98-005078
Sherill P. Gomez vs.
Department Of Children And Family Services
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, May 7, 1999.
Recommended Order on Friday, May 7, 1999.
1STATE OF FLORIDA
4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
8SHERILL P. GOMEZ , )
12)
13Petitioner, )
15)
16vs. ) Case No. 98-5078
21)
22DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND )
27FAMILY SERVICES , )
30)
31Respondent. )
33___________________________________)
34RECOMMENDED ORDER
36Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings,
44by its duly-designated Administrative Law Judge, Mary Clark, held
53a formal hearing in the above-styled case on March 31, 1999, by
65videoconference. The Administrative Law Judge presided from
72Tallahassee, Florida; the parties, their witnesses, and the court
81reporter participated from Orlando, Florida.
86APPEARANCES
87F or Petitioner: Sherill Gomez
923689 Penshurst Place
95Kissimmee, Florida 34758
98For Respondent: Carmen M. Sierra, Esquire
104Department of Children and
108Family Services
110400 West Robinson Street
114Suite S-1106
116Orlando, Florida 32801
119STATEMENT OF ISSUES
122T he issue for disposition in this proceeding is whether
132Petitioner is entitled to relicensure as a family day-care home.
142PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
144On October 13, 1998, the Department of Children and Family
154Services (DCFS) notified Ms. Gomez that her application for a
164family day-care home was denied for failure to meet minimum
174standards required by Chapter 402, Florida Statutes.
181Specifically, the notification letter cited violations regarding
188supervision of children in the home.
194M s. Gomez requested a formal evidentiary hearing and the
204case was referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings.
213At the hearing Ms. Gomez testified in her own behalf and
224presented a single exhibit, a videotape of her home. That
234exhibit, marked and received as Petitioner's Exhibit No. 1, has
244been viewed and considered by the Administrative Law Judge.
253DCFS presented the testimony of Barbara Ivey and Kathy
262Swaggerty. DCFS also presented a copy of Ms. Gomez's prior
272provisional license and Barbara Ivey's inspection report, marked
280and received in evidence as Respondent's Exhibits Nos. 1 and 2.
291Neither party filed a proposed recommended order nor filed
300the transcript.
302FINDINGS OF FACT
3051. S herill Gomez resides in Kissimmee, Osceola County,
314Florida, and had a provisional license to operate a family day-
325care home at her residence. The license was issued on April 13,
3371998, and expired six months later on October 13, 1998.
3472. I n 1989, Ms. Gomez was involved in an incident of child
360neglect. She had been babysitting in her home and left two
371children under the age of 3 sleeping but unattended when she went
383out shopping. In her absence a 2 1/2-year-old, Andre, got out
394the door and was picked up by the police. When Ms. Gomez
406returned she called the police and learned that they had Andre.
417Apparently all she knew about the child's mother was that she
428worked at Disney Village.
4323. Ms. Gomez took a three-hour course for family day-care
442and received explicit instructions regarding her duty to provide
451adult supervision at all times, both inside and outside the
461house. When she applied for licensure and assured DCFS that the
4721989 incident never would occur again, the licensing supervisor,
481Kathy Swaggerty, agreed to a six-month provisional license with
490close agency scrutiny of the home during that period.
4994. During the provisional license period, Barbara Ivey
507inspected Ms. Gomez's home several times, both announced and
516unannounced. She found several violations in July 1998 regarding
525record-keeping, bedding for the children, and access to unsafe
534items such as bleach, kitty litter, a weed-wacker, bicycles, and
544barbeque grills. Concerned that Ms. Gomez did not understand her
554obligation, Ms. Ivey spent about two and one-half hours with her
565on that visit explaining the rules. Ms. Ivey also explained the
576importance of adequate supervision.
5805. Ms. Ivey returned on August 5, 1998, and found some
591violations had been corrected, but there were still problems with
601two of the children's records; the bicycles were still
610accessible, and the carpet was dirty. On a subsequent visit in
621August everything but a nutrition card for one infant had been
632corrected. Ms. Ivey and Ms. Gomez discussed supervision again
641and Ms. Ivey emphasized that with one adult caregiver all of the
653children needed to be in the house or out in the play yard
666together.
6676. Ms. Gomez applied for relicensure and Ms. Ivey scheduled
677another inspection visit on September 30, 1998, shortly before
686the provisional license was due to expire.
6937. Ms. Ivey arrived at the home and was admitted by
704Ms. Gomez, who led her into the kitchen area where there was a
717round table with chairs in front of a large picture window
728looking onto the backyard. Through the window Ms. Ivey could see
739two children, ages 3 and 4 years, playing in the yard. A 5-month
752old infant was in a carry-all near the table in the kitchen.
764Ms. Ivey told Ms. Gomez that the children needed to come in.
776Ms. Gomez said that the children were all right, that they could
788be watched through the window, but Ms. Ivey insisted that the
799children should come in.
8038. When Ms. Ivey went out the backdoor she found another
814child, an infant, sitting alone on the patio out of view of the
827window and unable to be observed from inside the house. The
838backyard is not fenced and leads into a wooded area. The infant
850could have crawled away into that area.
8579. After the children were brought inside Ms. Ivey
866continued with her inspection but explained that the lack of
876supervision was a problem. Ms. Gomez also had six children
886enrolled, a number which was in excess of her approved capacity
897when her own child was home from school. In the October 13,
9091998, license denial letter, inadequate supervision was the
917specific basis for DCFS' finding that Ms. Gomez's home failed to
928meet minimum standards.
93110. At the hearing Ms. Gomez explained that the reason the
942children were left alone is that she had to go the door when
955Ms. Ivey arrived. This explanation does not justify her leaving
965the infant alone unobserved on the patio nor does it justify
976Ms. Gomez's delay in retrieving the children after Ms. Ivey's
986arrival. Moreover, under DCFS standards, she should have brought
995all of the children inside when she went into the house.
1006CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
100911. T he Division of Administrative Hearings has
1017jurisdiction in this proceeding pursuant to Sections 120.569 and
1026120.57(1), Florida Statutes.
102912. In this case, Ms. Gomez has the ultimate burden of
1040proving her entitlement to the license she seeks; DCFS has the
1051burden of proving that she committed the violations that would
1061make her unfit for licensure. Department of Banking and Finance,
1071Division of Securities and Investor Protection v. Osborne Stern
1080and Co. , 670 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 1996).
108813. Section 402.313, Florida Statutes, authorizes DCFS to
1096license family day-care homes. Rule 65C-20.009, Florida
1103Administrative Code, requires that operators of family day-care
1111homes must provide supervision of the children in their care and
1122must be able to respond to the emergencies and needs of children:
"1134During daytime hours of operation children shall have adult
1143supervision which means watching and directing children's
1150activities, both indoors and outdoors, and responding to each
1159child's needs."
116114. DCFS met its burden of proving that Ms. Gomez failed to
1173provide adequate supervision when she left an infant unattended
1182on a patio. Ms. Gomez did not establish her entitlement to
1193licensure.
1194RECOMMENDATION
1195Based on the foregoing, it is
1201RECOMMENDED: that the Department of Children and Family
1209Services enter its final order denying Sherill Gomez' application
1218for family day-care home licensure.
1223DONE AND ENTERED this 7th day of May, 1999, in Tallahassee,
1234Leon County, Florida.
1237___________________________________
1238MARY CLARK
1240Administrative Law Judge
1243Division of Administrative Hearings
1247The DeSoto Building
12501230 Apalachee Parkway
1253Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
1256(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675
1260Fax Filing (850) 921-6847
1264www.doah.state.fl.us
1265Filed with the Clerk of the
1271Division of Administrative Hearings
1275this 7th day of May, 1999.
1281COPIES FURNISHED :
1284Sherill Gomez
12863689 Penshurst Place
1289Kissimmee, Florida 34758
1292Carmen M. Sierra, Esquire
1296Department of Children and
1300Family Services
1302400 West Robinson Street
1306Suite S-1106
1308Orlando, Florida 32801
1311Gregory D. Venz, Agency Clerk
1316Department of Children and
1320Family Services
1322Building 2, Room 204
13261317 Winewood Boulevard
1329Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700
1332John S. Slye, General Counsel
1337Department of Children and
1341Family Services
1343Building 2, Room 204
13471317 Winewood Boulevard
1350Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700
1353NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
1359All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15
1370days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to
1381this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will
1392issue the final order in this case.
- Date
- Proceedings
- Date: 06/24/1999
- Proceedings: Final Order filed.
- Date: 04/08/1999
- Proceedings: (Respondent) Exhibits filed.
- Date: 03/31/1999
- Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
- Date: 03/25/1999
- Proceedings: Joint Prehearing Statement filed.
- Date: 02/02/1999
- Proceedings: Order and Amended Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 3/31/99; 11:00am; Orlando)
- Date: 01/25/1999
- Proceedings: Respondent`s Motion for Continuance filed.
- Date: 01/13/1999
- Proceedings: Notice of Video Hearing sent out. (Video Hearing set for 2/11/99; 8:00am; Orlando & Tallahassee)
- Date: 01/13/1999
- Proceedings: Order for Prehearing Conference sent out.
- Date: 12/07/1998
- Proceedings: Respondent`s Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
- Date: 11/24/1998
- Proceedings: Initial Order issued.
- Date: 11/17/1998
- Proceedings: Notice; Agency Denial Letter; Request for Hearing (letter form); Supportive Documents filed.