97-004984 Roy Harthern Ministries vs. Department Of Revenue
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, April 9, 1998.


View Dockets  
Summary: Department changed construction of statute, Petitioner no longer qualifies for exemption as a "religious organization."

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8ROY HARTHERN MINISTRIES, INC., )

13)

14Petitioner, )

16)

17vs. ) Case No. 97-4984

22)

23DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, )

27)

28Respondent. )

30___________________________________)

31RECOMMENDED ORDER

33A formal hearing was held by the Division of Administrative

43Hearings, before Administrative Law Judge, Daniel M. Kilbride, in

52Orlando, Florida, on March 3, 1998. The following appearances

61were entered:

63APPEARANCES

64For Petitioner: Roy Harthern, President

69Roy Harthern Ministries, Inc.

73Pos t Office Box 915971

78Orlando, Florida 32791

81For Respondent: Rex D. Ware, Assistant General Counsel

89Department of Revenue

92Post Office Box 6668

96Tallahassee, Florida 32314-6668

99STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

103Whether Petitioner qualifies for the renewal of a consumer

112certificate of exemption as a qualified religious organization

120pursuant to Section 212.08(7)(o), Florida Statutes?

126PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

128Petitioner, Roy Harthern Ministries, Inc. (Petitioner) f iled

136an application to renew its consumer certificate of exemption

145with Respondent, State of Florida, Department of Revenue

153(Respondent), on or about July 18, 1997. On October 13, 1997,

164Respondent issued its Notice of Intent to Deny Petitioner's

173application based on the grounds that Petitioner did not qualify

183as a religious organization. Petitioner filed a Petition for

192Formal Administrative Hearing and this matter was referred to the

202Division of Administrative Hearings.

206At the final hearing, Petitioner p resented the testimony of

216Roy Harthern, President of Roy Harthern Ministries. Respondent

224called W. David Young as a witness and introduced one joint

235exhibit which was accepted into evidence. In addition, the

244parties stipulated to certain facts.

249A transcript of the proceeding was filed on March 16, 1998.

260Respondent timely filed a Proposed Recommended Order on March 25,

2701998. Petitioner has not filed proposed findings of facts as of

281the date of this order.

286FINDINGS OF FACT

2891. Petitioner is an active no t-for-profit corporation

297organized under the laws of the State of Florida. It maintains

308exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue

317Code.

3182. The Respondent is the state agency charged with the

328administration of the tax laws of the State of Florida, including

339those dealing with the grant or denial of consumer certificates

349of exemption to qualified organizations.

3543. Reverend Roy Harthern is an ordained Assembly of God

364minister who previously had a career as a minister in several

375churches in Texas and Florida, as well as founding a Christian

386magazine and a Christian television station in Florida.

3944. The Reverend and Mrs. Harthern are evangelists and Bible

404teachers. In 1983, Reverend Harthern and his wife, Pauline,

413founded the organization from which the Reverend and

421Mrs. Harthern practice an itinerant ministry. They preach in

430different established churches each week, both inside and outside

439of the State of Florida and the United States. In the past,

451Reverend Harthern has had a regular religious show on television.

461Reverend Harthern also writes, records religious tapes and has a

471weekly radio program on a station owned by others. Petitioner

481does not have an established physical place of worship at which

492nonprofit religious services are regularly held; does not provide

501transportation for church members or other services; and does not

511provide services to state prisoners. There has been no

520substantial change in the type or nature of Petitioner's ministry

530since its founding in 1983.

5355. Respondent issued a certificate of exemption to

543Petitioner in 1983 as a "religious organization." Petitioner has

552renewed the exemption, in five-year intervals, ever since.

5606. Respondent has never sought to revoke or suspend

569Petitioner's exempt status since 1983.

5747. On July 18, 1997, Petitioner applied to renew its

584consumer certificate of exemption as a "religious organization."

592Its previous certificate was issued on October 6, 1992, and was

603due to expire on October 5, 1997

6108. There has been no su bstantive changes to the

620implementing statute during the relevant time period.

6279. On October 13, 1997, Respondent issued its Notice of

637Intent to Deny to Petitioner on the grounds that Petitioner did

648not have an established physical place of worship at which

658nonprofit religious services and activities were regularly

665conducted.

666CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

66910. The Division of Administrative Hearings has

676jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this cause,

686pursuant to Section 120.569 and 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.

69411. The Respondent is authorized to issue and reissue tax

704exemption certificates to qualified entities pursuant to Section

712212.084, Florida Statutes.

71512. Petitioner seeks a renewal of its exemption from tax-

725based upon the allegation that it qualifies as a "religious

735organization" pursuant to Section 212.08(7)(o)2.a., Florida

741Statutes, which provides:

7442. The provisions of this section

750authorizing exemptions from tax shall be

756strictly defined, limited, and applied in

762each category as follows:

766a. "Religious institutions" means churches,

771synagogues, and established physical places

776for worship at which nonprofit religious

782services and activities are regularly

787conducted and carried on. The term

"793religious institutions" includes nonprofit

797corporations the sole purpose of which is

804provide free transportation services to

809church members, their families, and other

815church attendees. The term "religious

820institutions" also includes state, district,

825or other governing or administrative offices

831the function of which is to assist or

839regulate the customary activities of

844religious organizations or members. The term

"850religious institutions" also includes any

855nonprofit corporation which is qualified as

861nonprofit pursuant to s. 501(c)(3), Internal

867Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which owns

875and operates a Florida television station, at

882least 90 percent of the programming of which

890station consists of programs of a religious

897nature, and the financial support for which,

904exclusive of receipts for broadcasting from

910other nonprofit organizations, is

914predominately from contributions from the

919general public. The term "religious

924institutions" also includes any nonprofit

929corporation which is qualified as nonprofit

935pursuant to s. 501(c)(3), Internal Revenue

941Code of 1986, as amended, which provides

948regular religious services to Florida state

954prisoners and which from its own established

961physical place of worship, operates a

967ministry providing worship and services of a

974charitable nature to the community on a

981weekly basis.

983See also , Rule 12A-1.001(3)(c) and (d), Florida Administrative

991Code.

99213. Tax exemptions are a matter of legislative grace. The

1002provisions of law which authorize a tax exemption must be

1012strictly construed against the person claiming the exemption.

1020Asphalt Pavers, Inc. v. Department of Revenue , 584 So. 2d 55, 57

1032(Fla. 1st DCA 1991); see also , Department of Revenue v. Skop , 383

1044So. 2d 678, 680 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). ("While doubtful language

1056in taxing statutes should be resolved in favor of the taxpayer,

1067the reverse is true in construction of exceptions and exemptions

1077from taxation."); Wanda Marine Corporation v. Department of

1086Revenue , 305 So. 2d 65, 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974) ("tax exemptions

1099must be strictly construed against the claimant.") As to new

1110applicants, Respondent is correct.

111414. However, the Respondent has also taken the position

1123that when a certificate expires, the Respondent can require

1132persons or organizations, who have had a certificate issued

1141previously, to submit a new application which will be reviewed by

1152the Respondent under the same guidelines and criteria as a

1162completely new applicant. In this regard, I must reluctantly

1171agree since the administrative construction of a statute by the

1181agency charged with its administration is entitled to great

1190weight. Consumer Credit Counseling Service of the Florida Gulf

1199Coast v. Department of Revenue , 22 Florida Law Weekly, D1613

1209(Fla. 2d DCA, July 2, 1997).

121515. However, Respondent has not filed charges against

1223Petitioner for wrongdoing. The uncontroverted evidence is that

1231the Petitioner's ministry has not changed since 1983 and neither

1241has the statute. Respondent is simply refusing to renew the

1251certificate because it has changed its construction of the

1260statute. This is unfortunate since Petitioner is clearly

1268providing a religious service in and out of Florida.

127716 Although Petitioner raised issues concerning the

1284constitutionality of the applicable statute, the Division of

1292Administrative Hearings does not have the authority to rule on

1302such issues in this proceeding. See Key Haven Associated

1311Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of the Internal

1320Improvement Trust Fund , 427 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 1982).

1329RECOMMENDATION

1330Upon the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law,

1340it is

1342RECOMMENDED that the Department of Revenue enter a Final

1351Order denying Petitioner's renewal application for exemption, and

1359the provisions of Section 212.08(7)(o)2.1., Florida Statutes.

1366DONE AND ENTERED this 9th day of April, 1998, at

1376Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

1380____ _______________________________

1382DANIEL M. KILBRIDE

1385Administrative Law Judge

1388Division of Administrative Hearings

1392The DeSoto Building

13951230 Apalachee Parkway

1398Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

1401(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

1405Fax Filing (850) 921-6847

1409Filed with the Clerk of the

1415Division of Administrative Hearings

1419this 9th day of April, 1998.

1425COPIES FURNISHED:

1427Roy Harthern, President

1430Roy Harthern Ministries, Inc.

1434Post Office Box 915971

1438Longwood, Florida 32791

1441Rex D. Ware, Esquire

1445Department of Revenue

1448Post Office Box 6668

1452Tallahassee, Florida 32314-6668

1455Linda Lettera, General Counsel

1459Department of Revenue

1462204 Carlton Building

1465Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0100

1468Larry Fuchs, Executive Director

1472Department of Revenue

1475104 Carlton Building

1478Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0100

1481NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

1487All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15

1498days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to

1509this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will

1520issue the final order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
Date: 07/06/1998
Proceedings: Final Order filed.
PDF:
Date: 07/01/1998
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
PDF:
Date: 04/09/1998
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 04/09/1998
Proceedings: Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 03/03/98.
Date: 03/25/1998
Proceedings: Respondent`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Date: 03/17/1998
Proceedings: Transcript of Proceedings filed.
Date: 03/03/1998
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Date: 01/26/1998
Proceedings: Order Continuing Hearing sent out. (hearing reset for 3/3/98; 1:00pm; Orlando)
Date: 01/23/1998
Proceedings: Motion for Continuance (Respondent) filed.
Date: 11/12/1997
Proceedings: Letter to D. Mason from R. Harthern (re: request to grant a certificate of exemption) filed.
Date: 11/12/1997
Proceedings: Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 2/20/98; 9:00am; Orlando)
Date: 11/06/1997
Proceedings: Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
Date: 10/31/1997
Proceedings: Initial Order issued.
Date: 10/27/1997
Proceedings: Agency Referral Letter; Request for Hearing, Letter Form; Agency Action Letter filed.

Case Information

Judge:
DANIEL M. KILBRIDE
Date Filed:
10/27/1997
Date Assignment:
10/31/1997
Last Docket Entry:
07/06/1998
Location:
Orlando, Florida
District:
Middle
Agency:
ADOPTED IN PART OR MODIFIED
 

Related DOAH Cases(s) (1):

Related Florida Statute(s) (4):

Related Florida Rule(s) (1):