12-001143
Agency For Health Care Administration vs.
Doctor`s Office For Women, Inc., D/B/A Today`s Women Medical Center
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, July 31, 2012.
Recommended Order on Tuesday, July 31, 2012.
1STATE OF FLORIDA
4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
8AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE )
13ADMINISTRATION, )
15)
16Petitioner, )
18) Case No. 12 - 1143
24vs. )
26)
27DOCTOR ' S OFFICE FOR WOMEN, )
34INC., d/b/a TODAY ' S WOMEN )
41MEDICAL CENTER , )
44)
45Respondent. )
47)
48RECOMMENDED ORDER
50Pursuant to notice, a hearing was conducted in this case on
61June 8, 2012, by video teleconference at sites in Miami and
72Tallahassee, Florida, before Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)
79Claude B. Arrington of the Division of Administrative Hearings
88(DOAH).
89APPEARANCES
90For Petitioner: Nelson E. Rodney, Esquire
96Agency for Health Care Administration
101Suite 300
1038333 Northwest 53rd Street
107Miami, Florida 33166
110For Respondent: Vlad Van Rosenthal, M.D.
116Q ualified Representative
119Doctor's Office for Women
1233250 South Dixie Highway
127Miami, Florida 33133
130STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
134Whether Respondent, Doctor ' s Office for Women, Inc., d/b/a
144Today ' s Women Medical Center (Respondent), failed to maintain
154medical records as alleged in the Administrative Complaint filed
163with DOAH on March 28, 2012.
169PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
171By Administrative Complaint filed February 7, 2012, the
179Agency for Health Care Administration (Petitioner) allege d
187certain facts pertaining to a n abortion performed on a female
198patient (the Patient) . Bas ed on those factual allegations,
208Petitioner charged Respondent with failing to maintain medical
216records in violation of Florida Administrative Code Rule 59A -
2269. 031 .
229Respondent thereafter timely requested a formal
235administrative hearing , the matter was referred to DOAH, and
244this proceeding followed.
247Prior to the formal hearing, Petitioner narrowed its
255allegations against Respondent. Petitioner alleged that
261Respondent violated the medical records rule by failing to
270maintain a consent form for a procedure that was approximately
280eight weeks after the Pa tient ' s abortion. Petitioner also
291alleged that Respondent violated the medical records rule by
300failing to obtain records of the Patient ' s visit to an emergency
313room between the abortion and the subsequent procedure. All
322other allegations were abandone d.
327At the final hearing, Petitioner presented the testimony of
336Ariesa Render, a nd Faith Randolph. Ms. Render is employed by
347Petitioner as a Health Facility Evaluator. Ms. Randolph is
356employed by Petitioner as a Registered Nurse Consultant.
364Petitioner offered two exhibits, both of which were admitted
373into evidence without objection. Respondent presented the
380testimony of Vla d Van Rosenthal, M.D. , the owner and medical
391director of the subject facility. Respondent offered no
399exhibits .
401A Transcript of the hearing was filed June 27, 2012.
411Petitioner filed a timely Proposed Recommended Order (PRO),
419which has been duly considered by the undersigned in the
429preparation of this Recommended Order. Respondent did not file
438a PRO.
440FINDINGS OF FACT
4431. At all times relevant to this proceeding, Respondent
452has been licensed as an abortion clinic authorized to perform
462first and second trimester abortions. The facility at issue in
472this proceeding is located in Miami - Dade County , Florida.
4822. Respondent is required to c omply with the following
492provisions of Florida Administrative Code Rule 59A - 9.031 :
502(1) A permanent individual clinical record
508shall be kept on each clinic patient.
515Clinical records shall be complete,
520accurately documented, and systematically
524organized to facilitate storage and
529retrieval.
530(a) Clinical records shall be complete,
536accurately documented, and systematically
540organized to facilitate storage and
545retrieval.
546(b) Clinical records involving second
551trimester abortion procedures shall be kept
557confidential and secure.
560(c) Operative reports signed by the
566physician performing the second trimester
571abortion shall be recorded in the clinical
578record immediately follow ing the procedure
584or that an operative progress note is
591entered in the clinical record to provide
598pertinent information.
600(2) Clinical records shall be kept on file
608for a minimum of five years from the date of
618the last entry.
6213. At the times relevant to this proceeding, Respondent
630used a consent form which, preceding the line for the patient to
642date and sign the form, states as follows:
650I, ________________, voluntarily authorize
654Doctor ' s Office for Women, [ Dr. Rosenthal ] ,
664who is an independent provider and will have
672complete control over this procedure, follow
678up and any and all treatments and who m oever
688he may designate as his assistants, to
695perform upon me an elective abortion. I
702fully understand that the purpose of the
709procedure is to terminate my pregnancy, and
716I affirm this is to be my personal choice in
726the light of the alternative of continuing
733th e pregnancy to full term. I further
741request and authorize him to do whatever he
749deems advisable if any unforeseen conditions
755arise in the course of the abortion that
763call, in his judgment, for procedures in
770addition to or different from those
776contemplated .
778I will fully and completely disclose my
785medical history, including allergies, blood
790conditions, prior medications or drugs
795taken, and reactions I had to anesthesia,
802medicines of [sic] drugs, I consume to my
810physician relying on my disclosure to be
817com plete.
819I consent to the administration of
825anesthesia as may be deemed necessary or
832advisable by my physician. I understand
838that local anesthesia do not eliminate all
845pain completely and IV sedation anesthesia
851(Versed, Valium, Demerol) will not put me to
859sleep and no guarantee to the contrary have
867been made to me.
871The nature and purpose of an abortion, the
879procedures, the risks involved, the
884emotional distress, and the possibility of
890complications have been fully explained to
896me. I realize there are inhere nt risks of
905minor and major complications which may
911occur in this and all surgical procedures
918without the fault of the physician. No
925guarantee has been made to me. The
932complications include, but are not limited
938to: allergic reaction to the sedative or
945a nesthesia; infection; excessive bleeding;
950the need for a second D&C to complete the
959abortion; perforation of the u terus;
965laceration of the cervix; hysterectomy -
971surgically removing the pregnancy through
976the abdomen; removal of the uterus as
983treatment of a complication (hysterectomy),
988also, one study indicates the possibility of
995breast cancer due to abortions even though
1002these studies are not conclusive, we still
1009recommend annual breast examinations, etc.
1014[sic].
1015I release the doctors and Doctor ' s Office
1024for Women and any corporation which operates
1031this facility from any liability resulting
1037from the above mentioned [sic] or any other
1045complications.
1046I further realize that I may need to be
1055hospitalized at my own expense for treatment
1062of such complications. I realize that such
1069conditions can be caused by my own condition
1077or conduct. I will accept hospitalization,
1083if required by the doctors for any
1090c omplications arising from this procedure.
1096I understand that my complication requiring
1102hospitalization, as a result of the
1108termination will not be covered financially
1114by the Doctor ' s Office for Women, or
1123corporation which m a y operate this facility
1131or the d octors.
1135I understand that any questions I have
1142will be answered before leaving the
1148facility. If I have any questions or
1155complications after leaving, I agree to call
1162the Doctor ' s Office at this number : [xxx -
1173xxx - xxxx].
1176I understand that I must return to the
1184office for a two - week post - termination
1193evaluation (free). I also acknowledge that
1199if I do not return for this evaluation, I
1208have not completed my medical care and
1215release the Doctor ' s Office for Women and
1224physicians from any liability resulting fr om
1231my termination.
1233The undersigned hereby expressly waives
1238and releases for themselves, heirs or
1244representatives any claim s or demand which
1251they may have of any nature, kind or
1259description agai nst [Dr. Rosenthal] and/or
1265his/her assistant/s and Doctor ' s Office for
1273Women, and any corporation which operates
1279this facility and the undersigned do [sic]
1286specifically assume any and all
1291responsibility for the operation,
1295acknowledging that the same is done at their
1303[sic] request for their benefits [sic]. I
1310certif y that (if married) I have notified m y
1320husband of my intention to obtain a
1327termination of pregnancy and I have given
1334him the opportunity to consult with me
1341concerning this decision. I CERTIFY THAT I
1348HAVE READ AND FULLY UNDERSTAND THE ABOVE
1355CONSENT TO AN A BORTION THAT THE EXPLANTAIONS
1363THEREIN REFERRED TO WERE MADE [sic]. I GIVE
1371THIS PERMISSION VOLUNTARILY AND OF MY OWN
1378FREE WILL, I FURTHER REPRESENT AND WARRANT
1385THAT I HAVE FULL LEGAL AUTHORITY TO GIVE
1393THIS PERMISSION.
13954 . On July 18, 2011, the Patient executed the foregoing
1406consent form , and Dr. Rosenthal performed an abortion on the
1416Patient.
14175 . On September 20, 2011, Ms. Render inspected the
1427Patient ' s medical records as maintained by Respondent a s part of
1440a survey of the facility.
14456 . Respondent ' s records for the Patient reflect the events
1457of July 18, 2011. The Patient ' s records reflected that the
1469Patient was seen at an emergency room on a date between July 18
1482and September 13, 2011. The Patient ' s records did not reflect
1494the date of that visit to the emergency room . The Patient ' s
1508records reflect that the Patient had gone to the emergency room
1519due to excessive bleeding for a sustained period of time
1529following the abortion on July 18 , 2011 . The Patient ' s records
1542reflect t hat all findings at the emergency room were " WNL "
1553(within normal limits), but the records have no further
1562information as to the emergency room visit.
15697. On September 13, 2011, the Patient returned to
1578Respondent ' s facility , at which time Dr. Rosenthal performed on
1589the Patient a procedure generally referred to as a D&C (dilation
1600and curettage). The Patient did not sign a separate consent
1610form for the second procedure.
16158. Ms. Randolph ' s testimony, and the consent form itse lf,
1627established that the consent form authorized emergency follow - up
1637care for the abortion, but it was insufficient to authorize the
1648D&C some eight weeks after the abortion. Petitioner established
1657that Respondent should have obtained written consent for t he
1667second procedure and should have maintained that consent as part
1677of the Patient ' s records. 1 /
1685CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
16889. The Division of Administrative Hearings has
1695jurisdiction over the subject matter of and the parties to this
1706proceeding pursuant to sectio ns 120.569 and 120.57(1).
171410 . The burden of proof is on Petitioner to prove the
1726material allegations of its Administrative Complaint by clear
1734and convincing evidence. Dep ' t of Banking & Fin. v. Osborne
1746Stern & Co., Inc. , 670 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 1996).
175611 . Respondent ' s records noted that the emergency room
1767visit occurred and noted th at all findings were " WNL. "
1777Petitioner did not prove that Respondent was required to obtain
1787a copy of the records of the Patient ' s emergency room visit or
1801further document the findings of that visit. Consequently, no
1810violation should be predicated on the absence of emergency room
1820records.
182112. Although the second procedure may have been necessary
1830because of the first procedure, they are two separate and
1840dis tinct procedures separated in time by eight weeks.
1849Petitioner proved that Respondent should have obtained a
1857separate consent from the Patient for the second procedure ,
1866which should have been maintained in the Patient ' s medical
1877records as alleged by the Ad ministrative Complaint. The failure
1887to maintain a valid consent form for the second procedure
1897violated Florida Administrative Code Rule 59A - 9.031 , as alleged
1907by the Administrative Complaint .
191213. Pursuant to section 390.018, Petitioner has the
1920authority to impose upon Respondent an administrative fine for
1929the violation found up to $1,000.00 , which is the amount of the
1942fine requested by Petitioner in its PRO . Considering the
1952importance of obtaining consent and ma intaining accurate records
1961in a medical fa cility , the undersigned concludes that a penalty
1972of $1,000.00 is appropriate.
1977RECOMMENDATION
1978Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions
1987of Law, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that the Agency for Health Care
1999Administration enter a final order finding Respondent guilty of
2008failing to maintain a consent form for the second procedure, but
2019dismissing all other charges against A Doctor ' s Office for
2030Women, Incorporated, d/b/a Today ' s Women Medical Center. It is
2041further recommended that the final orde r impose an
2050administrative fine in the amount of $1,000.00 against A
2060Doctor ' s Office for Women, Incorporated, d/b/a Today ' s Women
2072Medical Center.
2074DONE AND ENTERED this 31st day of July, 2012, in
2084Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
2088S
2089CLAUDE B. ARRINGTON
2092Div ision of Administrative Hearings
2097The DeSoto Building
21001230 Apalachee Parkway
2103Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 3060
2108(850) 488 - 9675
2112Fax Filing (850) 921 - 6847
2118www.doah.state.fl.us
2119Filed with the Clerk of the
2125Division of Administrative Hearings
2129this 31st day of Jul y, 2012.
2136ENDNOTE
21371 / In making these findings, the undersigned has considered
2147Dr. Rosenthal ' s testimony. Dr. Rosenthal testified, credibly,
2156that the Patient was not billed for the second procedure. He
2167further testified that he did not believe the Patient needed to
2178sign a separate consent form for the second procedure because of
2189the consent form signed by the Patient on July 18, 2011.
2200Dr. Rosenthal considered the Patient to have consented to the
2210D&C performed on September 13 as follow - up treatment for the
2222abortion performed July 18, 2011.
2227COPIES FURNISHED :
2230Richard J. Shoop, Agency Counsel
2235Agency for Health Care Administration
22402727 Mahan Drive, Mail Stop 3
2246Tallahassee, Florida 32308
2249Stuart Williams, General Counsel
2253Agency for Health Care Adminis tration
22592727 Mahan Drive, Mail Stop 3
2265Tallahassee, Florida 32308
2268Elizabeth Dudek, Secretary
2271Agency for Health Care Administration
22762727 Mahan Drive, Mail Stop 1
2282Tallahassee, Florida 32308
2285Nelson E. Rodney, Esquire
2289Agency for Health Care Administration
2294Suite 300
22968333 Northwest 53rd Street
2300Miami, Florida 33166
2303Vlad Van Rosenthal, M.D.
2307Qualified Representative
2309Doctor ' s Office for Women
23153250 South Dixie Highway
2319Miami, Florida 33133
2322NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
2328All parties have the right to sub mit written exceptions within
233915 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions
2350to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that
2361will issue the Final Order in this case.
- Date
- Proceedings
- PDF:
- Date: 08/01/2012
- Proceedings: Transmittal letter from Claudia Llado forwarding Respondent's proposed exhibits to the agency.
- PDF:
- Date: 07/31/2012
- Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
- Date: 06/27/2012
- Proceedings: Transcript of Proceedings (not available for viewing) filed.
- Date: 06/08/2012
- Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
- Date: 06/05/2012
- Proceedings: Respondent's List of Exhibits (exhibits not available for viewing)
- Date: 05/31/2012
- Proceedings: Petitioner's Proposed Exhibits (exhibits not available for viewing)
- Date: 05/31/2012
- Proceedings: Respondent's List of Exhibits (exhibits not available for viewing)
- PDF:
- Date: 04/18/2012
- Proceedings: Notice of Filing Admissions, Interrogatories, and Request to Produce filed.
Case Information
- Judge:
- CLAUDE B. ARRINGTON
- Date Filed:
- 03/28/2012
- Date Assignment:
- 03/29/2012
- Last Docket Entry:
- 09/24/2012
- Location:
- Miami, Florida
- District:
- Southern
- Agency:
- ADOPTED IN TOTO
Counsels
-
Nelson E. Rodney, Esquire
Address of Record -
Vlad Van Rosenthal
Address of Record -
Nelson E Rodney, Esquire
Address of Record -
Vlad Van Rosenthal, M.D.
Address of Record