PALM BEACH GREYHOUND KENNEL ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, vs. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, Respondent. ; Case No.: 18-0915RP; Rule No.: 61D-6.0052; Valid

 

 

PALM BEACH GREYHOUND KENNEL ASSOCIATION,

Petitioner,

 

vs.

 

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING,

Respondent.

 

Case No.18-915RP

 

1. Except as set forth herein, proposed rule 61D-6.052 is not an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority. Accordingly, Palm Beach Greyhound Kennel Association’s Petition for Administrative Determination of the Invalidity of Proposed Rule 61D-6.0052, F.A.C., except as set forth herein, is dismissed.

2. Proposed rules 61D-6.0052(1)(b), related to the selection of greyhounds for race-day sampling; 61D-6.0052(4)(a), related to the use of “a lockable freezer or container” in which 41 to store race-day specimens; 61D-6.0052(4)(a), related to the temperature at which race-day specimens should be preserved; and 61D-6.0052(5)(a) and (5)(b) regarding the chain of custody of confiscated materials, are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.