RULE NO.:RULE TITLE:
64B5-2.017Acceptable Variance of Examiners
PURPOSE AND EFFECT: The Board proposes the rule repeal due to unnecessary or outdated language.
SUMMARY: The rule will be repealed due to outdated or unnecessary language.
SUMMARY OF STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS AND LEGISLATIVE RATIFICATION:
The Agency has determined that this will not have an adverse impact on small business or likely increase directly or indirectly regulatory costs in excess of $200,000 in the aggregate within one year after the implementation of the rule. A SERC has not been prepared by the Agency.
The Agency has determined that the proposed rule is not expected to require legislative ratification based on the statement of estimated regulatory costs or if no SERC is required, the information expressly relied upon and described herein: During discussion of the economic impact of this rule at its Board meeting, the Board, based upon the expertise and experience of its members, determined that a Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs (SERC) was not necessary and that the rule will not require ratification by the Legislature. No person or interested party submitted additional information regarding the economic impact at that time.
Any person who wishes to provide information regarding a statement of estimated regulatory costs, or provide a proposal for a lower cost regulatory alternative must do so in writing within 21 days of this notice.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY: 466.004(4), 466.006(5)(d) FS.
LAW IMPLEMENTED: 466.006(5)(d) FS.
IF REQUESTED WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, A HEARING WILL BE SCHEDULED AND ANNOUNCED IN THE FAR.
THE PERSON TO BE CONTACTED REGARDING THE PROPOSED RULE IS: Jessica Sapp, Executive Director, Board of Dentistry, 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin #C08, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3258 or Jessica.Sapp@flhealth.gov.
THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSED RULE IS:
64B5-2.017 Acceptable Variance of Examiners.
Rulemaking Authority 466.004(4), 466.006(5)(d) FS. Law Implemented 466.006(5)(d) FS. History–New 12-10-79, Amended 6-22-80, 4-20-81, 5-24-82, 12-6-82, 5-24-83, 5-2-84, 5-19-85, Formerly 21G-2.17, 21G-2.017, 61F5-2.017, 59Q-2.017, Amended 10-12-04, 10-10-10, 1-10-12, Repealed .
NAME OF PERSON ORIGINATING PROPOSED RULE: Board of Dentistry
NAME OF AGENCY HEAD WHO APPROVED THE PROPOSED RULE: Board of Dentistry
DATE PROPOSED RULE APPROVED BY AGENCY HEAD: August 21, 2020
Document Information
- Comments Open:
- 12/31/2020
- Summary:
- The rule will be repealed due to outdated or unnecessary language.
- Purpose:
- The Board proposes the rule repeal due to unnecessary or outdated language.
- Rulemaking Authority:
- 466.004(4), 466.006(5)(d) FS.
- Law:
- 466.006(5)(d) FS.
- Related Rules: (1)
- 64B5-2.017. Acceptable Variance of Examiners