The Board proposes to repeal the rule because it duplicates what is otherwise provided for in statute or is otherwise procedural and unnecessary in nature.  


  • RULE NO.: RULE TITLE:
    64B16-29.003: Drug Requirement
    PURPOSE AND EFFECT: The Board proposes to repeal the rule because it duplicates what is otherwise provided for in statute or is otherwise procedural and unnecessary in nature.
    SUMMARY: The rule will be repealed due to the fact that it duplicates what is otherwise provided for in statute or is otherwise procedural and unnecessary in nature.
    SUMMARY OF STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS AND LEGISLATIVE RATIFICATION:
    The Agency has determined that this will not have an adverse impact on small business or likely increase directly or indirectly regulatory costs in excess of $200,000 in the aggregate within one year after the implementation of the rule. A SERC has not been prepared by the agency.
    The Agency has determined that the proposed rule is not expected to require legislative ratification based on the statement of estimated regulatory costs or if no SERC is required, the information expressly relied upon and described herein: During discussion of the economic impact of this rule at its Board meeting, the Board, based upon the expertise and experience of its members, determined that a Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs (SERC) was not necessary and that the rule will not require ratification by the Legislature. No person or interested party submitted additional information regarding the economic impact at that time.
    Any person who wishes to provide information regarding a statement of estimated regulatory costs, or provide a proposal for a lower cost regulatory alternative must do so in writing within 21 days of this notice.
    RULEMAKING AUTHORITY: 465.005, 828.055 FS.
    LAW IMPLEMENTED: 828.055 FS.
    IF REQUESTED WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, A HEARING WILL BE SCHEDULED AND ANNOUNCED IN THE FAW.
    THE PERSON TO BE CONTACTED REGARDING THE PROPOSED RULE IS: Mark Whitten, Executive Director, Board of Pharmacy/MQA, 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin #C04, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3254

    THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSED RULE IS:

    64B16-29.003 Drug Requirement.

    Rulemaking Specific Authority 465.005, 828.055 FS. Law Implemented 828.055 FS. History–New 10-17-79, Formerly 21S-14.03, Amended 4-24-88, Formerly 21S-14.003, 21S-29.003, 61F10-29.003, 59X-29.003, Repealed________.


    NAME OF PERSON ORIGINATING PROPOSED RULE: Board of Pharmacy
    NAME OF AGENCY HEAD WHO APPROVED THE PROPOSED RULE: Board of Pharmacy
    DATE PROPOSED RULE APPROVED BY AGENCY HEAD: October 18, 2011

Document Information

Comments Open:
1/27/2012
Summary:
The rule will be repealed due to the fact that it duplicates what is otherwise provided for in statute or is otherwise procedural and unnecessary in nature.
Purpose:
The Board proposes to repeal the rule because it duplicates what is otherwise provided for in statute or is otherwise procedural and unnecessary in nature.
Rulemaking Authority:
465.005, 828.055 FS.
Law:
828.055 FS.
Contact:
Mark Whitten, Executive Director, Board of Pharmacy/MQA, 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin #C04, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3254
Related Rules: (1)
64B16-29.003. Drug Requirement