10-001665
Robyn Cohen vs.
Carnival Cruise Lines
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, September 21, 2010.
Recommended Order on Tuesday, September 21, 2010.
1STATE OF FLORIDA
4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
8ROBYN COHEN , )
11)
12Petitioner, )
14)
15vs. ) Case No. 10 - 1665
22)
23CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES, )
27)
28Respondent. )
30________________________________)
31RECOMMENDED ORDER
33Ro bert E. Meale, Administrative Law Judge of the Division
43of Administrative Hearings, conducted the final hearing by
51videoconference in Tallahassee, Florida, on July 30, 2010 .
60Petitioner, her counsel, and one of her witnesses appeared in
70Tallahassee, and Re spondent's corporate representative, counsel,
77in - house counsel, and witnesses, as well as one witness for
89Petitioner, appeared in Miami.
93APPEARANCES
94For Petitioner: Marcy I. Lahart, Esquire
1004804 Southwest 45th Street
104Gainesville, Florida 32609
107For Respondent: Kara S. Nickel
112Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler
116Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A.
120Museum Tower, Suite 2200
124150 West Flagl er Street
129Miami, Florida 33130
132STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
136The issue is whether Respondent is guilty of discriminating
145against Petitioner, due to her handicap, in providing a public
155accommodation, in violation of Section 760.08, Florid a Statutes .
165PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
167By Complaint of Discrimination dated September 22, 2009,
175Petitioner alleged that Respondent discriminated against her in
183providing a public accommodation by denying her the right to be
194accompanied by her service animal. The Complaint alleges that,
203on August 9, 2009, Petitioner had arrived at the terminal to
214board a Carnival cruise ship in Ft. Lauderdale, but was stopped
225by one of Respondent's employees and told she could not board
236with a dog. The Complaint alleges that P etitioner replied that
247her dog was a service animal for her disability. The Complaint
258alleges that the employee asked what the disability was and why
269she needed a service animal. The Complaint alleges that
278Petitioner produced a card identifying her servi ce animal -- a dog
290named "Rocky." The employee allegedly contacted a supervisor,
298who asked Petitioner to produce the documentation again. The
307Complaint alleges that Petitioner was denied travel with her
316service animal, but eventually boarded without the se rvice dog,
326allowing her boyfriend to take the dog home.
334On March 5, 2010, the Florida Commission on Human Relations
344entered a Notice of Determination: No Cause.
351On March 15, 2010, Petitioner filed a Petition for Relief.
361The Petition alleges that Respon dent violated the Florida Civil
371Rights Act of 1992, as amended, by failing to accommodate her
382and her service animal on a cruise, failing to notify her within
394ten days of why she was denied the public accommodation, and
405unlawfully requiring advance notice of a need for an
414accommodation. The Petition seeks a wide range of compensatory
423damages.
424By Order on Motion to File First Amended Petition entered
434May 6, 2010, the Administrative Law Judge granted Petitioner
443leave to amend her grounds for liability to in clude a second
455denial of public accommodation at the first port reached by the
466cruise vessel after leaving Port Everglades, Key West. Even
475though the Complaint had not specifically pleaded this
483violation, there is a reasonable relationship between the
491ple aded allegations of acts and omissions at Port Everglades and
502the new allegations of similar acts and omissions at Key West,
513and the ensuing investigation should reasonably have addressed
521this matter. See Scholz v. RDV Sports , 710 So. 2d 618, 622
533(Fla. 5t h DCA 1998).
538By Order on Respondent's Motion to Compel and Petitioner's
547Motion for Protective Order entered July 8, 2010, the
556Administrative Law Judge struck all claims for damages or other
566affirmative relief for medical expenses or medical bills,
574pursu ant to the limited relief authorized in administrative
583proceedings, as provided in Section 760.11(6), Florida Statutes,
591as contrasted to the broader relief, including specifically
"599compensatory damages," authorized in judicial actions, as
606provided in Sec t i on 760.11(5), Florida Statutes, and case law
618defining compensatory damages to include medical expenses. See ,
626e.g. , Stewart v. George W. Davis & Sons, Inc. , 340 F. Supp. 643,
639646 (N.D. Fla. 1972); Cooperative Leasing, Inc. v. Johnson , 872
649So. 2d 956 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). See also Florida Public
660Utilities Company v. Large , 493 So. 2d 491 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
672(Human Rights Act of 1977, which limited courts and
681administrative judges to "affirmative relief," did not authorize
689award of compensatory damages in the form of pain and
699suffering). Cf. Broward County v. LaRosa , 505 So. 2d 422 (Fla.
7101987) (administrative agency may not constitutionally award
717nonquantifiable damages, such as for pain and suffering or
726humiliation); Laborers' International Union, Local 478 v .
734Burroughs , 541 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 1989) (court questioned whether
744administrative agency could award front pay, which, though more
753quantifiable than damages for suffering, is "somewhat
760indefinite" because it is based on an "arbitrary" determination
769of dura tion of front pay).
775On July 15, 2010, Respondent filed its stipulation that
784Petitioner is a person with a disability, within the meaning of
795the Florida Civil Rights Act, and that Petitioner's dog, Rocky,
805is a service animal, within the meaning of Florida law. At the
817hearing, Respondent further stipulated that Rocky serves
824Petitioner's disability.
826At the hearing, Petitioner called four witnesses and
834offered into evidence no exhibits. Respondent called three
842witnesses and offered into evidence three exhib its : Respondent
852Exhibits 2, 3, and 10, which were admitted .
861The court reporter filed the T ranscript on August 23 , 2010 .
873The parties filed P ropose d R ecommended O rders on September 17 ,
8862010.
887FINDINGS OF FACT
8901. Petitioner suffers from a panic disorder fo r which she
901requires the assistance of a service animal . Her service animal
912is a 40 - pound German Shepherd mix named "Rocky." Rocky enables
924Petitioner to overcome certain specific disabilities associated
931with her condition , but she does not always require Rocky's
941assistance.
9422. In the summer of 2009, Petitioner's mother organized a
952family vacation in the form of a Car i bbean cruise on a vessel
966operated by Respondent. She selected a cruise departing Port
975Everglades on August 9, 2009. The group included Pe titioner's
985father, Petitioner's sister, her fianc é , and other s . The first
997port of call for the cruise after departing Fort Lauderdale was
1008Key West, after which the vessel would sail to various ports
1019under the jurisdiction of other countries.
10253. On the morning of the departure, Petitioner's then -
1035boyfriend John McCarthy drove her and Rocky from Key Biscayne,
1045where they live in the same condominium building . Mr. McCarthy
1056proved to be a useful witness. He and Petitioner a re no longer
1069in a relationship. M r. McCarthy portrayed the events largely in
1080agreement with Petitioner's version of events, although his
1088reliability is somewhat undermined by the fact that he and
1098Petitioner have discussed many times what exactly took place on
1108that day. H owever, he displa yed a spirited independence from
1119Petitioner, as when he described her decision to file this
"1129lawsuit" as "ridiculous, " and, more importantly, admitted that,
1137while in the terminal, he was unsure whether Petitioner wanted
1147to take Rocky with her on the cruise . Much, but not all, of his
1162testimony has been credited.
11664. Leaving Key Biscayne that morning, Petitioner did not ,
1175in fact, intend to have Rocky accompany her on the cruise.
1186Among other possible reasons, Petitioner's mother had asked her
1195not to bring Ro cky , and Petitioner had acc eded to her mother's
1208wish. It was Petitioner's intent only for Rocky to see her off.
12205. Without incident, Petitioner, Mr. McCarthy, and Rocky
1228left the car at the cruise terminal parking area and made their
1240way into the cruise lobby. The trio entered the lobby amidst
1251swarms of embarking and disembarking passengers.
12576. Respondent hosts on its cruises many passengers with
1266disabilities, including some passengers with service animals.
1273Two Carnival managers described Respondent's policies for
1280accommodating disabled passengers. The Guest Access Support
1287manager, Kay Strawderman, explained the process by which persons
1296purchasing cruise tickets are directed to complete a form that
1306provides information about disabilities or special nee ds.
13147. If a passenger is bringing a service animal, Respondent
1324informs the passenger that he or she must contact the U.S.
1335Department of Agriculture for current regulations , by port,
1343governing animals, such as requirements for vaccination records .
1352These r egulations are imposed by the countries visited by the
1363vessel and may be enforced even if the animal does not leave the
1376ship. Neither Respondent nor the U.S. government has the
1385authority to permit any deviations from these foreign laws.
13948. Using the info rmation provided in the completed forms,
1404the Guest Access Support department compiles a list of special -
1415needs passengers, including passengers who will be bringing
1423service animals. The Guest Access Support department sends this
1432list to the Guest Logistics d epartment.
14399. Assigned to the terminal and in direct contact with
1449passengers , Guest Logistics employees ensure the efficient
1456boarding and exiting of the vessels and movement through the
1466terminal. The Guest Logistics manager, Doris Enamorado,
1473testifie d that her employees use the special - needs lists to
1485ensure that special - needs passengers and, if applicable , their
1495service animals are directed to special boarding areas, so they
1505can board without any delay.
151010. Ms. Strawderman and Ms. Enamorado both cons idered the
1520question of what they would do if a special - needs passenger
1532failed to fill out and return the forms , but arrived at the
1544terminal seeking to board with her service animal . The question
1555is hypothetical because this has never previously happened ,
1563including on the day in question .
157011. Ms. St rawderman insisted that, if a special - needs
1581passenger failed to return the forms, Respondent would not deny
1591boarding. Ms. Enamorado added that, if one of her employees
1601encountered a passenger with an animal i n the terminal seeking
1612to board, the employee would determine if the animal were a
1623service animal, including how it services the disability, and
1632then examine the vaccination records, without which a service
1641animal may not sail due to the requirements of th e laws of
1654foreign countries .
165712. Shortly after they entered the terminal, Petitioner,
1665Mr. McCarthy, and Rocky were approached by a Carn ival employee
1676named "Alex." Respondent invites the inference that Petitioner
1684spontaneously exploded into anger and hyst erics. At the
1693hearing, Petitioner displayed a tendency toward combativeness,
1700but none toward spontaneous anger or hysterics. More likely,
1709Alex, upon encounter ing Petitioner, Mr. McArthur, and a dog in a
1721crowded terminal, momentarily failed to display the composure
1729and dedication to service of Respondent's managerial employees
1737who testified at the hearing.
174213. Mr. McCarthy's testimony is es pecially useful at this
1752point and is largely credited. Approaching Petitioner, Alex
1760abruptly informed her that Rocky could not proceed. It is
1770likel y that Alex assumed that Rocky wa s a mere pet, as he does
1785not wear a special cape or harness and Petitioner does not bear
1797any obvious indication of a disability.
180314. Petitioner replied that Rocky wa s a service dog, and
1814he w as present only to see her off on the cruise. Alex replied
1828that Petitioner did not appear to suffer from a disability. As
1839Mr. McCarthy aptly notes, "the fight was on."
184715. Each side called for reinforcements. Petitioner spoke
1855on her cellphone with her sister and mother. Alex summoned his
1866supervisor, who joined the fray. Mr. McCarthy and Rocky wisely
1876stood to the side.
188016. By now, Petitioner was crying out of control . In this
1892condition, she could not reliably report on what she said to
1903Respondent's e mployees or what they said to her . Mr. McCarthy
1915seems to have been unable to hear much of what the parties were
1928saying to each other. Respondent's employees report that their
1937behavior was impeccable. Regardless, t here is no reliable
1946evidence that Petiti oner ever dema nded that Rocky, her service
1957animal , board the vessel with her.
196317. Much evidence suggests that Petitioner never intended
1971to take Rocky on the cruise. As far as Petitioner's mother or
1983Mr. McArthur knew, Rocky was staying home. Petitioner h erself
1993had failed to pack any food for Rocky, nor did she at any time
2007instruct Mr. McArthur to drive to a nearby store to obtain any.
2019No evidence suggests that Petitioner had brought with her any
2029proof of Rocky's vaccinations, which might be required by t he
2040various countries that they were visiting. Once on board,
2049Petitioner did not even demand that Respondent allow Rocky to
2059board in Key West.
206318. To convince her daughter to board the vessel,
2072Petitioner's mother said that Rocky could join them in Key Wes t.
2084Even after the vessel had sailed, Petitioner, s till agitated,
2094spoke constantly with Mr. McCarthy until the vessel sailed out
2104of cellphone range. She directed him to drive Rocky to Key West
2116to join her on the cruise, but Mr. McCarthy, citing a bad back
2129and th e fact that his birthday was the next day, declined to do
2143so, instead taking Rocky to South Beach the following day.
2153Mr. McCarthy's testimony suggested a boyfriend who was unwilling
2162to cater to his girlfriend's capricious decision to make an
2172issue with Rocky, not a boyfriend who was unwilling to help
2183right a wrong that his girlfriend had suffered.
219119. At some point prior to arriving in Key West,
2201Petitioner realized that Mr. McCarthy had no intention of
2210driving Rocky to Key West. Rather than disemb ark in Key West,
2222as she wanted , Petitioner acceded to her mother's exhortations
2231and remained on board , but she was very unhappy for the
2242remainder of the cruise .
2247CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
225020. The Division of Administrative Hearings has
2257jurisdiction over the sub ject matter. §§ 120.569, 120.57(1),
2266and 760.11(4)(b) and (6), Fla. Stat. (2009).
227321. Section 760.08, Florida Statutes, provides:
2279All persons shall be entitled to the full
2287and equal enjoyment of the goods, services,
2294facilities, privileges, advantages, and
2298accommodations of any place of public
2304accommodation, as defined in this chapter,
2310without discrimination or segregation on the
2316ground of race, color, national origin, sex,
2323handicap, familial status, or religion.
232822. Section 760.02(11), Florida Statutes, defines "public
2335accommodations" as:
"2337Public accommodations" means places of
2342public accommodation, lodgings, facilities
2346principally engaged in selling food for
2352consumption on the premises, gasoline
2357stations, places of exhibition or
2362entertainment, and other covered
2366establishments. . . .
237023. A cruise ship is a public accommodation. Spector v.
2380Norwegian Cruise Line, Ltd. , 545 U.S. 119, 129, 125 S. Ct. 2169,
23922177 (2005) (cruise ship is public accommodation under Americans
2401with Disabilities Act). By stipula tion, Petitioner is a person
2411with a handicap, and Rocky services her disability.
241924. Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.
2431§ 2000a, prohibits discrimination in places of public
2439accommodation , in identical language as that found in Section
244876 0.08, Florida Statutes, except for the omission of certain
2458protected classes , including handicap. Due to the lack of Title
2468II cases, federal courts routinely find guidance in the law of
2479Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e ,
2492includi ng the law of the shifting burdens of production of
2503evidence. See Fahim v. Marriott Hotel Services , 551 F.3d 344,
2513349 (5th Cir. 2008).
251725. Therefore, t he Title II plaintiff must prove a prima
2528facie case of discrimination by proving membership in a
2537prot ected class, an attempt to contract for services of a public
2549accommodation, a denial of those services, and the provision of
2559these services to similarly situated persons not in the
2568protected class. Id. at 350. Following proof of a prima facie
2579case of dis crimination, the defendant would have an opportunity
2589to show a legitimate business purpose for its acts or omissions,
2600and the plaintiff would then have an opportunity to show that
2611the legitimate business purpose was pr etextual. Id. (citing
2620McDonnell Dougl as Corp. v. Green , 411 U.S. 792, 93 S. Ct. 1817
2633(1973)).
263426. Here, Petitioner has failed to prove a prima facie
2644case. She has failed to prove that she was denied any services
2656for which she contracted. Obviously, Respondent did not deny
2665Petitioner the o pportunity to take the cru i se. Moreover,
2676because the evidence fails to establish that Petitioner asked
2685for her service animal to accompany her on the cruise,
2695Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent denied her the
2704opportunity to take the cruise with her service animal .
2714RECOMMENDATION
2715It is
2717RECOMMENDED that the Florida Commission on Human Relations
2725enter a final order dismissing Petitioner's amended petition.
2733DONE AND ENTERED this 21st day of September , 2010, in
2743Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
2747S
2748___________________________________
2749ROBERT E. MEALE
2752Administrative Law Judge
2755Division of Administrative Hearings
2759The DeSoto Building
27621230 Apalachee Parkway
2765Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 3060
2770(850) 488 - 9675 SUNCOM 278 - 9675
2778Fax Filing (850) 921 - 684 7
2785www.doah.state.fl.us
2786Filed with the Clerk of the
2792Division of Administrative Hearings
2796this 21st d ay of September , 2010.
2803COPIES FURNISHED:
2805Marcy I. LaHart, Esquire
2809Marcy I. LaHart, P.A.
28134804 Southwest 45th Street
2817Gainesville, Florida 32608
2820Martha deZayas, Esquire
2823Carnival Cruise Lines
28263655 Northwest 87 Avenue
2830Miami, Florida 33131
2833Kara S. Nickel, Esquire
2837Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler
2841Alhadef f & Sitterson, P.A.
2846150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200
2852Miami, Florida 33130
2855Denise Crawford, Agency Clerk
2859Florida Commission on Human Relations
28642009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100
2869Tallahassee, Florida 32301
2872Larry Kranert, General Counsel
2876Florida Commis sion on Human Relations
28822009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100
2887Tallahassee, Florida 32301
2890NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
2896All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within
290615 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions
2917to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that
2928will issue the Final Order in this case.
- Date
- Proceedings
- PDF:
- Date: 12/16/2010
- Proceedings: Agency Final Order Dismissing Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Public Accommodations Practice filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 09/21/2010
- Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
- PDF:
- Date: 08/25/2010
- Proceedings: Order Granting Extension of Time. (Response due September 17, 2010.)
- PDF:
- Date: 08/24/2010
- Proceedings: Respondent's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Parties to Submit Proposed Recommended Orders filed.
- Date: 08/23/2010
- Proceedings: Transcript Video Teleconference Final Hearing filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 08/06/2010
- Proceedings: Proffered Testimony Regarding Out-of-Pocket Medical Expenses Incurred by Robyn Cohen filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 08/06/2010
- Proceedings: Petitioner Robyn Cohen's Notice of Filing Proffered Testimony filed.
- Date: 07/30/2010
- Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
- PDF:
- Date: 07/29/2010
- Proceedings: Respondent Carnival Cruise Lines' Objections and Responses to Petitioner Robyn Cohen's First Set of Requests for Admission filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 07/29/2010
- Proceedings: Petitioner Robyn Cohen's Notice of Filing Respondent Carnival Cruise Line's Response to Petitioner's First Request for Admissions filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 07/29/2010
- Proceedings: Respondent's Exhibit List (exhibits not available for viewing) filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 07/23/2010
- Proceedings: Petitioner's Amended Notice of Taking Deposition (of S. Miller) filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 07/22/2010
- Proceedings: Petitioner's Unopposed Motion to Allow Witness to Appear by Telephone filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 07/15/2010
- Proceedings: Respondent Carnival Cruise Lines' Notice of Service of Amended Objections and Responses to Petitioner's First Set of Interrogatories filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 07/08/2010
- Proceedings: Order on Respondent`s Motion to Compel and Petitioner`s Motion for Protective Order.
- PDF:
- Date: 07/06/2010
- Proceedings: Respondent's Supplement to Motion to Compel and Opposition to Petitioner's Motion to Quash and for Protective Order filed.
- Date: 07/06/2010
- Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Motion Hearing Held.
- PDF:
- Date: 06/28/2010
- Proceedings: Petitioner's Notice of Taking Depositions (of D. Enamorado, K. Strawderman) filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 06/18/2010
- Proceedings: Respondent's Opposition to Petitioner's Motion to Quash Non-party Subpoenas and Motion for Protective Order filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 06/18/2010
- Proceedings: Respondent Carnival Cruise Lines' Notice of Intent to Serve Subpoenas Duces Tecum to Non-parties filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 06/18/2010
- Proceedings: Notice of Withdrawal of Respondent Carnival Cruise Lines' Notice of Service of Subpoenas Duces Tecum to Non-parties filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 06/18/2010
- Proceedings: Motion to Quash Non-party Subpoenas and Motion for Protective Order filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 06/17/2010
- Proceedings: Respondent Carnival Cruise Lines' Notice of Service of Subpoenas Duces Tecum to Non-parties (attachments not available for viewing) filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 06/17/2010
- Proceedings: Motion to Compel Responses to Respondent's First Request for Production of Documents filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 06/08/2010
- Proceedings: Respondent Carnival Cruise Lines' Notice of Service of Responses to Petitioner's First Set of Interrogatories filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 06/08/2010
- Proceedings: Respondent Carnival Cruise Lines' Notice of Service of Responses to Petitioner Robyn Cohen's First Set of Requests for Admission filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 06/04/2010
- Proceedings: Robyn Cohen's Notice of Serving Answers and Objections to Respondent Carnival Cruise Lines Interrogatories filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/06/2010
- Proceedings: Order on Motion to File First Amended Petition, Unopposed Motion for Continuance, and Motion to Shorten Time for Discovery Response.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/05/2010
- Proceedings: Petitioner's Memorandum of Law in Support of Her Motion foe Leave to File Amended Petition for Relief filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 05/03/2010
- Proceedings: Supplement to Respondent's Opposition to Petitioner's Motion for Leave to File her First Amended Petition for Relief filed.
- Date: 04/29/2010
- Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Motion Hearing Held.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/29/2010
- Proceedings: Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for July 30, 2010; 9:00 a.m.; Miami and Tallahassee, FL).
- PDF:
- Date: 04/21/2010
- Proceedings: Respondent Carnival Cruise Lines' Notice of Service of First Set of Interrogatories to Petitioner filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/21/2010
- Proceedings: Respondent's Opposition to Petitioner's Motion for Leave to File Her First Amended Petition for Relief filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/21/2010
- Proceedings: Petitioner Robyn Cohen's Motion to Shorten Time for Response to Discovery filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/21/2010
- Proceedings: Petitioners Robyn Cohen's Notice of Serving Interrogatories Upon Respondent Carnival Cruise Lines filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/20/2010
- Proceedings: Respondent's Unopposed Motion for Continuance of Final Hearing Date filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/20/2010
- Proceedings: Notice of Hearing (hearing set for May 6, 2010; 9:30 a.m.; Miami, FL).
- PDF:
- Date: 04/20/2010
- Proceedings: Respondent's Supplement to Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/19/2010
- Proceedings: Petitioner Robyn Cohen's Motion for Leave to File Her First Amended Petition for Relief filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/08/2010
- Proceedings: Order Denying Petitioner`s Extension of Time to File Response to Initial Order.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/07/2010
- Proceedings: Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Response to Initial Order filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 04/07/2010
- Proceedings: Order Granting Extension of Time (response to Initial Order to be filed by April 19, 2010).
- PDF:
- Date: 04/06/2010
- Proceedings: (Proposed) Order Granting Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Response to Initial Order filed.
Case Information
- Judge:
- ROBERT E. MEALE
- Date Filed:
- 03/26/2010
- Date Assignment:
- 03/26/2010
- Last Docket Entry:
- 12/16/2010
- Location:
- Miami, Florida
- District:
- Southern
- Agency:
- ADOPTED IN TOTO
Counsels
-
Robyn Cohen
Address of Record -
Violet Denise Crawford, Agency Clerk
Address of Record -
Martha deZayas, Assistant General Counsel
Address of Record -
Marcy I. LaHart, Esquire
Address of Record -
Kara S. Nickel, Esquire
Address of Record -
Marcy LaHart, Esquire
Address of Record