The Board proposes the rule repeal because the rule is a restatement of the direction of Section 456.079, Florida Statutes.  

  •  

    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

    Board of Optometry

    RULE NO.:RULE TITLE:

    64B13-15.001Purpose

    PURPOSE AND EFFECT: The Board proposes the rule repeal because the rule is a restatement of the direction of Section 456.079, Florida Statutes.

    SUMMARY: The rule repeal is necessary because the rule is a restatement of the direction of Section 456.079, Florida Statutes.

    SUMMARY OF STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS AND LEGISLATIVE RATIFICATION: The Agency has determined that this will not have an adverse impact on small business or likely increase directly or indirectly regulatory costs in excess of $200,000 in the aggregate within one year after the implementation of the rule. A SERC has not been prepared by the Agency.

    The Agency has determined that the proposed rule is not expected to require legislative ratification based on the statement of estimated regulatory costs or if no SERC is required, the information expressly relied upon and described herein: : During discussion of the economic impact of this rule at its Board meeting, the Board, based upon the expertise and experience of its members, determined that a Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs (SERC) was not necessary and that the rule will not require ratification by the Legislature. No person or interested party submitted additional information regarding the economic impact at that time.

    Any person who wishes to provide information regarding a statement of estimated regulatory costs, or provide a proposal for a lower cost regulatory alternative must do so in writing within 21 days of this notice.

    RULEMAKING AUTHORITY: 456.079 FS.

    LAW IMPLEMENTED: 456.079 FS.

    IF REQUESTED WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, A HEARING WILL BE SCHEDULED AND ANNOUNCED IN THE FAR.

    THE PERSON TO BE CONTACTED REGARDING THE PROPOSED RULE IS: Anthony Spivey, D.B.A., Executive Director, Board of Optometry/MQA, 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin # C07, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3257

     

    THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSED RULE IS:

     

    64B13-15.001 Purpose

    Rulemaking Specific Authority 456.079 FS. Law Implemented 456.079 FS. History–New 2-24-87, Formerly 21Q-15.001, 61F8-15.001, 59V-15.001, Repealed                   .

     

    NAME OF PERSON ORIGINATING PROPOSED RULE: Board of Optometry

    NAME OF AGENCY HEAD WHO APPROVED THE PROPOSED RULE: Board of Optometry

    DATE PROPOSED RULE APPROVED BY AGENCY HEAD: December 4, 2015

Document Information

Comments Open:
12/29/2015
Summary:
The rule repeal is necessary because the rule is a restatement of the direction of Section 456.079, Florida Statutes.
Purpose:
The Board proposes the rule repeal because the rule is a restatement of the direction of Section 456.079, Florida Statutes.
Rulemaking Authority:
456.079 FS.
Law:
456.079 FS.
Contact:
Anthony Spivey, D.B.A., Executive Director, Board of Optometry/MQA, 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin # C07, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3257.
Related Rules: (1)
64B13-15.001. Purpose