The Board proposes to repeal Rule 64B13-7.007 because the language for this rule will be added to rule 64B13-7.005, “Terms of Probation.” The Board proposes to repeal Rule 64B13-7.008 because orders are monitored by DOH compliance.

 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

Board of Optometry

RULE NOS.:RULE TITLES:

64B13-7.007Costs of Probation

64B13-7.008Oversight

PURPOSE AND EFFECT: The Board proposes to repeal Rule 64B13-7.007, F.A.C. because the language for this rule will be added to rule 64B13-7.005, F.A.C., “Terms of Probation.” The Board proposes to repeal Rule 64B13-7.008, F.A.C. because orders are monitored by DOH compliance.

SUMMARY: The repeal of Rule 64B13-7.007, F.A.C. is necessary because the language for this rule was added to Rule 64B13-7.005, F.A.C., “Terms of Probation.” The repeal of Rule 64B13-7.008, F.A.C. is necessary because orders are monitored by DOH compliance.

SUMMARY OF STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS AND LEGISLATIVE RATIFICATION: The Agency has determined that this will not have an adverse impact on small business or likely increase directly or indirectly regulatory costs in excess of $200,000 in the aggregate within one year after the implementation of the rule. A SERC has not been prepared by the Agency.

The Agency has determined that the proposed rule is not expected to require legislative ratification based on the statement of estimated regulatory costs or if no SERC is required, the information expressly relied upon and described herein: : During discussion of the economic impact of this rule at its Board meeting, the Board, based upon the expertise and experience of its members, determined that a Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs (SERC) was not necessary and that the rule will not require ratification by the Legislature. No person or interested party submitted additional information regarding the economic impact at that time.

Any person who wishes to provide information regarding a statement of estimated regulatory costs, or provide a proposal for a lower cost regulatory alternative must do so in writing within 21 days of this notice.

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY: 463.005 FS.

LAW IMPLEMENTED: 456.072(4), 463.016 FS.

IF REQUESTED WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, A HEARING WILL BE SCHEDULED AND ANNOUNCED IN THE FAR.

THE PERSON TO BE CONTACTED REGARDING THE PROPOSED RULE IS: Anthony Spivey, D.B.A., Executive Director, Board of Optometry/MQA, 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin # C07, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3257

 

THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSED RULE IS:

 

64B13-7.007 Costs of Probation

Rulemaking Specific Authority 463.005 FS. Law Implemented 456.072(4,) FS. History–New 7-18-90, Formerly 21Q-7.007, 61F8-7.007, 59V-7.007, Repealed                 .

 

64B13-7.008 Oversight

Rulemaking Specific Authority 463.005 FS. Law Implemented 463.016 FS. History–New 7-18-90, Formerly 21Q-7.008, 61F8-7.008, 59V-7.008, Repealed                 .

 

NAME OF PERSON ORIGINATING PROPOSED RULE: Board of Optometry

NAME OF AGENCY HEAD WHO APPROVED THE PROPOSED RULE: Board of Optometry

DATE PROPOSED RULE APPROVED BY AGENCY HEAD: December 4, 2015