11-004075CB
In Re: Senate Bill 6 (Denise Gordon Brown And David Brown) vs.
*
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Friday, March 30, 2012.
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Friday, March 30, 2012.
1THE FLORIDA SENATE
4SPECIAL MASTER ON CLAIM BILLS
9Location
10402 Senate Office Building
14Mailing Address
16404 South Monroe Street
20Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 1100
25(850) 487 - 5237
29DATE COMM ACTION
321 2/1/11 SM Favorable
36December 1, 2011
39The Honorable Mike Haridopolos
43President, The Florida Senate
47Suite 409, The Capitol
51Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 1100
56Re: SB 6 (2012) Î Senator Joe Negron
64Relief of Denise Brown and David Brown, for the benefit of their son,
77Darian Brown
79SPECIAL MASTERÓS FINAL REPORT
83THIS UNOPPOSED EQUITABLE CLAIM AGAINST THE
89NORTH BROWARD HOSPIT AL DISTRICT, WHICH I S FOR
98$2 MILLION IN LOCAL FUNDS, ARISES FROM T HE BIRTH
108OF DARIAN BROWN, A C HILD WHO SUFFERED A
117CATASTROPHIC BRAIN I NJURY IN UTERO DUE T O THE
127HOSPITAL STAFF'S NEG LIGENT DELAY IN
133R ECOGNIZING THE SIGNS OF FETAL DISTRESS,
140WHICH RESULTED IN AN UNTIMELY DELIVERY BY C -
149SECTION.
150FINDINGS OF FACT: On January 10, 2000, Denise Brown's obstetrician, Dr.
161Danoff, discovered that the fetal heart rate of the baby Mrs.
172Brown was carrying was elev ated. Because Mrs. Brown,
181who was then about 33 weeks pregnant, had delivered
190prematurely in the past, Dr. Danoff sent her to Broward
200General Hospital for observation and to rule out preterm
209labor. Mrs. Brown was admitted to the hospital at 11:30 a.m.
220D r. Danoff directed that Mrs. Brown have continuous fetal
230heart monitoring and gave standing orders that the nurse on
240duty was to notify the obstetrician if the baby's heart rate
251ever exceeded 160 beats per minute.
257SPECIAL MASTERÓS FINAL REPORT Î SB 6 (2012)
265December 1, 2011
268Page 2
270From January 10 through January 14, 2000 , Mrs. Brown
279remained stable, and her baby's heart rate stayed within
288normal limits. At about 5:00 p.m. on January 14, 2000,
298however, the fetal monitoring strips (printed graph paper
306showing displaying "tracings" of both the fetal heart rate and
316uterine c ontractions) began disclosing an accelerated heart
324rate (a condition known as tachycardia). The nursing staff
333did not notify the obstetrician of this development, despite
342the standing order to do so.
348Over the next few hours, the fetal monitoring strips showed
358increasingly worrisome signs, namely consistent fetal
364tachycardia and loss of fetal heart rate variability. (A healthy
374fetal heart beats at varying rates, creating a tracing that
384looks like a jag ged line. Loss of fetal heart rate variability
396produces a smooth line.) Variability indicates fetal wellbeing.
404The absence of variability may indicate fetal distress. At
41311:00 p.m., the baby's heart rate started to slow periodically
423after uterine contr actions. When this occurs, it is called a
"434late deceleration." Late decelerations are an ominous sign,
442especially in conjunction with tachycardia and loss of
450variability. The nursing staff, however, did not notify the
459obstetrician, or any other physicia n, that Mrs. Brown's baby
469might be in trouble.
473The fetal tachycardia, loss of variability, and late
481decelerations continued throughout the night. At about 5:15
489a.m., the attending nurse finally called an obstetrician, Dr.
498Vasanti Puranik, who was an empl oyee of North Broward
508Hospital District. At Dr. Puranik's request, the fetal
516monitoring strips were faxed to her for review. Upon receipt,
526the doctor discovered that the graph paper had been fed into
537the electronic fetal monitor upside down. The strips,
545therefore, were not readily interpretable, although it could be
554seen that the baby's heart rate lacked variability.
562Dr. Puranik consulted by telephone with another obstetrician,
570Laurie Scott, M.D., and they agreed that it was time to
581deliver Mrs. Brown's baby. Neither doctor rushed to the
590hospital, however. Dr. Puranik arrived on the obstetrical unit
599at 6:27 a.m., where she ordered a routine Caesarian section.
609Mrs. Brown was prepared for surgery. Dr. Puranik began
618the C - section at 7:24 a.m., and Daria n was born at 7:27 a.m.
633SPECIAL MASTERÓS FINAL REPORT Î SB 6 (2012)
641December 1, 2011
644Page 3
646Darian had been oxygen - deprived in his mother's womb for
657hours before his birth. As a result, he was born with
668numerous complications, including respiratory distress
673syndrome, cystic kidney disease, neonatal jaundice,
679neonatal hy poglycemia, and newborn intraventricular
685hemorrhage. He required aggressive resuscitation.
690Eventually, Mrs. Brown and Darian were discharged from the
699hospital. The Browns were not told, however, that Darian
708might have suffered a serious brain injury.
715I n October 2000, Mrs. Brown became concerned that her
725son was not meeting developmental milestones. Her
732inquiries to the pediatrician resulted in a computed
740tomography (CT) scan of Darian's brain being ordered. The
749CT scan showed that Darian's brain had b een seriously and
760irreversibly damaged by partial prolonged hypoxia (oxygen
767deprivation) in the hours before his birth.
774The insult to Darian's brain has left him suffering from
784cerebral palsy, spastic quadriplegia, and developmental
790delay. He is unable t o talk but smiles at family members and
803communicates basic needs by gesturing (e.g., pointing to his
812stomach when hungry or to his head when he has a
823headache). Darian has no bladder or bowel control, cannot
832feed himself, and is unable to perform any acti vities of daily
844living. He will be totally dependent on others for care and
855treatment for the rest of his life.
862Paul M. Deutsch, Ph.D., performed a comprehensive
869evaluation of Darian and prepared Life Care Plan, which
878quantifies the future medical expenses that will be incurred
887over the course of Darian's lifetime. The report prepared by
897the plaintiffs' economist, Raffa Consulting Economists, Inc. ,
904which takes into account Dr. Deutsch's Life Care Plan,
913concludes that the present value of Daran's f uture medical
923needs is between $11.5 and $13.6 million, and that his
933estimated lost earning capacity, reduced to present value, is
942approximately $0.68 million.
945LEGAL PROCEEDINGS: In 2003, Mr. and Mrs. Brown brought suit on their son's
958behalf, and in the ir respective individual capacities, against
967the North Broward Hospital District and others. The action
976was filed in the Circuit Court in and for Broward County,
987Florida.
988SPECIAL MASTERÓS FINAL REPORT Î SB 6 (2012)
996December 1, 2011
999Page 4
1001While the lawsuit was pending, the Browns settled with Dr.
1011Scott and Parinatal As sociates, P. A. for a confidential
1021amount. The case proceeded to trial in 2008 against the
1031North Broward Hospital District as the sole remaining
1039defendant. On June 13, 2008, after four weeks of trial, the
1050jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff s and against
1062the district, awarding a total of $35.2 million in damages.
1072The resulting judgment was appealed. In June 2010, the
1081Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed.
1088The hospital district sued its insurers seeking a declaration
1097of coverage for the damages awarded to the Browns. The
1107coverage lawsuit led to a global settlement under which the
1117district's insurers paid the Browns $10.35 million, the district
1126paid its sovereign immunity limit of $200,000, and the parties
1137agreed that the plaintif fs could seek an additional $2 million
1148through an uncontested claim bill in that amount.
1156Under the settlement agreements, the plaintiffs' net recovery
1164to date (after satisfying medical and legal expenses and
1173attorneys' fees) is approximately $8.5 million. They have
1181paid roughly $3.3 million to their attorneys.
1188CLAIMANTS' ARGUMENTS: The North Broward Hospital District is vicariously liable for
1199the negligent acts of its employees and agents, including but
1209not limited to:
1212Failing timely to alert Mrs. Bro wn's obstetrician, or any
1222medical doctor, of the onset of fetal tachycardia, despite a
1232standing order to do just that.
1238Failing timely to notify a physician of the loss of fetal
1249heart rate variability and subsequent onset of late
1257decelerations, which (the nurses should have known)
1264indicated that the baby was likely in distress.
1272Failing to notice, for hours, that the graph paper in the
1283electronic fetal monitor had been inserted upside down,
1291producing tracings that were not readily interpretable.
1298Failing to order an emergency C - section immediately
1307upon discovery that the baby's fetal heart signals were non -
1318reassuring.
1319SPECIAL MASTERÓS FINAL REPORT Î SB 6 (2012)
1327December 1, 2011
1330Page 5
1332RESPONDENT'S POSITION: The North Broward Hospital District does not oppose the bill.
1344The Chief Executive Officer of the district has attes ted that if
1356the claim bill were enacted, the $2 million award would be
1367paid out of the district's general operating account, and that
1377the payment of this sum would not in any way detrimentally
1388impact the district's ability to provide medical services to th e
1399people of Broward County.
1403CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: As provided in section 768.28, Florida Statutes (2010),
1414sovereign immunity shields the North Broward Hospital
1421District against tort liability in excess of $200,000 per
1431occurrence. See Eldred v. North Browa rd Hospital District ,
1440498 So. 2d 911, 914 (Fla. 1986)(§ 768.28 applies to special
1451hospital taxing districts); Paushter v. South Broward Hospital
1459District , 664 So. 2d 1032, 1033 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). Unless
1470a claim bill is enacted, therefore, Darian and his parents will
1481not realize the full benefit of the settlement agreement they
1491have made with the district.
1496Under the doctrine of respondeat superior, the North
1504Broward Hospital District is vicariously liable for the negligent
1513acts of its agents and employee s, when such acts are within
1525the course and scope of the agency or employment. See
1535Roessler v. Novak , 858 So. 2d 1158, 1161 (Fla. 2d DCA
15462003).
1547The nurses and obstetrician who were involved in Mrs.
1556Brown's treatment were employees of the district actin g
1565within the scope of their employment. Accordingly, the
1573negligence of these actors is attributable to the district.
1582The district's employee s each had a duty to provide Mrs.
1593Brown and Darian with competent medical care. Such duty
1602was breached, with tragic consequences: Had Darian been
1610delivered shortly after his fetal heart signals became
1618ominous late in the evening on January 14, 2000, as he
1629reasonably should have been, rather than 8 or 9 hours later,
1640as in fact he was, Darian likely would not have suffered a
1652catastrophic brain injury before birth. The negligence of the
1661district's employees and agents was a direct and proximate
1670cause of Darian's substantial damages.
1675The sum that the North Florida Hospital District has agreed
1685to pay Darian ($2.2 mi llion in the aggregate) is a relatively
1697small percentage of Darian's total economic losses. If this
1706SPECIAL MASTERÓS FINAL REPORT Î SB 6 (2012)
1714December 1, 2011
1717Page 6
1719claim bill is enacted, the Brown family's recovery, including
1728the funds previously received from other sources, should be
1737adequate to cover Darian's future medical needs. The
1745undersigned concludes that the settlement at hand is both
1754reasonable and responsible.
1757ATTORNEY Ó S FEES: Section 768.28(8), Florida Statutes, provides that "[n] o
1769attorney may charge, demand, receive, or collect, for
1777services rendered, fees in excess of 25 percent of any
1787judgment or settlement. " The law firm that the Harris family
1797retained, Clark, Fountain, La Vista, Prather, Keen & Littky -
1807Rubin, LLP, has submitted the affidavit of Nancy La Vista,
1817Esquire, attesting that, if t he claimants were awarded $2
1827million under the claim bill at issue, the attorneys' fees would
1838be limited to $500,000, or 25 percent of the compensation
1849being sought.
1851RECOMMENDATIONS: For the reasons set forth above , I recommend that Senate
1862Bill 6 (2012 ) be reported FAVORABLY.
1869Respectfully submitted,
1871John G. Van Laningham
1875Senate Special Master
1878cc: Senator Joe Negron
1882Debbie Brown, Interim Secretary of the Senate
1889Counsel of Record
- Date
- Proceedings
- Date: 03/30/2012
- Proceedings: End of 2012 Regular Session. CASE CLOSED.
- PDF:
- Date: 03/30/2012
- Proceedings: Transmittal letter from Claudia Llado forwarding records to the agency.
- PDF:
- Date: 02/23/2012
- Proceedings: Special Master's Final Report released (transmitted to Senate President [February 23, 2012]).
- PDF:
- Date: 09/28/2011
- Proceedings: Notice of Filing Amended Joint Report (as to corrected notice of publication only) filed.
- PDF:
- Date: 09/19/2011
- Proceedings: Letter to T. Thomas from T. Heath regarding a response to a letter dated September 9, 2011 filed.
- Date: 08/12/2011
- Proceedings: DOAH Case files 10-9580CB and 11-0115CB (1 box returned from Senate; available for viewing in 10-9580CB and 11-0115CB) filed.
Case Information
- Judge:
- JOHN G. VAN LANINGHAM
- Date Filed:
- 08/12/2011
- Date Assignment:
- 08/15/2011
- Last Docket Entry:
- 03/30/2012
- Location:
- West Palm Beach, Florida
- District:
- Southern
- Agency:
- Contract Hearings
- Suffix:
- CB
Counsels
-
Thomas C. Heath, Esquire
Address of Record -
Nancy La Vista, Esquire
Address of Record -
Leah Marino, Deputy General Counsel
Address of Record -
Tom Thomas, Esquire
Address of Record