The purpose and effect will be to repeal the identified rule.

 

ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION

RULE NO.:RULE TITLE:

28-22.100Purpose and Effect

PURPOSE AND EFFECT: The purpose and effect will be to repeal the identified rule.

SUMMARY: The identified rule is obsolete in that Franklin County is no longer designated as an area of critical state concern.

SUMMARY OF STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS AND LEGISLATIVE RATIFICATION:

The Agency has determined that this will not have an adverse impact on small business or likely increase directly or indirectly regulatory costs in excess of $200,000 in the aggregate within one year after the implementation of the rule. A SERC has not been prepared by the agency.

The Agency has determined that the proposed rule is not expected to require legislative ratification based on the statement of estimated regulatory costs or if no SERC is required, the information expressly relied upon and described herein: The Commission has determined that repeal of the identified rule is not expected to require legislative ratification based on the fact that the rule is obsolete as Franklin County is no longer designated as an area of critical state concern.

Any person who wishes to provide information regarding a statement of estimated regulatory costs, or provide a proposal for a lower cost regulatory alternative must do so in writing within 21 days of this notice.

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY: 380.0555(10) FS.

LAW IMPLEMENTED: 380.0555 FS.

IF REQUESTED WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, A HEARING WILL BE SCHEDULED AND ANNOUNCED IN THE FAR.

THE PERSON TO BE CONTACTED REGARDING THE PROPOSED RULE IS: Barbara Leighty, Office of the Governor, Room 1801, The Capitol, Tallahassee, FL 32399-0001, telephone: [phone]

 

THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSED RULE IS:

 

28-22.100 Purpose and Effect.

Rulemaking Specific Authority 380.0555(10) FS. Law Implemented 380.0555 FS. History–New 3-16-87, Amended 8-26-87, 11-2-87, 4-18-88, 6-5-88, 6-21-88, 7-21-88, 10-5-88, 1-8-89, 1-30-89, 7-20-89, 9-14-89, 10-25-89, 10-29-89, 11-20-89, 12-17-89, 1-1-90, 10-11-90, 2-6-91, 3-27-91, 5-19-91, 7-21-91, 8-1-91, 1-15-92, 3-24-92, 10-8-92, 12-21-92, 1-5-93, 2-16-93, 7-8-93, Repealed__________.

 

NAME OF PERSON ORIGINATING PROPOSED RULE: Administration Commission

NAME OF AGENCY HEAD WHO APPROVED THE PROPOSED RULE: Administration Commission

DATE PROPOSED RULE APPROVED BY AGENCY HEAD: November 19, 2013