The proposed rule amendment is being promulgated to implement changes in the administration of the District's Cooperative Assistance Program that will improve the quality and variety of projects submitted through the grant ....

 

NAVIGATION DISTRICTS

Florida Inland Navigation District

RULE NOS.:RULE TITLES:

66B-1.003Definitions

66B-1.005Funds Allocation

66B-1.008Project Eligibility

66B-1.014Small-Scale Spoil Island Restoration and Enhancement Projects

66B-1.015Small-Scale Derelict Vessel Removal Projects

PURPOSE AND EFFECT: The proposed rule amendment is being promulgated to implement changes in the administration of the District's Cooperative Assistance Program that will improve the quality and variety of projects submitted through the grant program. This makes minor changes to the Cooperative Assistance program rule sections: Definitions, Funds Allocation, Project Eligibility, Small-Scale Spoil Island and Small-Scale Derelict Vessel projects and increases potential funding for derelict vessel removal.

SUMMARY: The amendments being proposed at this time will increase potential funding for derelict vessel removal, increase project lifespan and clarify or make changes suggested by JAPC staff.

SUMMARY OF STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS AND LEGISLATIVE RATIFICATION:

The Agency has determined that this will not have an adverse impact on small business or likely increase directly or indirectly regulatory costs in excess of $200,000 in the aggregate within one year after the implementation of the rule. A SERC has not been prepared by the Agency.

The Agency has determined that the proposed rule is not expected to require legislative ratification based on the statement of estimated regulatory costs or if no SERC is required, the information expressly relied upon and described herein: 1) No requirement for a SERC was triggered under Section 120.541(1), F.S. and 2) Based upon the nature of the rule, the adverse impact or regulatory cost, if any, do not exceed nor would be expected to exceed any one of the economic analysis criteria set forth in Section 120.541(2)(a), F.S. It is anticipated that the proposed rule will not have any negative economic impact.

Any person who wishes to provide information regarding a statement of estimated regulatory costs, or provide a proposal for a lower cost regulatory alternative must do so in writing within 21 days of this notice.

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY: 374.976(2) FS.

LAW IMPLEMENTED: 374.976 (1) - (3) FS.

IF REQUESTED WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, A HEARING WILL BE HELD AT THE DATE, TIME AND PLACE SHOWN BELOW:

DATE AND TIME: January 8, 2021, 11:00 a.m.

PLACE: Florida Inland Navigation District, 1314 Marcinski Rd., Jupiter, Florida 33477

THE PERSON TO BE CONTACTED REGARDING THE PROPOSED RULE IS: Janet Zimmerman, Assistant Executive Director, Florida Inland Navigation District, 1314 Marcinski Rd., Jupiter, FL 33477, Phone: [phone].

 

THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSED RULE IS:

 

66B-1.003 Definitions

The basic terms utilized in this rule are defined as follows:

(1) through (25) No change

(26) “FIRST BUDGET HEARING” means the public hearing to adopt a tentative District budget and proposed millage rate as required by Section 200.065(2)(c), F.S. “TRIM HEARING” means a public hearing required by Chapter 200, F.S., concerning the tax and budget of the District.

(27) through (28) No change

Rulemaking Authority 374.976(2) FS. Law Implemented 374.976(1) FS. History–New 12-17-90, Amended 2-6-97, Formerly 16T-1.003, Amended 5-17-98, 3-21-01, 3-20-03, 3-3-04, 4-21-05, 4-24-06, 4-15-07, 3-25-08, 2-22-10, 3-7-11,_____.

 

66B-1.005 Funds Allocation

(1) No change

(2) Project Funding Ratio: All financial assistance and support to eligible state and regional agencies shall require, at minimum, equal matching funds from the project sponsor’s own budget, with the exception of public navigation projects that meet the provisions of subsection 66B-1.005(6), F.A.C., land acquisition projects in accordance with subsection 66B-1.005(7), and Rule 66B-1.008, F.A.C., and small-scale spoil island restoration and enhancement projects that meet the provisions of Rule 66B-1.014, F.A.C and projects approved in counties recovering from a state of emergency. Applicant’s in-house costs are limited pursuant to paragraph 66B-1.007(1)(c), F.A.C. All financial assistance to seaports shall require equal matching funds. The District shall contribute no more than fifty (50) percent of the state share of the cost of an inlet project. The District shall not contribute funding to both the state and local shares of an inlet management project.

(3) through (4) No change.

(5) Inlet Management and Beach Renourishment: Projects and project elements in the categories of inlet management and beach renourishment shall be subject to the following provisions. The District shall contribute no more than fifty percent of the local share of the cost of the project. The District shall not contribute funding to both the state and local shares of an inlet management or beach renourishment project. Funding for the construction phase of an inlet management or beach renourishment project may be approved by the District Board for a multiple year period subject to budgeting and allocation pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 200, F.S. Additionally the following provisions shall be met for inlet management or beach renourishment projects:

(a) Inlet Management: Inlet management projects shall benefit public navigation within the District and shall be consistent with Department of Environmental Protection approved inlet management plans and the statewide beach management plan pursuant to Section 161.161, F.S. Prior to funding any inlet management project, the Board shall make a finding that the project is a benefit to public navigation in the District. Inlet management projects that are determined to be consistent with Department of Environmental Protection approved inlet management plans are declared to be a benefit to public navigation.

(b) Beach Renourishment: All projects in this category shall be consistent with the statewide beach management plan. Beach renourishment projects shall only include those beaches that have been adversely impacted by navigation inlets, navigation structures, navigation dredging, or a navigation project. Prior to funding any beach renourishment project project, the Board shall make a finding that the beaches to be nourished have been adversly impacted by navigation inlets, navigation structures, navigation dredging or a navigation project. The determination of beach areas that are adversely impacted by navigation for the purposes of this program shall be made by Department of Environmental Protection approved inlet management plans. If state funding is not provided for a beach project, public access with adequate parking must be available in accordance with Chapter 161, F.S.

(6) No change.

(7) Land Acquisition: Land acquisition projects that provide for commercial/industrial waterway access shall qualify for a maximum of fifty (50) percent funding. All other land acquisition projects shall qualify for a maximum of twenty-five (25) percent program funding. All pre-agreement expenses for land acquisition must be completed within one-year of the date of application for funding. Except for acquisition of publicly owned spoil disposal site, all funded land acquisition projects must construct the required boating access facility within 7 years of completion of the land acquisition, or the District may require the applicant to refund the program funding. Immediately upon acquiring title to the land, the applicant shall record a declaration of covenants in favor of the District stating that if the required boating access facility is not constructed within 7 years and dedicated for the public use as a boating access facility in perpetuity for a minimum period of 25 years after completion of construction, the District shall require the applicant to refund the program funding.

Rulemaking Authority 374.976(2) FS. Law Implemented 374.976(1), (3) FS. History–New 12-17-90, Amended 2-6-97, Formerly 16T-1.005, Amended 5-17-98, 3-31-99, 3-21-01, 7-30-02, 3-3-04, 4-21-05, 4-24-06, 4-15-07, 3-25-08, 4-1-09, 3-7-11, 3-7-12, 4-10-13, 5-15-16,_____..

 

66B-1.008 Project Eligibility

(1) No change.

(2) Property Control: The site of a new proposed land-based development project shall be dedicated for the public use for which the project was intended for a minimum period of 35 25  years after project completion. Such dedication shall be in the form of a deed, lease, management agreement or other legally binding document and shall be recorded in the public property records of the county in which the property is located. This property control requirement also applies to a project site owned by another governmental entity. The governmental entity that owns the project site may be joined as a co-applicant to meet this property control requirement. Existing land based development projects that are being repaired, replaced or modified must demonstrate that the project site has been dedicated for public use for at least  35 25years with at least 10 years remaining on the dedication document.

(3) Permits: The project sponsor is responsible for obtaining and abiding by any and all federal, state and local permits, laws, proprietary authorizations and regulations in the development and operation of the project. Applicants for construction projects that include elements that require state or federal environmental permits or proprietary authorizations will demonstrate that all required environmental permitting and authorizations will be completed by the third Monday in September. District’s final TRIM hearing. This demonstration will be by submission of the required environmental permit(s) and authorizations, or by submission of a letter from the agency(s) stating that a permit or authorization is not required. Should the environmental permitting element of an application that has construction elements requiring state or federal environmental permits or authorizations not be completed by the District’s final TRIM hearing, the construction portion of the project will not be considered for funding. Whereby funding decisions are completed at the final TRIM hearing, the District will not deviate from the funding schedule to accommodate any application deficiency. Failure to timely submit the required environmental permits and authorizations or letters stating such permits or authorizations are not required shall result in the application not being considered for funding.

(4) through (7) No change.

Rulemaking Authority 374.976(2) FS. Law Implemented 374.976(1)-(3) FS. History–New 12-17-90, Amended 2-6-97, Formerly 16T-1.008, Amended 5-17-98, 3-31-99, 3-5-00, 3-21-01, 7-30-02, 3-20-03, 3-3-04, 4-15-07, 3-25-08, 4-1-09, 2-22-10, 3-7-11, 3-7-12, 1-27-14, 2-17-15, 2-21-16,_____.

 

66B-1.014 Small-Scale Spoil Island Restoration and Enhancement Projects

(1) through (4) No change.

(5) Hold Harmless Waiver – All volunteers, who are not government employees, shall sign a hold harmless waiver Form No. 02-01 (New 7-30-02) as approved by the District and hereby incorporated by reference and available from the District office.

Rulemaking Authority 374.976(2) FS. Law Implemented 374.976(1) FS. History–New 3-20-03, Amended 4-24-06, 3-7-11,_____.

 

66B-1.015 Small-Scale Derelict Vessel Removal Projects

(1) through (3) No change.

(4) District funding shall be limited to $50,000 $30,000 per county, per year, provided on a reimbursement basis only. The limitation on pre-agreement expenses may be waived by the Board in accordance with subsection 66B-1.005(3), F.A.C.

Rulemaking Authority 374.976(2) FS. Law Implemented 374.976(1) FS. History–New 4-24-06, Amended 4-15-07, 3-25-08, 3-7-11, 1-27-14,_____.

 

NAME OF PERSON ORIGINATING PROPOSED RULE: Janet Zimmerman

NAME OF AGENCY HEAD WHO APPROVED THE PROPOSED RULE: Board of Commissioners, Florida Inland Navigation District

DATE PROPOSED RULE APPROVED BY AGENCY HEAD: November 14, 2020

DATE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE DEVELOPMENT PUBLISHED IN FAR: November 20, 2020