13-001622 Department Of Children And Families vs. Oak Grove Church Daycare
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, August 15, 2013.


View Dockets  
Summary: Respondent failed to have at least one staff member present with a current and valid certificate in infant/child CPR and first aid training. Recommend $100 fine.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND

12FAMILIES ,

13Petitioner ,

14vs. Case No. 13 - 1622

20OAK GROVE CHURCH DAYCARE ,

24Respondent .

26/

27RECOMMENDED ORDER

29Pursuant to notic e, a formal hearing was held in this case

41on July 15, 2013, in Port St. Joe, Florida, before Barbara J.

53Staros, an administrative law judge assigned by the Division of

63Administrative Hearings .

66APPEARANCES

67For Petitioner: Paul A. Rowell, Esquire

73Depart ment of Children and Families

792383 Phillips Road

82Tallahassee, Florida 323 08

86For Respond ent: James E. Wiley, pro se

94Oak Grove Church Daycare, Inc.

99Post Office Box 967

103Port St. Joe, Florida 32457

108STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

112The issue in t his proceeding is whether Respondent

121committed the violations as alleged in the Administrative

129Complaint and, if so, wha t is the appropriate penalty.

139PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

141On April 3, 2013, the Department of Children and Families

151(Department) issued an Ad ministrative Complaint to Respondent,

159Oak Grove Church Daycare (Oak Grove) , seeking to impose an

169administrative fine for alleged violations of Florida

176Administrative Code Rule 65C - 22.004(2) and (4), for failure to

187have at least one staff member present at all times with a

199current and valid certification in f irst a id and for failure to

212have at least one staff member present at all times with a

224curr ent and valid certification in infant/c hild cardiopulmonary

233resuscitation (CPR). Oak Grove disputed the allegat ions of the

243Administrative Complaint and requested an administrative

249hearing. The Department forwarded the request for a hearing to

259the Division of Administrative Hearings on or about May 1, 2013.

270A Notice of Hearing was issued on May 15, 2013 , schedulin g the

283final hearing for July 19, 2013. The Department filed a

293Consented Motion for Continuance based upon the unavailability

301of a witness. The Consented M otion for Continuance was granted

312and the case was rescheduled for July 15, 2013. T he case was

325hear d as scheduled.

329At hearing, the Department presented the testimony of one

338witness, Yvonne Goss. The Department's Exhibits numbered 1

346through 6 were admitted into evidence. Respondent presented the

355testimony of one witness, Kristy Raffield. Respondent's

362Exhibits numbered 1 through 3 were admitted into evidence.

371The hearing was not transcribed. Petitioner filed a

379Proposed Recommended Order, which has been considered in the

388preparation of this Recommended Order. Respondent did not file

397a pos t - hearing written submission.

404All references to statutes are to Florida Statutes (2012)

413unless otherwise noted.

416FINDINGS OF FACT

4191. Respondent is licensed by th e Department to operate a

430child - care facility located in Port St. Joe, Florida.

4402. James Wiley is the p resident/CEO of Oak Grove.

4503. Yvonne Goss is a child licensing counselor for the

460Department. S he is assigned to regularly inspect Oak Grove and

471other facilities .

4744. The Administrative Complaint charged Respondent with

481being out of compliance with t he first a id CPR requirements in

494violation of Florida Administrat ive Code Rule 65C - 22.2004(2).

504Specifically, the complaint alleges as follows:

510On the chi ld care inspections dated

517March 14, 2013 and November 13, 2012, your

525facility was out of compliance i n that the

534facility did not have at least one staff

542member present at all times with a current

550and valid certification in First Aid (Class

557II violation). A fine of $50.00 is imposed.

5655. On November 13, 2012, Ms. Goss conducted a regular

575inspection of O ak Grove. As part of her i nspection, Ms. Goss

588inspected the files of the facility to determine whether it was

599in compliance with the governing statutes and rules.

6076. After revi ewing the facilityÓs files, Ms. Goss

616determined that no staff member on premis es during the

626inspection had a curr ent and valid certification in first a id.

638In addition to reviewing the files, Ms. Goss inquired of staff

649members who were on the premises during the inspection whether

659they had current and valid certification in first ai d. She

670received negative responses from the staff who were present.

6797. The Administrative Complaint further charged Respondent

686with the following:

689On the chi ld care inspections dated

696March 14, 2013 and November 13, 2012, your

704facility was out of complia nce in that the

713facility did not have at least one staff

721member present at all times with a current

729and valid certification in Infant/Child

734cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (Class

738II violation). A fine of $50.00 is imposed .

7478. During the November 13, 2012 , inspection, Ms. GossÓ

756review of the facilityÓs file s revealed that no staff member on

768premises during the inspection had current and valid

776certif ication in infa nt/ child CPR.

7839. Ms. Goss also inquired of Oak Grove staff members who

794were present whet her any of them had current and valid

805certification in infant/child CPR. She received neg ative

813responses from the staff.

81710. Ms. Goss then issued an Administrative Warning to

826Respondent , which set forth the rule requirements regarding

834first aid and CPR a nd which found that Respondent was not in

847compliance with r ule 65C - 22.004(2)(a) and (b).

85611. Kristy Raffield is an administrative assistant at

864RespondentÓs facility. When questioned by Ms. Goss as to

873whether she had on file documentation showing the requ ired

883certifications, she answered no. Following Ms. GossÓ inspection

891visit, Ms. Raffield went on - line and completed the requirements

902for adult, child, and i nfant CPR, and has a card reflecting that

915she completed the requirements on November 13, 2012, the date of

926th e first inspection.

93012. On March 14, 2013, Ms. Goss conducted another regular

940inspection of Oak Grove. She again reviewed the facilityÓs

949files to determine whether it was in compliance with the

959governing statutes and rules. Based upon her revi ew of the

970files, she determined that no staff member on premises during

980the inspection had curr ent and valid certification in infant and

991child CPR.

99313. She also inquired of staff members who were present as

1004to whether any of them had current and valid cer tification in

1016infant and child CPR. The staff present responded to her in the

1028negative.

102914. Based on the same file review, Ms. Goss determined

1039that no staff member on premises during the inspection had

1049current and valid certification in first aid. She inquired of

1059staff members who were present if they had such certification

1069and t hey responded in the negative.

107615. Based upon these findings, Ms. Goss issued a Notice of

1087Adminis trative Action to Respondent.

109216. According to Ms. Raffield, one staff member who had

1102the appropriate certifications on file was out sick on March 14,

11132013, because she had strep throat.

111917. A staff member, Debbie Croft, went on - line and

1130received certification that day (March 14, 2013). Her card

1139reflecting completion of the first aid r equirements is in

1149evidence.

115018. Ms. Raffield acknowledged that while there were

1158employees who possessed the required certifications, there were

1166no employees who possessed these certifications on premises at

1175the times of the inspections.

1180CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

118319. The Division of Administrative Hearings has

1190jurisdiction over the parties to and subject matter of this

1200proceeding. § 120.57(1), Fla. Stat. (2013). This proceeding is

1209de novo. § 120.57(1)(k), Fla. Stat.

121520. The Department is the agency ch arged with the

1225re sponsibility of licensing child - care facilities in the S tate

1237of Florida. § 402.301 - 402.319, Fla. Stat.

124521. Section 402.310 authorizes the Department to take

1253adverse action r egarding the license of a child - care facility

1265for violations o f the above - referenced statutes or the rules

1277adopted thereunder, including the imposition of fines.

128422. Florida Administrative Code Rule 65C - 22.010 reads in

1294pertinent part as follows:

1298(1) Definitions

1300* * *

1303(d) ÒViolationÓ means a finding of

1309noncompliance by the department or local

1315licensing authority of a licensing standard.

1321* * *

13242. ÒClass II ViolationÓ is the second or

1332subsequent incident of noncompliance with an

1338individual Class II standard as described on

1345CF - FSP Form 5316. Class II v iolations are

1355less serious in nature than Class I

1362violations, and could be anticipated to pose

1369a threat to the health, safety or well - being

1379of a child, although the threat is not

1387imminent.

1388* * *

1391(2) Disciplinary Sanctions.

1394* * *

1397(e) Disciplinary san ctions for licensing

1403violations that occur within a two year

1410period shall be progressively enforced as

1416follows:

14172. Class II violations

1421a. For the first violation of a Class II

1430standard, the department shall issue a

1436formal warning letter stating the

1441dep artmentÓs intent to take administrative

1447action if further violations of the standard

1454occur. The v iolation will be classified as

1462ÒTechnical Support.Ó

1464b. For the second violation of the same

1472Class II standard, the department shall

1478issue an administrative complaint imposing a

1484fine of $50 for each violation. This

1491violation, and subsequent violations, of the

1497same standard within a two yea r period will

1506be classified as ÒClass II.Ó

151123. Rule 65C - 22.004 reads in pertinent part as follows:

152265C - 22.004 Health R elated Requirements

1529(2) First Aid, Cardiopulmonary

1533Resuscitation and Emergency Procedures.

1537(a) Each child care facility must have at

1545least one staff member with current and

1552valid certificate(s) of course completion

1557for first aid training and infant

1563car diopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)

1567procedures. One staff member satisfying

1572these training requirements shall be present

1578at all times that children are in care at

1587the facility, on field trips, and during all

1595transportation activities.

1597(b) Certificate(s) of course completion are

1603valid based on the time frames established

1610by each first aid and CPR training program,

1618not to exceed three years. . . .

1626Documentation that identifies staff members

1631who have met the first aid and infant and

1640child cardiopulmonary res uscitation (CPR)

1645training requirement shall be kept on file

1652at the child care facility.

165724. The Department has the burden to prove by clear and

1668convincing evidence the grounds for discipline against

1675RespondentÓs license. Coke v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. S erv s. ,

1687704 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Dep't of Banking & Fin. v.

1701Osborne Stern & Co. , 670 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 1996).

171125. The Department met its burden in proving that

1720Respondent violated r ule 65C - 22.004(2), in that on Novemb er 13,

17332012, and again on Mar ch 14, 2013, Oak Grove did not have at

1747least one employee with current first aid certification or

1756current and valid infant/child CPR certification on premises.

1764While Respondent presented evidence that staff made the effort

1773to take and complete necessary c ourse requirements following the

1783inspections, the facilityÓs staffing must be sufficient to cover

1792staffing contingencies, even for brief periods of time. These

1801incidents con stitute class II violations.

180726. As this was the second class II violation of the same

1819standards within a two - year period, the Department shall impose

1830an administrative fine of $50 for each second violation pursuant

1840to r ule 65C - 22.010(2)(e)2.

1846RECOMMENDATION

1847Based upon the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it

1858is

1859RECOMMENDED:

1860That the Department of Children and Famil ies enter a final

1871order imposing a total administrative fine of $100.

1879DONE AND ENTERED this 15 th day of August , 2013 , in

1890Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

1894S

1895BARBARA J. STAROS

1898Administrative Law Judge

1901Division of Administrative Hearings

1905The DeSoto Building

19081230 Apalachee Parkway

1911Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 3060

1916(850) 488 - 9675

1920Fax Filing (850) 921 - 6847

1926www.doah.state.fl.us

1927Filed with the Clerk of the

1933Division of Administrative H earings

1938this 15 th day of August , 2013 .

1946COPIES FURNISHED :

1949Gregory D. Venz, Agency Clerk

1954Department of Children and Families

19591317 Winewood Boulevard

1962Tallahassee, Florida 32399

1965James E. Wiley

1968Oak Grove Church Daycare, Inc.

1973Post Office Box 967

1977Port St. Jo e, Florida 32457

1983Paul A. Rowell, Esquire

1987Department of Children and Families

19922383 Phillips Road

1995Tallahassee, Florida 32308

1998Michael Andrew Lee, Esquire

2002Department of Children and Families

20072383 Phillips Road

2010Tallahassee, Florida 32308

2013Esther Jacobo, I nterim Secretary

2018Department of Children and Families

2023Building 1, Room 202

20271317 Winewood Boulevard

2030Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 0700

2035Marion Drew Parker, General Counsel

2040Department of Children and Families

2045Building 2, Room 204

20491317 Winewood Boulevard

2052Tallaha ssee, Florida 32399 - 0700

2058NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

2064All parties have the right to su bmit written exceptions within

207515 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions

2086to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that

2097will issue the Final Order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
PDF:
Date: 11/21/2013
Proceedings: Agency Final Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 11/19/2013
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 08/15/2013
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 08/15/2013
Proceedings: Recommended Order (hearing held July 15, 2013). CASE CLOSED.
PDF:
Date: 08/15/2013
Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
PDF:
Date: 08/05/2013
Proceedings: Petitioner's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Date: 07/15/2013
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
PDF:
Date: 07/09/2013
Proceedings: Respondent's Proposed Exhibit List filed.
PDF:
Date: 07/08/2013
Proceedings: Petitioner's (Proposed) Exhibit List filed.
PDF:
Date: 07/08/2013
Proceedings: Petitioner's Witness List filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/21/2013
Proceedings: Order Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for July 15, 2013; 10:00 a.m.; Port St. Joe, FL).
PDF:
Date: 06/21/2013
Proceedings: Parties Status Report filed.
PDF:
Date: 06/12/2013
Proceedings: Order Granting Continuance (parties to advise status by June 21, 2013).
PDF:
Date: 05/30/2013
Proceedings: Consented Motion for Continuance filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/15/2013
Proceedings: Notice of Appearance (Paul Rowell) filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/15/2013
Proceedings: Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
PDF:
Date: 05/15/2013
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing (hearing set for July 19, 2013; 10:00 a.m.; Port St. Joe, FL).
PDF:
Date: 05/02/2013
Proceedings: Initial Order.
PDF:
Date: 05/01/2013
Proceedings: Request for Administrative Hearing filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/01/2013
Proceedings: Administrative Complaint filed.
PDF:
Date: 05/01/2013
Proceedings: Notice (of Agency referral) filed.

Case Information

Judge:
BARBARA J. STAROS
Date Filed:
05/01/2013
Date Assignment:
05/02/2013
Last Docket Entry:
11/21/2013
Location:
Port St. Joe, Florida
District:
Northern
Agency:
ADOPTED IN TOTO
 

Counsels

Related Florida Statute(s) (4):