99-003964 Department Of Children And Family Services vs. Children`s Academy Preschool No. 3
 Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Wednesday, December 8, 1999.


View Dockets  
Summary: A $900 fine for nine health code violations at a child-care facility was determined to be appropriate.

1STATE OF FLORIDA

4DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

8DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND )

13FAMILY SERVICES, )

16)

17Petitioner, )

19)

20vs. ) Case No. 99-3964

25)

26CHILDREN'S ACADEMY PRESCHOOL NO. 3, )

32)

33Respondent. )

35____________________________________)

36RECOMMENDED ORDER

38Pursuant to notice, a hearing was held in this case in

49accordance with Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes, on November

5723, 1999, by video teleconference at sites in Miami and

67Tallahassee, Florida, before Stuart M. Lerner, a duly-designated

75Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative

83Hearings.

84APPEARANCES

85For Petitioner: Rosemarie Rinaldi, Esquire

90District 11 Legal Office

94Department of Children and

98Family Services

100401 Northwest Second Avenue

104Suite N-1014

106Miami, Florida 33128

109For Respondent: Patrick Adeleke, Co-Owner

114Children's Academy Preschool No. 3,

11913801 Memorial Highway

122North Miami, Florida 33161

126STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

130Whether Respondent should be fined $900.00 for violating

138licensing standards applicable to child care facilities, as

146alleged by Petitioner in its July 16, 1999, letter to Respondent.

157PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

159By letter dated July 16, 1999, the Department of Children

169and Family Services (Department) notified Petitioner of its

177intent to impose upon Petitioner a fine in the amount of $900.00

189for nine specified "violations of the minimum standards, rules

198and regulations for the operation of a Child Care Facility [set

209forth in] Florida Administrative Code, Rule 65C-22 and Section

218402.305, Florida Statutes." Respondent thereafter requested a

225hearing on the Department's proposed action. On September 21,

2341999, the matter was referred to the Division of Administrative

244Hearings (Division) for the assignment of an Administrative Law

253Judge to conduct the hearing Respondent had requested.

261As noted above, the hearing was held on November 23, 1999.

272At the hearing, three witnesses testified. Ann Marie Alderman, a

282Sanitation and Safety Specialist with the Miami-Dade Health

290Department, and Linda Reiling, a Family Service Counselor with

299the Department, testified for the Department. In addition to

308Ms. Alderman's and Ms. Reiling's testimony, the Department

316offered one exhibit, Petitioner's Composite Exhibit 1, which was

325received by the undersigned. Patrick Adeleke, Respondent's co-

333owner, testified on behalf of Respondent. Respondent presented

341no other evidence.

344At the conclusion of the evidentiary portion of the hearing

354on November 23, 1999, the undersigned inquired of the parties as

365to whether they intended to file proposed recommended orders. In

375response to the undersigned's inquiry, Respondent's

381representative, Mr. Adeleke, indicated that Respondent would be

389waiving its right to file a proposed recommended order. Counsel

399for the Department, on the other hand, indicated that she would

410be filing a proposed recommended order on behalf of the

420Department. The undersigned thereupon, on the record, announced

428that the Department's proposed recommended order had to be filed

438no later than 10 days from the date of the conclusion of the

451hearing.

452The Department timely filed its Proposed Recommended Order

460on December 2, 1999. In making the recommendation contained in

470this Recommended Order, the undersigned has given careful

478consideration to the Department's Proposed Recommended Order.

485FINDINGS OF FACT

488Based upon the evidence adduced at hearing and the record as

499a whole, the following findings of fact are made:

5081. Children's Academy Preschool No. 3 (Facility) is a child

518care facility licensed by the Department. It is located at 16263

529Northwest Second Avenue, North Miami Beach, Florida.

5362. Patrick Adeleke and his wife, Mary Adeleke, have owned

546the Facility since 1996.

5503. The Facility was in poor condition when the Adelekes

560purchased it in 1996. The Adelekes have made improvements to the

571Facility (albeit in a slow and deliberate manner).

5794. In October of 1996, shortly after the Adelekes assumed

589ownership of the Facility, Ann Marie Alderman, a Sanitation and

599Safety Specialist with the Department, conducted an inspection of

608the Facility and found numerous health code violations.

6165. Ms. Alderman returned to the Facility in February of

6261998. Her inspection of the Facility on this return visit, like

637her previous inspection in October of 1996, revealed a large

647number of health code violations. These violations were

655ultimately corrected.

6576. Ms Alderman again visited the Facility on April 15,

6671999. The purpose of this visit was to conduct an annual health

679inspection.

6807. Ms. Alderman found numerous health code violations

688during her April 15, 1999, visit to the Facility.

6978. Following her inspection, Ms. Alderman prepared an

705inspection report, which accurately described the violations that

713existed at the Facility at the time of the inspection and which

725gave notice that these violations needed to be corrected by

7358:00 a.m. on May 3, 1999. Before leaving the Facility, she

746handed this inspection report to the person in charge of the

757Facility that day, Carmen Macrena.

7629. Ms. Alderman made a follow-up visit to the Facility on

773May 3, 1999, and discovered that there were still health code

784violations. Children were not spaced 18 inches apart while

793napping. Most of the emergency lights did not work. The floor

804in the hot water closet in Toddler Room No. 2 was dirty. The

817dryer vent was disconnected. There was no working thermometer in

827the refrigerator in the Middle Baby Room or in the kitchen

838freezer. Discarded appliances and other non-usable items were in

847the back yard. An air conditioning unit in the Middle Baby Room

859needed cleaning. Dish detergent was located in an area where it

870could be reached by children attending the Facility.

87810. These continuing violations were corrected

884approximately a week after Ms. Alderman's May 3, 1999,

893reinspection.

89411. Upon being made aware of the violations that existed at

905the Facility as of May 3, 1999, the Department determined that

916Respondent should be fined $900.00.

92112. By letter dated July 16, 1999, the Department advised

931Respondent of its intention to impose such a fine.

94013. Thereafter, Respondent requested an administrative

946hearing on the matter.

950CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

95314. The Department has been statutorily delegated the

961authority to establish, by rule, licensing standards for child

970care facilities in Florida. The extent of the Department's

979authority is described in Section 402.305, Florida Statutes,

987which provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

994(1) Licensing standards.--The department

998shall establish licensing standards that each

1004licensed child care facility must meet

1010regardless of the origin or source of the

1018fees used to operate the facility or the type

1027of children served by the facility.

1033(a) The standards shall be designed to

1040address the following areas:

10441. The health, sanitation, safety, and

1050adequate physical surroundings for all

1055children in child care. . . .

1062(c) The minimum standards for child care

1069facilities shall be adopted in the rules of

1077the department and shall address the areas

1084delineated in this section. The department,

1090in adopting rules to establish minimum

1096standards for child care facilities, shall

1102recognize that different age groups of

1108children may require different standards.

1113The department may adopt different minimum

1119standards for facilities that serve children

1125in different age groups, including school-age

1131children. . . .

1135(5) Physical facilities.--Minimum standards

1139shall include requirements for building

1144conditions, indoor play space, outdoor play

1150space, napping space, bathroom facilities,

1155food preparation facilities, outdoor

1159equipment, and indoor equipment. . . .

1166(7) Sanitation and safety.--

1170(a) Minimum standards shall include

1175requirements for sanitary and safety

1180conditions . . . .

118515. The Department has adopted such "licensing standards."

1193They are found in Chapter 65C-22, Florida Administrative Code.

120216. Rule 65C-22.002, Florida Administrative Code, imposes

1209requirements relating to the "physical environment" in child care

1218facilities. It provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

1226(1) General Requirements. . . .

1232(b) All child care facilities must be in

1240good repair, free from health and safety

1247hazards, clean, and free from vermin

1253infestation. During the hours that the

1259facility is in operation, no portion of the

1267building shall be used for any activity which

1275endangers the health and safety of the

1282children.

1283(c) All areas and surfaces accessible to

1290children shall be free of toxic substances

1297and hazardous materials. . . .

1303(e) All potentially harmful items including

1309cleaning supplies, flammable products,

1313poisonous, toxic, and hazardous materials

1318must be labeled. These items as well as

1326knives and sharp tools shall be stored in

1334locations inaccessible to the children in

1340care.

1341(2) Rooms Occupied by Children.

1346(a) All rooms must have lighting the

1353equivalent of 20 foot candles to allow for

1361supervision and for safe methods of entering

1368and exiting each room. . . .

1375(c) All rooms shall be kept clean,

1382adequately ventilated and in good

1387repair. . . .

1391(4) Outdoor Play Area. . . .

1398(c) The outdoor play area shall be clean,

1406free of litter, nails, glass and other

1413hazards. . . .

1417(5) Napping and Sleeping Space. For the

1424purpose of these standards, sleeping refers

1430to the normal overnight sleep cycle while

1437napping refers to a brief period of rest

1445during daylight or early evening hours. . . .

1454(e) A minimum distance of eighteen (18)

1461inches must be maintained around individual

1467napping and sleeping spaces. Exit areas must

1474remain clear in accordance with fire safety

1481regulations. . . .

1485(7) Fire Safety.

1488(a) Unless statutorily exempted, all child

1494care facilities shall conform to state

1500standards adopted by the State Fire Marshal,

1507Chapter 4A-36, Florida Administrative Code,

1512Uniform Standards for Life Safety and Fire

1519Prevention in Child Care Facilities and shall

1526be inspected annually. A copy of the current

1534and approved annual fire inspection report by

1541a certified fire inspector must be on file

1549with the department or local licensing

1555agency. . . .

1559(9) Equipment and Furnishings.

1563(a) Indoor Equipment . . .

15692. Toys, equipment and furnishings must be

1576safe and maintained in a sanitary condition.

1583(b) Outdoor Equipment . . .

15894. All equipment, fences, and objects on the

1597facility's premises shall be free of sharp,

1604broken and jagged edges and properly placed

1611to prevent overcrowding or safety hazards in

1618any one area.

162117. The Legislature, in addition to authorizing the

1629Department to establish the "licensing standards" found in

1637Chapter 65C-22, Florida Administrative Code, has, in

1644Section 402,310, Florida Statutes, autho rized the Department to

1654impose penalties, including administrative fines, upon child care

1662facilities that violate these "licensing standards."

1668Section 402.310, Florida Statutes, provides, in pertinent part,

1676as follows:

1678(1)(a) The department or local licensing

1684agency may deny, suspend, or revoke a license

1692or impose an administrative fine not to

1699exceed $100 per violation, per day, for the

1707violation of any provision of ss. 402.301-

1714402.319 or rules adopted thereunder.

1719However, where the violation could or does

1726cause death or serious harm, the department

1733or local licensing agency may impose an

1740administrative fine, not to exceed $500 per

1747violation per day.

1750(b) In determining the appropriate

1755disciplinary action to be taken for a

1762violation as provided in paragraph (a), the

1769following factors shall be considered:

17741. The severity of the violation, including

1781the probability that death or serious harm to

1789the health or safety of any person will

1797result or has resulted, the severity of the

1805actual or potential harm, and the extent to

1813which the provisions of this part have been

1821violated.

18222. Actions taken by the licensee to correct

1830the violation or to remedy complaints.

18363. Any previous violations of the licensee.

1843(2) When the department has reasonable cause

1850to believe that grounds for the denial,

1857suspension, or revocation of a license or

1864imposition of an administrative fine exist,

1870it shall determine the matter in accordance

1877with procedures prescribed in

1881chapter 120. . . .

188618. At any administrative hearing held "in accordance with

1895procedures prescribed in [C] hapter 120," Florida Statutes, the

1904Department, if it seeks to impose an administrative fine upon a

1915child care facility for violating "licensing standards," bears

1923the burden of establishing the accused child care facility's

1932guilt of the alleged violation(s). Proof greater than a mere

1942preponderance of the evidence must be presented. Clear and

1951convincing evidence is required. See Department of Banking and

1960Finance, Division of Securities and Investor Protection v.

1968Osborne Stern and Company , 670 So. 2d 932, 935 (Fla. 1996)("[A]n

1980administrative fine deprives the person fined of substantial

1988rights in property. Administrative fines . . . are generally

1998punitive in nature. . . . Because the imposition of

2008administrative fines . . . are penal in nature and implicate

2019significant property rights, the extension of the clear and

2028convincing evidence standard to justify the imposition of such a

2038fine is warranted."); Section 120.57(1)(j), Florida Statutes

2046("Findings of fact shall be based on a preponderance of the

2058evidence, except in penal or licensure disciplinary proceedings

2066or except as otherwise provided by statute."). "'[C] lear and

2077convincing evidence requires that the evidence must be found to

2087be credible; the facts to which the witnesses testify must be

2098distinctly remembered; the testimony must be precise and explicit

2107and the witnesses must be lacking in confusion as to the facts in

2120issue. The evidence must be of such weight that it produces in

2132the mind of the trier of fact a firm belief or conviction,

2144without hesitancy, as to the truth of the allegations sought to

2155be established.'" In re Davey , 645 So. 2d 398, 404 (Fla. 1994),

2167quoting, with approval, from Slomowitz v. Walker , 429 So. 2d 797,

2178800 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

218319. In the instant case, after determining that "reasonable

2192cause" existed to fine Respondent $900.00 for committing nine

"2201violations of minimum standards, rules and regulations for the

2210operation of a Child Care Facility [set forth in] Florida

2220Administrative Code, Rule 65C-22 and Section 402.305, Florida

2228Statutes," the Department, by letter dated July 16, 1999,

2237notified Respondent of its intention to impose such a fine and of

2249Respondent's right to request an administrative hearing on the

2258matter.

225920. Respondent requested and received such an

2266administrative hearing.

226821. At the administrative hearing, clear and convincing

2276evidence was presented establishing that the violations alleged

2284by the Department were committed.

228922. Mr. Adeleke, during his presentation at the hearing,

2298admitted the existence of these violations. He contended,

2306however, that a $900.00 fine was too severe a penalty to impose

2318for these violations given his and his wife's efforts to make

2329improvements at the Facility and the Facility's limited budget.

2338He suggested that a $200.00 fine would be "more than reasonable."

234923. While the Adelekes have made improvements to the

2358Facility since they purchased it and ultimately corrected the

2367violations cited in the Department's July 16, 1999, letter,

2376taking into account the number and nature of these violations,

2386the length of time it took to correct them, and the previous

2398violations (not cited in Department's July 16, 1999, letter) that

2408were observed at the Facility after the Adelekes' purchase, the

2418$900.00 fine proposed by the Department (which is considerably

2427less than the fine it could have imposed) is appropriate and

2438should not be reduced. 1/

2443RECOMMENDATION

2444Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of

2454Law, it is

2457RECOMMENDED that the Department issue a final order finding

2466Respondent guilty of the violations cited in its July 16, 1999,

2477letter to Respondent and fining Respondent a total of $900.00

2487($100.00 per violation) for these violations.

2493DONE AND ENTERED this 8th day of December, 1999, in

2503Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

2507___________________________________

2508STUART M. LERNER

2511Administrative Law Judge

2514Division of Administrative Hearings

2518The DeSoto Building

25211230 Apalachee Parkway

2524Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

2527(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

2531Fax Filing (850) 921-6847

2535www.doah.state.fl.us

2536Filed with the Clerk of the

2542Division of Administrative Hearings

2546this 8th day of December, 1999.

2552ENDNOTE

25531/ The Department has not given notice of its intent to, and

2565therefore may not, impose a fine greater than $900.00 for these

2576violations. See Williams v. Turlington , 498 So. 2d 468 (Fla. 3d

2587DCA 1986)("Since Williams was not given notice by either the

2598complaint or any later proceedings that he was at risk of having

2610his license permanently revoked, the Commission's imposition of

2618the non-prayed for relief of permanent revocation, even if

2627justified by the evidence, was error.").

2634COPIES FURNISHED:

2636Rosemarie Rinaldi, Esquire

2639District 11 Legal Office

2643Department of Children and

2647Family Services

2649401 Northwest Second Avenue

2653Suite N-1014

2655Miami, Florida 33128

2658Patrick Adeleke

2660Mary Adeleke

266216263 Northwest Second Avenue

2666Miami, Florida 33181

2669Patrick Adeleke

2671Mary Adeleke

267313801 Memorial Highway

2676North Miami, Florida 33161

2680John S. Slye, General Counsel

2685Department of Children and Family Services

2691Building 2, Room 204

26951317 Winewood Boulevard

2698Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700

2701Samuel C. Chavers, Acting Agency Clerk

2707Department of Children and Family Services

2713Building 2, Room 204B

27171317 Winewood Boulevard

2720Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700

2723NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

2729All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15

2740days from the date of this recommended order. Any exceptions to

2751this recommended order should be filed with the agency that will

2762issue the final order in this case.

Select the PDF icon to view the document.
PDF
Date
Proceedings
Date: 02/24/2000
Proceedings: Final Order Imposing Administrativr Fine for Violation of Rule 65C-22.002, F.A.C. filed.
PDF:
Date: 02/20/2000
Proceedings: Agency Final Order
Date: 12/13/1999
Proceedings: (R. Rinaldi) Notice of Filing; Petitioner`s Composite Exhibit (number 1) filed.
PDF:
Date: 12/08/1999
Proceedings: Recommended Order
PDF:
Date: 12/08/1999
Proceedings: Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 11/23/99.
Date: 12/02/1999
Proceedings: Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order (for Judge Signature) (filed via facsimile).
Date: 11/23/1999
Proceedings: CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Date: 11/23/1999
Proceedings: (R. Rinaldi) Notice of Filing; Petitioner`s Composite Exhibit (number 1) (filed via facsimile).
Date: 10/22/1999
Proceedings: Notice of Video Hearing sent out. (hearing set for November 23, 1999; 9:15 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale and Tallahassee, Florida)
Date: 10/20/1999
Proceedings: Joint Response to Order (filed via facsimile).
Date: 10/08/1999
Proceedings: Order sent out. (parties shall file a joint response to Initial order no later than 10/20/99)
Date: 10/07/1999
Proceedings: (Petitioner) Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
Date: 09/28/1999
Proceedings: Initial Order issued.
Date: 09/22/1999
Proceedings: Notice; Request for Hearing, letter form; Agency Action Letter filed.

Case Information

Judge:
STUART M. LERNER
Date Filed:
09/22/1999
Date Assignment:
09/28/1999
Last Docket Entry:
02/24/2000
Location:
Miami, Florida
District:
Southern
Agency:
ADOPTED IN TOTO
 

Related DOAH Cases(s) (1):

Related Florida Statute(s) (4):

Related Florida Rule(s) (1):