20-003360 Doug Lancaster Farms, Inc. vs. Dobson's Woods And Water, Inc., And Western Surety Company, As Surety
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, November 20, 2020.


View Dockets  
Summary: Petitioner satisfied its burden of demonstrating that Respondent and/or its surety company owe $12,580.00 for an unpaid invoice.

1P RELIMINARY S TATEMENT

5If any person or business entity claims to have been damaged by a breach

19of contract committed by a dealer 1 in agricultural products , 2 then that person

33or business entity can file a complaint against the dealer and its surety

46company with the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (“the

56Department”). § 604.21(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2019). 3 “Such complaint shall be filed

68within 6 months from the date of sale in instances involving direct sales or

82from the date on which the agricultural product was received by the dealer in

96agricultural produc ts, as agent, to be sold for the producer.” Id. If the

110Department determines that the facts alleged in the complaint justify further

121action, then the Department shall serve notice of the complaint on the dealer

134against whom the complaint was filed and the dealer’s surety company.

145§ 604.21(2), Fla. Stat. At that point, the surety company becomes a party to

159the action. Id. Any party whose substantial interests are at stake in such a

173proceeding may request a formal administrative hearing before DOAH, and that hearing shall be conducted pursuant to chapter 120, Florida Statutes.

1941 Section 604.15(2), Florida Statutes (2019), defines a “dealer in agricultural products” as

207“any person, partnership, corporation, or other business entity, whether itinerant or

218domiciled within this state, engaged within this state in the business of purchasing,

231receiving, or soliciting agricultural products from the producer or the producer’s agent or

244representative fo r resale or processing for sale; acting as an agent for such producer in the

261sale of agricultural products for the account of the producer on a net return basis; or acting as a negotiating broker between the producer or the producer's agent or representati ve and

293the buyer.”

2952 Section 604.15(1), defines “agricultural products ” as “ the natural products of the farm,

310nursery, grove, orchard, vineyard, garden, and apiary (raw or manufactured); sod;

321horticulture; hay; livestock; milk and milk products; poultry and poultry products; the fruit

334of the saw palmetto (meaning the fruit of the Serenoa repens ); limes (meaning the

349fruit Citrus aurantifolia , variety Persian, Tahiti, Bearss, or Florida Key limes); and any

362other nonexempt agricultural products produced in the state, except tobacco, sugarcane,

373tropical foliage, timber and timber byproducts, forest products as defined in s. 591.17 and

387citrus other than limes. ”

3923 Unless stated otherwise, all statutory references shall be to the 2019 version of the Florida

408Sta tutes.

410§ 604.21(6), Fla. Stat. After receiving a recommended order from DOAH, the

422Department issues a final order that is subject to review before a district

435court of appeal.

438On October 29, 2019, Lancaster Farms filed a claim with the Department

450alleging that Dobson’s had not paid $53,245.00 for 269 agricultural products

462that had been furnished to Dobson’s by Lancaster Farms. The aforementioned products included trees such as Live Oaks, C rape Myrtles,

483Elms, and Magnolias.

486After receiving notice of this claim from the Department, Dobson’s filed an

498Answer on December 15, 2019, asserting that the vast majority of the money

511owed to Lancaster Farms had been paid in November of 2019 or was goin g to

527be paid by December 31, 2019. Dobson’s stated in its Answer that “[t]he only

541remaining unpaid invoice [of $12,580.00] has not yet been funded by the

554owner. Note that our terms are ‘NTO Terms’ listed on the invoice. We provide the producer all Notice t o Owner information and pay the invoice when

581funded by the owner.”

585The Department referred this matter to DOAH on July 27, 2020, and

597the undersigned scheduled a final hearing for September 20, 2020. On

608September 9, 2020, the undersigned granted a Motion to Continue filed by

620Lancaster Farms and rescheduled the final hearing for November 2, 2020.

631The final hearing was convened as scheduled. Lancaster Farms presented

641testimony from Kelly Lancaster and Larry Dobson. Lancaster Farms did not

652move any exhibits into evidence. Dobson’s presented testimony from Larry

662Dobson and did not move any exhibits into evidence.

671Only Lancaster Farms filed a Proposed Recommended Order, and that

681pleading was considered in the preparation of this Recommended Order.

691F INDINGS OF F ACT

696Based on the evidence adduced at the final hearing, the record as a whole,

710and matters subject to official recognition, the following Findings of Fact are

722made:

7231. Oden Hardy was the general contractor for a project in Apopka, Florida,

736known as the Space Box project. Dobson’s, a subcontractor on the Space Box

749project, contracted to purchase 269 trees (including Live Oaks, Crape Myrtles, Elms, and Magnolias) for $53,245.00 from Lancaster Farms.

7692. Dobson’s supplied Lancaster Farms with all the info rmation needed to

781file a “notice to owner” as authorized by section 713.06, Florida Statutes.

7933. A truck from Dobson’s picked up the trees and transported them to the

807site of the Space Box project. Upon arriving with the trees, Dobson’s discovered that the re was no means by which the trees could be watered at

834the site. Rather than attempting to jury rig some manner of watering system as requested by Oden Hardy, Dobson’s transported the trees to its place of

860business, and the trees remain there.

8664. The part ies have stipulated that Dobson’s has paid all of the invoices

880except for Invoice No. 5810 , totaling $12,580.00.

8885. There is no dispute that the trees at issue are “agricultural products”

901within the meaning of section 604.15(1). There is also no dispute th at

914Dobson’s is a “dealer in agricultural products” within the meaning of section 604.15( 2 ).

929C ONCLUSIONS OF L AW

9346. DOAH has jurisdiction over the parties to this proceeding and the

946subject matter pursuant to sections 120.569, 120.57(1), and 604.21(6) , Flo rida

957Statutes .

9597. The Department is the state agency responsible for investigating and

970taking action on complaints against dealers in agricultural products.

979§§ 604.15 through 604.34, Fla. Stat.

9858. Any business claiming to be damaged by any breach of the c onditions of

1000an agreement made with a dealer in agricultural products may file a

1012complaint with the Department against the dealer and its surety company.

1023§ 604.21(1)(a), Fla. Stat.

10279. As the petitioning party, Lancaster Farms bears the burden of proving

1039the allegations in its complaint by a preponderance of the evidence. Dep’t of

1052Banking & Fin., Div. of Sec. & Inv. Prot. v. Osborne Stern & Co. , 670 So. 2d

1069932, 934 (Fla. 1996)(stating that “[t]he general rule is that a party asserting

1082the affirmative of an issue has the burden of presenting evidence as to that

1096issue.”); Fla. Dep’t of Transp. v. J.W.C. Co. , 396 So. 2d 778, 788 (Fla. 1 st DCA

11131981).

111410. Lancaster Farms has satisfied its burden of demonstrating that

1124Dobson’s still owes $12,580.00 for Invoice No . 5810. Lancaster Farms is also

1138entitled to recover the $50.00 filing fee associated with the complaint filed on

1151October 29, 2019, with the Department. § 604.21(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (providing

1162that “[i]n the event the complainant is successful in proving that claim, the

1175dealer in agricultural products shall reimburse the complainant for the $50

1186filing fee as part of the settlement of the claim.”).

119611. Dobson’s argues in response to the complaint that it provided the

1208information Lancaster Farms needed to file a “notice to owner” as provided

1220for in section 713.06. Furthermore, Dobson’s argues that Lancaster Farms

1230will be paid once it collects on its lawsuit against Oden Hardy or the owner of

1246the Space Box project.

125012. A “notice to owner” under section 713.06, enables a subcontractor to

1262seek payment from the owner of a project when payment is not received from

1276the contractor:

1278The purpose of the “Notice to Owner” is to inform

1288the owner that potential lienors who do not have a contract with the owner, may make [a ] claim

1307against the owner’s property to secure their unpaid debt created in improving that property. The notice allows the owner to be protected and effectively impound monies that ordinarily would go to the

1339contractor. A Notice to Owner is a mandatory

1347pro cedural requirement for a lienor not dealing

1355directly with the owner in order to have a construction lien. A Notice to Owner need not be served by a lienor who is in privity with the owner,

1384or with the owner’s agent.

1389Larry R. Leiby, Florida Construction Law Manual § 8.24 (2020 - 2021 ed.).

1402See Mirror and Shower Door Products, In c . v. Seabridge, Inc. , 621 So. 2d 486,

1418487 (Fla. 4 th DCA 1993)(noting that “[t]he purpose of the notice to owner is to

1434protect an owner from the possibility of paying his contractor monies which

1446ought to go to a subcontractor who remains unpaid.”).

145513. Dobson’s has not provided any authority to support its argument, and

1467the undersigned’s independent research has not discovered any authorities

1476limiting Lancaster Farms to seeking payme nt from the owner of the Space

1489Box project. That research has also failed to discovery any authority

1500requiring Lancaster Farms to file a “ notice to owner ” upon being provided

1514with the necessary information.

1518R ECOMMENDATION

1520Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is

1533R ECOMMENDED that the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services

1543enter a final order approving the claim of Doug Lancaster Farms, Inc., against Dobson’s Woods and Water, Inc., in the amount of $12,630.00.

1567D ONE A N D E NTERED this 20th day of November, 2020 , in Tallahassee,

1582Leon County, Florida.

1585G. W. C HISENHALL

1589Administrative Law Judge

1592Division of Administrative Hearings

1596The DeSoto Building

15991230 Apalachee Parkway

1602Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 3060

1607(850) 488 - 9675

1611Fa x Filing (850) 921 - 6847

1618www.doah.state.fl.us

1619Filed with the Clerk of the

1625Division of Administrative Hearings

1629this 20th day of November, 2020 .

1636C OPIES F URNISHED :

1641Larry K. Dobson

1644Dobson's Woods and Water, Inc.

1649851 Maguire Road

1652Ocoee, Florida 34761 - 2915

1657Kelly Lancaster

1659Doug Lancaster Farms, Inc.

16633364 East County Road 48

1668Center Hill, Florida 33514

1672Western Surety Company

1675Post Office Box 5077

1679Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57117 - 5077

1686Kristopher Vanderlaan, Esquire

1689Vanderlaan & Vanderlaan, P.A.

1693507 Northeast 8 th Avenue

1698Ocala, Florida 34470

1701(eServed)

1702Steven Hall, General Counsel

1706Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services

1712407 South Calhoun Street, Suite 520

1718Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 0800

1723(eServed)

1724Honorable Nicole “Nikki” Fried

1728Commissioner of Agricult ure

1732Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services

1738The Capitol, Plaza Level 10

1743Tallahassee, Florida 32399 - 0810

1748(eServed)

1749N OTICE OF R IGHT T O S UBMIT E XCEPTIONS

1760All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15 days from

1773the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
PDF:
Date: 02/17/2021
Proceedings: Agency Final Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/04/2021
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 11/20/2020
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 11/20/2020
Proceedings: Recommended Order (hearing held November 2, 2020). CASE CLOSED.
PDF:
Date: 11/20/2020
Proceedings: Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
PDF:
Date: 11/10/2020
Proceedings: (Petitioner's Proposed Recommended) Order filed.
Date: 11/02/2020
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
PDF:
Date: 09/17/2020
Proceedings: Order Rescheduling Hearing by Zoom Conference (hearing set for November 2, 2020; 9:00 a.m.; Center Hill).
PDF:
Date: 09/16/2020
Proceedings: Petitioner's Notice of Availability for Final Hearing filed.
PDF:
Date: 09/09/2020
Proceedings: Order Granting Motion to Continue (parties to advise status by September 16, 2020).
PDF:
Date: 09/08/2020
Proceedings: Notice of Calendar Conflict and Motion to Continue Hearing filed.
PDF:
Date: 09/01/2020
Proceedings: Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
PDF:
Date: 09/01/2020
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing by Zoom Conference (hearing set for September 14, 2020; 9:00 a.m.; Center Hill).
PDF:
Date: 08/28/2020
Proceedings: Response to Initial Order and Order to Show Cause filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/28/2020
Proceedings: Notice of Appearance and Designation of Email Addresses filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/28/2020
Proceedings: Notice of Appearance (Kristopher Vanderlaan) filed.
PDF:
Date: 08/20/2020
Proceedings: Order to Show Cause.
PDF:
Date: 08/19/2020
Proceedings: Letter from Ginger L. Barnes regarding supporting documentation filed.
PDF:
Date: 07/28/2020
Proceedings: Initial Order.
PDF:
Date: 07/28/2020
Proceedings: Agricultural Products Dealer Claim Form filed.
PDF:
Date: 07/28/2020
Proceedings: Answer of Respondent filed.
PDF:
Date: 07/28/2020
Proceedings: Notice of Claim Filing filed.
PDF:
Date: 07/28/2020
Proceedings: Agency referral filed.

Case Information

Judge:
G. W. CHISENHALL
Date Filed:
07/28/2020
Date Assignment:
07/28/2020
Last Docket Entry:
02/17/2021
Location:
Center Hill, Florida
District:
Northern
Agency:
ADOPTED IN TOTO
 

Counsels

Related Florida Statute(s) (6):