and

1489standards shall be met by all public lodging

1497and public food service establishments:

1502(3) Vermin control - Effective control

1508measures shall be taken to protect against

1515the entrance into the establishment, and the

1522breeding or presence on the premises of

1529rodents, flies, roaches and other vermin.

1535All buildings shall be effectively rodent-

1541proofed, free of rodents and maintained in a

1549rodent-proof and rodent-free

1552condition. . . .

155616. Food Code Rule 6-501.111, “Controlling Pests,”

1564provides in pertinent part:

1568The presence of insects, rodents, and other

1575pests shall be controlled to minimize their

1582presence on the PREMISES by:

1587(A) Routinely inspecting incoming shipments

1592of FOOD and supplies;

1596(B) Routinely inspecting the PREMISES for

1602evidence of pests;

1605(C) Using methods, if pests are found, such

1613as trapping devices or other means of pest

1621control as specified under §§ 7-202.12, 7-

1628206.12, and 7-206.13; and

1632(D) Eliminating harborage conditions.

1636(emphasis in original)

163917. The evidence is clear and convincing and demonstrates

1648that the Restaurant violated Food Code Rule 6-501.111 in that

165870-plus fresh rodent droppings were found in the kitchen behind

1668the chest-type freezer. Furthermore, the evidence is clear and

1677convincing and demonstrates that the violation was a critical

1686violation.

168718. As to penalty, Section 509.261, Florida Statutes

1695(2008), provides in pertinent part:

1700(1) Any public lodging establishment or

1706public food service establishment that has

1712operated or is operating in violation of

1719this chapter or the rules of the division,

1727operating without a license, or operating

1733with a suspended or revoked license may be

1741subject by the division to:

1746(a) Fines not to exceed $ 1,000 per

1755offense;

1756(b) Mandatory attendance, at personal

1761expense, at an educational program sponsored

1767by the Hospitality Education Program; and

1773(c) The suspension, revocation, or refusal

1779of a license issued pursuant to this

1786chapter.

178719. The Department suggests an administrative fine in the

1796amount of $1,000.00, which is consistent with the administrative

1806fine provision of Section 509.261(1)(a), Florida Statutes

1813(2008).

1814RECOMMENDATION

1815Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of

1825Law, it is

1828RECOMMENDED that the Department of Business and

1835Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants,

1842enter a final order:

18461. Finding that Restaurant El Hondureno II violated Food

1855Code Rule 6-501.111.

18582. Imposing an administrative fine in the amount of

1867$1,000.00 against Restaurant El Hondureno II.

1874DONE AND ENTERED this 31st day of December, 2009, in

1884Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

1888__________________________________

1889ERROL H. POWELL

1892Administrative Law Judge

1895Division of Administrative Hearings

1899The DeSoto Building

19021230 Apalachee Parkway

1905Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

1908(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

1912Fax Filing (850) 921-6847

1916www.doah.state.fl.us

1917Filed with the Clerk of the

1923Division of Administrative Hearings

1927this 31st day of December, 2009.

1933ENDNOTES

19341/ Eva Alvarado agreed to provide this Administrative Law Judge

1944and Petitioner with a copy of Respondent’s Composite Exhibit No.

19542, which consisted of fumigation reports/receipts from December

19622008 through March 2009. However, Ms. Alvarado failed to provide

1972a copy of Respondent’s Composite Exhibit No. 2, and it,

1982therefore, cannot be considered.

19862/ This identification number is the corresponding identification

1994number of the violation in the inspection report.

2002COPIES FURNISHED:

2004Charles F. Tunnicliff, Esquire

2008Department of Business and

2012Professional Regulation

20141940 North Monroe Street, Suite 42

2020Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202

2023Eva Alvarado

2025Restaurant El Hondureno II

20292298 Northwest 36th Street

2033Miami, Florida 33142

2036William L. Veach, Director

2040Division of Hotels and Restaurants

2045Department of Business and

2049Professional Regulation

20511940 North Monroe Street

2055Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792

2058Reginald Dixon, General Counsel

2062Department of Business and

2066Professional Regulation

20681940 North Monroe Street

2072Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792

2075NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

2081All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

209115 days from the date of this recommended order. Any exceptions

2102to this recommended order should be filed with the agency that

2113will issue the final order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
PDF:
Date: 03/23/2010
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 03/23/2010
Proceedings: Agency Final Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 12/31/2009
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 12/31/2009
Proceedings: Recommended Order (hearing held November 20, 2009). CASE CLOSED.
PDF:
Date: 12/31/2009
Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
PDF:
Date: 12/21/2009
Proceedings: Petitioner's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 12/14/2009
Proceedings: Notice of Filing Transcript.
Date: 12/10/2009
Proceedings: Transcript of Proceedings filed.
Date: 11/20/2009
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
PDF:
Date: 11/18/2009
Proceedings: Petitioner's Amended Exhibit List (exhibits not attached) filed.
PDF:
Date: 11/04/2009
Proceedings: Petitioner's Witness List filed.
PDF:
Date: 11/04/2009
Proceedings: Petitioner's Exhibit List (no exhibits attached) filed.
PDF:
Date: 10/30/2009
Proceedings: Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
PDF:
Date: 10/30/2009
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for November 20, 2009; 1:00 p.m.; Miami and Tallahassee, FL).
PDF:
Date: 10/02/2009
Proceedings: Response to Initial Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 09/30/2009
Proceedings: Election of Rights filed.
PDF:
Date: 09/30/2009
Proceedings: Administrative Complaint filed.
PDF:
Date: 09/30/2009
Proceedings: Agency referral filed.
PDF:
Date: 09/30/2009
Proceedings: Initial Order.

Case Information

Judge:
ERROL H. POWELL
Date Filed:
09/30/2009
Date Assignment:
09/30/2009
Last Docket Entry:
03/23/2010
Location:
Miami, Florida
District:
Southern
Agency:
ADOPTED IN TOTO
 

Counsels

Related DOAH Cases(s) (1):

Related Florida Statute(s) (6):

Related Florida Rule(s) (2):