Vol. 47, No. 44 (03/05/2021)

1. Proposed Rules

• Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
  • Freshwater Fish and Wildlife
    • The purpose of the rule amendment is to revise the definitions for bird sanctuary and restricted hunting area consistent with other proposed changes to the regulations governing the establishment of these areas. The effect ....
      • Due of Comment: 3/26/2021
    • The purpose of the rule amendment is to eliminate reference to restricted hunting areas in support of other proposed changes to the regulations governing the establishment of these areas. The effect will be consistency of ....
      • Due of Comment: 3/26/2021
    • The purpose of the rule amendment is to provide clear, objective criteria for the establishment of restricted hunting areas, and to eliminate rule language related to establishment of bird sanctuaries. The effect will be ....
      • Due of Comment: 3/26/2021
    • The purpose of this rule development effort is to provide clear regulations for existing bird sanctuaries. The effect will be increased understanding of the requirements necessary for enforcement of bird sanctuary regulations.....
      • Due of Comment: 3/26/2021
    • The purpose of the rule amendment is to provide rule language consistent with amendments to other rules related to restricted hunting areas. The effect will increase clarity and understanding of regulations relevant to newly ....
      • Due of Comment: 3/26/2021

2. Notices of Changes, Corrections and Withdrawals

• Department of Health
  • Division of Disease Control
    • Definitions

3. Notice of Petitions and Dispositions Regarding the Validity of R

• Department of Environmental Protection
  • Departmental
    • ALAFIA PRESERVE (MULBERRY) LLC & EAGLE RIDGE (MULBERRY) LLC, LDS DONALDSON KNOLL .... vs. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Respondent.; Case No.: 21-0798RP; Rule No.: 62-41.300, 62-41.301, 62-41.302, 62-41.303, 62-41.304, 62-41.305; ...
    • CITY OF ST. CLOUD, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Respondent.; Case No.: 21-0802RP; Rule No.: 62-41.300, 62-41.301, 62-41.302, 62-41.303, 62-41.304, 62-41.305; Petition
    • CITY OF WINTER HAVEN, FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIN, Respondent.; Case No.: 21-0803; Rule No.: 62-41.300, 62-41.301, 62-41.302, 62-41.303, 62-41.304, 62-41.305; Petition
    • CITY OF FORT MEADE, FLORIDA, CITY OF EAGLE PARK, FLORIDA and CITY OF POLK CITY, .... vs. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Respondent.; Case No.: 21-0804; Rule No.: 62-41.300, 62-41.301, 62-41.302, 62-41.303, 62-41.304, 62-41.305; ...
    • CITY OF MULBERRY, FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Respondent.; Case No.: 21-0805; Rule No.: 62-41.300, 62-41.301, 62-41.302, 62-41.303, 62-41.304, 62-41.305; Petition
    • CITY OF BARTOW, FLORIDA, Respondent, vs. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Respondent.; Case No.: 21-0806; Rule No.: 62-41.300, 62-41.301, 62-41.302, 62-41.303, 62-41.304, 62-41.305; Petition
    • CITY OF SANFORD, Petitioner, vs. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF PROTECTION, Respondent.; Case No.: 21-0807; Rule No.: 62-41.300, 62-41.301, 62-41.302, 62-41.303, 62-41.304, 62-41.305; Petition