11-000115CB
In Re: Senate Bill 306 (Denise Gordon Brown And David Brown) vs.
*
Status: Closed
DOAH Final Order on Tuesday, February 1, 2011.
DOAH Final Order on Tuesday, February 1, 2011.
1THE FLORIDA SENATE
4SPECIAL MASTER ON CLAIM BILLS
9Location
1040 2 Senate Office Building
15Mailing Address
17404 South Monroe Street
21Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 1100
26(850) 487 - 5237
30DATE COMM ACTION
332 / 1 /11 SM Favorable
39February 1, 2011
42The Honorable Mike Haridopolos
46President, The Florida Senate
50Suite 409, The Capitol
54Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 1100
59Re : SB 306 (2011) Î Senator Nan H. Rich
69Relief of Denise Brown and David Brown, for the benefit of their son,
82Darian Brown
84SPECIAL MASTERÓS FINAL REPORT
88THIS UNOPPOSED EQUIT ABLE CLAIM AGAINST T HE
96NORTH BROWARD HOSPIT AL DISTRICT, WHICH I S FOR
105$2 MILLION IN LOCAL FUNDS, ARISES FROM T HE BIRTH
115OF DARIAN BROWN, A C HILD WHO SUFFERED A
124CATASTROPHIC BRAIN I NJURY IN UTERO DUE T O THE
134HOSPITAL STAFF'S NEG LIGENT DELAY IN
140RECOGNIZING THE SIGN S OF FETAL DISTRESS,
147WHICH RESULTED IN AN UNTIMELY DELIVERY BY C -
156SECTION.
157FINDINGS OF FACT: On January 10, 2000, Denise Brown's obstetrician, Dr.
168Danoff, discovered that the fetal heart rate of the baby she
179was carrying was elev ated. Because Mrs. Brown, who was
189then about 33 weeks pregnant, had delivered prematurely in
198the past, Dr. Danoff sent her to Broward General Hospital for
209observation and to rule out preterm labor. Mrs. Brown was
219admitted to the hospital at 11:30 a.m. D r. Danoff directed
230that Mrs. Brown have continuous fetal heart monitoring and
239gave standing orders that the nurse on duty was to notify the
251obstetrician if the baby's heart rate ever exceeded 160 beats
261per minute.
263SPECIAL MASTERÓS FINAL REPORT Î SB 306 (2011)
271February 1, 2011
274Page 2
276From January 10 through January 14, 2000 , Mrs. Brown
285remained stable, and her baby's heart rate stayed within
294normal limits. At about 5:00 p.m. on January 14, 2000,
304however, the fetal monitoring strips (printed graph paper
312showing displaying "tracings" of both the fetal heart rate and
322uterine c ontractions) began disclosing an accelerated heart
330rate (a condition known as tachycardia). The nursing staff
339did not notify the obstetrician of this development, despite
348the standing order to do so.
354Over the next few hours, the fetal monitoring strips showed
364increasingly worrisome signs, namely consistent fetal
370tachycardia and loss of fetal heart rate variability. (A healthy
380fetal heart beats at varying rates, creating a tracing that
390looks like a jag ged line. Loss of fetal heart rate variability
402produces a smooth line.) Variability indicates fetal wellbeing.
410The absence of variability may indicate fetal distress. At
41911:00 p.m., the baby's heart rate started to slow periodically
429after uterine contr actions. When this occurs, it is called a
"440late deceleration." Late decelerations are an ominous sign,
448especially in conjunction with tachycardia and loss of
456variability. The nursing staff, however, did not notify the
465obstetrician, or any other physicia n, that Mrs. Brown's baby
475might be in trouble.
479The fetal tachycardia, loss of variability, and late
487decelerations continued throughout the night. At about 5:15
495a.m., the attending nurse finally called an obstetrician, Dr.
504Vasanti Puranik, who was an empl oyee of North Broward
514Hospital District. At Dr. Puranik's request, the fetal
522monitoring strips were faxed to her for review. Upon receipt,
532the doctor discovered that the graph paper had been fed into
543the electronic fetal monitor upside down. The strips,
551therefore, were not readily interpretable, although it could be
560seen that the baby's heart rate lacked variability.
568Dr. Puranik consulted by telephone with another obstetrician,
576Laurie Scott, M.D., and they agreed that it was time to
587deliver Mrs. Brown's baby. Neither doctor rushed to the
596hospital, however. Dr. Puranik arrived on the obstetrical unit
605at 6:27 a.m., where she ordered a routine Caesarian section.
615Mrs. Brown was prepared for surgery. Dr. Puranik began
624the C - section at 7:24 a.m., and Daria n was born at 7:27 a.m.
639SPECIAL MASTERÓS FINAL REPORT Î SB 306 (2011)
647February 1, 2011
650Page 3
652Darian had been oxygen - deprived in his mother's womb for
663hours before his birth. As a result, he was born with
674numerous complications, including respiratory distress
679syndrome, cystic kidney disease, neonatal jaundice,
685neonatal hy poglycemia, and newborn intraventricular
691hemorrhage. He required aggressive resuscitation.
696Eventually, Mrs. Brown and Darian were discharged from the
705hospital. The Browns were not told, however, that Darian
714might have suffered a serious brain injury.
721I n October 2000, Mrs. Brown became concerned that her
731son was not meeting developmental milestones. Her
738inquiries to the pediatrician resulted in a computed
746tomography (CT) scan of Darian's brain being ordered. The
755CT scan showed that Darian's brain had b een seriously and
766irreversibly damaged by partial prolonged hypoxia (oxygen
773deprivation) in the hours before his birth.
780The insult to Darian's brain has left him suffering from
790cerebral palsy, spastic quadriplegia, and developmental
796delay. He is unable t o talk but smiles at family members and
809communicates basic needs by gesturing (e.g., pointing to his
818stomach when hungry or to his head when he has a
829headache). Darian has no bladder or bowel control, cannot
838feed himself, and is unable to perform any acti vities of daily
850living. He will be totally dependent on others for care and
861treatment for the rest of his life.
868Paul M. Deutsch, Ph.D., performed a comprehensive
875evaluation of Darian and prepared Life Care Plan, which
884quantifies the future medical expenses that will be incurred
893over the course of Darian's lifetime. The report prepared by
903the plaintiffs' economist, Raffa Consulting Economists, Inc. ,
910which takes into account Dr. Deutsch's Life Care Plan,
919concludes that the present value of Daran's f uture medical
929needs is between $11.5 and $13.6 million, and that his
939estimated lost earning capacity, reduced to present value, is
948approximately $0.68 million.
951LEGAL PROCEEDINGS: In 2003, Mr. and Mrs. Brown brought suit on their son's
964behalf, and in the ir respective individual capacities, against
973the North Broward Hospital District and others. The action
982was filed in the Circuit Court in and for Broward County,
993Florida.
994SPECIAL MASTERÓS FINAL REPORT Î SB 306 (2011)
1002February 1, 2011
1005Page 4
1007While the lawsuit was pending, the Browns settled with Dr.
1017Scott and Parinatal As sociates, P. A. for a confidential
1027amount. The case proceeded to trial in 2008 against the
1037North Broward Hospital District as the sole remaining
1045defendant. On June 13, 2008, after four weeks of trial, the
1056jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff s and against
1068the district, awarding a total of $35.2 million in damages.
1078The resulting judgment was appealed. In June 2010, the
1087Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed.
1094The hospital district sued its insurers seeking a declaration
1103of coverage for the damages awarded to the Browns. The
1113coverage lawsuit led to a global settlement under which the
1123district's insurers paid the Browns $10.35 million, the district
1132paid its sovereign immunity limit of $200,000, and the parties
1143agreed that the plaintif fs could seek an additional $2 million
1154through an uncontested claim bill in that amount.
1162Under the settlement agreements, the plaintiffs' net recovery
1170to date (after satisfying medical and legal expenses and
1179attorneys' fees) is approximately $8.5 million. They have
1187paid roughly $3.3 million to their attorneys.
1194CLAIMANTS' ARGUMENTS: The North Broward Hospital District is vicariously liable for
1205the negligent acts of its employees and agents, including but
1215not limited to:
1218Failing timely to alert Mrs. Bro wn's obstetrician, or any
1228medical doctor, of the onset of fetal tachycardia, despite a
1238standing order to do just that.
1244Failing timely to notify a physician of the loss of fetal
1255heart rate variability and subsequent onset of late
1263decelerations, which (the nurses should have known)
1270indicated that the baby was likely in distress.
1278Failing to notice, for hours, that the graph paper in the
1289electronic fetal monitor had been inserted upside down,
1297producing tracings that were not readily interpretable.
1304F ailing to order an emergency C - section immediately
1314upon discovery that the baby's fetal heart signals were non -
1325reassuring.
1326SPECIAL MASTERÓS FINAL REPORT Î SB 306 (2011)
1334Febr uary 1, 2011
1338Page 5
1340RESPONDENT'S POSITION : The North Broward Hospital District does not oppose the bill.
1353The Chief Executive Officer of the district has attes ted that if
1365the claim bill were enacted, the $2 million award would be
1376paid out of the district's general operating account, and that
1386the payment of this sum would not in any way detrimentally
1397impact the district's ability to provide medical services to th e
1408people of Broward County.
1412CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: As provided in s ection 768.28, Florida Statutes (2010),
1424sovereign immunity shields the North Broward Hospital
1431District against tort liability in excess of $200,000 per
1441occurrence. See Eldred v. North Broward Hospital District ,
1449498 So. 2d 911, 914 (Fla. 1986)(§ 768.28 applies to special
1460hospital taxing districts); Paushter v. South Broward Hospital
1468District , 664 So. 2d 1032, 1033 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). Unless
1479a claim bill is enacted, therefore, Darian an d his parents will
1491not realize the full benefit of the settlement agreement they
1501have made with the district.
1506Under the doctrine of respondeat superior, the North
1514Broward Hospital District is vicariously liable for the negligent
1523acts of its agents and emp loyees, when such acts are within
1535the course and scope of the agency or employment. See
1545Roessler v. Novak , 858 So. 2d 1158, 1161 (Fla. 2d DCA
15562003).
1557The nurses and obstetrician who were involved in Mrs.
1566Brown's treatment were employees of the district acting
1574within the scope of their employment. Accordingly, the
1582negligence of these actors is attributable to the district.
1591The district's employee's each had a duty to provide Mrs.
1601Brown and Darian with competent medical care. Such duty
1610was breached, wit h tragic consequences: Had Darian been
1619delivered shortly after his fetal heart signals became
1627ominous late in the evening on January 14, 2000, as he
1638reasonably should have been, rather than 8 or 9 hours later,
1649as in fact he was, Darian likely would not ha ve suffered a
1662catastrophic brain injury before birth. The negligence of the
1671district's employees and agents was a direct and proximate
1680cause of Darian's substantial damages.
1685The sum that the North Florida Hospital District has agreed
1695to pay Darian ($2.2 million in the aggregate) is a relatively
1706SPECIAL MASTERÓS FINAL REPORT Î SB 306 (2011)
1714February 1, 2011
1717Page 6
1719small percentage of Darian's total economic losses. If this
1728claim bill is enacted, the Brown family's recovery, including
1737the funds previously received from other sources, should be
1746adequate to cover Darian's futu re medical needs. The
1755undersigned concludes that the settlement at hand is both
1764reasonable and responsible.
1767ATTORNEYS FEES: Section 768.28(8), Florida Statutes, provides that "[n] o
1777attorney may charge, demand, receive, or collect, for
1785services rendere d, fees in excess of 25 percent of any
1796judgment or settlement. " The law firm that the Harris family
1806retained, Clark, Fountain, La Vista, Prather, Keen & Littky -
1816Rubin, LLP, has submitted the affidavit of Nancy La Vista,
1826Esquire, attesting that, if the clai mants were awarded $2
1836million under the claim bill at issue, the attorneys' fees would
1847be limited to $500,000, or 25 percent of the compensation
1858being sought.
1860RECOMMENDATIONS: For the reasons set forth above, I recommend that Senate
1871Bill 306 (2011) be reported FAVORABLY.
1877Respectfully submitted,
1879John G. Van Laningham
1883Senate Special Master
1886cc: Senator Nan H. Rich
1891R. Philip Twogood , Secretary of the Senate
1898Counsel of Record
- Date
- Proceedings
- PDF:
- Date: 05/23/2011
- Proceedings: Transmittal letter from Claudia Llado forwarding records to the agency.
- Date: 05/09/2011
- Proceedings: End of 2011 Regular Session.
Case Information
- Judge:
- JOHN G. VAN LANINGHAM
- Date Filed:
- 01/10/2011
- Date Assignment:
- 01/10/2011
- Last Docket Entry:
- 05/23/2011
- Location:
- Laurel Hill, Florida
- District:
- Northern
- Agency:
- Contract Hearings
- Suffix:
- CB
Counsels
-
Thomas C. Heath, Esquire
Address of Record -
Nancy La Vista, Esquire
Address of Record -
Leah Marino, Deputy General Counsel
Address of Record -
Tom Thomas, Esquire
Address of Record