82-001937
Caloosa Property Owners Association, Inc. vs.
Caleffe Investment, Ltd.; Worthington Enterprises; Et Al.
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Wednesday, February 23, 1983.
Recommended Order on Wednesday, February 23, 1983.
1STATE OF FLORIDA
4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
8CALOOSA PROPERTY OWNERS )
12ASSOCIATION, INC., )
15)
16Petitioner, )
18)
19vs. ) CASE NO. 82-1937
24)
25SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT )
30DISTRICT; CALEFFE INVESTMENT, )
34LTD.; and WORTHINGTON )
38ENTERPRISES, INC., )
41)
42Respondent. )
44_________________________________)
45RECOMMENDED ORDER
47Pursuant to notice, a formal administrative hearing was conducted in the
58above matter on December 14, 15 and 16, 1982, in West Palm Beach, Florida. The
73following appearances were entered: Tracy C. Sharpe, West Palm Beach, Florida,
84appeared on behalf of the Petitioner, Caloosa Property Owners Association, Inc.;
95Terry E. Lewis, Tallahassee, Florida, appeared on behalf of the Respondents,
106Caleffe investment, Ltd., and Worthington Enterprises, Inc.; and Irene Kennedy
116Quincey, West Palm Beach, Florida, appeared on behalf of the Respondent, South
128Florida Water Management District.
132Caleffe Investment, Ltd., and Worthington Enterprises, Inc., have filed an
142application with the South Florida Water Management District ( SFWMD) for
153conceptual approval of a surface water management system for a proposed
164industrial park known as Palm Beach Park of Commerce. SFWMD issued notice of
177its intent to grant conceptual approval. The Petitioner, Caloosa Property
187Owners Association, Inc., filed a Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing.
197The Petition was forwarded to the Division of Administrative Hearings by SFWMD
209on July 15, 1982. The final hearing was originally scheduled to be conducted
222commencing on January 18, 1983. Upon request of the applicants, the hearing was
235rescheduled to be conducted as set out above on an expedited basis.
247At the hearing the applicants called the following witnesses: Howard L.
258Searcy, a consulting engineer in private practice and an investor in the
270proposed industrial park; Robert D. Blackburn, a consulting biologist; Robert
280Goodrick, a research biologist employed with SFWMD; Charles Allen Hall, an
291engineer employed with SFWMD; and Richard Rogers, a registered civil engineer
302employed with SFWMD. The Petitioner called the following witnesses: Arthur R.
313Marshall, a consultant in environmental matters in private practice; James H.
324Hartwell, a consulting hydrologist in private practice; and Paul Parks, a
335chemist in private practice. SFWMD presented evidence through the testimony of
346witnesses called by the other parties.
352A portion of the hearing was dedicated to testimony from members of the
365public at large. Robert E. Leis, the President of Wind in the Pines Homeowners
379Association; and John C. Jones, the Executive Director of the Florida Wildlife
391Federation, testified as members of the public at large.
400The following exhibits were received into evidence: Exhibits 1 through 11
411offered jointly by the applicants and SFWMD, Petitioner's Exhibit 1, Hearing
422Officer's Exhibits 1 through 5, and Public Exhibits 1 and 2.
433A briefing schedule was established which ran from the date of the filing
446of the transcript of the hearing. The parties have submitted post-hearing legal
458memoranda which include proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The
470proposed findings and conclusions have been adopted only to the extent that they
483are expressly set out in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law which
497follow. They have been otherwise rejected as not supported by the evidence,
509contrary to the better weight of the evidence, irrelevant to the issues, or
522legally erroneous.
524ISSUES
525The ultimate issue to be resolved in this proceeding is whether the
537applicants have offered reasonable assurance that their proposed surface water
547management system for the Palm Beach Park of Commerce would operate within the
560rules of SFWMD set out at Section 40E-4.301, Florida Administrative Code. The
572Petitioners specifically contend that the project as proposed would cause
582flooding on lands adjacent to the project, would have adverse impacts on surface
595and ground waters, and otherwise is inconsistent with SFWMD criteria.
605Applicants and SFWMD contend that the project meets applicable standards.
615FINDINGS OF FACT
6181. The applicants propose to develop an industrial park to be known as the
632Palm Beach Park of Commerce ( PBPC) in western Palm Beach County, Florida. The
646proposed site is located on State Road 710 and State Road 711. The site is
661approximately 1,248 acres in size. PBPC proposes to accommodate a variety of
674commercial and industrial uses. Applicants are seeking conceptual approval of a
685proposed surface water management system. They are not at this time seeking
697permits from SFWMD which would allow construction of the overall system. The
709proposed system does not include plans for surface water management on sites
721within PBPC, but rather relates solely to an overall system.
7312. Petitioner is an association of homeowners within a single family
742residential development known as Caloosa. The development is approximately
7511,400 acres in size and consists of single family residences on approximately
764five-acre lots. The Caloosa development is located to the southeast of the
776proposed PBPC. Surface and ground water flows from the PBPC site toward the
789Caloosa development. Residents of Caloosa depend on individual wells for their
800drinking water.
8023. The site of the proposed PBPC is primarily a flat, broad plain with
816wetland pockets and pine-palmetto flatwoods. Approximately 720 acres of the
826site is dominated by pine flatwoods. A bit more than 300 acres of the site is
842in agricultural land, either presently or recently under cultivation. Between
852160 and 170 acres of the site are viable, productive wetlands. The wetland
865areas are inundated with water during a sufficient portion of the year to
878support predominantly wetland vegetation. The land slopes generally from the
888northwest to the southeast.
8924. The proposed PBPC site is located within the Loxahatchee basin.
903Surface water from the site presently drains toward the southeast into the
915Caloosa canal. The Caloosa canal flows through the Caloosa development and
926ultimately discharges into the C-18 canal. The C-18 canal drains into the
938Loxahatchee River. Water from areas to the north and west of the proposed site
952presently drains onto the site and into the Caloosa canal. The proposed
964drainage system would carry water to the discharge point at the southeast corner
977of the site through a perimeter canal system. Water from the off-site locations
990would drain into the perimeter canal to the discharge point. On-site surface
1002water would drain toward wetland pockets into the perimeter canal system or
1014directly into the canal system. The proposed drainage system would preserve 135
1026acres of the wetlands presently located on the project site. These wetland
1038areas have been incorporated into the surface water management system.
1048Approximately 33 acres of wetlands would be filled. The wetland areas serve a
1061significant function to preserve water quality, and to mitigate the loss of
1073these wetlands, applicants propose to create a wetland area along the northern
1085portion of the perimeter canal. This constructed wetland area would serve
1096approximately the same water quality function as the wetland area that would be
1109filled.
11105. The proposed surface water drainage system is designed so as to retain
1123the first one inch of runoff from any storm event through a system of swales.
1138Thus, surface water runoff would cross grassy areas and percolate through the
1150swale systems before entering the perimeter canal system. Such a system serves
1162to filter most of the pollutants that would be carried into the surface water
1176system as the result of a storm event.
11846. The Caloosa canal is presently not able to accommodate flows that would
1197result from the proposed PBPC surface water management system without flooding
1208up to a storm event of three-day duration and 25-year return frequency. This
1221would be a storm of such magnitude that it is likely to occur only once each 25
1238years over a three-day period. There are two existing bridges over the Caloosa
1251canal which narrow the canal to only 16 feet in width. The narrow openings
1265under the bridges presently cause flooding and erosion in the canal, which is
1278generally 65 feet in width. At the discharge point of the Caloosa canal into
1292the C-18 canal, there is a 65-foot wide steel sheet pile weir, downstream of the
1307weir there are three 72-inch diameter pipes which discharge directly into the C-
132018 canal. These pipes are not adequate to accommodate flows that would be
1333anticipated from the proposed PBPC as a result of a storm event of three-day
1347duration and 25-year return frequency. There has been erosion in the Caloosa
1359canal partially as a result of its sandy banks and partially because of the
1373constrictions resulting from the narrow bridges. In order to assure that the
1385Caloosa canal could accept discharges anticipated from the PBPC surface water
1396management system, the bridges would need to be expanded to 60 feet in width, an
1411additional 72-inch diameter pipe would need to be installed at the discharge
1423point into the C-18 canal, and maintenance work would need to be performed on
1437the Caloosa canal so that it could be restored to its uneroded condition. If
1451these improvements are made in the Caloosa canal system, then the proposed
1463surface water management system for PBPC is not likely to result in any
1476downstream flooding except in the event of a storm event in excess of three-day
1490duration and 25-year return frequency.
14957. Design features of the proposed drainage system including preservation
1505of wetland areas, creation of new wetland areas, and retention of the first one
1519inch of storm water runoff prior to discharge into surface waters are known as
"1533best management practices." SFWMD has a policy of accepting the implementation
1544of best management practices as providing reasonable assurance that a surface
1555water system will not result in adverse water quality impacts. It does not
1568appear that construction of the proposed surface water management system would
1579of itself have any negative impact upon the quality of surface or ground waters.
15938. There is potential for negative water quality impacts that would result
1605from activities of individual, commercial or industrial tenants of PBPC. The
1616applicants have agreed to prohibit certain uses within the proposed industrial
1627park as a condition for receiving conceptual approval and to impose deed
1639restrictions or restrictive covenants prohibiting specific uses on all property
1649within PBPC. Uses which applicants have agreed to exclude are: breweries,
1660fertilizer manufacturers, coal and petroleum derivation manufacturers,
1667exterminator manufacturing and warehousing, and all chemical manufacturing
1675including insecticides, herbicides and pesticides. Despite these restrictions,
1683there are many potential commercial and industrial activities that could occur
1694within PBPC that would involve the use of toxic substances which could have
1707potentially devastating water quality impacts. The application for conceptual
1716approval contemplates that each individual tenant within PBPC will need to
1727obtain a permit from SFWMD for a surface water management system for their
1740individual portion of PBPC. Each tenant would be required to establish a system
1753which itself would retain the first one inch of runoff from any storm event. It
1768is essential that individual tenants whose activities include the use of toxic
1780substances be required to implement systems to assure that toxic wastes are
1792adequately treated and disposed of properly and that systems are established to
1804prevent accidents, and in the event of accidents, to deal with them on an
1818emergency basis. The most potentially dangerous impact in water quality terms
1829that might result from industrial uses is where toxic substances that are water
1842soluble are used on the site. Such substances would not be filtered through
1855percolation and could enter surface and ground waters. As a condition of
1867approval, it is appropriate that all construction or operating permits be
1878conditioned upon the implementation of control systems and emergency systems
1888that reasonably assure that no individual user within PBPC would engage in
1900activities that would be likely to result in violations of water quality
1912standards.
19139. It does not appear that the proposed surface water management system
1925for PBPC would cause adverse environmental impacts. Most of the on-site
1936wetlands will be retained, and those that will be filled are lower quality
1949wetlands that will be replaced by the creation of wetlands along the perimeter
1962canal system. Construction activities and activities on site after development
1972will undoubtedly change wildlife habitat. The area of the proposed site is not,
1985however, a unique wildlife habitat; and it does not appear that any species
1998would be threatened with significant habitat reduction.
200510. The proposed water management has been designed so that it can be
2018effectively operated and maintained. The Northern Palm Beach County Water
2028Control District has agreed to maintain the surface water management system.
2039The district is a public entity that has personnel and expertise available to
2052operate the system.
205511. It does not appear that the proposed surface water management system
2067would have any adverse impact upon public health or safety. It is possible that
2081individual tenants depending upon the nature of their activities, could offer
2092potential health and safety hazards. It is appropriate that such hazards be
2104taken into account in the approval of surface water management systems for
2116individual sites within the proposed park.
212212. It appears that the proposed surface water management system is
2133virtually as good a system as could be designed to accommodate an industrial
2146park. The proposed use of the land as an industrial park is compatible with
2160comprehensive plans and zoning regulations of Palm Beach County.
2169CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
217213. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the
2182parties and the subject matter of this proceeding. Sections 120.57(1), 120.60,
2193Florida Statutes.
219514. Petitioner has standing to seek a formal administrative hearing with
2206respect to this permit application. Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.
221515. SFWMD has authority to adopt rules and regulations in support of its
2228responsibilities to implement Part IV, Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, relating
2238to management and storage of surface waters. Section 373.044, Florida Statutes.
2249In its Rule 40E-4.021(2), Florida Administrative Code, SFWMD has defined a
"2260letter of conceptual approval" as a surface water management permit approving
2271the concept of a master plan for a surface water management system. Under the
2285definition, a letter of conceptual approval is binding upon SFWMD and the
2297applicant. SFWMD Rule 40E-4.041(2)(a), Florida Administrative Code, provides:
2305The District [ SFWMD] issues three types of
2313surface water management permits: letters of
2319conceptual approval, construction permits, and
2324operation permits. . .
2328(a) A letter of conceptual approval may be
2336issued for projects that are to be developed
2344in phases. A letter of conceptual approval
2351does not authorize any construction.
2356In order to obtain a surface water management permit, including a letter of
2369conceptual approval, an applicant is required to meet the conditions set out at
2382SFWMD Rule 40E-4.301, Florida Administrative Code. The rule provides:
2391(1) In order to obtain a permit under this
2400chapter, an applicant must give reasonable
2406assurances that the surface water management
2412system:
2413(a) provides adequate flood protection and
2419drainage,
2420(b) will not cause adverse water quality
2427and quantity impacts on receiving waters and
2434adjacent lands regulated pursuant to chapter
2440373, Florida Statutes,
2443(c) will not cause discharges which result
2450in any violation, in surface waters of the
2458state, of the standards and criteria of
2465chapter 17-3,
2467(d) will not cause adverse impacts on
2474surface and groundwater levels and flows,
2480(e) will not cause adverse environmental
2486impacts,
2487(f) can be effectively operated and
2493maintained,
2494(g) will not adversely affect public health
2501and safety,
2503(h) is consistent with the requirements of
2510other public agencies,
2513( i) is, in the opinion of the District, the
2523most publicly acceptable alternative available,
2528(j) will serve a proposed land use which:
25361. for conceptual approvals, is
2541compatible with the local government
2546comprehensive plan or is compatible with the
2553existing zoning for the area,
25582. for construction and operation
2563permits, is compatible with the existing
2569zoning for the area,
2573(k) meets any applicable basin criteria in
2580chapter 40E-41,
2582(l) will not otherwise be harmful to the
2590water resources of the District, and will not
2598interfere with the legal rights of others as
2606defined in rule 7-40.07,
2610(m) is not against public policy, and
2617(n) will meet the general and specific
2624criteria in the document described in
2630paragraph 40E-4.091(1)(a).
263216. SFWMD has adopted specific criteria for determining water quantity
2642impacts of a proposed system in a document entitled "Basis of Review for Surface
2656Water Management Permit Applications Within the South Florida Water Management
2666Disrict - December, 1982." See Rule 40E-4.091(1)(a), Florida Administrative
2675Code. Paragraph 3.2.1.2 of the "Basis of Review" document provides:
2685Discharge--Off-site discharge is limited to
2690amounts which will not cause additional
2696adverse off-site impacts. These amounts are:
2702a. historic discharges, or
2706b. amounts determined in previous District
2712permit actions, or
2715c. amounts specified in District criteria
2721(See Appendices 2 and 3).
2726Unless otherwise specified by previous
2731District permits, District criteria or local
2737government, a storm event of 3 day duration
2745and 25 year return frequency shall be used in
2754computing off-site discharge.
275717. In determining water quality impacts, SFWMD has not sought to
2768duplicate efforts of the Department of Environmental Regulation. Rather, the
2778district has followed a policy of requiring implementation of "best management
2789practices" in surface water management systems.
279518. Under Rule 40E-4.381(1), Florida Administrative Code, SFWMD is
2804authorized to impose reasonable conditions upon the issuance of permits. In its
2816staff analysis of the PBPC proposed surface water management system, SFWMD
2827proposed that twelve special conditions be attached to a letter of conditional
2839approval. Applicants have agreed to accept these special conditions as a part
2851of a letter of conditional approval. The special conditions are attached to
2863this Recommended Order as Appendix I.
286919. With the imposition of the special conditions proposed by the SFWMD
2881staff, and of three other special conditions, reasonable assurance that the
2892surface water management system proposed for PBPC meets the requirements of Rule
290440E-4.301, Florida Administrative Code, has been provided. These additional
2913special conditions are as follows:
2918(a) That slumping and erosion within the Caloosa canal be corrected so
2930that the Caloosa canal is able to accommodate the quantities of water that will
2944be discharged from PBPC.
2948(b) That the applicants record deed restrictions or restrictive
2957covenants which prohibit the following uses within Palm Beach Park of Commerce:
2969breweries, fertilizer manufacturers, coal and petroleum derivations
2976manufacturers, exterminator manufacturing and warehousing, and all chemical
2984manufacturing including insecticides, herbicides and pesticides.
2990(c) That prior to the issuance of any construction permits, detailed
3001plans be prepared for containing and disposing of toxic substances and for
3013preventing such substances from entering surface and ground water systems.
3023Emergency plans should also be established for dealing with any accidental
3034release of toxic substances.
3038RECOMMENDED ORDER
3040Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is,
3053hereby,
3054RECOMMENDED:
3055That a Final Order be entered by the South Florida Water Management
3067District issuing a letter of conditional approval to the applicants for the
3079proposed surface water management plan for Palm Beach Park and Commerce and
3091imposing the twelve special conditions set out in Appendix I to this Recommended
3104Order and the three additional special conditions set out in Paragraph 7 of the
3118Conclusions of Law set out in this Recommended Order upon the applicants.
3130RECOMMENDED this 23rd day of February, 1983, in Tallahassee, Florida.
3140___________________________________
3141G. STEVEN PFIEFFER
3144Hearing Officer
3146Division of Administrative Hearings
3150The Oakland Building
31532009 Apalachee Parkway
3156Tallahassee, Florida 32301
3159(904) 488-9675
3161Filed with the Clerk of the
3167Division of Administrative Hearings
3171this 23rd day of February, 1983.
3177COPIES FURNISHED:
3179Tracy C. Sharpe, Esquire
3183Parish, Parish & Romani, P.A.
3188Post Office Box 3887
3192West Palm Beach, Florida 33402
3197Irene Kennedy Quincey, Esquire
3201South Florida Water Management
3205District
32063301 Gun Club Road
3210Post Office Box V
3214West Palm Beach, Florida 33402-4238
3219Terry E. Lewis, Esquire
3223Robert M. Rhodes, Esquire
3227Messer, Rhodes & Vickers, P.A.
3232Suite 701, Lewis State Bank Bldg.
3238Post Office Box 1876
3242Tallahassee, Florida 32302-1876
3245Mr. John R. Maloy
3249Executive Director
3251South Florida Water Management
3255District
3256Post Office Box V
3260West Palm Beach, Florida 33402
3265Randall E. Denker, Esquire
3269Lehrman & Denker
3272103 North Gadsden Street
3276Post Office Box 1736
3280Tallahassee, Florida 32302
3283Alan J. Ciklin, Esquire
3287Boose, Ciklin & Martens
32918th Floor - The Concourse
32962000 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.
3301West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
3306=================================================================
3307AGENCY FINAL ORDER
3310=================================================================
3311SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
3316CALOOSA PROPERTY OWNERS
3319ASSOCIATION, INC.,
3321Petitioner,
3322vs. DOAH NO. 82-1937
3326SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
3330DISTRICT, and CALEFFE INVESTMENT,
3334LTD.,and WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES,
3338INC.,
3339Respondents.
3340___________________________________/
3341FINAL ORDER
3343The Hearing Officer's Order came on to be heard before the Governing Board
3356of South Florida Water Management District on the 14th day of April 1983.
3369The Governing Board has considered the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law
3381and Recommended Order of the Hearing Officer, dated February 23, 1983,
3392Exceptions to Recommended Order of the Hearing Officer by Counsel for
3403Petitioner, Caloosa Property Owners Association, Inc. with a certificate of
3413service dated March 7, 1983, Reply to Exceptions to Recommended Order of the
3426Hearing Officer, by Counsel for Respondents, Caleffe Investment, Ltd. and
3436Worthington Enterprises, Inc., with a certificate of service dated March 10,
34471983 and Exception to Recommended Order by Counsel for Respondent, South Florida
3459Water Management District with a certificate of service dated March 9, 1983.
3471Because the exceptions filed by Petitioner had the affect of disputing the
3483Findings of Fact of the Hearing Officer, each of the members of the Governing
3497Board was furnished a complete transcript of the Hearing held by the Hearing
3510Officer, and each Governing Board member has read the transcript.
3520With regard to the Exceptions filed by Petitioner, the Governing Board acts
3532as follows:
3534Exception Number 1 - Denied - the law allows
3543the Hearing Officer to recommend modifications
3549in the project as part of the Recommended
3557Order.
3558Exception Number 2 - (A) Denied - the record
3567reflects that the Caloosa Canal can be
3574designed and maintained to avoid problems with
3581erosion. (B) Denied - this is a Conceptual
3589Permit and the record reflects safe guards
3596against ground water contamination can be
3602established when tenants are known and before
3609occupation of each parcel of the Palm Beach
3617Park of Commerce.
3620Exception Number 3 - Denied - Conceptual
3627Approval is all that is sought and the record
3636reflects Caloosa Canal can be designed to
3643accommodate the flows expected. This design
3649would occur when a construction permit is
3656sought for the entire water management system
3663serving Palm Beach Park of Commerce if Caloosa
3671Canal problems are not corrected at an earlier
3679date.
3680Exception Number 4 - Denied - Water quality
3688existing presently in C-18 ( Loxahatchee River)
3695would not, according to the record, be
3702adversely affected by the Palm Beach Park of
3710Commerce.
3711Exception Number 5 - Denied - there is
3719evidence in the record that the design and
3727location of the Palm Beach Park of Commerce is
3736a "publicly acceptable alternative".
3741Exception Number 6 - Denied - the record
3749indicates consideration of the legal rights of
3756others.
3757Exception Number 7 - Denied - record indicates
3765that the proposed Park of Commerce has
3772necessary zoning, DRI approval and meets the
3779requirements for Conceptual Approval of South
3785Florida Water Management District.
3789Exception Number 8 - Denied - the record
3797reflects testimony that the artificial
3802wetlands will fulfill the function of natural
3809wetlands.
3810With regard to the Exception filed by Respondent, South Florida Water
3821Management District, the District acts as follows
3828(1) Exception Number 1 - Approved - a review
3837of the record indicates no intention on the
3845part of the Hearing Officer to delete the 10
3854limiting conditions imposed by the District in
3861its recommendation for approval; therefore,
3866the 10 limiting conditions are incorporated in
3873this Order.
3875(2) Exception Number 2 - Approved - a review
3884of the Findings of Fact (#8) of the Hearing
3893Officer indicates his intent with regard to
39007(C) of his Conclusions of Law is that
3908detailed plans be prepared, at the time of
3916issuance of construction permits for
3921individual lots, for dealing, with containment
3927and disposal of toxic substances and
3933prevention of such substances from entering
3939surface and ground water
3943The Governing Board adopts the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and
3955Recommended Order of the Hearing Officer, except as hereby modified:
3965(1) Modification of Paragraph 7 of the
3972Conclusions of Law to read: "With the
3979imposition of the limiting conditions, special
3985conditions proposed by the South Florida Water
3992Management District staff, and of three other
3999special conditions, reasonable assurance that
4004the surface water management system proposed
4010for Palm Beach Park of Commerce meets the
4018requirements of Rule 40E-4.301, Florida
4023Administrative Code, has been provided." These
4029additional special conditions are as follows:
4035(a) same as Hearing Officer's Recommended
4041Order.
4042(b) same as Hearing Officer's Recommended
4048Order.
4049(c) That prior to the issuance of any
4057construction permits for individual lots,
4062detailed plans be prepared or containing and
4069disposing of toxic substances and for
4075preventing such substances from entering
4080surface and ground water systems. Emergency
4086plans should also be established for dealing
4093with any accidental release of toxic
4099substances. Both the detailed and emergency
4105plans shall have the prior written approval of
4113the Department of Environmental Regulation.
4118The Governing Board orders the issuance of the subject permit in accordance
4130with this Order.
4133DONE and ORDERED on this the 14th day of April, 1983 in Cape Coral,
4147Florida.
4148SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
4152DISTRICT, BY ITS GOVERNING BOARD
4157(Corporate Seal)
4159BY:______________________________
4160Chairman
4161ATTEST:
4162By:___________________________
4163Secretary
4164FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE SOUTH
4171FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
4175ON April 14, 1983
4179BY Jean Guy
4182CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
4185I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished TRACY
4199C. SHARPE, ESQUIRE, Farish, Farish & Romani, P.A., Post Office Box 3887, West
4212Palm Beach, Florida 33402; RANDALL E. DENKER, ESQUIRE, Lehrman and Denker Law
4224Offices, Post Office Box 1736, Tallahassee, Florida 32302; TERRY E. LEWIS,
4235ESQUIRE, Messer, Rhoads & Vickers, P.A., Suite 701 Lewis State Bank Building,
4247Post Office Box 1876, Tallahassee, Florida, 32302-1876, and ALAN J. CIKLIN,
4258ESQUIRE, Concourse Building, 8th Floor, 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West
4269Palm Peach, Florida 33409, by U S Mail, this 22nd day of April, 1983 and Irene
4285Kennedy Quincey, Esquire P. O. Pox V, West Palm Beach, Florida 33402-4238.
4297______________________________
4298Robert J. Grafton
Case Information
- Judge:
- G. STEVEN PFEIFFER
- Date Filed:
- 07/15/1982
- Date Assignment:
- 07/15/1982
- Last Docket Entry:
- 06/21/1991
- Location:
- Tallahassee, Florida
- District:
- Northern
- Agency:
- ADOPTED IN PART OR MODIFIED