The Board proposes the rule repeal because the rule is no longer necessary because the examination is now being administered by a national company.  

  • DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
    Board of Opticianry

    RULE NO.: RULE TITLE:
    64B12-8.019: Security and Monitoring Procedures for Licensure Examination

    PURPOSE AND EFFECT: The Board proposes the rule repeal because the rule is no longer necessary because the examination is now being administered by a national company.

    SUMMARY: The rule is being repealed because the examination is being administered by an national company and the rule is no longer necessary.

    SUMMARY OF STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COST: During discussion of the economic impact of this rule the Department, based upon the expertise and experience of its members, determined that a Statement of Estimated Regulatory Cost (SERC) was not necessary and that these rule amendments will not require ratification by the Legislature. No person or interested party submitted additional information regarding the economic impact at that time. The rule will not have an adverse impact on small business, or likely increase regulatory costs in excess of $200,000 in the aggregate within 1 year after implementation of the rule.

    Any person who wishes to provide information regarding the statement of estimated costs, or to provide a proposal for a lower regulatory cost alternative must do so in writing within 21 days of this notice.

    RULEMAKING AUTHORITY: 456.017(1)(d) FS.
    LAW IMPLEMENTED: 456.017(1)(d) FS.

    IF REQUESTED WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, A HEARING WILL BE SCHEDULED AND ANNOUNCED IN THE FAW.

    THE PERSON TO BE CONTACTED REGARDING THE PROPOSED RULE IS: Sue Foster, Executive Director, Board of Opticianry/MQA, 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin #C08, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3258

     

    THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSED RULE IS:

    64B12-8.019 Security and Monitoring Procedures for Licensure Examination.

    Rulemaking Specific Authority 456.017(1)(d) FS. Law Implemented 456.017(1)(d) FS. History–New 12-30-82, Formerly 21P-8.19, 21P-8.019, 61G13-8.019, 59U-8.019, Repealed_________.

     

    NAME OF PERSON ORIGINATING PROPOSED RULE: Board of Opticianry

    NAME AGENCY HEAD WHO APPROVED THE PROPOSED RULE: Board of Opticianry

    DATE PROPOSED RULE APPROVED BY AGENCY HEAD: November 4, 2011

Document Information

Comments Open:
1/20/2012
Summary:
The rule is being repealed because the examination is being administered by an national company and the rule is no longer necessary.
Purpose:
The Board proposes the rule repeal because the rule is no longer necessary because the examination is now being administered by a national company.
Rulemaking Authority:
456.017(1)(d) FS.
Law:
456.017(1)(d) FS.
Contact:
Sue Foster, Executive Director, Board of Opticianry/MQA, 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin #C08, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3258
Related Rules: (1)
64B12-8.019. Security and Monitoring Procedures for Licensure Examination