11-001272PL Department Of Health, Board Of Physical Therapy vs. Marly Delis Cueto, P.T.
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, July 19, 2011.


View Dockets  
Summary: Respondent was convicted of a crime which directly relates to the practice of physical therapy and failed to timely report the conviction. She was also terminated from the Medicaid program. For these offenses, discipline is recommended.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF )

14PHYSICAL THERAPY PRACTICE , )

18)

19Petitioner, )

21) Case No s . 1 1 - 1271 PL

31vs. ) 11 - 1272PL

36)

37MARLY DELIS CUETO , P.T . , )

43)

44Respondent. )

46)

47RECOMMENDED ORDER

49This case came before Administrative Law Judge John G. Van

59Laningham for final hearing by video teleconference on May 17 ,

692011, at sites in Tallahassee and Miami, Florida.

77APPEARANCES

78For Petitioner: Greg S. Marr , Esquire

84John B. Fricke , Esquire

88S. J. DiConcilio, Esquire

92Department of Health

954052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin C - 65

103Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 3265

108For Respondent: James M. Barclay, Esquire

114Clark, Partington, Hart, Larry,

118Bond & Stackhouse

121106 East College Avenue, Suite 600

127Tallahassee , Florida 32516

130Javier Talamo, Esquire

133Kravitz & Talamo, LLP

1377600 West 20th Avenue, Suite 213

143Hialeah, Florida 33016 - 1894

148STATEMENT OF THE ISSU ES

153The issue s in this case are whether Respondent: (a) was

164c onvicted of a crime which directly relates to the practice of

176physical therapy; (b) failed to timely report a criminal

185conviction to the Board of Physical Therapy Practice; and (c)

195was terminated from the Medicaid program, as Petitioner has

204alleged; and, i f one or more of these allegations are

215established, whether the Board should impose discipline on

223Respondent's physical therapy license within the applicable

230penalty guidelines or take some other action.

237PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

239On October 21 , 200 9 , Petit ioner Department of Health issued

250a two - count Administrative Complaint against Respondent Marly

259Delis Cueto, P.T. The Department alleged that Ms. Cueto had

269been convicted of a crime which directly relate s to the practice

281of physical therapy, and that she had failed to report this

292conviction to the Board of Physical Therapy Practice within 30

302days after it occurred, as the law requires. On April 21, 2010,

314the Department issued a second Administrative Complaint against

322Ms. Cueto, in which she was charged wi th having been terminated

334for cause from further participation as an enrolled Medicaid

343provider.

344In response to each complaint, Ms. Cueto timely requested a

354formal h earing , and on March 11, 2011 , the Department filed the

366pleadings with the Division of Admi nistrative Hearings . Upon

376receipt, the matters were docketed, respectively, as Case Nos.

38511 - 1271PL (involving the two - count complaint) and 11 - 1272PL

398(involving the one - count complaint), and an Administrative Law

408Judge was assigned to preside in them . By order dated March 28,

4212011, these two cases were consolidated for all purposes,

430including the final hearing.

434The final hearing took place as scheduled on May 17, 2011,

445with both parties present. The Department called as witnesses

454Michael R. Coleman, Jenn ifer Wenhold, Horace L. Dozier, and

464William S. Quillen, Ph.D . In addition, Petitioner ' s Exhibits 1

476through 4 and 7 wer e received in evidence. 1 (Petitioner's

487Exhibit 5 was not offered and those identified as 2A and 6 were

500withdrawn.)

501Ms. Cueto testified on h er own behalf and presented no

512other witnesses. Respondent's Exhibits 1 through 7 were

520admitted into evidence .

524The one - volume final hearing transcript was filed on

534June 1 1 , 2011 . The time for submitting p roposed r ecommended

547o rders was enlarged to June 30, 2011, on Ms. Cueto's unopposed

559motion . Each party met this deadline, and their respective

569Proposed Recommended Order s have been considered .

577FINDINGS OF FACT

5801 . At all times relevant to this case, Respondent Marly

591Delis Cueto ("Cueto"), P.T ., w as licensed as a physical

604therapist in the s tate of Florida .

6122. Petit ioner Department of Health (" Department " ) has

622regulatory jurisdiction over licensed physical therapists such

629as Cueto . In particular, the Department is authorized to file

640and prosecu te an administrative complaint against a physica l

650therapist , as it has done in this instance, when a panel of the

663Board of Physical Therapy Practice ("Board") has found that

674probable cause exists to suspect that the therapist has

683committed a disciplinable offense. Exercising its prosecutorial

690authority, t he Department has charged Cueto with three such

700offense s , namely, being convicted of a crime which directly

710relates to the practice of physical therapy; failing to report

720this conviction to the Board; and being terminated from the

730state Medicaid program .

7343 . It is undisputed that, on November 5, 2008 , in a case

747styled State of Florida v. Cueto , No. 08 - 16209CF10A , the Circuit

759Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Broward

769County, Florida , a ccepted Cueto's plea of nolo contendere to the

780single count of grand theft (a third - degree felony) with which

792she had been charged; withheld adjudication of guilt; and

801sentenced her to a term of two years' probation with special

812conditions. The conditions were that Cueto pay the Agency for

822Health Care Administration ("AHCA") $28,000 as restitution to

833the Medicaid program, from which she had stolen funds; and that

844she relinquish her Medicare and Medicaid provider numbers while

853on probation.

8554. Cueto did n ot explain the reasons for, and

865circumstances surrounding , her plea of nolo contendere. There

873is , at bottom, no persuasive evidence in the record upon which

884to base any findings of an exculpatory nature concerning the

894underlying criminal charge for which Cueto was sentenced.

902Where, as here, there is insufficient proof of objectively

911reasonable grounds for entering a plea of no contest, which are

922consistent with innocence, the undersigned presumes that the

930licensee entered the plea because of a guilty cons cience or in

942surrender to overwhelming odds of conviction. Thus, it is

951determined that Cueto's plea of nolo contendere constituted a

960conviction.

9615 . T he conduct which gave rise to Cueto 's conviction is

974relevant only for the limited purpose of determining whether the

984crime directly relates to the practice of physical therapy . In

995this regard, the undersigned finds that during the period from

1005January 1, 2007 to April 22, 2008, Cueto ÏÏ who, as a licensed

1018physical therapist, was an enrolled Medicaid provider ÏÏ k nowingly

1028and intentionally submitted multiple claims to the Florida

1036Medicaid program for physical therapy services that she had not

1046actually rendered, on which false claims she was paid at least

1057$28,000 to which she was not entitled. It is determined that

1069Cueto was convicted of a crime which directly relates to the

1080practice of physical therapy.

10846. Cueto did not report to the Board that fact that she

1096had pleaded nolo contendere to a crime, as she was legally

1107required to do within 30 days after entering the plea.

11177. On September 30, 2009, AHCA entered a Final Order

1127terminating Cueto from participation as a provider in the

1136Florida Medicaid program. AHCA imposed this sanction against

1144Cueto pursuant to Florida Administrative Code Rule 59G - 9.070 (8)

1155(2008) ÏÏ a s it was authorized to do under section 409.913 (13) ,

1168Florida Statutes (2009) ÏÏ because she had been convicted of grand

1179theft on November 5, 2008. As of the final hearing in this

1191case, Cueto had not been reenrolled as a Medicaid provider.

1201CONCLUSIONS OF LA W

12058 . The Division of Administrative Hearings has personal

1214and subject matter jurisdiction in this proceeding pursuan t to

1224s ections 120.569, and 120.57(1), Florida Statutes (201 1 ) .

12359 . A proceeding, such as this one, to suspend, revoke, or

1247impose other disc ipline upon a license is penal in nature.

1258State ex rel. Vining v. Fl a . Real Estate Comm ' n , 281 So. 2d 487,

1275491 (Fla. 1973). Accordingly, to impose discipline, the

1283Department must prove the charges against Cueto by clear and

1293convincing evidence. Dep ' t of Banking & Fin., Div. of Sec. &

1306Investor Prot . v. Osborne Stern & Co. , 670 So. 2d 932, 933 - 34

1321(Fla. 1996)(citing Ferris v. Turlington , 510 So. 2d 292, 294 - 95

1333(Fla. 1987)); Nair v. Dep ' t of Bus . & Pro f ' l Reg . , Bd. of Med . ,

1354654 So. 2d 205, 207 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

136310 . Regarding the standard of proof, in Slomowitz v.

1373Walker , 429 So. 2d 797, 800 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), the court

1385developed a " workable definition of clear and convincing

1393evidence " and found that of necessity such a definition would

1403need to contain " both qualitative and quantitative standards. "

1411The court held that:

1415clear and convincing evidence requires that

1421the evidence must be found to be credible;

1429the facts to which the witnesses testify

1436must be distinctly remembered; the testimony

1442must be precise and explicit and the

1449witnesses must be lacking in confusion as to

1457the facts in issue. The evidence must be of

1466such weight that it produces in the mind of

1475the trier of fact a firm belief or

1483conviction, without hesitancy, as to the

1489truth of the allegations sought to be

1496established.

1497Id. The Florida Supreme Court later adopted the Slomowitz

1506court ' s description of clear and convincing evidence. See In re

1518Davey , 645 So. 2d 398, 404 (Fla. 1994). The First District

1529Court of Appeal also has followed the Slomow itz test, adding the

1541interpretive comment that " [a]lthough this standard of proof may

1550be met where the evidence is in conflict, . . . it seems to

1564preclude evidence that is ambiguous. " Westinghouse Elec. Corp.

1572v. Shuler Bros., Inc. , 590 So. 2d 986, 988 (Fl a. 1st DCA 1991),

1586rev . denied , 599 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. 1992)(citation omitted).

159611 . In Count One of the Administrative Complaint which

1606initiated Case No. 11 - 1271PL , the Department charged Cueto under

1617s ection 4 86.125 (1)(c), Florida Statutes (2008) , 2 which p rovides

1629in pertinent part as follows:

1634(1) The following acts constitute grounds

1640for denial of a license or disciplinary

1647action . . . :

1652* * *

1655(c) Being convicted or found guilty of, or

1663entering a plea of nolo contendere to,

1670rega r dless of adjudicat ion, a crime in any

1680jurisdiction which directly relates to the

1686practice of physical therapy or to the

1693ability to practice physical therapy . The

1700entry of a plea of nolo contendere shall be

1709considered a conviction for purpose [ sic ] of

1718this chapter.

17201 2 . The evidence prove s clearly and convincingly that

1731Cueto entered a plea of nolo contendere to a crime that is

1743directly relate d to the practice of physical therapy . She was

1755not tried and found guilty of the crime, however, nor was she

1767adjudicated guilty of grand theft.

17721 3 . Generally speaking, "[i]n the eyes of the law a person

1785is not deemed to have committed a crime until an adjudication of

1797guilt has been entered against him." Holland v. Fla. Real

1807Estate Comm'n , 352 So. 2d 914, 916 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)(real

1818estate agent who had pleaded nolo contendere to, and been found

1829guilty of, the felony charge of gross fraud could not

1839subsequently be disciplined for having "[b]een guilty of a

1848crime" because the court had withheld adjudication). Section

18564 8 6 .125 (1)(c) at tempts to override this general principle by

1869equating a no contest plea with a conviction.

187714 . In Ayala v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg. , 478 So. 2d 1116

1890(Fla. 1st DCA 1985), the court considered the question of

1900whether section 458.331(1)(c), Florida Statutes (198 3) ÏÏ to which

1910section 460.413(1)(c) is ide ntical except that it refers to the

1921practice of physical therapy instead of medicine ÏÏ was

1930unconstitutional for creating a conclusive presumption of guilt

1938on the predicate fact of a no contest plea. Rather than deci de

1951the constitutional issue, however, the court instead elected to

1960interpret the statute in a way that would "allow it to withstand

1972constitutional attack." Id. at 1118. Announcing its holding,

1980the court wrote:

1983We find that section 458.331(1)(c) is

1989clearl y constitutional by construing the

1995word "shall" in the last sentence of that

2003subsection as permissive rather than

2008mandatory in meaning. Rich v. Ryals , 212

2015So. 2d 641, 643 . As so construed, the Board

2025of Medical Examiners may presumptively

2030consider the nol o contendere plea as

2037evidence of a conviction for purposes of

2044chapter 458; however, in accordance with the

2051Supreme Court's opinion in The Florida Bar

2058v. Lancaster , 448 So. 2d 1019 , the Board

2066must allow appellant the opportunity to

2072rebut this presumption an d assert his

2079innocence of the underlying criminal charges

2085by explaining the reasons and circumstances

2091surrounding his plea of nolo contendere, and

2098thereby attempt to convince the Board that

2105he is not guilty of a crime in violation of

2115the provisions of sect ion 458.331(1)(c) .

2122The Board must consider this evidence in

2129deciding appellant's guilt or innocence for

2135purposes of the disciplinary charges. Such

2141explanation may, of course, always be

2147considered in mitigation of punishment if

2153appellant should be adjudic ated guilty by

2160the Board.

2162Id. at 1118 - 19. See also Dep't of Health v. Higginbotham , Case

2175No. 10 - 2796PL, 2011 Fla. Div. Adm. Hear. LEXIS 106 ( Fla. DOAH

2189May 11, 2011).

219215. Ayala says , in short, that the Department is entitled

2202to rely on a presumption , which arises from the no contest plea,

2214that the respondent was convicted of a crime for which

2224administrative discipline may be imposed. The presumption is

2232rebuttable, however, and thus the respondent must be allowed to

"2242assert his innocence" of the crim e ÏÏ not, significantly, by

2253proving his innocence (although the option of proving that his

2263conduct did not violate the criminal law should be open to the

2275respondent), but rather by proving the circumstances surrounding

2283his plea and the reasons for entering s uch a plea, which

2295evidence then must be considered in determining whether the

2304respondent is guilty of the disciplinable offense.

231116. As a matter of fact, as found above, Cueto failed to

2323rebut the Ayala presumption. The evidence shows clearly and

2332convi ncingly that she was in fact "convicted" of a crime which

2344directly relates to the practice of physical therapy.

2352Therefore, Cueto is guilty of the offense described in s ection

2363486.125 (1)(c).

236517. In Count Two of the Administrative Complaint which

2374initiate d Case No. 11 - 1271PL , the Department charged Cueto under

2386s ection 456.072(1)(x ), Florida Statutes (2008), which states as

2396follows:

2397Failing to report to the board, or the

2405department if there is no board, in writing

2413within 30 days after the licensee has been

2421convicted or found guilty of, or entered a

2429plea of nolo contendere to, regardless of

2436adjudication, a crime in any jurisdiction

2442[shall constitute grounds for discipline] .

2448Convictions, findings, adjudications, and

2452pleas entered into prior to the enactment o f

2461this paragraph must be reported in writing

2468to the board, or department if there is no

2477board, on or before October 1, 1999.

2484Cueto failed to report her conviction to the Board as required.

2495She is therefore guilty of the offense described in s ection

2506456.0 72(1)(x ) .

251018. In the Administrative Complaint which initiated Case

2518No. 11 - 1272PL , the Department charged Cueto under s ection

2529456.072(1)(kk ), Florida Statutes (2009), which provides:

2536Being terminated from the state Medicaid

2542program pursuant to s. 409.913, any other

2549state Medicaid program, or the federal

2555Medicare program [shall constitute grounds

2560for discipline], unless eligibility to

2565participate in the program from which the

2572practitioner was terminated has been

2577restored.

2578Cueto was in fact terminated from the state Medicaid program

2588pursuant to section 409.913, and she had not been reenrolled

2598therein at the time of the final hearing in this case. She is

2611therefore guilty of the offense defined in s ection

2620456.072(1)(kk ), Florida Statutes (2009).

262519. Cueto c ontends that she was not terminated from

2635Medicaid "for cause" as the Department has alleged. S ection

2645456.072(1)(kk ) does not require, as a prerequisite to imposing

2655discipline, that the Medicaid provider have been terminated for

2664cause. Nevertheless, Cueto was terminated for cause, that being

2673her conviction for grand theft, which crime relates to the

2683practice of physical therapy. At the time AHCA terminated

2692Cueto's participation as an enrolled provider, the penalty

2700guidelines then in effect for violations of Medicaid - related

2710laws required that the sanction of termination be imposed for a

2721violation of section 409.913(13 ) (b) , which statute directs AHCA

2731to immediately terminate the participation of a Medicaid

2739provider who has been convicted of a crime relating to the

2750practice of the provider's profession. See Fla. Admin Code R.

276059G - 9.070(8)(a)2. (2008). The same rule defined "termination"

2769as "a twenty - year preclusion from any action that results in a

2782claim for payment to the Medicaid program as a result of

2793fu rnishing, supervising a person who is furnishing, or causing a

2804person to furnish goods or services." Fla. Admin Code R. 59G -

28169.070(2)(y).

281720. The Department might have alleged that Cueto's

2825termination had been for cause because under the Board's current

2835disciplinary guidelines, which took effect on June 30, 2010, a

2845termination for cause from the Medicaid program warrants a

2854harsher penalty than does a termination "not . . . for cause."

2866Fla. Admin. Code R. 64B17 - 7.001(1)(ff)(2010). Although this

2875Board rul e does not define "cause," AHCA's current disciplinary

2885guidelines, which became effective on September 7, 2010, provide

2894that a "termination pursuant to this rule is also called a 'for

2906cause' or 'with cause' termination." Fla. Admin. Code R. 59G -

29179.070(3)(p )(2010). Neither rule , however, applies in this case,

2926which must be decided under the disciplinary guidelines in

2935effect at the time the offense was committed. See Orasan v. Ag.

2947for Health Care Admin. , 668 So. 2d 1062, 1063 (Fla. 1st DCA

29591996); Willner v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg. , 563 So. 2d 805, 806

2971(Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

297521. Cueto was convicted of a crime relating to the

2985practice of physical therapy in November 2008. Under the then

2995applicable disciplinary guidelines, t he range of penalties for a

3005first o ffense involving s ection 48 6 . 125 (1)(c) , when the

3018underlying crime was a felony, is from " a minimum of fine of

3030$5,000 and two years probation, up to a fine of $10,000 and/or

3044revocation . " Fla. Admin. Code R. 64B17 - 7.001(1)(c)(2007).

305322. Cueto's failure to report her conviction to the Board

3063within 30 days occurred in December 2008. Under the then

3073applicable disciplinary guidelines, t he range of penalties for a

3083first offense involving s ection 4 56 . 072(1)(x) is "from a minimum

3096fine of $1,000 and/or a letter o f concern, up to a maximum fine

3111of $3,000 and/or one month suspension of license followed by two

3123years of probation." Fla. Admin. Code R. 64B17 -

31327.001(1)(x)(2007).

313323. Cueto was terminated from the Medicaid program in

3142September 2009. Rule 64B17 - 7.001 (20 07), which was in effect at

3155that time, does not prescribe a punishment for the offense

3165defined in section 456.072(1)(kk ), Florida Statutes (2009).

3173Cueto can be sanctioned for this offense, however, through

3182section 486.125(1)(k), Florida Statutes (2009), w hich , as the

3191Department alleged in the Administrative Complaint, provides

3198that a violation of chapter 456 is grounds for discipline.

320824. Under the disciplinary guidelines in effect in

3216September 2009, t he range of penalties for a first offense

3227involving s e ction 486.125(1)(k) is "from a minimum fine of

3238$1,000 and/or a letter of concern, up to a maximum fine of

3251$5,000 and/or suspension of license for two years followed by

3262two years of probation." Fla. Admin. Code R. 64B17 -

32727.001(1)(x)(2007).

32732 5 . Rule 64B17 - 7 .001(2)(2007) provides that, in applying

3285the penalty guidelines, the following aggravating and mitigating

3293circumstances are to be taken into account:

3300( a) The danger to the public;

3307(b) The number of distinct charges;

3313(c) The actual damage, physical or

3319ot herwise, to the patient(s);

3324(d) The length of time since the date of

3333the last violation(s);

3336(e) The length of time that the licensee

3344has held a license in any jurisdiction;

3351(f) The deterrent effect of the penalty

3358imposed;

3359(g) Rehabilitation efforts of the licensee

3365including remorse, restitution, and

3369corrective action(s);

3371(h) The effect of the penalty on the

3379licensee ' s livelihood;

3383(i) Efforts of the licensee to report or

3391stop violations or the failure of the

3398licensee to correct or stop violations;

3404(j) The willfulness and/or negligence of

3410the licensee pertaining to any violation;

3416(k) Any other mitigating or aggravating

3422circumstances.

3423The undersigned concludes that consideration of the aggravating

3431and mitigating factors leads to a wash . Thus, an appro priate

3443penalty should fall squarely within the prescribed range.

345126 . The Department has propose d that Cueto's license be

3462revoked and that s he be required to pay an administrative fine of

3475$10,000 . Although t his penalty comes within the applicable

3486range o f penalties and hence is within the Board's discretion to

3498impose, it is harsher than necessary to protect the public .

3509RECOMMENDATION

3510Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of

3520Law, it is RECOMMENDED that the Board of Physical Therapy

3530Practi ce enter a final order finding Marly Delis Cueto guilty of

3542the offense described in s ection 48 6.125 (1)(c), Florida

3552Statutes , i.e., being convicted of a crime that directly rela te s

3564to the practice of physical therapy; guilty of the offense

3574defined in sectio n 456.072(1)(x), namely failing to timely

3583report a criminal conviction to the Board; and guilty of the

3594offense defined in section 486.125(1)(k), in consequence of

3602having been terminated from the Medicaid program, which latter

3611constitutes a disciplinable of fense under section

3618456.072(1)(kk) . It is further RECOMMENDED that the Board impose

3628an administrative fine of $1 4 ,000 and suspend Cueto's physical

3639therapy license for two years, to be followed by two years of

3651probation on such reasonable terms and conditi ons as the Board

3662establish es , which may include the requirement that Cueto pay in

3673full the $28,000 she has been ordered to remit to AHCA as

3686restitution of the stolen funds .

3692DONE AND ENTERED this 19th day of Ju ly , 20 1 1 , in

3705Tallahassee, Leon County, Florid a.

3710S

3711___________________________________

3712JOHN G. VAN LANINGHAM

3716Administrative Law Judge

3719Division of Administrative Hearings

3723The DeSoto Building

37261230 Apalachee Parkway

3729Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 3060

3734(850) 488 - 9675 SUNCOM 278 - 9675

3742Fax Filing (850) 921 - 68 47

3749www.doah.state.fl.us

3750Filed with the Clerk of the

3756Division of Administrative Hearings

3760this 19th day of Ju ly , 20 1 1 .

3770ENDNOTES

37711 / Petitioner's Exhibit 7 is Dr. Quillen's curriculum vitae,

3781which the Department was permitted to submit after the final

3791hearing. Before filing this CV, the Department had marked it

3801for identification as Petitioner's Exhibit 1. The undersigned

3809renumbered the document so that no two Petitioner's Exhibits

3818would bear the same number.

38232 / Additionally, or in the alternative, the Department charged

3833Cueto under section 486.125(1)(k)(violating any provision of

3840chapter 486 or chapter 456 subjects licensee to pu nishment),

3850alleging that her no contest plea was disciplinable pursuant to

3860section 456.073(1)(c), which m akes it an offense to enter a plea

3872of guilty or nolo contendere to a crime relating to the practice

3884of the licensee's profession. The undersigned need not decide

3893in this case whether it is legally permissible to charge a

3904physical therapist under section 4 56.073(1)(c) ÏÏ a general

3913statute which applies without apparent limitation to all

3921licensed health care providers ÏÏ as an alternative to charging

3931the therapist under section 486.125(1)(c), which is a specific

3940statute applicable only to licensed physical thera pists. See

3949B.D.M. Fin. Corp. v. Dep't of Bus. & Pro f 'l Reg. , 698 So. 2d

39641359, 1362 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)(agency erred in revoking

3973registration under statu t e generally authorizing "affirmative

3981action" to enforce law because another statute having more

3990rigoro us criteria specifically addressed revocations); Sheils v.

3998Jack Eckerd Corp. , 560 So. 2d 361, 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)(in

4010action against pharmacy for damages, shorter limitation period

4018specifically applicable to professional malpractice claims

4024controlled ove r longer period governing products liability

4032actions generally because "where a general law that applies to

4042numerous classes of cases conflicts with the law that applies

4052only to a particular class, the latter, or more specific law,

4063generally controls . . . ."). The outcome here happens to be

4076the same under either section. At any rate, moreover, Cueto's

4086criminal conviction constitutes but a single disciplinable "act"

4094for which she cannot fairly receive multiple administrative

4102punishments. Cf. Syder v. Sta te , 921 So. 2d 871, 873 (Fla. 4th

4115DCA 2006)(Double Jeopardy Clause prohibits the government from

4123securing multiple criminal convictions based on same conduct).

4131COPIES FURNISHED :

4134Greg S. Marr , Esquire

4138John B. Fricke , Esquire

4142S. J. DiConcilio, Esquire

4146Department of Health

41494052 Bald Cyp ress Way, Bin C - 65

4158Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 3265

4163James M. Barclay, Esquire

4167Clark, Partington, Hart, Larry,

4171Bond & Stackhouse

4174106 East College Avenue, Suite 600

4180Tallahassee, Florida 32516

4183Javier Talamo, Esquire

4186Kravitz & Talamo, LLP

41907600 West 20th Avenue, Suite 213

4196Hialeah, Florida 33016 - 1894

4201Allen Hall , Executive Director

4205Board of Physical Therapy Practice

421040 5 2 Bald Cypress Way , Bin C - 05

4220Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 3255

4225Nicholas W. Romanello, General Counsel

4230Department of Health

42334052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin A - 02

4241Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 1701

4246NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

4252All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

426215 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions

4273to this Recommended Order should be file d with the agency that

4285will issue the Final Order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
PDF:
Date: 12/06/2011
Proceedings: Marly Cueto's Notice of Prejudicial Error, Notice of Hearing, Motion to Recuse Fl Bd of Physical Therapy, Motion to Impound Prejudicial ex parte Documents, Motion for Attorney Fees and Motion for Sanctions filed.
PDF:
Date: 12/06/2011
Proceedings: Respondent Marly Cueto's Opposition to Department's Exception to Recommended Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 12/06/2011
Proceedings: Petitioner's Responses to Respondent's Exceptions to Recommended Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 12/06/2011
Proceedings: Petitioner's Exception to Recommended Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 12/06/2011
Proceedings: Respondent Marly Cueto's Exceptions to Recommended Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 12/06/2011
Proceedings: (Agency) Final Order by Recommended Order with Exceptions filed.
PDF:
Date: 12/02/2011
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 07/19/2011
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 07/19/2011
Proceedings: Recommended Order (hearing held May 17, 2011). CASE CLOSED.
PDF:
Date: 07/19/2011
Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
PDF:
Date: 06/30/2011
Proceedings: Respondent Marly Cueto's Proposed Recommended Order (filed in Case No. 11-001272PL).
PDF:
Date: 06/30/2011
Proceedings: Respondent Marly Cueto's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/30/2011
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/15/2011
Proceedings: Order Granting Enlargement of Time.
PDF:
Date: 06/13/2011
Proceedings: Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Recommended Orders (filed in Case No. 11-001272PL).
PDF:
Date: 06/13/2011
Proceedings: Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Recommended Orders filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/10/2011
Proceedings: Notice of Filing Transcript.
Date: 06/06/2011
Proceedings: Transcript of Proceedings (not available for viewing) filed.
Date: 05/17/2011
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
PDF:
Date: 05/17/2011
Proceedings: Final Hearing Exhibit - Petitioner's Exhibit 1 (exhibit not available for viewing) filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/11/2011
Proceedings: Notice of Appearance (of J. Fricke) filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/11/2011
Proceedings: Notice of Appearance (of M. Shah) filed.
Date: 05/11/2011
Proceedings: Respondent's Marly Delis Cueto's Exhibits (exhibits not available for viewing)
PDF:
Date: 05/11/2011
Proceedings: Order Denying Continuance of Final Hearing.
PDF:
Date: 05/10/2011
Proceedings: Letter to Claudia Llado from Greg Marr regarding exhibits 1-5, intended to be offered into evidence (exhibits not available for viewing) filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/10/2011
Proceedings: Subpoena Duces Tecum (William Quillen) filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/10/2011
Proceedings: Affidavit of Service (William Quillen) filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/09/2011
Proceedings: Petitioner's Opposition to Respondent's Motion to Reschedule Final Hearing filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/09/2011
Proceedings: Motion to Reschedule Final Hearing (filed in Case No. 11-001272PL).
PDF:
Date: 05/09/2011
Proceedings: Joint Pre-hearing Stipulation (filed in Case No. 11-001272PL).
PDF:
Date: 05/09/2011
Proceedings: Motion to Reschedule Final Hearing filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/09/2011
Proceedings: Joint Pre-hearing Stipulation filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/05/2011
Proceedings: Order Taking Official Recognition.
PDF:
Date: 04/28/2011
Proceedings: Motion to Take Official Recognition filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/28/2011
Proceedings: Motion to Take Official Recognition filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/28/2011
Proceedings: Motion to Take Official Recognition filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/27/2011
Proceedings: Notice of Appearance (of S.J. DiConcilio) filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/27/2011
Proceedings: Subpoena Duces Tecum (Horace Dozier) filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/22/2011
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum (of W. Quillen; filed in Case No. 11-001272PL).
PDF:
Date: 04/22/2011
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum (of W. Quillen) filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/21/2011
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum (of H. Dozier; filed in Case No. 11-001272PL).
PDF:
Date: 04/21/2011
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum (of H. Dozier) filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/20/2011
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum (of J. Wenhold; filed in Case No. 11-001272PL).
PDF:
Date: 04/20/2011
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum (of A. Hall; filed in Case No. 11-001272PL).
PDF:
Date: 04/20/2011
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum (of J. Wenhold) filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/20/2011
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum (of A. Hall) filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/19/2011
Proceedings: Mary Delis Cueto's Response to Requests for Admission (filed in Case No. 11-001272PL).
PDF:
Date: 04/19/2011
Proceedings: Mary Delis Cueto's Response to Requests for Admission filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/19/2011
Proceedings: Mary Delis Cueto's Response to Request for Production (filed in Case No. 11-001272PL).
PDF:
Date: 04/19/2011
Proceedings: Mary Delis Cueto's Response to Request for Production filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/19/2011
Proceedings: Notice of Intent to Offer Evidence Under Section 90.803(6)(a), Florida Statutes-Department of Health Licensing File filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/08/2011
Proceedings: Amended Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for May 17 and 18, 2011; 9:00 a.m.; Miami and Tallahassee, FL; amended as to Dates).
PDF:
Date: 04/06/2011
Proceedings: Amended Notice of Taking Depositon (of M. Cueto) filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/06/2011
Proceedings: Notice of Change in Law Firm Affiliation, Address, and Contact Information (filed in Case No. 11-001272PL).
PDF:
Date: 04/06/2011
Proceedings: Notice of Change in Law Firm Affiliation, Address, and Contact Information filed.
PDF:
Date: 04/05/2011
Proceedings: Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
PDF:
Date: 04/05/2011
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for May 17, 2011; 9:00 a.m.; Miami and Tallahassee, FL).
PDF:
Date: 03/29/2011
Proceedings: Notice of Taking Deposition (of M. Cueto) filed.
PDF:
Date: 03/28/2011
Proceedings: Order of Consolidation (DOAH Case Nos. 11-1271PL, and 11-1272PL).
PDF:
Date: 03/21/2011
Proceedings: Motion to Consolidate filed.
PDF:
Date: 03/21/2011
Proceedings: Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 03/17/2011
Proceedings: Petitioner's Notice of Method of Recording Testimony at Final Hearing filed.
PDF:
Date: 03/16/2011
Proceedings: Notice of Serving Petitioner's Request for Production, Interrogatories, and Request for Admission to Respondent filed.
PDF:
Date: 03/14/2011
Proceedings: Initial Order.
PDF:
Date: 03/11/2011
Proceedings: Marly Delis Cueto's Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
PDF:
Date: 03/11/2011
Proceedings: Election of Rights filed.
PDF:
Date: 03/11/2011
Proceedings: Administrative Complaint filed.
PDF:
Date: 03/11/2011
Proceedings: Agency referral filed.

Case Information

Judge:
JOHN G. VAN LANINGHAM
Date Filed:
03/11/2011
Date Assignment:
03/14/2011
Last Docket Entry:
12/06/2011
Location:
Miami, Florida
District:
Southern
Agency:
ADOPTED IN TOTO
Suffix:
PL
 

Counsels

Related Florida Statute(s) (8):